See All of This Company's Exhibits
2019
United States
Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 40-F
☐ | Registration Statement pursuant to section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
☒ | Annual report pursuant to section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019
Commission File Number: 001-04307
Husky Energy Inc.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Alberta, Canada |
1311 | Not Applicable | ||
(Province or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(Primary Standard Industrial Classification Code Number (if applicable)) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number (if applicable)) |
707-8th Avenue S.W. Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2P 1H5
(403) 298-6111
(Address and telephone number of Registrants principal executive office)
CT Corporation System, 111 Eighth Avenue, New York, New York 10011
(877) 467-3525
(Name, address (including zip code) and telephone number (including area code)
of agent for service in the United States)
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Class: None
Title of each Class |
Trading Symbol(s) |
Name of each exchange on which registered | ||
N/A | N/A | N/A |
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Title of Class: None
Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act:
Title of Class: Common Shares
For annual reports, indicate by check mark the information filed with this Form:
☒ Annual information form | ☒ Audited annual financial statements |
Number of outstanding shares of each of the issuers classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period
covered by the annual report:
1,005,121,738 Common Shares outstanding as of December 31, 2019
10,435,932 Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares, Series 1 outstanding as of December 31, 2019
1,564,068 Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares, Series 2 outstanding as of December 31, 2019
10,000,000 Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares, Series 3 outstanding as of December 31, 2019
8,000,000 Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares, Series 5 outstanding as of December 31, 2019
6,000,000 Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares, Series 7 outstanding as of December 31, 2019
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
☒ Yes ☐ No
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (s.232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit such files).
☒ Yes ☐ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an emerging growth company as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Emerging growth company ☐
If an emerging growth company that prepares its financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
This Annual Report on Form 40-F shall be incorporated by reference into or as an exhibit to, as applicable, the Registrants Registration Statement under the Securities Act of 1933: Form F-10 (File No. 333-236603); Form S-8 (File No. 333-187135).
| The term new or revised financial accounting standard refers to any update issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board to its Accounting Standards Codification after April 5, 2012. |
Principal Documents
The following documents have been filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 40-F:
A. | Annual Information Form |
The Annual Information Form (AIF) of Husky Energy Inc. (Husky or the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2019 is included as Document A of this Annual Report on Form 40-F.
B. | Audited Annual Financial Statements |
Huskys audited consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, including the auditors report with respect thereto, are included as Document B of this Annual Report on Form 40-F.
C. | Managements Discussion and Analysis |
Huskys Managements Discussion and Analysis for the year ended December 31, 2019 is included as Document C of this Annual Report on Form 40-F.
Certifications
See Exhibits 31.1, 31.2, 32.1 and 32.2, which are included as Exhibits to this Annual Report on Form 40-F.
Supplemental Reserves Information
See Exhibit 99.1 for the Supplemental Reserves Information, which is included as an Exhibit to this Annual Report on Form 40-F.
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
See the section Disclosure Controls and Procedures in Huskys Managements Discussion and Analysis for the year ended December 31, 2019, which is included as Document C of this Annual Report on Form 40-F.
Managements Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
See the section Disclosure Controls and Procedures in Huskys Managements Discussion and Analysis for the year ended December 31, 2019, which is included as Document C of this Annual Report on Form 40-F.
Attestation Report of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
See the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm that accompanies Huskys audited consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, which are included as Document B of this Annual Report on Form 40-F.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
See the section Disclosure Controls and Procedures in Huskys Managements Discussion and Analysis for the year ended December 31, 2019, which is included as Document C of this Annual Report on Form 40-F.
Notice Pursuant to Regulation BTR
Not Applicable.
Audit Committee Financial Expert
The Board of Directors of Husky has determined that William Shurniak is an audit committee financial expert (as defined in paragraph 8(b) of General Instruction B to Form 40-F) serving on its Audit Committee. Pursuant to paragraph 8(a)(2) of General Instruction B to Form 40-F, the Board has applied the definition of independence applicable to the audit committee members of New York Stock Exchange listed companies, although Huskys securities are not listed on a U.S. stock exchange. Mr. Shurniak is a corporate director and is independent under the New York Stock Exchange standards. For a description of Mr. Shurniaks relevant experience in financial matters, see Mr. Shurniaks history in the section Directors and Officers and in the section Audit Committee in Huskys AIF for the year ended December 31, 2019, which is included as Document A of this Annual Report on Form 40-F.
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
Huskys code of ethics is disclosed in its Code of Business Conduct, which is applicable to its principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller or persons performing similar functions and to all of its other employees, and is posted on its website at www.huskyenergy.com. On April 25, 2019, Husky amended its Code of Business Conduct effective as of April 25, 2019, and a copy of this new amended Code of Business Conduct is included as Exhibit 99.2 to this Annual Report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019. A copy of such amended Code of Business Conduct was posted on Huskys website (together with a disclosure of the nature of the amendments) promptly after the amendments became effective.
The following is a general summary of the nature of the amendments:
i. | Updates to the section on lobbying to provide additional guidance on which activities constitute lobbying and when and to whom to report lobbying activities. When originally drafted, this section was Canadian centric, so updates were made to reflect other lobbying laws to which Husky is subject. |
ii. | Updates to the section on accepting hospitality, promotional offerings and other business courtesies to align with, and reflect changes to, Huskys Anti-Bribery and Anti-Corruption Policy. This included updating the definition of things of value and the rules regarding the acceptance or giving of bona fide hospitality, promotional offerings and other business courtesies. |
iii. | Updates to the section on privacy to provide additional guidance on handling of personal information and to reflect Taiwanese privacy law requirements. |
A copy of the amended Code of Business Conduct is available to any person without charge, upon request made in writing to Huskys principal executive office, Attention: Corporate Secretary.
In the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, Husky did not grant a waiver, including an implicit waiver, from a provision of its code of ethics to any of its principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller or persons performing similar functions that relates to one or more of the items set forth in paragraph (9)(b) of General Instruction B to Form 40-F. In the event that, during Huskys ensuing fiscal year, Husky:
i. | amends any provision of its Code of Business Conduct that applies to its principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller or persons performing similar functions that relates to any element of the code of ethics definition enumerated in paragraph (9)(b) of General Instruction B to Form 40-F; or |
ii. | grants a waiver, including an implicit waiver, from a provision of its Code of Business Conduct to any of its principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller or persons performing similar functions that relates to one or more of the items set forth in paragraph (9)(b) of General Instruction B to Form 40-F; |
Husky will promptly disclose such occurrences on its website following the date that such amendment or waiver is granted and will specifically describe the nature of any amendment or waiver, and in the case of a waiver, name the person to whom the waiver was granted and the date of the waiver, in each case as further described in paragraph (9) of General Instruction B to Form 40-F.
Principal Accountant Fees and Services
See the section External Auditor Service Fees in Huskys AIF for the year ended December 31, 2019, which is included as Document A of this Annual Report on Form 40-F.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
See the section Contractual Obligations, Commitments and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements in Huskys Managements Discussion and Analysis for the year ended December 31, 2019, which is included as Document C of this Annual Report on Form 40-F.
Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations
See the section Contractual Obligations, Commitments and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements in Huskys Managements Discussion and Analysis for the year ended December 31, 2019, which is included as Document C of this Annual Report on Form 40-F.
Interactive Data File
See Exhibit 101 to this Annual Report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019.
Mine Safety Disclosure
Not applicable.
Undertaking and Consent to Service of Process
Undertaking
Husky undertakes to make available, in person or by telephone, representatives to respond to inquiries made by the Commission staff, and to furnish promptly, when requested to do so by the Commission staff, information relating to: the securities in relation to which the obligation to file an annual report on Form 40-F arises; or transactions in said securities.
Consent to Service of Process
A Form F-X signed by Husky and its agent for service of process has been filed with the Commission together with Form F-10 (File No. 333-236603) in connection with its securities registered on such form.
Any change to the name or address of the agent for service of process of Husky shall be communicated promptly to the Commission by an amendment to the Form F-X referencing the file number of Husky.
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of the Exchange Act, Husky Energy Inc. certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 40-F and has duly caused this Annual Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereto duly authorized.
Dated this 27th day of February, 2020
Husky Energy Inc. | ||
By: |
/s/ Robert J. Peabody | |
Name: Robert J. Peabody | ||
Title: President & Chief Executive Officer | ||
By: |
/s/ James D. Girgulis | |
Name: James D. Girgulis | ||
Title: Senior Vice President, General Counsel & | ||
Secretary |
Document A
Form 40-F
Annual Information Form
For the Year Ended December 31, 2019
ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019
February 27, 2020
1 | ||||
1 | ||||
6 | ||||
6 | ||||
7 | ||||
10 | ||||
STATEMENT OF RESERVES DATA AND OTHER OIL AND GAS INFORMATION |
21 | |||
42 | ||||
50 | ||||
56 | ||||
63 | ||||
63 | ||||
65 | ||||
68 | ||||
71 | ||||
79 | ||||
79 | ||||
79 | ||||
79 | ||||
79 | ||||
80 | ||||
84 | ||||
APPENDIX B - REPORT ON RESERVES DATA BY INDEPENDENT QUALIFIED RESERVES AUDITOR |
88 | |||
APPENDIX C - REPORT OF MANAGEMENT AND DIRECTORS ON OIL AND GAS DISCLOSURE |
89 | |||
APPENDIX D - INDEPENDENT QUALIFIED RESERVES AUDITOR AUDIT OPINION |
90 |
Unless otherwise indicated, in this Annual Information Form (AIF), the terms Husky and the Company mean Husky Energy Inc. and its subsidiaries and partnership interests on a consolidated basis, including information with respect to predecessor corporations.
Unless otherwise indicated, the information contained in this AIF is presented as at or for the year ended December 31, 2019, and all financial information included and incorporated by reference in this AIF is determined using International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.
Except where otherwise indicated, all dollar amounts stated in this AIF are in Canadian dollars.
See also Reader Advisories on page 80 of this AIF.
ABBREVIATIONS AND GLOSSARY OF TERMS
When used in this AIF, the following terms have the meanings indicated:
Units of Measure |
||
bbl |
barrel | |
bbl/day |
barrel per calendar day | |
bbls/day |
barrels per calendar day | |
bcf |
billion cubic feet | |
bcf/day |
billion cubic feet per calendar day | |
boe |
barrels of oil equivalent | |
boe/day |
barrels of oil equivalent per calendar day | |
GJ |
gigajoule | |
kt |
kilotonne | |
long ton/day |
imperial measurement of a metric tonne per calendar day | |
m3 |
cubic metres | |
mbbls |
thousand barrels | |
mbbls/day |
thousand barrels per calendar day | |
mboe |
thousand barrels of oil equivalent | |
mboe/day |
thousand barrels of oil equivalent per calendar day | |
mcf |
thousand cubic feet | |
mmbbls |
million barrels | |
mmboe |
million barrels of oil equivalent | |
mmbtu |
million British thermal units | |
mmcf |
million cubic feet | |
mmcf/day |
million cubic feet per calendar day | |
tcf |
trillion cubic feet | |
tCO2e |
tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent |
abandonment and reclamation costs
All costs associated with the process of restoring the Companys properties that have been disturbed by oil and gas activities to a standard imposed by applicable government or regulatory authorities, including costs associated with the retirement of upstream and downstream assets which consist primarily of plugging and abandoning wells, abandoning surface and subsea plant, equipment and facilities, and restoring land.
API gravity
Measure of oil density or specific gravity used in the petroleum industry. The API scale expresses density such that the greater the density of the petroleum, the lower the degree of API gravity.
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 1
Asphalt Refinery
The asphalt refinery owned by the Company and located in Lloydminster, Alberta.
barrel
A unit of volume equal to 42 U.S. gallons.
bitumen
A naturally occurring solid or semi-solid hydrocarbon, consisting mainly of heavier hydrocarbons with a viscosity greater than 10,000 millipascal-seconds or 10,000 centipoise measured at the hydrocarbons original temperature in the reservoir and at atmospheric pressure on a gas-free basis, and that is not primarily recoverable at economic rates through a well without the implementation of enhanced recovery methods.
Board
The Board of Directors of the Company.
BP-Husky Toledo Refinery
The crude oil refinery owned 50% by the Company and 50% by BP Corporation North America Inc. and located in Toledo, Ohio.
CHOPS
Cold heavy oil production with sand.
CO2e
Carbon dioxide equivalent.
conventional natural gas
Natural gas that has been generated elsewhere and has migrated as a result of hydrodynamic forces and is trapped in discrete accumulations by seals that may be formed by localized structural, depositional or erosional geological features.
C-NLOPB
Canada-Newfoundland Offshore Petroleum Board
development well
A well drilled within the proved area of an oil and gas reservoir to the depth of a stratigraphic horizon known to be productive.
diluent
A lighter gravity liquid hydrocarbon, usually condensate or synthetic oil, added to heavy oil and bitumen to facilitate the transmissibility of the oil through a pipeline.
enhanced oil recovery or EOR
The increased recovery from a crude oil pool achieved by artificial means or by the application of energy extrinsic to the pool. An artificial means or application includes pressuring, cycling, pressure maintenance or injection to the pool of a substance or form of energy but does not include the injection in a well of a substance or form of energy for the sole purpose of aiding in the lifting of fluids in the well, or stimulation of the reservoir at or near the well by mechanical, chemical, thermal or explosive means.
exploration licence or EL
A licence with respect to the Canadian offshore or the Northwest Territories conferring the right to explore for, and the exclusive right to drill and test for, hydrocarbons and petroleum, the exclusive right to develop the applicable area in order to produce petroleum and, subject to satisfying the requirements for issuance of a production licence and compliance with the terms of the licence and other provisions of the relevant legislation, the exclusive right to obtain a production licence.
exploration well
A well drilled to find a new field or to find a new reservoir in a field previously found to be productive of oil or gas. Generally, an exploration well is any well that is not a development well, a service well, an extension well, which is a well drilled to extend the limits of a known reservoir, or a stratigraphic test well as those terms are defined herein.
feedstock
Raw materials which are processed into petroleum products.
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 2
field
An area consisting of a single reservoir or multiple reservoirs all grouped on or related to the same individual geological structural feature and/or stratigraphic condition. There may be two or more reservoirs in a field which are separated vertically by intervening impervious strata, or laterally by local geologic barriers, or by both.
FPSO
Floating production, storage and offloading vessel.
GAAP
Generally accepted accounting principles, consistently applied.
gross/net acres and gross/net wells
Gross refers to the total number of acres or wells, as the context requires, in which a working interest is owned. Net refers to the sum of the fractional working interests owned by a company.
gross reserves and gross production
A companys working interest share of reserves or production, as the context requires, before deduction of royalties.
GSA
Gas sales agreement.
heavy crude oil
Crude oil with a relative density greater than 10 degrees API gravity and less than or equal to 22.3 degrees API gravity.
high-TAN
A measure of acidity. Crude oils with a high content of naphthenic acids are referred to as high total acid number (TAN) crude oils or high acid crude oil. The TAN value is defined as the milligrams of Potassium Hydroxide required to neutralize the acidic group of one gram of the oil sample. Crude oils in the industry with a TAN value greater than one are referred to as high-TAN crudes.
HMLP
Husky Midstream Limited Partnership.
HS&E
Health, safety and environment.
light crude oil
Crude oil with a relative density greater than 31.1 degrees API gravity.
Lima Refinery
The crude oil refinery owned by the Company and located in Lima, Ohio.
liquefied petroleum gas
Liquefied propanes and butanes, separately or in mixtures.
medium crude oil
Crude oil with a relative density greater than 22.3 degrees API gravity and less than or equal to 31.1 degrees API gravity.
natural gas
A naturally occurring hydrocarbon gas and other gases.
natural gas liquids or NGL
Those hydrocarbon components recovered from raw natural gas as liquids by processing through extraction plants, or recovered from field separators, scrubbers or other gathering facilities. These liquids include the hydrocarbon components ethane, propane and butane and condensates and combinations thereof.
net revenue
Gross revenue less royalties.
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 3
NL
Newfoundland and Labrador.
oil sands
Sands and other rock materials that contain bitumen and all other mineral substances in association therewith.
operating netback
Gross revenue less production, operating and transportation costs and royalties on a per unit basis.
petroleum coke
A carbonaceous solid delivered from oil refinery coker units or other cracking processes.
Plan of Development
Represents, as it relates to the Companys operations in Indonesia, a development plan on one or more oil and gas fields in an integrated and optimal plan for the production of hydrocarbon reserves considering technical, economical and environmental aspects. An initial Plan of Development in a development area needs both SKK Migas and the Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources approvals. Subsequent Plans of Development in the same development area only need SKK Migas approval.
production licence
Confers, with respect to the portions of the offshore area to which the licence applies, the right to explore for, and the exclusive right to drill and test for, petroleum, the exclusive right to develop those portions of the offshore area in order to produce petroleum, the exclusive right to produce petroleum from those portions of the offshore area and title to the petroleum produced.
production sharing contract or PSC
A contract for the development of resources under which the contractors costs (investment) are recoverable each year out of the production but with a maximum amount of production that can be applied to the cost recovery in any year.
Scope 1 emissions
Direct emissions from sources that are owned or controlled by the Company, as prescribed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Scope 2 emissions
Indirect emissions from sources that are owned or controlled by the Company, as prescribed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
SEC
United States Securities and Exchange Commission.
secondary recovery
Oil or gas recovered by injecting water or gas into the reservoir to force additional oil or gas to the producing wells. Usually, but not necessarily, this is done after the primary recovery phase has passed.
seismic survey
A method by which the physical attributes in the outer rock shell of the earth are determined by measuring, with a seismograph, the rate of transmission of shock waves through the various rock formations.
service well
A well drilled or completed for the purpose of supporting production in an existing field. Specific purposes of service wells include gas injection, water injection, steam injection, air injection, saltwater disposal, water supply for injection, observation or injection for in-situ combustion.
Significant Discovery Declaration
A discovery indicated by the first well on a geological feature that demonstrates by flow testing the existence of hydrocarbons in that feature and, having regard to geological and engineering factors, suggests the existence of an accumulation of hydrocarbons that has potential for sustained production.
Significant Discovery Licence
The document of title by which an interest owner can continue to hold rights to a discovery area while the extent of that discovery is determined and, if it has potential to be brought into commercial production in the future, until commercial development becomes viable. A significant discovery licence is effective from the application date and remains in force for so long as the relevant declaration of significant discovery is in force, or until a production licence is issued for the relevant lands.
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 4
spot price
The price for a one-time open market transaction for immediate delivery of a specific quantity of product at a specific location where the commodity is purchased on the spot at current market rates.
steam-assisted gravity drainage or SAGD
An enhanced oil recovery method used to produce heavy crude oil and bitumen in-situ. Steam is injected via a horizontal well along a producing formation. The temperature in the formation increases and lowers the viscosity of the crude oil allowing it to fall into a horizontal production well beneath the steam injection well.
stratigraphic test well
A hole drilled to delineate or derisk the geology, and may include the cutting of cores, to aid in exploring and developing for oil and gas and usually drilled without the intent of being completed for production.
sulphur
An element that occurs in natural gas and petroleum.
Superior Refinery
The crude oil refinery owned by the Company and located in Superior, Wisconsin.
synthetic oil
A mixture of hydrocarbons derived by upgrading heavy crude oils, including bitumen, through a process that reduces the carbon content and increases the hydrogen content.
thermal
Use of steam injection into the reservoir in order to enable the heavy oil and bitumen to flow to the well bore.
turnaround
Performance of plant or facility maintenance.
Upgrader
The heavy oil upgrading facility owned and operated by the Company and located in Lloydminster, Saskatchewan.
waterflood
One method of secondary recovery in which water is injected into an oil reservoir for the purpose of forcing oil out of the reservoir and into the bore of a producing well.
wellhead
The structure, sometimes called the Christmas tree, that is positioned on the surface over a well and used to control the flow of oil or gas as it emerges from the subsurface casing head.
working interest
A percentage of ownership in an oil and gas lease granting its owners the right to explore, drill and produce oil and gas from a property.
2-D seismic survey
Two-dimensional seismic imaging uses seismic wave data recorded on one receiver line on the ground, to output a single cross-section of seismic data that is used to detect geologic variations in the subsurface.
3-D seismic survey
Three-dimensional seismic imaging uses seismic wave data recorded simultaneously on a series of parallel receiver lines on the ground, to output a three-dimensional volume of seismic data that is used to detect geologic variations in the subsurface.
2018 U.S. Shelf Prospectus and Registration Statement
The universal short form base shelf prospectus filed by the Company on January 29, 2018 with the Alberta Securities Commission and the related U.S. registration statement (containing such prospectus) filed with the SEC that became effective on January 30, 2018.
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 5
The following table discloses various indicators of the Canadian dollar/U.S. dollar rate of exchange or the cost of a U.S. dollar in Canadian currency for the three years indicated.
Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
Exchange Rate Information (Cdn$ per US$) |
2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |||||||||
Year-end(1) |
1.297 | 1.365 | 1.252 | |||||||||
Low |
1.297 | 1.228 | 1.213 | |||||||||
High |
1.359 | 1.365 | 1.374 | |||||||||
Average |
1.327 | 1.296 | 1.298 |
(1) | The year-end exchange rates were quoted by the Thomson Reuters WM/R for the noon rate at the last day of the relevant period. The high, low and average rates were either quoted or calculated within each of the relevant periods. |
Incorporation and Organization
Husky Energy Inc. was incorporated under the Business Corporations Act (Alberta) on June 21, 2000. The Companys Articles were amended effective February 28, 2011 to permit the issuance of common shares as payment of stock dividends on the common shares and to authorize preferred shares to be issued in one or more series. The Companys Articles were amended: effective March 11, 2011, to create Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares, Series 1 (the Series 1 Preferred Shares) and Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares, Series 2 (the Series 2 Preferred Shares); effective December 4, 2014, to create Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares, Series 3 (the Series 3 Preferred Shares) and Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares, Series 4 (the Series 4 Preferred Shares); effective March 9, 2015, to create Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares, Series 5 (the Series 5 Preferred Shares) and Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares, Series 6 (the Series 6 Preferred Shares); and effective June 15, 2015, to create Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares, Series 7 (the Series 7 Preferred Shares) and Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares, Series 8 (the Series 8 Preferred Shares).
Huskys registered office and head and principal office are located at 707 - 8th Avenue S.W., Calgary, Alberta, T2P 1H5.
Intercorporate Relationships
The following table lists Huskys significant subsidiaries and jointly-controlled entities and their respective places of incorporation, continuance or organization, as the case may be, as at December 31, 2019. All of the entities listed below, except as otherwise indicated, are 100% beneficially owned, or controlled or directed, directly or indirectly, by Husky.
Significant Subsidiaries and Joint Operations(1) |
Jurisdiction | |
Husky Oil Operations Limited |
Alberta | |
Husky Energy International Corporation |
Alberta | |
Lima Refining Company |
Delaware | |
Husky Marketing and Supply Company |
Delaware | |
Husky Oil Limited Partnership |
Alberta | |
Husky Terra Nova Partnership(2) |
Alberta | |
Husky Downstream General Partnership(2) |
Alberta | |
Husky Energy Marketing Partnership |
Alberta | |
Sunrise Oil Sands Partnership (50%) |
Alberta | |
BP-Husky Refining LLC (50%) |
Delaware |
(1) | Principal operating subsidiaries exclusive of intercorporate relationships due to financing related receivables and financing investments. |
(2) | Dissolved effective January 1, 2020, and assets were transferred to 2188787 Alberta ULC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Husky. |
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 6
Three-year History of Husky
The following is a description of how Huskys business has developed over the last three completed financial years.
2017
On March 10, 2017, the Company issued $750 million of 3.60% notes due March 10, 2027 by way of a prospectus supplement dated March 7, 2017 to its base shelf prospectus.
On April 13, 2017, the Company announced that it had signed a PSC for Block 16/25 in the Pearl River Mouth Basin in the South China Sea. Under the PSC, Husky has an obligation to drill two exploration wells within the first three years.
On May 5, 2017, the Company announced that, during the first quarter of 2017, it had commenced production from a new eight-well pad at the Tucker Thermal Project in the Cold Lake region of Alberta and from a new infill well at North Amethyst offshore NL.
On May 29, 2017, the Company announced that, together with its partners, it would be moving forward with the West White Rose Project in the Jeanne dArc Basin offshore NL, using a fixed wellhead platform tied back to the SeaRose FPSO.
Also in May 2017, the Company announced a new discovery at Northwest White Rose. The White Rose A-78 well was drilled approximately 11 kilometres northwest of the SeaRose FPSO in the first quarter of 2017 and delineated a light oil column of more than 100 metres (gross). The Company has a 93.23% working interest in the well.
On July 21, 2017, the Company announced that the construction and installation of the shallow water jackets and subsea pipelines for the MDA-MBH fields in the Madura Strait were completed. The contract for a leased floating production unit was signed, and planning for the build commenced.
On September 15, 2017, the Company repaid the maturing 6.20% notes issued under a trust indenture dated September 11, 2007. The amount paid to note holders was $365 million, including $11 million of interest.
On October 26, 2017, the Company announced that, during the third quarter of 2017, gas production from the BD Project commenced and was sold from the onshore gas distribution facility in East Java under a fixed price GSA.
Also in October 2017, the Company announced that the GSA for future gas production from Liuhua 29-1, the third deepwater gas field at the Liwan Gas Project, was signed. The project was sanctioned in the fourth quarter of 2017.
On November 8, 2017, the Company completed the purchase of the Superior Refinery from Calumet Specialty Products Partners, L.P. for $670 million (US$527 million). The acquisition included the Superior Refinerys associated logistics assets, including two asphalt terminals, 3.6 mmbbls of crude and product storage and a fuels and asphalt marketing business. See Description of Huskys Business - Integrated Corridor - U.S. Refining and Marketing - Superior Refinery.
In November 2017, the Company sanctioned two new 10,000 bbl/day thermal projects at Westhazel and Edam Central.
Also in November 2017, the C-NLOPB announced that the Company was the successful bidder on a parcel of land in its 2017 land sale (50% Husky working interest). The lands cover an area of 121,453 hectares in the Jeanne dArc Basin and are adjacent to the Companys other exploration licences in the basin.
Also in November 2017, the Companys participation in the Wenchang oilfields petroleum contract expired, with the Company not being entitled to any further production rights.
During 2017, the Company completed the sale of select assets in Western Canada, representing approximately 20,200 boe/day for gross proceeds of approximately $185 million.
Also during 2017, regulatory approval was received for the three Lloyd thermal projects sanctioned in late 2016, Dee Valley, Spruce Lake North and Spruce Lake Central.
Also during 2017, the Company and Imperial Oil closed their previously announced transaction to create a single expanded truck transport network of approximately 160 sites.
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 7
2018
On January 17, 2018, the Company announced that it would begin taking steps to suspend operations of the SeaRose FPSO and associated production facilities offshore NL to comply with an order received from the C-NLOPB related to an iceberg management incident that occurred in March 2017.
On January 26, 2018, the Company announced that the C-NLOPB had lifted the notice to suspend operations of the SeaRose FPSO and associated facilities and that the Company would resume operations.
On March 1, 2018, the Company announced the establishment of a quarterly cash dividend of $0.075 per common share.
On April 26, 2018, a fire occurred at the Superior Refinery and operations were suspended.
On May 18, 2018, the Company announced that it had drilled a successful exploration well on Block 15/33 in the South China Sea, signed two PSCs for Block 22/11 and Block 23/07 in the Beibu Gulf area of the South China Sea and made a discovery at the White Rose A-24 exploration well offshore NL.
On July 26, 2018, the Company announced that the Board had approved an increase in the quarterly cash dividend to $0.125 per common share.
During the third quarter of 2018, the BD Project achieved total daily sales targets of 100 mmcf/day of conventional natural gas (40 mmcf/day Husky working interest) and 6,000 bbls/day of associated NGL (2,400 bbls/day Husky working interest).
On October 2, 2018, the Company announced that it had commenced an unsolicited offer to acquire all of the outstanding common shares of MEG Energy Corp. (MEG).
In October 2018, the Tucker Thermal Project reached nameplate capacity of 30,000 bbls/day.
Also in October 2018, the Rush Lake 2 thermal project achieved first production, with nameplate capacity of 10,000 bbls/day achieved in November 2018.
In November 2018, the Company shut in oil production at the White Rose field due to operational safety concerns resulting from severe weather and an oil release on November 16.
Also in November 2018, the Spruce Lake East thermal project in Saskatchewan was sanctioned.
In December 2018, the Sunrise Energy Project reached its nameplate capacity of 60,000 bbls/day (30,000 bbls/day Husky working interest).
2019
On January 8, 2019, the Company announced that it would be undertaking a strategic review and potentially selling its Canadian Retail and Commercial Fuels Network and the Prince George Refinery.
On January 16, 2019, the Companys unsolicited offer to acquire all of the outstanding common shares of MEG expired with the minimum tender condition not having been met. The Company did not extend the offer due to a lack of support from the MEG board of directors and MEG shareholders.
On March 15, 2019, the Company issued US$750 million of 4.400% notes maturing on April 15, 2029 by way of a prospectus supplement dated March 13, 2019 to the 2018 U.S. Shelf Prospectus and Registration Statement.
On January 30, 2019, partial production resumed at the White Rose field following the shut-in of production announced in November 2018.
In the first quarter of 2019, regulatory approval was received for the Spruce Lake East thermal project.
On June 12, 2019, the Company entered guilty pleas on federal and provincial charges related to a 2016 oil spill in Saskatchewan and agreed to pay fines totaling $3.82 million.
On August 16, 2019, the Company announced that it would resume full production at the White Rose field.
On August 26, 2019, the Company announced that it had commenced production at its 10,000 barrel-per-day Dee Valley thermal project in Saskatchewan.
On September 30, 2019, the Company announced that it had received the required permit approvals to begin construction activities at the Superior Refinery following the April 2018 fire, and that the rebuild would take place over the following two years.
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 8
On November 1, 2019, the Company announced the closing of the sale of the Prince George Refinery to Tidewater Midstream and Infrastructure Ltd. (Tidewater) for $215 million in cash plus a closing adjustment of approximately $53.5 million.
On December 20, 2019, production operations on the Terra Nova FPSO were safely shut-in in response to a C-NLOPB order citing insufficient redundancy of fire water pumps. See Description of Huskys Business - Offshore - Atlantic - Terra Nova Field.
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 9
DESCRIPTION OF HUSKYS BUSINESS
Overview
Husky is a publicly traded international integrated energy company headquartered in Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Management has identified segments for the Companys business based on differences in products, services and management responsibility. For the year ended December 31, 2019, the Companys business was conducted predominantly through two major business segments: Upstream and Downstream.
Upstream operations include exploration for, and development and production of, crude oil, bitumen, conventional natural gas and NGL (Exploration and Production) and marketing of the Companys and other producers crude oil, conventional natural gas, NGL, sulphur and petroleum coke, pipeline transportation, the blending of crude oil and conventional natural gas, and storage of crude oil, diluent and conventional natural gas (Infrastructure and Marketing). Infrastructure and Marketing markets and distributes products to customers on behalf of Exploration and Production and is grouped in the Upstream business segment based on the nature of its interconnected operations. The Companys Upstream operations are located primarily in Western Canada, offshore China and Indonesia (Asia Pacific) and offshore the east coast of Canada (Atlantic) (Asia Pacific and Atlantic collectively, Offshore).
Downstream operations include upgrading of heavy crude oil feedstock into synthetic crude oil in Canada (Upgrading), refining crude oil in Canada, marketing of refined petroleum products including gasoline, diesel, ethanol blended fuels, asphalt and ancillary products and production of ethanol (Canadian Refined Products). It also includes refining in the U.S. of primarily crude oil to produce and market asphalt, gasoline, jet fuel and diesel fuels that meet U.S. clean fuels standards (U.S. Refining and Marketing). Upgrading, Canadian Refined Products and U.S. Refining and Marketing all process and refine natural resources into marketable products and are grouped together as the Downstream business segment due to the similar nature of their products and services.
Effective January 1, 2020, the Companys businesses were reorganized under two new business segments: (i) an integrated Canada-U.S. Upstream and Downstream corridor (Integrated Corridor); and (ii) production located offshore the east coast of Canada ( Atlantic) and offshore China and Indonesia ( Asia Pacific and collectively with Atlantic, Offshore). The Company will no longer operate under Upstream and Downstream business segments.
Integrated Corridor
The Companys business in the Integrated Corridor includes: crude oil, bitumen, conventional natural gas, NGL and ethanol production from Western Canada; marketing and transportation of the Companys and other producers production; the Upgrader and Asphalt Refinery; Husky Midstream Limited Partnership (35% working interest and operatorship); the Lima Refinery, the BP-Husky Toledo Refinery (50% working interest) and the Superior Refinery in the U.S. Midwest; and the marketing of refined petroleum products including gasoline, diesel and ethanol blended fuels through petroleum outlets. Conventional natural gas production from the Western Canada portfolio is closely aligned with the Companys energy requirements for refining and thermal bitumen production and acts as a natural hedge.
Offshore
The Companys Offshore business includes operations, development and exploration in Asia Pacific and Atlantic.
Corporate Strategy
The Companys business strategy is to generate returns from investing in a deep portfolio of projects and other opportunities across the Integrated Corridor and Offshore businesses. These investments are intended to provide for increasing margins, funds from operations and earnings. A strong balance sheet, deep physical integration and largely fixed price contracts in Asia Pacific provide resilience to market volatility while preserving upside exposure to rising commodity prices.
Integrated Corridor
Thermal and Non-Thermal Developments
Heavy Oil and Bitumen
The majority of the Companys heavy oil assets are located in the Lloydminster region of Alberta and Saskatchewan, with lands consisting of approximately two million acres. The majority of the Companys operations are 100% working interest. The Companys operations are supported by a network of facilities and pipelines that transport heavy crude oil and bitumen from the field locations to the Asphalt Refinery, the Upgrader and the Companys other assets in the Integrated Corridor business segment, thus providing full integration.
Production of heavy crude oil and bitumen from the Lloydminster area uses a variety of technologies, including SAGD, CHOPS, horizontal wells, waterflooded fields and non-thermal EOR.
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 10
Lloydminster Thermal Projects
Lloydminster bitumen production consists of 10 thermal plants located in the Lloydminster region of Saskatchewan: Bolney/Celtic, Dee Valley, Edam East, Edam West, Paradise Hill, Pikes Peak South, Rush Lake 1 & 2, Sandall and Vawn. Each plant has a number of production pads and utilizes SAGD technology. Production in 2019 from Lloydminster thermal projects averaged 80,500 bbls/day. Saskatchewan thermal production is not impacted by Alberta government-mandated production curtailment.
The Company is phasing execution of its long-life thermal projects to optimize capital efficiency and project execution. In 2018, the Company completed two land deals to create two thermal hubs, one at Spruce Lake and one at Dee Valley. This has resulted in the acceleration of the Spruce Lake East project. The Edam Central project is now expected to be completed in 2022.
The following table shows major projects and their status as at December 31, 2019:
Project Name |
Nameplate Capacity (bbls/day) |
Expected Project |
Project Status | |||
Dee Valley | 10,000 | On production August 2019 | First steam was achieved on June 30, 2019, with first oil on August 24, 2019. Reached nameplate capacity on September 30, 2019. | |||
Spruce Lake Central(1) | 10,000 | Mid-Year 2020 | Central Processing Facility (CPF) construction is complete and module setting on well pads has begun. Overall project is 90% complete. | |||
Spruce Lake North | 10,000 | Around the end of 2020 | CPF fabrication and module setting is complete. The overall project is 50% complete. | |||
Spruce Lake East |
10,000 | Around the end of 2021 | Regulatory approvals have been received, and lease construction is complete. Procurement and fabrication programs are in progress. | |||
Edam Central | 10,000 | 2022 | Regulatory approvals have been received. | |||
Dee Valley 2 | 10,000 | 2023 | Project sanctioned in November 2019, and regulatory approvals have been received. |
(1) | Previously expected to start production by the second half of 2020. |
In February 2019, the Pikes Peak thermal bitumen plant was closed down as it reached the end of its useful life. The plant achieved first production in September 1981 and produced 78 mmbbls over its useful life.
Tucker Thermal Project
The Tucker Thermal Project is a SAGD oil sands project located 30 kilometres northwest of Cold Lake, Alberta. It commenced bitumen production at the end of 2006.
Work to debottleneck the CPF and field was completed in 2018. Subsequently, production ramped up and nameplate capacity of 30,000 bbls/day was achieved in October 2018. Total annual production in 2019 averaged 23,700 bbls/day and was impacted by the government-mandated production quotas in Alberta. The Company plans to drill two new sustainment pads in 2020/21.
A major plant turnaround is scheduled for the CPF and field in the fourth quarter of 2020.
Cold and EOR
Production in Cold and EOR consists of a combination of production technologies, including CHOPS and horizontal wells and EOR projects.
In 2018, the Company sanctioned a full field polymer injection project at Aberfeldy, and injection began in 2019.
During 2019, the Company operated three carbon dioxide (CO2) injection EOR pilot projects and a CO2 capture and liquefaction plant at the Lloydminster Ethanol Plant. The liquefied CO2 is used in the ongoing EOR piloting program. The Company is also piloting several types of CO2 capture technology at its Pikes Peak South facility in Saskatchewan.
Total annual production in 2019 averaged 34,400 bbls/day and was also impacted by the government-mandated production quotas in Alberta.
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 11
Sunrise Energy Project
On March 31, 2008, Husky and BP Corporation North America Inc. (BP) completed a transaction that created an integrated North American oil sands and refining businesses. The businesses are comprised of a 50/50 partnership to develop the Sunrise Energy Project, operated by Husky, and a 50/50 limited liability company for the BP-Husky Toledo Refinery, operated by BP. The Sunrise Energy Project is a SAGD oil sands project located in the Athabasca region of northern Alberta. During the fourth quarter of 2018 the project reached its nameplate capacity of 60,000 bbls/day.
At the end of 2019, there were 81 producing well pairs. Five well pairs and six infills have been drilled and are ready for production once government-mandated production quotas are lifted. Total annual production in 2019 averaged 49,200 bbls/day (24,600 bbls/day Husky working interest), and was impacted by the government-mandated production quotas in Alberta and the completion of a planned turnaround on Plant 1A. The turnaround on Plant 1B is scheduled for the second quarter of 2020.
Western Canada
Northern Operations
The Companys Northern operations are located primarily in northwest Alberta. Production in 2019 consisted of approximately 1,300 bbls/day of light crude oil, 6,600 bbls/day of NGL and 172.8 mmcf/day of conventional natural gas. The area is heavily weighted towards conventional natural gas production (approximately 79%). Primary areas of operation include Edson and Grande Prairie, where operations are centered on liquids-rich gas resources.
Edson operations are located primarily in west-central Alberta and consist of the Ansell and Galloway areas. The Ansell conventional natural gas resource play is located in the deep basin Cretaceous formation, with the Company holding an average 95% working interest in approximately 177 net sections of contiguous lands. The Company has been actively developing the Spirit River formation since 2012 using multi-stage fractured horizontal wells. Production from the Ansell and Galloway areas has doubled since 2012 and in 2019 averaged 2,200 bbls/day of NGL and 112.6 mmcf/day of conventional natural gas. In 2019, the Company drilled two wells and completed six wells, while also participating in one non-operated well. In November 2019, the Company consolidated the majority of its Ansell production to the new HMGP Corser gas plant and shut-in some older area facilities to reduce costs.
Grande Prairie operations are located primarily in northwest Alberta and consist primarily of the Wembley, Kakwa, Wapiti and Karr areas. Production from Grande Prairie in 2019 averaged 1,300 bbls/day of light crude oil, 4,400 bbls/day of NGL and 60.2 mmcf/day of conventional natural gas. A drilling program targeting the oil and liquids-rich conventional natural gas Montney formation in the Wembley and Karr areas continued with five wells drilled in 2019 and nine wells completed. Six of these wells were brought on production in the fourth quarter of 2019, averaging 500 boe/day in 2019, with the remaining two beginning production in early 2020. At Wembley, the Company has a processing agreement at the Tidewater Pipestone Gas Plant and a transportation agreement with HMGP for a pipeline connection between the Companys 13-26 pad and the Tidewater take point. The Kakwa Spirit River liquids-rich conventional natural gas resource play averaged 50 bbls/day of light crude oil, 2,600 bbls/day of NGL and 41.0 mmcf/day of conventional natural gas in 2019. During the year, the Company drilled three wells and completed six wells in Kakwa. Development is focused on the Cardium oil play in the Wapiti area south of the city of Grand Prairie, Alberta, utilizing horizontal drilling and multi-stage fracturing technology to unlock crude oil reserves. During 2019, production from the Cardium play averaged 2,400 boe/day.
Southern Operations
The Companys Southern operations are primarily located in central and southern Alberta. As at December 31, 2019, the Company operated one crude oil and four conventional natural gas facilities with approximately 600 active wells throughout the area. Production in 2019 averaged 1,100 bbls/day of light crude oil, 2,100 bbls/day of NGL and 36.0 mmcf/day of conventional natural gas. In September 2019, the Company signed a Purchase and Sale Agreement to divest the assets in the Hussar area. In 2019, production from these assets averaged 300 bbls/day of light crude oil, 250 bbls/day of NGL and 7.5 mmcf/day of conventional natural gas. The sale was completed on February 11, 2020.
In 2019, the Company continued to participate in an eight-well non-operated Viking program in the North Blackstone area. During the year, four wells were drilled and eight wells were completed and brought on production by the end of 2019. During 2019, production from this program averaged 1,400 boe/day.
Rainbow Lake Development
Rainbow Lake, located approximately 900 kilometres northwest of Edmonton, Alberta, is the site of the Companys largest light crude oil production operation in Western Canada. Production during 2019 from the Rainbow Lake assets averaged 4,700 bbls/day of light crude oil, 4,000 bbls/day of NGL and 72.9 mmcf/day of conventional natural gas. The Company continued a Muskeg oil appraisal program in 2019 with one well drilled and 11 wells completed during the year. During the year, the Company successfully completed a 21-day turnaround at the Rainbow Lake facility, on time and without any safety incidents.
The Company holds a 50% interest in a 90-megawatt natural gas fired cogeneration facility adjacent to its Rainbow Lake processing plant. The cogeneration facility produces electricity and thermal energy, or steam, for the Rainbow Lake processing plant. Additional electricity is also generated for the Power Pool of Alberta.
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 12
Northwest Territories
The Company acquired two ELs in 2011 in the Northwest Territories at the Slater River Canol shale play, which were consolidated as one EL in 2015 and cover 483,000 gross acres (466,000 net acres). Two pilot wells were drilled and suspended in 2012 which satisfied the requirements to extend the term of both the ELs to their full nine-year term. In 2016, the Company was awarded a Significant Discovery Declaration on 545 sections (150,000 hectares) of land within the ELs north of the Gambill Fault, and granted separately a Significant Discovery License over five sections of land south of the Gambill Fault. Abandonment work on the two pilot wells and 12 water monitoring wells in addition to reclamation of well sites and surplus infrastructure commenced in the fourth quarter of 2018 and carried through the 2019 winter season. In addition, summer work in 2019 included continued reclamation work as well as maintenance on the existing infrastructure that will remain in place to service the Significant Discovery Declaration area.
Infrastructure and Marketing
Overview
The Company is engaged in the marketing of both its own and other producers crude oil, natural gas, NGL, asphalt, sulphur and petroleum coke production. The sale and transportation of the Companys production and third-party commodity trading volumes are managed through access to capacity on third-party pipelines and storage facilities in both Canada and the U.S. The Company is able to capture differences between the two markets by utilizing infrastructure capacity to deliver production and/or third-party commodity trading volumes from Canada to the U.S. market.
Husky Midstream Limited Partnership
HMLP was created in July 2016 with the sale of selected pipeline gathering systems in Alberta and Saskatchewan and the Lloydminster and Hardisty terminals. CKI Infrastructure Holdings Limited owns 16.25%, Power Assets Holdings Limited owns 48.75% and Husky owns 35% of HMLP and is the operator. HMLP has approximately 2,200 kilometres of pipeline in the Lloydminster region, 4.1 million barrels of storage capacity at Hardisty and Lloydminster and other ancillary assets. The Lloydminster Terminal, with a total storage capacity of 1.0 million barrels, serves as a hub for the gathering systems. The pipeline system transports blended heavy crude oil to Lloydminster, providing feedstock for the Upgrader and for the Asphalt Refinery, and to Hardisty where the system connects to downstream pipelines accessing markets across Canada and the United States. Blended heavy crude oil and bitumen from the field and synthetic crude oil from the upgrading operations are transported south to Hardisty, Alberta to a connection with the major export trunk pipelines. The Hardisty Terminal, with a total storage capacity of 3.4 million barrels, acts as the exclusive blending hub for Western Canada Select (WCS), the largest heavy oil benchmark pricing point in North America.
HMLP has a separate Board of Directors from Husky and independent financing that supports both significant growth projects that are under construction and planned future expansions. Approximately $700 million in growth projects are underway. HMLP is in the process of diversifying its operations beyond the Lloydminster and Hardisty area and has completed construction of the Ansell Corser Gas Plant, which added 120 mmcf/day of processing capacity in the fourth quarter of 2019.
A major pipeline project is underway in Saskatchewan to provide transportation for the anticipated increase in the Companys bitumen production. The Hardisty terminal is also expanding to provide additional pipeline connectivity and crude oil storage for customers. The assets will play an integral and valuable role in the successful transportation of heavy oil and bitumen production to end markets by providing connections to the Upgrader and to the Asphalt Refinery, third-party terminals and pipelines through strategic hubs such as the Hardisty Terminal.
Third-Party Pipeline Commitments
In 2010, the Company commenced its pipeline commitment on the Keystone pipeline system, which ships Canadian crude oil from Hardisty, Alberta to Patoka, Illinois. This commitment was part of a strategy, commenced in 2006, to expand the market for the Companys crude oil into the U.S. Midwest. This strategy was further supported through the acquisition of the Lima Refinery in 2007, which enabled the Companys Canadian synthetic and bitumen production, along with additional third-party crude and other feedstocks, to be processed at the refinery. The Company has the ability to utilize the portion of the Keystone pipeline system that continues to Cushing, Oklahoma, and the Company holds long-term firm capacity on the Enbridge Flanagan South pipeline and Southern Access Extension pipeline which connect Enbridges Mainline to the U.S. Gulf Coast and Patoka markets.
Due to the Companys Keystone pipeline commitment, the Lima Refinery is able to access a significant amount of Canadian crude oil as part of its crude feedstock requirements. The Keystone pipeline has enabled the Company to transport crude oil through interconnecting pipeline systems to the Lima Refinery and/or sell it into the Cushing, Oklahoma market.
Since 2012, the pipeline systems leaving Canada have at times been subject to significant apportionment, affecting both Canadian export volumes and crude oil prices in Western Canada. The Company has mitigated these effects through the reliability of its proprietary pipeline system, its firm capacity on export pipelines and its demand for Canadian crude oil feedstock for its Canadian upgrading and refining assets. In 2017, the Company further enhanced this integration when it purchased the 50,000 barrel-per-day Superior Refinery, which runs a combination of heavy Canadian crude and light crudes from Canada and the U.S. The Superior Refinery is located on the Enbridge Mainline crude system. As a seller and buyer of crude oils, the Company has a relatively balanced exposure to many location and grade differentials.
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 13
The Company has been monitoring opportunities to participate in growing crude oil markets accessed by rail, which have developed due to refiners desire for inland crude oil which has at times been priced at significant discounts to ocean imports. The Company has made crude oil deliveries via trucks to rail-loading facilities, where netbacks can be increased relative to pipeline alternatives. While the Companys primary focus is on low-cost pipeline transportation options, it has maintained the flexibility to access crude by rail markets.
In December of 2018, the Government of Alberta imposed an oil production curtailment order in Alberta. This reduced the economic motivation to export crude by rail or develop longer term market access strategies.
Natural Gas Storage Facilities
The Company has operated a 25 bcf natural gas storage facility at Hussar, Alberta since 2000.
Commodity Marketing
The Company has developed its commodity marketing operations to include the acquisition of third-party volumes to enhance the value of its Integrated Corridor assets.
Currently, the Company is a marketer of both its own and third-party production of crude oil, synthetic crude oil, NGL, natural gas and sulphur. The Company also markets petroleum coke, a by-product from the Upgrader and its Ohio and Wisconsin refineries. The Company supplies feedstock to the Upgrader and to the Asphalt Refinery from its own and third-party heavy oil and bitumen production sourced from the Lloydminster and Cold Lake areas. The Company also sells blended heavy crude oil directly to refiners based in the U.S. and Canada. The extensive infrastructure in the Lloydminster area supports the Companys heavy crude oil refining, upgrading and marketing operations. The Company markets light and medium crude oil and NGL sourced from its own production and third-party production. Light crude oil is acquired for processing by the Lima Refinery and the Superior Refinery. The Company supplies a portion of the synthetic crude oil produced at the Upgrader to the Lima Refinery and Superior Refinery, and markets the rest to refiners in Canada and the U.S.
The Company markets natural gas sourced from its own production and third-party production. The Company is currently committed to gas sales contracts with third parties, which in aggregate do not exceed amounts forecasted to be deliverable from the Companys reserves. The Company trades natural gas to generate revenue from managed assets, including transportation and natural gas storage facilities.
Upgrading Operations
The Company owns and operates the Upgrader. The Upgrader is designed to process blended heavy crude oil feedstock, creating high quality, low sulphur synthetic crude oil and ultra-low sulphur diesel and recover diluent from the feedstock for return to and reuse in the field. Synthetic crude oil is used as refinery feedstock for the production of transportation fuels in Canada and the U.S.
The Upgrader was commissioned in 1992 with an original design capacity of 46,000 bbls/day of synthetic crude oil. In 2007, the Upgrader commenced production of transportation grade diesel. The Upgraders current rated production capacity is 80,000 bbls/day of synthetic crude oil, diluent and ultra low sulphur diesel.
Production at the Upgrader in 2019 averaged 54,930 bbls/day of synthetic crude oil, 13,880 bbls/day of diluent and 6,100 bbls/day of ultra low sulphur diesel. In addition, as by-products of its upgrading operations, the Upgrader produced approximately 339 long ton/day of sulphur and 961 long ton/day of petroleum coke during 2019. These products are sold in Canadian and international markets.
Canadian Refined Products
The Companys Canadian refined products operations include manufacturing of fuel and fuel grade ethanol, manufacturing of asphalt products from heavy crude oil and bitumen and acquisition by purchase and exchange of refined petroleum products. The Companys retail distribution network includes the wholesale, commercial and retail marketing of refined petroleum products and provides a platform for non-fuel related convenience product businesses.
Until its sale by the Company in November 2019, light oil was processed and refined products were produced at the Prince George Refinery and such products were also acquired from third-party refiners and marketed through the Companys retail and commercial petroleum outlets and through direct marketing to third-party dealers and end users. On November 1, 2019, the Prince George Refinery was sold to Tidewater and in conjunction with the deal, Husky agreed to a five-year offtake agreement to purchase the refined products at market price. Asphalt and residual products are produced at the Asphalt Refinery and are marketed directly or through the Companys eight terminals located in Western Canada and the U.S. Midwest.
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 14
Asphalt Refinery
The Asphalt Refinery processes heavy crude oil and bitumen into asphalt products used in road construction and maintenance. The refinery has a throughput capacity of 30,000 bbls/day of heavy crude oil and bitumen. The refinery also produces straight run gasoline, bulk distillates and residuals. The straight run gasoline stream is removed and re-circulated into HMLPs pipeline network as pipeline diluent. The distillate stream is transferred to the Upgrader and treated for blending into the Husky Synthetic Blend (HSB) stream. Residuals are a blend of medium and light distillate and gas oil streams, which are typically sold directly to customers as refinery feedstock or drilling and well-fracturing fluids, or used in asphalt cutbacks and emulsions.
Refinery throughput averaged 26,400 bbls/day of blended heavy crude oil and bitumen feedstock during 2019. Due to the seasonal demand for asphalt products, many asphalt refineries typically operate at full capacity only during the normal paving season in Canada and the northern U.S. The Company has implemented various strategies to increase refinery throughput during the other months of the year that are outside of the normal paving season, such as increasing storage capacity and developing U.S. markets for asphalt products. This allows the Asphalt Refinery to run at or near full capacity throughout the year.
Asphalt Distribution Network
In addition to sales directly from the Asphalt Refinery, the Company, through the Husky Asphalt division, has an asphalt distribution network which consists of seven asphalt terminals located at: Kamloops, British Columbia; Edmonton and Lethbridge, Alberta; Yorkton, Saskatchewan; Winnipeg, Manitoba; Rhinelander, Wisconsin; and Crookston, Minnesota, and an emulsion plant located at Saskatoon, Saskatchewan. The Company also markets asphalt from independently operated terminals in the states of Washington, Minnesota, Wisconsin and Ohio.
Ethanol Plants
In September 2006, the Company commissioned an ethanol plant in Lloydminster, Saskatchewan. The plant has an annual nameplate capacity of 130 million litres. In December 2007, the Minnedosa, Manitoba ethanol plant was commissioned with an annual nameplate capacity of 130 million litres and both plants are currently operating above that capacity due to efforts to optimize yield. In 2019, ethanol production averaged 823 thousand litres/day.
During 2012, the Lloydminster plant commissioned a CO2 capture facility. The plant is currently capturing CO2 for use in the Companys non-thermal EOR projects and ethanol produced at the plant has a low carbon intensity designation.
Other Supply Arrangements
During 2019, the Company purchased approximately 27,250 bbls/day of refined petroleum products of which 25,850 bbls/day were pursuant to an agreement with Imperial Oil. The Company also acquired approximately 7,600 bbls/day of refined petroleum products pursuant to exchange agreements with third-party refiners in addition to Imperial Oil.
Retail and Commercial Network
During 2015, the Company and Imperial Oil entered into an agreement to create a single truck transport network of approximately 160 cardlock sites. The agreement has been fully implemented, and the consolidation of the two cardlock networks, under the Esso brand, was completed in the third quarter of 2017.
On January 8, 2019, the Company announced its intention to market and potentially sell its Canadian Retail and Commercial Fuels Network. The strategic review continues to progress.
As of December 31, 2019, there were 552 independently operated Husky and Esso-branded petroleum product outlets. These outlets include travel centres, convenience stores and cardlock and bulk distribution facilities located coast-to-coast. The Companys network of travel centres features a proprietary cardlock system that enables commercial customers to make purchases using a fuel payment card that processes transactions, provides detailed billing and offers purchase controls and spending limits, as well as advanced fraud protection. A variety of full and self-serve retail stations serve urban and rural markets across the country, while the Companys bulk distributors offer direct sales to commercial and agricultural markets in the Prairie provinces.
The Companys retail and commercial operating model is balanced by corporate-owned/dealer-operated and branded dealer-owned- and-operated sites. Retail outlets offer a variety of services, including convenience stores, service bays, 24-hour accessibility, car washes, Husky House Restaurants and proprietary and co-branded quick-serve restaurants. In addition to ethanol-blended gasoline, the Company sells diesel, propane and Mobil-branded lubricants to customers. The Company supplies refined petroleum products to its branded independent retailers on an exclusive basis and provides financial and other assistance for location improvements, marketing support and related services.
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 15
The following table shows the number of Husky and Esso-branded petroleum outlets by province as of December 31, 2019:
British Columbia |
Alberta | Saskatchewan | Manitoba | Ontario | Quebec | New Brunswick |
2019 Total |
2018 Total |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Husky-Branded Petroleum Outlets |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Retail Owned Outlets |
36 | 43 | 7 | 12 | 54 | | | 152 | 165 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Leased |
31 | 27 | 3 | 7 | 23 | | | 91 | 97 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Independent Retailers |
46 | 60 | 12 | 3 | 13 | | | 134 | 136 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total |
113 | 130 | 22 | 22 | 90 | | | 377 | 398 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Esso-Branded Petroleum Outlets |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Retail Owned Outlets |
18 | 18 | 4 | 4 | 15 | | | 59 | 48 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Leased |
3 | 4 | | 3 | 3 | | | 13 | 8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Independent Retailers |
33 | 23 | 4 | 6 | 30 | 6 | 1 | 103 | 100 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total |
54 | 45 | 8 | 13 | 48 | 6 | 1 | 175 | 156 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Cardlocks(1) |
49 | 45 | 9 | 11 | 42 | 7 | 1 | 164 | 162 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Convenience Stores(1) |
80 | 83 | 13 | 21 | 94 | | | 291 | 296 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restaurants |
8 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 13 | | | 34 | 34 |
(1) | Located at branded petroleum outlets. |
The Company also markets refined petroleum products directly to various commercial markets, including independent dealers, national rail companies and major industrial and commercial customers in Canada.
The following table shows average daily sales volumes of light refined petroleum products for the periods indicated:
Years ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
Average Daily Sales Volume (mbbls/day) |
2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |||||||||
Gasoline |
20.5 | 21.7 | 22.3 | |||||||||
Diesel fuel |
25.7 | 26.5 | 22.8 | |||||||||
Liquefied Petroleum Gas |
0.5 | 0.2 | 0.2 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
46.7 | 48.4 | 45.3 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 16
U.S. Refining and Marketing
Lima Refinery
The Lima Refinery has a crude oil throughput capacity, depending on crude slate, of 175,000 bbls/day. The Lima Refinery, prior to the completion of the crude oil flexibility project, processed both light sweet crude oil and a small percentage of heavy crude oil feedstock sourced from the U.S. and Canada, which includes Canadian synthetic crude oil, including HSB produced by the Upgrader. The Lima Refinery produces low sulphur gasoline, gasoline blend stocks, ultra-low sulphur diesel, jet fuel, petrochemical feedstock and other by-products. The feedstocks are received via the Mid-Valley and Marathon pipelines, and the refined products are transported via the Buckeye, Inland and Energy Transfer Partners pipeline systems and by rail car to primary markets in Ohio, Illinois, Indiana, Pennsylvania and southern Michigan.
During 2019, total production throughput at the Lima Refinery averaged 176,000 bbls/day excluding days for the 2019 shutdown. Production, excluding days for the crude oil flexibility project shutdown, consisted of an average of 85,000 bbls/day of gasoline, 72,000 bbls/day of distillates and 19,000 bbls/day of other products.
In 2016, the Company completed the first stage of the crude oil flexibility project to enable the refinery to process up to 10,000 bbls/day of heavy crude oil feedstock. The refinery completed a planned turnaround in the fourth quarter of 2019 and made final tie-ins for the project. The refinery is now designed to allow for the processing of up to 40,000 bbls/day of heavy crude oil from Western Canada and the ability to swing between light and heavy crude oil feedstock. The project was completed in early 2020 and the refinery will ramp up to full rates during the first quarter of 2020.
BP-Husky Toledo Refinery
The BP-Husky Toledo Refinery has a nameplate capacity of 160,000 bbls/day. Products from the refinery include low sulphur gasoline, ultra-low sulphur diesel, aviation fuels and by-products.
A feedstock optimization project completed during the 2016 turnaround improved the BP-Husky Toledo Refinerys ability to process high-TAN crude oil to support production from the Sunrise Energy Project. Since January 1, 2017, the Company has been marketing its share of the joint operations refined product.
During 2019, the Companys share of total throughput averaged 63,100 bbls/day, with the Companys share of sales of gasoline averaging 39,000 bbls/day, distillates averaging 18,700 bbls/day and other fuel and feedstock averaging 7,100 bbls/day.
Superior Refinery
On November 8, 2017, the Company completed the acquisition of the Superior Refinery, which has a permitted throughput capacity of 50,000 bbls/day and an operating capacity of 45,000 bbls/day on its current crude slate. The refinery produces motor fuel products and asphalt from light and heavy crude oil originating from North Dakota and Western Canada.
The refinery also has associated infrastructure including five storage and distribution terminals that are strategically located throughout the northern area of the United States. These terminals include: the Superior products terminal; the Duluth Terminal in Duluth, Minnesota, which has a storage capacity of 200,000 barrels; the Duluth Marine Terminal in Duluth, Minnesota which has a storage capacity of 14,000 barrels; the Rhinelander Terminal in Rhinelander, Wisconsin, which has a storage capacity of 166,000 barrels; and the Crookston Terminal in Crookston, Minnesota, which has a storage capacity of 156,000 barrels.
On April 26, 2018, the Superior Refinery experienced an incident while preparing for a major turnaround and was taken out of operation. During 2019, demolition, site preparation work and permitting were completed, and the rebuild work commenced. The investment in the rebuild is estimated to be approximately US$750 million, of which the Company anticipates a substantial portion will be recovered from property damage insurance. This represents a change from the previous estimate of greater than US$400 million, with the change being due to a more complete assessment of the extent of equipment damage from the April 26, 2018 incident. The Company anticipates that lost income through April 2020 will be compensated by business interruption insurance. The refinery is being rebuilt with the same configuration and with the capability to run continuously at the 45,000 barrel-per-day operating capacity and will be able to produce a full slate of products, including asphalt, gasoline and diesel. Full operations are expected to resume in 2021.
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 17
Offshore
Asia Pacific
China
Liwan Gas Project
The Liwan Gas Project includes the conventional natural gas discoveries at the Liwan 3-1, Liuhua 34-2 and Liuhua 29-1 fields within the Contract Area 29/26 exploration block located in the Pearl River Mouth Basin of the South China Sea, approximately 300 kilometres southeast of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.
The Company has a 49% working interest in the Liwan 3-1 and Liuhua 34-2 fields and a 75% working interest in the Liuhua 29-1 field, and China National Offshore Oil Corporation Limited (CNOOC) has 51% and 25% working interests, respectively. The initial development of the Liwan 3-1 and Liuhua 34-2 fields was separated into deepwater and shallow water development projects, with the Company acting as deepwater operator and CNOOC acting as shallow water operator. The deepwater infrastructure includes production wells and trees, subsea pipelines and manifolds that produce to twin 22-inch deepwater pipelines running approximately 78 kilometres to a shallow water central platform. The shallow water infrastructure includes the central platform standing in approximately 120 metres of water, a 261-kilometre shallow water pipeline running from the central platform to the onshore Gaolan Gas Plant, which has liquids separation facilities, 10 spherical NGL storage tanks, an export jetty, control facilities as well as administrative and accommodation buildings.
The Liwan 3-1 field commenced production at the end of March 2014. The gas field is currently producing from nine wells. The single production well in the Liuhua 34-2 field was tied into the deepwater facilities of the Liwan 3-1 field and commenced production in December 2014.
In 2019, total conventional natural gas sales from Liwan 3-1 and Liuhua 34-2 averaged 311 mmcf/day and 38 mmcf/day, respectively. In 2019, the Companys working interest share of production from the two fields was 171 mmcf/day of conventional natural gas and 7,400 bbls/day of NGL.
Substantial construction work was completed in 2019 at Liuhua 29-1 development project, the third deepwater gas field of the Liwan Gas Project. During the year, the remaining three wells were drilled, and all seven wells in the full field development were fully completed. The production pipeline and the mono-ethylene glycol supply line were engineered, fabricated and installed. The project is now approximately 80% complete, and construction activities will resume again in March 2020. First gas production from the Liuhua 29-1 field is expected by the end of 2020, with target production of 45 mmcf/day conventional natural gas (Husky working interest) and 1,800 bbls/day NGL (Husky working interest) when fully ramped up.
Block 15/33
The Company executed a PSC in December 2015 for an exploration block offshore China. Block 15/33 is located in the Pearl River Mouth Basin in the South China Sea, about 140 kilometres southeast of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and covers an area of 155 square kilometres in water depths of approximately 80 to 100 metres. The Company is the operator of the block during the exploration phase, with a working interest of 100%. In the event of a commercial discovery, its partner CNOOC may assume a working interest of up to 51% during the development and production phase. Under the PSC, the corresponding CNOOC share of exploration costs is to be recovered from production allocated to the Company.
The Company is progressing commercial development plans following the successful drilling and testing of the XJ34-3-2 exploration well. The block boundaries have been expanded and additional exploration and appraisal drilling is planned in 2020.
Block 16/25
The Company executed a PSC in April 2017 for an exploration block offshore China. Block 16/25 is located in the Pearl River Mouth Basin in the South China Sea, about 150 kilometres southeast of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and approximately 72 kilometres northeast of Block 15/33. The block covers an area of 44 square kilometres in water depths of approximately 85 to100 metres.
The Company drilled one exploration well in the third quarter of 2018, which encountered non-commercial hydrocarbons. This block was released and the costs written off in 2019 after technical evaluations were completed.
Blocks 22/11 and 23/07
The Company and CNOOC signed two PSCs for Blocks 22/11 and 23/07 in the Beibu Gulf area of the South China Sea in the first half of 2018. The Company is the operator of both blocks with a working interest of 100% during the exploration phase. In the event of a commercial discovery, its partner CNOOC may assume a participating partnership interest of up to 51% in either or both blocks for the development and production phases. The Company has elected to move into the second exploratory phase for Block 23/07.
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 18
Taiwan
In December 2012, the Company signed a joint venture agreement with CPC Corporation. The Company and CPC Corporation have rights to an exploration block in the South China Sea covering approximately 7,700 square kilometres located southwest of the island of Taiwan. The Company holds a 75% working interest during exploration, while CPC Corporation has the right to participate in the development program up to a 50% interest.
The acquisition of 2-D seismic survey data was completed in 2014, and the acquisition of 3-D seismic survey data was completed in 2017. The Company is analyzing the 3-D seismic survey data to identify potential drilling prospects.
Indonesia
Madura Strait
The Company has a 40% interest in approximately 622,000 acres (2,516 square kilometres) of the Madura Strait, located offshore East Java, in Indonesia. The Companys two partners are CNOOC, which is the operator and has a 40% working interest, and Samudra Energy Ltd., which holds the remaining 20% interest through its affiliate, SMS Development Ltd. The Madura Strait includes the operating BD field and developments at the MDA, MBH, MDK and MAC fields and three additional discoveries.
In 2019, total BD field sales averaged 82 mmcf/day of conventional natural gas and 6,100 bbls/day of NGL. The Companys working interest share of production was 32 mmcf/day of conventional natural gas and 2,500 bbls/day of NGL.
At the MDA and MBH fields, the two shallow water platforms have been fully installed. Five MDA and two MBH field production wells are expected to be drilled in the 2020 timeframe pending regulatory approval. Contracting for a floating production unit to process the gas is also planned to be finalized during 2020 with fabrication to take place in 2021/2022. Gas production and sales are planned to commence in 2021 with gas sales under government-approved contracts into the East Java gas market. Subsequently, an additional shallow water field, MDK, is scheduled to be developed and tied into the MDA and MBH infrastructure. Pre-engineering activities and approvals progressed at the MAC field, where an approved Plan of Development is in place.
Anugerah
The Company executed a PSC in February 2014 with the Government of Indonesia for the Anugerah contract area. The Company holds a 100% interest in the Anugerah Block, which is located in the East Java Basin approximately 150 kilometres east of the Madura Strait. The block covers an area of 1,420,000 net acres (8,215 square kilometres).
The Company previously acquired 2-D and 3-D seismic survey data on the contract area, which was required during the first three years of the PSC. An analysis of those data and data from offset block information indicates that exploratory drilling would not be economic. The block will be relinquished in February 2020.
Atlantic
Overview
The Companys Atlantic exploration and development program is focused in the Jeanne dArc Basin and the Flemish Pass Basin. The Jeanne dArc Basin contains the Hibernia, Terra Nova and Hebron fields, as well as the White Rose field and satellite extensions, including North Amethyst, West White Rose and South White Rose. In the Flemish Pass Basin, the Company holds a 35% non-operated working interest in each of the Bay du Nord, Bay de Verde, Baccalieu, Harpoon and Mizzen discoveries. The Company is the operator of the White Rose field and satellite extensions and holds an ownership interest in the Terra Nova field, as well as a number of smaller undeveloped fields. The Company also holds significant exploration acreage offshore NL.
White Rose Field and Satellite Extensions
The White Rose field is located 354 kilometres off the coast of NL and is approximately 48 kilometres east of the Hibernia field on the eastern flank of the Jeanne dArc Basin. The Company is the operator of the main White Rose field and satellite tiebacks, including the North Amethyst, West White Rose and South White Rose extensions. The Company has a 72.5% working interest in the main field and a 68.875% working interest in the satellite extensions. To date, production has been facilitated via subsea tie-ins with wells drilled independently through drill centres and connected via flowlines to the SeaRose FPSO.
First oil was achieved at White Rose in November 2005. The White Rose field currently has 13 production wells, 10 water injection wells and three gas injection wells. Two infill production wells were completed during 2019. The Companys share of light crude oil production from the White Rose field was 7,200 bbls/day (Husky working interest) during 2019.
On May 31, 2010, first oil was achieved from North Amethyst, the first satellite extension at the White Rose field. The field is located approximately six kilometres southwest of the SeaRose FPSO. Production flows from North Amethyst to the SeaRose FPSO through a series of subsea flow lines. In September 2016, the Company began production from the deeper Hibernia formation at North Amethyst utilizing existing infrastructure. As of December 31, 2019, the field had eight production wells and four water injection wells. During 2019, light crude oil production from North Amethyst was 1,900 bbls/day (Husky working interest).
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 19
Initial production from West White Rose was achieved in September 2011 through a two-well pilot project. The pilot wells have helped provide further information on the reservoir to refine development plans for the full West White Rose field. During 2019, light crude oil production from this satellite field was 500 bbls/day (Husky working interest).
Production commenced from the South White Rose Extension in 2015 with production wells supported by both gas flood and water injection. As at December 31, 2019, the project had three production wells, one water injection well and one gas injection well. During 2019, light crude oil production from the South White Rose Extension was 2,700 bbls/day (Husky working interest).
In May 2017, the Company and its co-venturers announced plans to proceed with full field development at West White Rose using a fixed drilling platform. First oil is forecasted around the end of 2022, with the West White Rose Project expected to ramp up to peak production of 52,500 bbls/day (Husky working interest) in 2026 as development wells are brought online. Like the other White Rose tiebacks, the platform will leverage existing offshore infrastructure including the SeaRose FPSO. Construction of various components for the West White Rose platform is underway at sites in NL, and in Ingleside, Texas, where the facilitys topsides are being fabricated.
At the graving dock in Argentia, NL, four slipforms were completed on the outer caisson for the projects concrete gravity structure and the first three interior decks were installed. The inner pedestal for the concrete structure will be slipformed to its full height during the 2020 construction season. Following a schedule review in early 2019, Husky and its partners decided to adjust the tow-out and installation date for the concrete gravity structure from 2021 to 2022. Project spending has been adjusted to meet the new schedule. As of December 31, 2019, the project was approximately 55% complete.
In late January 2019, the Company began a staged ramp-up of production at the White Rose field following a 250-cubic-metre oil spill from a failed flowline connector at the South White Rose Extension in November 2018. The flowline connector was replaced with one with a higher tensile strength and processes were updated to prevent a recurrence. All sections of the field were back in operation during August 2019. Huskys investigation revealed that hydrate formation caused the flowline connector to separate. The C-NLOPB, which regulates the industry offshore NL, continues its investigation.
Terra Nova Field
The Terra Nova field is located approximately 350 kilometres southeast of St. Johns, NL. The Terra Nova field is divided into three distinct areas, known as the Graben, the East Flank and the Far East. Production at Terra Nova commenced in January 2002. The Company has a 13% working interest in the field.
On December 20, 2019, production operations on the Terra Nova FPSO were safely shut-in in response to a C-NLOPB order citing insufficient redundancy of fire water pumps.
As at December 31, 2019, there were 15 development wells drilled in the Graben area, consisting of nine production wells, four water injection wells and two gas injection wells. In the East Flank area, there were 12 development wells, consisting of eight production wells and four water injection wells. The Far East has one extended reach production well and an extended reach water injection well. The operator continues to progress delineation and development opportunities at Terra Nova.
Light crude oil production during 2019 from the Terra Nova field was 4,100 bbls/day (Husky working interest).
East Coast Exploration
The Company holds working interests ranging from 5.8% to 100% in 23 Significant Discovery Areas in the Jeanne dArc Basin and Flemish Pass Basin, offshore NL and Baffin Island.
The Tigers Eye D-17 exploration well, drilled approximately 10 kilometres south of the White Rose field during the second quarter of 2019, did not encounter commercial quantities of hydrocarbons and has been expensed.
The Company continues to evaluate previous hydrocarbon discoveries at the White Rose A-24 exploration well, north of the SeaRose FPSO, and the Northwest White Rose A-78 well.
The Company and its partner continue to assess potential development of Bay du Nord and other discoveries in the Flemish Pass Basin. A benefits framework agreement was reached with the Government of NL in July 2018, based on an FPSO-based development concept to produce resources at Bay du Nord and Bay de Verde. Technological and commercial evaluations continue. The Company holds a 35% non-operated working interest in the Bay du Nord, Bay de Verde, Baccalieu, Harpoon and Mizzen discoveries.
The Company was awarded a parcel of land during the November 2019 C-NLOPB land sale. The EL is northwest of White Rose and adjacent to other Husky land holdings.
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 20
STATEMENT OF RESERVES DATA AND OTHER OIL AND GAS INFORMATION
Disclosure of Oil and Gas Activities
Operating Netback Analysis(1)
The following tables show the Companys netback analysis by product and area:
Year Ended | Three Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||
Average Per Unit Amounts |
Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2019 | Sept 30, 2019 | June 30, 2019 | Mar 31, 2019 | |||||||||||||||
Company Total(2) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Sales volume (mboe/day) |
290.0 | 311.3 | 294.8 | 268.4 | 285.2 | |||||||||||||||
Gross Revenue ($/boe)(3) |
$ | 48.37 | $ | 46.06 | $ | 47.54 | $ | 53.35 | $ | 47.20 | ||||||||||
Royalties ($/boe) |
$ | 3.29 | $ | 3.25 | $ | 3.21 | $ | 3.69 | $ | 3.03 | ||||||||||
Production and Operating Costs ($/boe)(3) |
$ | 15.53 | $ | 15.25 | $ | 14.83 | $ | 15.83 | $ | 16.30 | ||||||||||
Transportation Costs ($/boe)(4) |
$ | 0.16 | $ | 0.08 | $ | 0.19 | $ | 0.22 | $ | 0.18 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Operating netback ($/boe) |
$ | 29.39 | $ | 27.48 | $ | 29.31 | $ | 33.61 | $ | 27.69 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Light and Medium Crude Oil ($/bbl) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Canada - Western Canada |
||||||||||||||||||||
Gross Revenue(3) |
$ | 47.11 | $ | 36.50 | $ | 44.07 | $ | 52.32 | $ | 56.94 | ||||||||||
Royalties |
$ | 9.10 | $ | 10.24 | $ | 9.90 | $ | 9.65 | $ | 6.73 | ||||||||||
Production and Operating Costs(3) |
$ | 26.43 | $ | 22.30 | $ | 16.68 | $ | 36.63 | $ | 28.07 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Operating netback |
$ | 11.58 | $ | 3.96 | $ | 17.48 | $ | 6.04 | $ | 22.14 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Canada - Atlantic Canada |
||||||||||||||||||||
Gross Revenue |
$ | 86.44 | $ | 84.54 | $ | 83.47 | $ | 92.00 | $ | 92.12 | ||||||||||
Royalties |
$ | 8.15 | $ | 7.17 | $ | 6.96 | $ | 11.07 | $ | 10.06 | ||||||||||
Production and Operating Costs |
$ | 42.20 | $ | 30.48 | $ | 32.21 | $ | 52.75 | $ | 92.01 | ||||||||||
Transportation Costs(4) |
$ | 2.89 | $ | 0.97 | $ | 2.66 | $ | 4.74 | $ | 6.87 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Operating netback |
$ | 33.20 | $ | 45.92 | $ | 41.64 | $ | 23.44 | ($ | 16.82 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Canada - Total |
||||||||||||||||||||
Gross Revenue(3) |
$ | 72.85 | $ | 71.67 | $ | 71.32 | $ | 77.07 | $ | 73.09 | ||||||||||
Royalties |
$ | 8.50 | $ | 7.99 | $ | 7.87 | $ | 10.53 | $ | 8.26 | ||||||||||
Production and Operating Costs(3) |
$ | 36.85 | $ | 28.29 | $ | 27.42 | $ | 46.66 | $ | 57.52 | ||||||||||
Transportation Costs(4) |
$ | 1.90 | $ | 0.71 | $ | 1.84 | $ | 2.95 | $ | 3.16 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Operating netback |
$ | 25.60 | $ | 34.67 | $ | 34.19 | $ | 16.92 | $ | 4.14 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Heavy Crude Oil ($/bbl) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Canada - Total |
||||||||||||||||||||
Gross Revenue(3) |
$ | 54.70 | $ | 50.01 | $ | 56.72 | $ | 63.15 | $ | 49.38 | ||||||||||
Royalties |
$ | 5.08 | $ | 4.27 | $ | 5.26 | $ | 5.86 | $ | 4.99 | ||||||||||
Production and Operating Costs(3) |
$ | 34.84 | $ | 35.97 | $ | 37.63 | $ | 32.31 | $ | 35.85 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Operating netback |
$ | 14.78 | $ | 9.77 | $ | 13.83 | $ | 24.98 | $ | 8.54 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Bitumen ($/bbl) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Canada - Total |
||||||||||||||||||||
Gross Revenue(3)(4) |
$ | 49.00 | $ | 41.39 | $ | 51.09 | $ | 58.32 | $ | 46.64 | ||||||||||
Royalties |
$ | 2.45 | $ | 2.12 | $ | 2.60 | $ | 3.18 | $ | 1.96 | ||||||||||
Production and Operating Costs(3) |
$ | 12.73 | $ | 12.58 | $ | 12.15 | $ | 12.39 | $ | 13.79 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Operating netback |
$ | 33.82 | $ | 26.69 | $ | 36.34 | $ | 42.75 | $ | 30.89 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 21
Year Ended | Three Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||
Average Per Unit Amounts |
Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2019 | Sept 30, 2019 | June 30, 2019 | Mar 31, 2019 | |||||||||||||||
Conventional Natural Gas ($/mcf) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Canada - Total |
||||||||||||||||||||
Gross Revenue(3)(5) |
$ | 1.72 | $ | 2.29 | $ | 0.95 | $ | 1.20 | $ | 2.46 | ||||||||||
Royalties(5)(6) |
($ | 0.01 | ) | $ | 0.07 | ($ | 0.11 | ) | ($ | 0.09 | ) | $ | 0.07 | |||||||
Production and Operating Costs(3) |
$ | 1.68 | $ | 1.71 | $ | 1.39 | $ | 1.91 | $ | 1.60 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Operating netback |
$ | 0.05 | $ | 0.51 | ($ | 0.33 | ) | ($ | 0.63 | ) | $ | 0.80 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
China |
||||||||||||||||||||
Gross Revenue |
$ | 14.02 | $ | 14.31 | $ | 13.28 | $ | 14.05 | $ | 14.35 | ||||||||||
Royalties |
$ | 0.80 | $ | 0.88 | $ | 0.75 | $ | 0.75 | $ | 0.76 | ||||||||||
Production and Operating Costs |
$ | 0.90 | $ | 0.86 | $ | 1.02 | $ | 0.87 | $ | 0.88 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Operating netback |
$ | 12.32 | $ | 12.57 | $ | 11.51 | $ | 12.43 | $ | 12.71 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Indonesia(7) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Gross Revenue |
$ | 9.87 | $ | 9.85 | $ | 9.82 | $ | 9.94 | $ | 9.88 | ||||||||||
Royalties |
$ | 1.10 | $ | 1.01 | $ | 1.06 | $ | 1.07 | $ | 1.25 | ||||||||||
Production and Operating Costs |
$ | 1.40 | $ | 1.47 | $ | 1.04 | $ | 1.59 | $ | 1.53 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Operating netback |
$ | 7.37 | $ | 7.37 | $ | 7.72 | $ | 7.28 | $ | 7.10 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total |
||||||||||||||||||||
Gross Revenue(3) |
$ | 6.44 | $ | 7.02 | $ | 5.44 | $ | 6.19 | $ | 7.12 | ||||||||||
Royalties |
$ | 0.33 | $ | 0.41 | $ | 0.24 | $ | 0.28 | $ | 0.40 | ||||||||||
Production and Operating Costs(3) |
$ | 1.40 | $ | 1.39 | $ | 1.25 | $ | 1.54 | $ | 1.34 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Operating netback |
$ | 4.71 | $ | 5.22 | $ | 3.95 | $ | 4.37 | $ | 5.38 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Natural Gas Liquids ($/bbl) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Canada - Total |
||||||||||||||||||||
Gross Revenue(3) |
$ | 23.38 | $ | 23.88 | $ | 17.13 | $ | 25.06 | $ | 27.47 | ||||||||||
Royalties |
$ | 3.44 | $ | 3.36 | $ | 2.26 | $ | 3.01 | $ | 4.93 | ||||||||||
Production and Operating Costs(3) |
$ | 10.20 | $ | 10.88 | $ | 8.76 | $ | 11.18 | $ | 10.14 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Operating netback |
$ | 9.74 | $ | 9.64 | $ | 6.11 | $ | 10.87 | $ | 12.40 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
China |
||||||||||||||||||||
Gross Revenue |
$ | 67.28 | $ | 67.87 | $ | 61.81 | $ | 69.77 | $ | 69.11 | ||||||||||
Royalties |
$ | 3.82 | $ | 3.93 | $ | 3.47 | $ | 3.92 | $ | 3.90 | ||||||||||
Production and Operating Costs |
$ | 5.43 | $ | 5.16 | $ | 6.10 | $ | 5.25 | $ | 5.27 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Operating netback |
$ | 58.03 | $ | 58.78 | $ | 52.24 | $ | 60.60 | $ | 59.94 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Indonesia(7) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Gross Revenue |
$ | 88.91 | $ | 90.33 | $ | 83.03 | $ | 101.07 | $ | 81.96 | ||||||||||
Royalties |
$ | 13.75 | $ | 14.31 | $ | 12.95 | $ | 15.32 | $ | 12.61 | ||||||||||
Production and Operating Costs |
$ | 8.39 | $ | 8.82 | $ | 6.22 | $ | 9.52 | $ | 9.19 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Operating netback |
$ | 66.77 | $ | 67.20 | $ | 63.86 | $ | 76.23 | $ | 60.16 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total |
||||||||||||||||||||
Gross Revenue(3) |
$ | 44.99 | $ | 45.72 | $ | 38.39 | $ | 50.22 | $ | 46.07 | ||||||||||
Royalties |
$ | 4.70 | $ | 4.56 | $ | 3.94 | $ | 4.86 | $ | 5.41 | ||||||||||
Production and Operating Costs(3) |
$ | 8.43 | $ | 8.62 | $ | 7.66 | $ | 8.91 | $ | 8.52 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Operating netback |
$ | 31.86 | $ | 32.54 | $ | 26.80 | $ | 36.45 | $ | 32.14 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | The operating netback includes results from upstream exploration and production and excludes results from upstream infrastructure and marketing. Operating netback is a non-GAAP measure. Refer to the Reader Advisories for further details. |
(2) | Includes associated co-products converted to boe and mcf. |
(3) | Transportation expenses have been deducted from both gross revenue and production and operating costs to reflect the actual price received at the oil and gas lease. |
(4) | Includes offshore transportation costs shown separately from price received. |
(5) | Includes sulphur sales revenues/royalties. |
(6) | Alberta Gas Cost Allowance reported exclusively as gas royalties. |
(7) | Revenues and expenses related to the Husky-CNOOC Madura Ltd. joint venture are accounted for under the equity method for consolidated financial statement purposes. |
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 22
Production History
Year Ended | Three Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||
Average Gross Daily Production |
Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2019 | Sept 30, 2019 | June 30, 2019 | Mar 31, 2019 | |||||||||||||||
Canada - Western Canada |
||||||||||||||||||||
Light and Medium Crude Oil (mbbls/day) |
8.5 | 8.9 | 9.4 | 7.4 | 8.9 | |||||||||||||||
Heavy Crude Oil (mbbls/day) |
30.2 | 32.6 | 31.6 | 28.9 | 27.6 | |||||||||||||||
Bitumen (mbbls/day) |
128.8 | 137.8 | 126.4 | 120.4 | 130.3 | |||||||||||||||
Conventional Natural Gas (mmcf/day) |
297.5 | 297.7 | 310.4 | 279.6 | 301.8 | |||||||||||||||
NGL (mbbls/day) |
12.7 | 12.6 | 13.0 | 10.7 | 14.4 | |||||||||||||||
Canada - Atlantic |
||||||||||||||||||||
Light and Medium Crude Oil (mbbls/day) |
16.4 | 24.4 | 21.1 | 12.2 | 7.6 | |||||||||||||||
China - Asia Pacific(1) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Conventional Natural Gas (mmcf/day) |
171.0 | 183.1 | 158.3 | 161.5 | 180.6 | |||||||||||||||
NGL (mbbls/day) |
7.4 | 8.3 | 6.6 | 7.1 | 7.7 | |||||||||||||||
Indonesia - Asia Pacific(2) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Conventional Natural Gas (mmcf/day) |
32.4 | 26.6 | 34.6 | 34.0 | 34.4 | |||||||||||||||
NGL (mbbls/day) |
2.5 | 2.1 | 2.8 | 2.5 | 2.6 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total Gross Production (mboe/day) |
290.0 | 311.3 | 294.8 | 268.4 | 285.2 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | Reported production volumes include Huskys working interest production from the Liwan Gas Project (49%). |
(2) | Reported production volumes include Huskys working interest production from the BD Project (40%). Revenues and expenses related to the Husky-CNOOC Madura Ltd. joint venture are accounted for under the equity method for consolidated financial statement purposes. |
Producing and Non-Producing Wells(1)(2)(3)
Oil Wells | Conventional Natural Gas Wells | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Producing Wells |
Gross | Net | Gross | Net | Gross | Net | ||||||||||||||||||
Canada |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alberta |
1,526 | 1,337 | 1,690 | 1,174 | 3,216 | 2,511 | ||||||||||||||||||
Saskatchewan |
2,209 | 2,138 | 82 | 81 | 2,291 | 2,219 | ||||||||||||||||||
British Columbia |
| | 121 | 121 | 121 | 121 | ||||||||||||||||||
Newfoundland |
22 | 6 | | | 22 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
3,757 | 3,481 | 1,893 | 1,376 | 5,650 | 4,857 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
International |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
China |
| | 10 | 5 | 10 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||
Indonesia |
| | 4 | 2 | 4 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
| | 14 | 7 | 14 | 7 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
As at December 31, 2019 |
3,757 | 3,481 | 1,907 | 1,383 | 5,664 | 4,864 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Oil Wells | Conventional Natural Gas Wells | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-Producing Wells |
Gross | Net | Gross | Net | Gross | Net | ||||||||||||||||||
Canada |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alberta |
1,516 | 1,385 | 841 | 632 | 2,357 | 2,017 | ||||||||||||||||||
Saskatchewan |
3,755 | 3,601 | 184 | 165 | 3,939 | 3,766 | ||||||||||||||||||
British Columbia |
| | 12 | 10 | 12 | 10 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
As at December 31, 2019 |
5,271 | 4,986 | 1,037 | 807 | 6,308 | 5,793 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | The number of gross wells is the total number of wells in which the Company owns a working interest. The number of net wells is the sum of the fractional interests owned in the gross wells. Productive wells are those producing or capable of producing at December 31, 2019. |
(2) | The above table does not include producing wells in which the Company has no working interest but does have a royalty interest. At December 31, 2019, the Company had a royalty interest in 832 wells, of which 452 were oil producers and 380 were gas producers. |
(3) | For purposes of the table, multiple completions are counted as a single well. Where one of the completions in a given well is an oil completion, the well is classified as an oil well. In 2019, there were 959 gross and 869 net oil wells and 75 gross and 63 net conventional natural gas wells that were completed in two or more formations and from which production is not commingled. |
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 23
Of the 34 mmboe of Proved Developed Non-Producing reserves as of year-end 2019, approximately 27 mmboe are associated with wells drilled in 2019 in the thermal bitumen projects and Sunrise Energy Project that will be placed on production in 2020. An additional 3 mmboe are associated with the Companys Wembley liquids-rich gas resource play. The remaining volumes are associated with optimization programs within existing fields scheduled over the next five years. Because the remaining capital is small relative to drilling and completion costs, the associated reserves are considered developed. There are no other non-producing wells attributed with material reserves.
Properties with No Attributed Reserves
Unproved Acreage (thousands of acres) |
Gross | Net | ||||||
Western Canada |
||||||||
Alberta |
2,976 | 2,552 | ||||||
Saskatchewan |
634 | 619 | ||||||
British Columbia |
180 | 152 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
3,790 | 3,323 | |||||||
Northwest Territories and Arctic |
471 | 458 | ||||||
Atlantic |
2,808 | 1,137 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
7,069 | 4,918 | |||||||
China |
317 | 306 | ||||||
Indonesia |
2,034 | 1,665 | ||||||
Taiwan |
1,904 | 1,428 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
As at December 31, 2019 |
11,324 | 8,138 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
Where Husky holds interests in different formations under the same surface area pursuant to separate leases, the acreage for each lease is included in the gross and net amounts.
As at December 31, 2019, over the next 12 months, development rights to approximately 226 thousand net acres, or less than 7%, of the Companys net unproved acreage in Western Canada will be subject to expiry.
As at December 31, 2019, over the next 12 months, development rights to 109 thousand net acres in Atlantic will be subject to expiry.
As at December 31, 2019 over the next 12 months, development rights to 15 thousand net acres in the Northwest Territories are subject to relinquishment.
As at December 31, 2019, over the next 12 months, development rights to the 1,428 thousand net acres in Taiwan are subject to expiry. The Company is analyzing the 3-D survey from 2017 to identify potential drilling prospects and is evaluating options to extend the expiry to beyond 2020 or proceed to the exploration phase.
As of December 31, 2019, over the next 12 months, the Indonesian Anugerah PSC of 1,420 thousand net acres will be fully relinquished.
The Company has commitments totaling approximately $268 million related to exploration to be completed in Atlantic between 2022 and 2023. Not fulfilling commitments in accordance with licensing timelines triggers forfeiture of security deposits of 25% of unfulfilled commitments.
Significant Factors or Uncertainties Relevant to Properties with No Attributed Reserves
The Company holds interests in a diverse portfolio of undeveloped petroleum assets in Western Canada, Atlantic, Asia Pacific, the Northwest Territories and the Arctic. As part of its active portfolio management, the Company continually reviews the economic viability of its undeveloped properties using industry-standard economic evaluation techniques and pricing and economic environment assumptions. Each year, as part of this active management process, some properties are selected for further development activities, while others are held in abeyance, sold, swapped or relinquished back to the mineral rights owner. There is no guarantee that commercial reserves will be discovered or developed on these properties.
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 24
Abandonment and Reclamation Costs
There are no significant abandonment or reclamation costs, no unusually high expected development costs or operating costs and no contractual obligations to produce and sell a significant portion of production at prices substantially below those which could be realized but for those contractual obligations that have affected, or that the Company reasonably expects to affect, anticipated development or production activities on properties with no attributed reserves. For further information on abandonment and reclamation costs in respect of the Companys properties, please refer to Note 17 of the Companys audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2019.
Drilling Activity - Number of Wells Drilled
Year Ended December 31, 2019 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Western Canada | Atlantic | China | Indonesia | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross | Net | Gross | Net | Gross | Net | Gross | Net | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exploration |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Oil |
1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.4 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gas |
| | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.4 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Development |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Oil |
120.0 | 117.0 | 2.0 | 1.5 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gas |
15.0 | 11.0 | | | 3.0 | 2.3 | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
135.0 | 128.0 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 3.0 | 2.3 | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
136.0 | 129.0 | 3.0 | 1.9 | 3.0 | 2.3 | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Stratigraphic Test Wells |
| | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Service Wells |
| | | | | | | |
Costs Incurred
($millions) |
Total | Western Canada |
Atlantic | Total Canada |
China | Indonesia(1) | ||||||||||||||||||
Property acquisition - Unproven |
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Property acquisition - Proven |
6 | 6 | | 6 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Exploration |
93 | 27 | 57 | 84 | 9 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Development |
2,764 | 1,362 | 1,059 | 2,421 | 342 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
2019 |
2,863 | 1,395 | 1,116 | 2,511 | 351 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | Capital expenditures related to the Husky-CNOOC Madura Ltd. joint venture are accounted for under the equity method for consolidated financial statement purposes. |
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 25
Oil and Gas Reserves Disclosure
Overview
Huskys oil and gas reserves are estimated in accordance with the standards contained in the Canadian Oil and Gas Evaluation Handbook (COGEH), and the reserves data disclosed conforms with the requirements of National Instrument 51-101 Standards of Disclosure for Oil and Gas Activities (NI 51-101). All of Huskys oil and gas reserves estimates are prepared by internal qualified reserves evaluation staff using a formalized process for determining, approving and booking reserves.
For the purposes of Huskys NI 51-101 reserves disclosure in this years AIF, Sproule Associates Limited. (Sproule), an independent firm of qualified reserves evaluators, was engaged to conduct a complete audit and review of 100% of Huskys oil and gas reserves estimates. Sproule issued an audit opinion stating that Huskys internally generated proved and probable reserves and net present values based on forecast and constant price assumptions are, in aggregate, reasonable, and have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted oil and gas engineering and evaluation practices as set out in the COGEH.
The Audit Committee of the Board has examined Huskys procedures for assembling and reporting reserves data and other information associated with oil and gas activities and has reviewed that information with management. The Board has approved, on the recommendation of the Audit Committee, the content of Huskys disclosure in this AIF of its reserves data and other oil and gas information.
Disclosure of Oil and Gas Information
Unless otherwise noted in this document, all provided reserves estimates have a preparation date of January 31, 2020 and an effective date of December 31, 2019 and are Huskys total proved and probable reserves. Gross reserves or gross production are reserves or production attributable to Huskys working interest prior to deduction of royalties; net reserves or net production are reserves or production net of such royalties. Gross or net production reported refers to sales volume, unless otherwise indicated. Unless otherwise noted, production and reserves figures are stated on a gross basis. Unless otherwise indicated, oil and gas commodity prices are quoted after the effects of hedging gains and losses. Unless otherwise indicated, all financial information is in accordance with IFRS. Note that the numbers in each column of the tables throughout this section may not add due to rounding.
The estimates of reserves and future net revenue for individual properties may not reflect the same confidence level as estimates of reserves and future net revenue for all properties, due to the effects of aggregation.
Bitumen reserves include reserves from Huskys thermal projects in the Lloydminster area. These projects also contain heavy oil that is lighter and less viscous than typical bitumen.
The reserves information prepared in accordance with the rules of the U.S. Financial Accounting Standards Board and the SEC (collectively, the U.S. Rules) is included in the Companys Form 40-F, which is available at www.sec.gov or on the Companys website at www.huskyenergy.com. The material differences between reserves quantities disclosed under NI 51-101 and those disclosed under the U.S. Rules is that NI 51-101 requires the determination of reserves quantities to be based on forecast pricing assumptions whereas the U.S. Rules require the determination of reserves quantities to be based on constant price assumptions calculated using a 12-month average price for the year (sum of the benchmark price on the first calendar day of each month in the year divided by 12).
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 26
Summary of Oil and Conventional Natural Gas Reserves
As at December 31, 2019
Forecast Prices and Costs
Canada
Light & Medium Crude Oil (mmbbls) |
Heavy Crude Oil (mmbbls) |
Bitumen (mmbbls) |
Total Oil (mmbbls) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross | Net | Gross | Net | Gross | Net | Gross | Net | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proved |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed Producing |
36.4 | 31.6 | 44.7 | 43.1 | 141.1 | 127.3 | 222.1 | 202.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed Non-producing |
0.4 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 27.3 | 25.3 | 28.4 | 26.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
66.4 | 62.3 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 775.0 | 689.1 | 842.7 | 752.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total Proved |
103.2 | 94.2 | 46.6 | 44.9 | 943.3 | 841.7 | 1,093.2 | 980.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Probable |
91.8 | 77.0 | 19.0 | 18.3 | 422.3 | 337.0 | 533.1 | 432.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total Proved Plus Probable |
195.0 | 171.3 | 65.7 | 63.2 | 1,365.6 | 1,178.7 | 1,626.3 | 1,413.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conventional Natural Gas (bcf) |
Natural Gas Liquids (mmbbls) |
Total (mmboe) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross | Net | Gross | Net | Gross | Net | |||||||||||||||||||
Proved |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed Producing |
686.3 | 606.8 | 37.3 | 28.4 | 373.8 | 331.4 | ||||||||||||||||||
Developed Non-producing |
22.7 | 20.7 | 2.0 | 1.7 | 34.2 | 31.5 | ||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
106.1 | 99.2 | 17.3 | 14.9 | 877.7 | 784.1 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total Proved |
815.0 | 726.7 | 56.6 | 45.0 | 1,285.7 | 1,147.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Probable |
339.4 | 313.3 | 43.7 | 35.9 | 633.4 | 520.4 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total Proved Plus Probable |
1,154.4 | 1,039.9 | 100.3 | 80.9 | 1,919.1 | 1,667.4 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
China
Light & Medium Crude Oil (mmbbls) |
Heavy Crude Oil (mmbbls) |
Bitumen (mmbbls) |
Total Oil (mmbbls) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross | Net | Gross | Net | Gross | Net | Gross | Net | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proved |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed Producing |
| | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed Non-producing |
| | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
| | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total Proved |
| | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Probable |
| | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total Proved Plus Probable |
| | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conventional Natural Gas (bcf) |
Natural Gas Liquids (mmbbls) |
Total (mmboe) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross | Net | Gross | Net | Gross | Net | |||||||||||||||||||
Proved |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed Producing |
335.3 | 317.0 | 11.2 | 10.6 | 67.1 | 63.4 | ||||||||||||||||||
Developed Non-producing |
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
160.5 | 157.0 | 5.8 | 5.7 | 32.6 | 31.9 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total Proved |
495.8 | 474.0 | 17.0 | 16.3 | 99.7 | 95.3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Probable |
119.5 | 113.0 | 4.5 | 4.2 | 24.4 | 23.1 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total Proved Plus Probable |
615.2 | 587.1 | 21.5 | 20.6 | 124.0 | 118.4 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 27
Indonesia
Light & Medium Crude Oil (mmbbls) |
Heavy Crude Oil (mmbbls) |
Bitumen (mmbbls) |
Total Oil (mmbbls) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross | Net | Gross | Net | Gross | Net | Gross | Net | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proved |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed Producing |
| | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed Non-producing |
| | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
| | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total Proved |
| | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Probable |
| | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total Proved Plus Probable |
| | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conventional Natural Gas (bcf) |
Natural Gas Liquids (mmbbls) |
Total (mmboe) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross | Net | Gross | Net | Gross | Net | |||||||||||||||||||
Proved |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed Producing |
140.6 | 103.4 | 5.1 | 3.9 | 28.6 | 21.1 | ||||||||||||||||||
Developed Non-producing |
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
101.0 | 67.4 | | | 16.8 | 11.2 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total Proved |
241.6 | 170.8 | 5.1 | 3.9 | 45.4 | 32.3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Probable |
91.5 | 54.6 | 1.6 | 0.7 | 16.9 | 9.8 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total Proved Plus Probable |
333.1 | 225.3 | 6.8 | 4.6 | 62.3 | 42.1 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Light & Medium Crude Oil (mmbbls) |
Heavy Crude Oil (mmbbls) |
Bitumen (mmbbls) |
Total Oil (mmbbls) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross | Net | Gross | Net | Gross | Net | Gross | Net | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proved |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed Producing |
36.4 | 31.6 | 44.7 | 43.1 | 141.1 | 127.3 | 222.1 | 202.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed Non-producing |
0.4 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 27.3 | 25.3 | 28.4 | 26.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
66.4 | 62.3 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 775.0 | 689.1 | 842.7 | 752.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total Proved |
103.2 | 94.2 | 46.6 | 44.9 | 943.3 | 841.7 | 1,093.2 | 980.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Probable |
91.8 | 77.0 | 19.0 | 18.3 | 422.3 | 337.0 | 533.1 | 432.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total Proved Plus Probable |
195.0 | 171.3 | 65.7 | 63.2 | 1,365.6 | 1,178.7 | 1,626.3 | 1,413.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conventional Natural Gas (bcf) |
Natural Gas Liquids (mmbbls) |
Total (mmboe) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross | Net | Gross | Net | Gross | Net | |||||||||||||||||||
Proved |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed Producing |
1,162.1 | 1,027.2 | 53.6 | 42.8 | 469.4 | 416.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Developed Non-producing |
22.7 | 20.7 | 2.0 | 1.7 | 34.2 | 31.5 | ||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
367.6 | 323.6 | 23.1 | 20.6 | 927.1 | 827.2 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total Proved |
1,552.4 | 1,371.5 | 78.8 | 65.2 | 1,430.7 | 1,274.7 | ||||||||||||||||||
Probable |
550.4 | 480.9 | 49.8 | 40.9 | 674.7 | 553.3 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total Proved Plus Probable |
2,102.8 | 1,852.4 | 128.6 | 106.0 | 2,105.4 | 1,827.9 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 28
Future Net Revenue Tables
Summary of Net Present Values of Future Net RevenueBefore Income Taxes and Discounted
As at December 31, 2019
Forecast Prices and Costs
Canada
Before Income Taxes and Discounted at (%/year) | Unit Value Discounted at 10% |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
($ millions) |
0% | 5% | 10% | 15% | 20% | ($/boe) | ||||||||||||||||||
Proved |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed Producing |
(410.8 | ) | 3,056.0 | 3,433.1 | 3,359.1 | 3,198.1 | 10.36 | |||||||||||||||||
Developed Non-producing(1) |
(250.7 | ) | 94.3 | 177.7 | 196.7 | 194.8 | 5.64 | |||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
18,276.3 | 8,278.9 | 4,340.5 | 2,271.5 | 1,021.6 | 5.54 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total Proved |
17,614.7 | 11,429.1 | 7,951.2 | 5,827.3 | 4,414.5 | 6.93 | ||||||||||||||||||
Probable |
21,349.9 | 11,903.2 | 7,785.5 | 5,526.7 | 4,138.2 | 14.96 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total Proved Plus Probable |
38,964.7 | 23,332.3 | 15,736.7 | 11,354.0 | 8,552.7 | 9.44 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | In the Heavy Oil properties there are approximately 9,000 oil and gas wells with no reserves assigned that carry surface land, maintenance and property taxes that also form part of each non-producing propertys (that has reserves) operating costs. Accordingly, these costs have been included in the reserves reports in the Proved Developed Non-producing category. |
China
Before Income Taxes and Discounted at (%/year) | Unit Value Discounted at 10% |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
($ millions) |
0% | 5% | 10% | 15% | 20% | ($/boe) | ||||||||||||||||||
Proved |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed Producing |
4,069.5 | 3,514.9 | 3,095.5 | 2,770.0 | 2,511.5 | 48.81 | ||||||||||||||||||
Developed Non-producing |
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
1,259.6 | 861.1 | 593.5 | 407.0 | 272.5 | 18.60 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total Proved |
5,329.0 | 4,376.0 | 3,689.0 | 3,177.0 | 2,783.9 | 38.70 | ||||||||||||||||||
Probable |
1,372.0 | 909.0 | 645.7 | 485.3 | 381.3 | 27.99 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total Proved Plus Probable |
6,701.0 | 5,285.0 | 4,334.8 | 3,662.3 | 3,165.2 | 36.61 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indonesia
Before Income Taxes and Discounted at (%/year) | Unit Value Discounted at 10% |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
($ millions) |
0% | 5% | 10% | 15% | 20% | ($/boe) | ||||||||||||||||||
Proved |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed Producing |
610.2 | 508.6 | 434.4 | 378.7 | 335.7 | 20.59 | ||||||||||||||||||
Developed Non-producing |
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
339.4 | 270.3 | 217.2 | 175.8 | 143.1 | 19.35 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total Proved |
949.6 | 778.9 | 651.6 | 554.5 | 478.7 | 20.16 | ||||||||||||||||||
Probable |
291.4 | 190.3 | 127.5 | 87.1 | 60.1 | 12.99 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total Proved Plus Probable |
1,241.0 | 969.2 | 779.2 | 641.6 | 538.9 | 18.49 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Before Income Taxes and Discounted at (%/year) | Unit Value Discounted at 10% |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
($ millions) |
0% | 5% | 10% | 15% | 20% | ($/boe) | ||||||||||||||||||
Proved |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed Producing |
4,268.8 | 7,079.5 | 6,963.0 | 6,507.8 | 6,045.3 | 16.74 | ||||||||||||||||||
Developed Non-producing(1) |
(250.7 | ) | 94.3 | 177.7 | 196.7 | 194.8 | 5.64 | |||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
19,875.3 | 9,410.3 | 5,151.2 | 2,854.3 | 1,437.1 | 6.23 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total Proved |
23,893.4 | 16,584.1 | 12,291.9 | 9,558.7 | 7,677.2 | 9.64 | ||||||||||||||||||
Probable |
23,013.3 | 13,002.5 | 8,558.7 | 6,099.1 | 4,579.6 | 15.47 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total Proved Plus Probable |
46,906.7 | 29,586.5 | 20,850.6 | 15,657.9 | 12,256.9 | 11.41 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | In the Heavy Oil properties there are approximately 9,000 oil and gas wells with no reserves assigned that carry surface land, maintenance and property taxes that are part of each non-producing propertys (that has reserves) operating costs. Accordingly, these costs have been included in the reserves reports in the Proved Developed Non-producing category. |
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 29
Summary of Net Present Values of Future Net RevenueAfter Income Taxes and Discounted
As at December 31, 2019
Forecast Prices and Costs
Canada
After Income Taxes and Discounted at (%/year) | ||||||||||||||||||||
($ millions) |
0% | 5% | 10% | 15% | 20% | |||||||||||||||
Proved |
||||||||||||||||||||
Developed Producing |
(370.9 | ) | 2,264.0 | 2,543.7 | 2,485.7 | 2,364.5 | ||||||||||||||
Developed Non-producing(1) |
(197.0 | ) | 60.5 | 121.2 | 134.0 | 131.6 | ||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
13,686.9 | 5,929.6 | 2,913.4 | 1,343.9 | 404.2 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total Proved |
13,118.9 | 8,254.1 | 5,578.3 | 3,963.7 | 2,900.4 | |||||||||||||||
Probable |
15,847.2 | 8,706.2 | 5,639.2 | 3,973.5 | 2,957.6 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total Proved Plus Probable |
28,966.2 | 16,960.2 | 11,217.5 | 7,937.3 | 5,858.0 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | In the Heavy Oil properties there are approximately 9,000 oil and gas wells with no reserves assigned that carry surface land, maintenance and property taxes that are part of each non-producing propertys (that has reserves) operating costs. Accordingly, these costs have been included in the reserves reports in the Proved Developed Non-producing category. |
China
After Income Taxes and Discounted at (%/year) | ||||||||||||||||||||
($ millions) |
0% | 5% | 10% | 15% | 20% | |||||||||||||||
Proved |
||||||||||||||||||||
Developed Producing |
3,049.9 | 2,634.5 | 2,320.6 | 2,077.2 | 1,883.9 | |||||||||||||||
Developed Non-producing |
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
942.3 | 627.7 | 415.3 | 266.5 | 158.7 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total Proved |
3,992.1 | 3,262.2 | 2,735.9 | 2,343.7 | 2,042.7 | |||||||||||||||
Probable |
1,028.8 | 681.6 | 484.3 | 364.1 | 286.2 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total Proved Plus Probable |
5,020.9 | 3,943.8 | 3,220.2 | 2,707.8 | 2,328.9 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indonesia
After Income Taxes and Discounted at (%/year) | ||||||||||||||||||||
($ millions) |
0% | 5% | 10% | 15% | 20% | |||||||||||||||
Proved |
||||||||||||||||||||
Developed Producing |
467.8 | 399.7 | 348.8 | 309.7 | 279.0 | |||||||||||||||
Developed Non-producing |
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
235.5 | 188.4 | 151.7 | 122.5 | 99.2 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total Proved |
703.3 | 588.1 | 500.4 | 432.2 | 378.2 | |||||||||||||||
Probable |
153.4 | 102.2 | 69.2 | 47.0 | 31.7 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total Proved Plus Probable |
856.7 | 690.3 | 569.6 | 479.3 | 409.9 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
After Income Taxes and Discounted at (%/year) | ||||||||||||||||||||
($ millions) |
0% | 5% | 10% | 15% | 20% | |||||||||||||||
Proved |
||||||||||||||||||||
Developed Producing |
3,146.8 | 5,298.1 | 5,213.1 | 4,872.6 | 4,527.5 | |||||||||||||||
Developed Non-producing(1) |
(197.0 | ) | 60.5 | 121.2 | 134.0 | 131.6 | ||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
14,864.6 | 6,745.8 | 3,480.4 | 1,733.0 | 662.1 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total Proved |
17,814.4 | 12,104.4 | 8,814.7 | 6,739.6 | 5,321.2 | |||||||||||||||
Probable |
17,029.4 | 9,490.0 | 6,192.7 | 4,384.7 | 3,275.5 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total Proved Plus Probable |
34,843.8 | 21,594.4 | 15,007.3 | 11,124.3 | 8,596.7 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | In the Heavy Oil properties there are approximately 9,000 oil and gas wells with no reserves assigned that carry surface land, maintenance and property taxes that are part of each non-producing propertys (that has reserves) operating costs. Accordingly, these costs have been included in the reserves reports in the Proved Developed Non-producing category. |
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 30
Total Future Net Revenue for Total Proved Plus Probable ReservesUndiscounted
As at December 31, 2019
Forecast Prices and Costs
($ millions) |
Revenue | Royalties | Operating Costs |
Develop- ment Costs |
Abandon- ment and Reclama- tion Costs |
Future Net Revenue Before Income Taxes |
Income Taxes |
Future Net Revenue After Income Taxes |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Canada |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Proved |
77,491.1 | 9,445.9 | 29,621.8 | 13,851.6 | 6,957.0 | 17,614.7 | 4,495.8 | 13,118.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Proved Plus Probable |
120,422.7 | 17,946.9 | 38,437.7 | 17,905.4 | 7,168.1 | 38,964.7 | 9,998.5 | 28,966.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
China |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Proved |
7,489.4 | 410.8 | 1,185.2 | 390.9 | 173.4 | 5,329.0 | 1,336.9 | 3,992.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Proved Plus Probable |
9,222.4 | 505.2 | 1,449.1 | 390.9 | 176.3 | 6,701.0 | 1,680.1 | 5,020.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Indonesia |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Proved |
2,898.4 | 812.7 | 1,050.4 | 52.3 | 33.4 | 949.6 | 246.3 | 703.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Proved Plus Probable |
3,975.2 | 1,284.4 | 1,314.3 | 92.6 | 42.9 | 1,241.0 | 384.3 | 856.7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Proved |
87,878.9 | 10,669.5 | 31,857.4 | 14,294.8 | 7,163.8 | 23,893.4 | 6,079.0 | 17,814.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Proved Plus Probable |
133,620.3 | 19,736.5 | 41,201.0 | 18,388.8 | 7,387.2 | 46,906.7 | 12,063.0 | 34,843.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future Net Revenue by Product Type
As at December 31, 2019
Forecast Prices and Costs
Future Net Revenue Before Income Taxes (discounted at 10%/year)(1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Canada | China | Indonesia | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
($ millions) | ($/boe) | ($ millions) | ($/boe) | ($ millions) | ($/boe) | ($ millions) | ($/boe) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Proved |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Light & Medium Crude Oil |
73.5 | 0.47 | | | | | 73.5 | 0.47 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Heavy Crude Oil |
376.8 | 8.12 | | | | | 376.8 | 8.12 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bitumen |
7,345.7 | 8.73 | | | | | 7,345.7 | 8.73 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Oil |
7,795.9 | 7.47 | | | | | 7,795.9 | 7.47 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conventional Natural Gas |
155.3 | 1.49 | 3,689.0 | 38.70 | 651.6 | 20.16 | 4,496.0 | 19.40 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total Proved |
7,951.2 | 6.93 | 3,689.0 | 38.70 | 651.6 | 20.16 | 12,291.9 | 9.64 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Proved Plus Probable |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Light & Medium Crude Oil |
2,308.4 | 9.64 | | | | | 2,308.4 | 9.64 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Heavy Crude Oil |
682.8 | 10.46 | | | | | 682.8 | 10.46 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bitumen |
12,074.7 | 10.24 | | | | | 12,074.7 | 10.24 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Oil |
15,065.9 | 10.16 | | | | | 15,065.9 | 10.16 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conventional Natural Gas |
670.8 | 3.65 | 4,334.8 | 36.61 | 779.2 | 18.49 | 5,784.7 | 16.80 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total Proved Plus Probable |
15,736.7 | 9.44 | 4,334.8 | 36.61 | 779.2 | 18.49 | 20,850.6 | 11.41 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | By-products, including solution gas, NGL and other associated by-products, are included in their main product group (conventional natural gas or oil). |
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 31
Pricing Assumptions
Except as noted below, the pricing assumptions disclosed in the following table were derived using the industry averages prescribed by McDaniel and Associates Consultants Ltd., Sproule and GLJ Petroleum Consultants Ltd. China and Indonesia gas prices are derived from the GSAs specific to each set of projects. For historical prices realized during 2019, see Statement of Reserves Data and Other Oil and Gas Information Disclosure of Oil and Gas Activities Operating Netback Analysis.
Light Crude Oil | Medium Crude Oil | Heavy Crude Oil | ||||||||||||||||||
WTI (U.S. $/bbl) |
Brent (U.S. $/bbl) |
Edmonton (Cdn $/bbl) |
Hardisty Bow River (Cdn $/bbl) |
Lloyd Heavy API (Cdn $/bbl) |
||||||||||||||||
Historical |
||||||||||||||||||||
2019 |
57.03 | 64.30 | 69.22 | 59.44 | 54.21 | |||||||||||||||
Forecast |
||||||||||||||||||||
2020 |
61.00 | 66.33 | 72.64 | 58.43 | 51.23 | |||||||||||||||
2021 |
63.75 | 67.94 | 76.06 | 63.00 | 56.11 | |||||||||||||||
2022 |
66.18 | 70.06 | 78.35 | 64.99 | 57.72 | |||||||||||||||
2023 |
67.91 | 71.66 | 80.71 | 66.91 | 59.45 | |||||||||||||||
2024 |
69.48 | 73.27 | 82.64 | 68.65 | 61.09 | |||||||||||||||
2025 |
71.07 | 74.57 | 84.60 | 70.41 | 62.75 | |||||||||||||||
2026 |
72.68 | 76.22 | 86.57 | 72.20 | 64.43 | |||||||||||||||
2027 |
74.24 | 77.83 | 88.49 | 73.91 | 66.04 | |||||||||||||||
2028 |
75.73 | 79.36 | 90.31 | 75.53 | 67.55 | |||||||||||||||
2029 |
77.24 | 80.92 | 92.17 | 77.18 | 69.08 | |||||||||||||||
Thereafter |
2.00%/yr | 2.00%/yr | 2.00%/yr | 2.00%/yr | 2.00%/yr | |||||||||||||||
Bitumen | Conventional Natural Gas | Natural Gas Liquids | ||||||||||||||||||
Hardisty WCS (Cdn $/bbl) |
AECO (Cdn $/GJ) |
Edmonton Propane (Cdn $/bbl) |
Edmonton Butane (Cdn $/bbl) |
Edmonton Condensate (Cdn $/bbl) |
||||||||||||||||
Historical |
||||||||||||||||||||
2019 |
58.72 | 1.54 | 17.22 | 23.78 | 70.11 | |||||||||||||||
Forecast |
||||||||||||||||||||
2020 |
57.57 | 1.93 | 26.36 | 42.10 | 76.83 | |||||||||||||||
2021 |
62.35 | 2.20 | 29.80 | 47.03 | 79.82 | |||||||||||||||
2022 |
64.33 | 2.48 | 32.94 | 50.66 | 82.30 | |||||||||||||||
2023 |
66.23 | 2.57 | 34.00 | 52.21 | 84.72 | |||||||||||||||
2024 |
67.97 | 2.66 | 34.88 | 53.48 | 86.71 | |||||||||||||||
2025 |
69.72 | 2.74 | 35.78 | 54.77 | 88.73 | |||||||||||||||
2026 |
71.49 | 2.80 | 36.69 | 56.07 | 90.77 | |||||||||||||||
2027 |
73.20 | 2.87 | 37.57 | 57.32 | 92.76 | |||||||||||||||
2028 |
74.80 | 2.93 | 38.41 | 58.50 | 94.65 | |||||||||||||||
2029 |
76.43 | 3.00 | 39.26 | 59.71 | 96.57 | |||||||||||||||
Thereafter |
2.00%/yr | 2.00%/yr | 2.00%/yr | 2.00%/yr | 2.00%/yr |
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 32
Asia Pacific | ||||||||||||||||
China | Indonesia | |||||||||||||||
Conventional Natural Gas (U.S. $/mcf)(1) |
Conventional Natural Gas (U.S. $/mcf)(1) |
Inflation rates(2) | Exchange rates(3) | |||||||||||||
Historical |
||||||||||||||||
2019 |
10.71 | 7.46 | 1.53 | 0.75 | ||||||||||||
Forecast |
||||||||||||||||
2020 |
10.98 | 7.53 | | 0.76 | ||||||||||||
2021 |
10.51 | 7.18 | 1.67 | 0.77 | ||||||||||||
2022 |
9.44 | 7.08 | 2.00 | 0.79 | ||||||||||||
2023 |
9.26 | 7.20 | 2.00 | 0.79 | ||||||||||||
2024 |
9.30 | 7.35 | 2.00 | 0.79 | ||||||||||||
2025 |
9.36 | 7.51 | 2.00 | 0.79 | ||||||||||||
2026 |
9.49 | 7.64 | 2.00 | 0.79 | ||||||||||||
2027 |
9.59 | 7.81 | 2.00 | 0.79 | ||||||||||||
2028 |
9.49 | 7.98 | 2.00 | 0.79 | ||||||||||||
2029 |
9.46 | 8.07 | 2.00 | 0.79 | ||||||||||||
Thereafter |
2.00 | 0.79 |
(1) | Conventional natural gas prices in China and Indonesia have been updated from the prior year values due to changes in exchange rates and are the volume weighted average based on the various GSAs. |
(2) | Inflation rates represent a percentage for forecasting costs. |
(3) | Exchange rates used to generate the benchmark reference prices are quoted in U.S. dollar to Canadian dollar. |
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 33
Reconciliation of Gross Proved Reserves
Light & Medium Crude Oil (mmbbls) |
Heavy Crude Oil (mmbbls) |
Bitumen (mmbbls) |
Total Oil (mmbbls) |
Conventional Natural Gas (bcf) |
Natural Gas Liquids (mmbbls) |
Total (mmboe) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Canada - Western Canada |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End of 2018 |
18.2 | 53.7 | 889.7 | 961.6 | 1,288.1 | 46.3 | 1,222.6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Technical Revisions |
(0.5 | ) | (0.2 | ) | (12.1 | ) | (12.7 | ) | (496.7 | ) | (6.0 | ) | (101.5 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Economic Factors |
(0.1 | ) | (1.1 | ) | (0.3 | ) | (1.6 | ) | (14.8 | ) | (0.6 | ) | (4.6 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Acquisitions |
| | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Dispositions |
| | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Discoveries |
0.1 | | | 0.1 | 0.1 | | 0.1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Extensions & Improved Recovery |
3.3 | 5.8 | 113.0 | 122.2 | 146.7 | 21.5 | 168.1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Production |
(2.6 | ) | (11.6 | ) | (47.0 | ) | (61.2 | ) | (108.5 | ) | (4.6 | ) | (83.9 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
End of 2019 |
18.3 | 46.6 | 943.3 | 1,008.3 | 815.0 | 56.6 | 1,200.7 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Canada - Atlantic |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End of 2018 |
93.3 | | 93.3 | | | 93.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Technical Revisions |
(2.6 | ) | | | (2.6 | ) | | | (2.6 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Economic Factors |
(0.1 | ) | | | (0.1 | ) | | | (0.1 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Acquisitions |
| | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Dispositions |
| | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Discoveries |
| | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Extensions & Improved Recovery |
0.2 | | | 0.2 | | | 0.2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Production |
(6.0 | ) | | | (6.0 | ) | | | (6.0 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
End of 2019 |
84.9 | | | 84.9 | | | 84.9 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
China |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End of 2018 |
| | | | 529.6 | 18.3 | 106.6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Technical Revisions |
| | | | 1.7 | 0.5 | 0.7 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Economic Factors |
| | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Acquisitions |
| | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Dispositions |
| | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Discoveries |
| | | | 26.8 | 1.0 | 5.5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Extensions & Improved Recovery |
| | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Production |
| | | | (62.4 | ) | (2.7 | ) | (13.1 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
End of 2019 |
| | | | 495.8 | 17.0 | 99.7 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Indonesia |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End of 2018 |
| | | | 253.7 | 6.1 | 48.3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Technical Revisions |
| | | | (0.3 | ) | | (0.1 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Economic Factors |
| | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Acquisitions |
| | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Dispositions |
| | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Discoveries |
| | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Extensions & Improved Recovery |
| | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Production |
| | | | (11.8 | ) | (0.9 | ) | (2.9 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
End of 2019 |
| | | | 241.6 | 5.1 | 45.4 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 34
Light & Medium Crude Oil (mmbbls) |
Heavy Crude Oil (mmbbls) |
Bitumen (mmbbls) |
Total Oil (mmbbls) |
Conventional Natural Gas (bcf) |
Natural Gas Liquids (mmbbls) |
Total (mmboe) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End of 2018 |
111.5 | 53.7 | 889.7 | 1,054.9 | 2,071.4 | 70.7 | 1,470.8 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Technical Revisions |
(3.1 | ) | (0.2 | ) | (12.1 | ) | (15.3 | ) | (495.3 | ) | (5.6 | ) | (103.4 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Economic Factors |
(0.2 | ) | (1.1 | ) | (0.3 | ) | (1.7 | ) | (14.8 | ) | (0.6 | ) | (4.7 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Acquisitions |
| | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Dispositions |
| | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Discoveries |
0.1 | | | 0.1 | 26.9 | 1.0 | 5.5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Extensions & Improved Recovery |
3.5 | 5.8 | 113.0 | 122.4 | 146.7 | 21.5 | 168.3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Production |
(8.6 | ) | (11.6 | ) | (47.0 | ) | (67.2 | ) | (182.7 | ) | (8.2 | ) | (105.8 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
End of 2019 |
103.2 | 46.6 | 943.3 | 1,093.2 | 1,552.4 | 78.8 | 1,430.7 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2019, the Companys proved oil and gas reserves were 1,431 mmboe, down from 1,471 mmboe at the end of 2018. The Companys 2019 reserves replacement ratio, defined as net additions of proved reserves divided by total production during the period, was 67% excluding economic revisions (62% including economic revisions).
Major changes to proved reserves in 2019 included:
| Western Canada Extensions & Improved Recovery additions of 168 mmboe which included 40 mmbbls from one new and 35 mmbbls from three existing Lloydminster bitumen SAGD projects (16 mmbbls transferred from probable reserves), 20 mmbbls at the Tucker Thermal Project (transferred from probable reserves), 15 mmbbls at the Sunrise Oil Sands project and 38 mmboe from Wembley (including 111 bcf of conventional natural gas and 19 mmbbls of NGL) and 5 mmboe from Wapiti new locations. |
| Discoveries included 27 bcf of conventional natural gas and 1 mmbbls of NGL for Liuhua 29-1 transferred from probable reserves as Technical Revisions. |
| Western Canada Technical Revisions are associated with the updated long-term strategic plan where less liquid rich gas plays are no longer funded. This resulted in a reduction of proved undeveloped reserves of 443 bcf (90% of the Technical Revisions) of conventional natural gas and 5 mmbbls of NGL. |
| Economic Factors of 5 mmboe are mainly associated with lower gas prices in Western Canada. |
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 35
Reconciliation of Gross Probable Reserves
Light & Medium Crude Oil (mmbbls) |
Heavy Crude Oil (mmbbls) |
Bitumen (mmbbls) |
Total Oil (mmbbls) |
Conventional Natural Gas (bcf) |
Natural Gas Liquids (mmbbls) |
Total (mmboe) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Canada - Western Canada |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End of 2018 |
5.4 | 21.9 | 831.8 | 859.1 | 462.9 | 10.7 | 946.9 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Technical Revisions |
(1.5 | ) | (7.9 | ) | (430.1 | ) | (439.5 | ) | (358.7 | ) | (5.2 | ) | (504.4 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Economic Factors |
| (0.2 | ) | (0.3 | ) | (0.4 | ) | 0.9 | | (0.2 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Acquisitions |
| | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Dispositions |
| | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Discoveries |
| | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Extensions & Improved Recovery |
3.7 | 5.1 | 20.9 | 29.8 | 234.2 | 38.2 | 107.0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Production |
| | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
End of 2019 |
7.7 | 19.0 | 422.3 | 449.0 | 339.4 | 43.7 | 549.3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Canada - Atlantic |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End of 2018 |
83.8 | | | 83.8 | | | 83.8 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Technical Revisions |
0.2 | | | 0.2 | | | 0.2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Economic Factors |
0.1 | | | 0.1 | | | 0.1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Acquisitions |
| | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Dispositions |
| | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Discoveries |
| | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Extensions & Improved Recovery |
0.1 | | | 0.1 | | | 0.1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Production |
| | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
End of 2019 |
84.1 | | | 84.1 | | | 84.1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
China |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End of 2018 |
| | | | 109.0 | 4.1 | 22.2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Technical Revisions |
| | | | 10.4 | 0.4 | 2.1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Economic Factors |
| | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Acquisitions |
| | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Dispositions |
| | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Discoveries |
| | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Extensions & Improved Recovery |
| | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Production |
| | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
End of 2019 |
| | | | 119.5 | 4.5 | 24.4 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Indonesia |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End of 2018 |
| | | | 91.5 | 1.7 | 16.9 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Technical Revisions |
| | | | 0.1 | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Economic Factors |
| | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Acquisitions |
| | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Dispositions |
| | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Discoveries |
| | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Extensions & Improved Recovery |
| | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Production |
| | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
End of 2019 |
| | | | 91.5 | 1.6 | 16.9 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 36
Light & Medium Crude Oil (mmbbls) |
Heavy Crude Oil (mmbbls) |
Bitumen (mmbbls) |
Total Oil (mmbbls) |
Conventional Natural Gas (bcf) |
Natural Gas Liquids (mmbbls) |
Total (mmboe) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End of 2018 |
89.2 | 21.9 | 831.8 | 942.9 | 663.4 | 16.4 | 1,069.9 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Technical Revisions |
(1.3 | ) | (7.9 | ) | (430.1 | ) | (439.3 | ) | (348.2 | ) | (4.8 | ) | (502.1 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Economic Factors |
0.1 | (0.2 | ) | (0.3 | ) | (0.4 | ) | 0.9 | | (0.2 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Acquisitions |
| | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Dispositions |
| | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Discoveries |
| | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Extensions & Improved Recovery |
3.8 | 5.1 | 20.9 | 29.9 | 234.2 | 38.2 | 107.1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Production |
| | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
End of 2019 |
91.8 | 19.0 | 422.3 | 533.1 | 550.4 | 49.8 | 674.7 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Major changes to probable reserves in 2019 included:
| Western Canada Extensions & Improved Recovery include the additions at Wembley of 207 bcf of conventional natural gas and 36 mmbbls of NGL. |
| China Technical Revisions include 17 bcf from an increase in the original gas in place and the GSA for Liuhua 34-2. At Liuhua 29-1, 27 bcf were transferred from probable to proved reserves. This transfer was offset by a technical increase of 20 bcf due to updated mapping. |
| Sunrise Energy Project bitumen locations include negative Technical Revisions of 285 mmbbls for the expansions, and associated locations, that are no longer funded in the next five years of the updated strategic plan. Sunrise probable reserves were also negatively impacted by an update of the geological interpretation impacting the probable recovery of 91 mmbbls. |
| As indicated in the proved reserves reconciliation, 37 mmbbls of probable bitumen reserves were transferred to proved reserves. |
| Western Canada less liquids-rich gas projects were also impacted by the updated strategic plan resulting in a reduction of 312 bcf of conventional natural gas and 3 mmbbls of NGL probable reserves. |
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 37
Reconciliation of Gross Proved Plus Probable Reserves
Light & Medium Crude Oil (mmbbls) |
Heavy Crude Oil (mmbbls) |
Bitumen (mmbbls) |
Total Oil (mmbbls) |
Conventional Natural Gas (bcf) |
Natural Gas Liquids (mmbbls) |
Total (mmboe) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Canada - Western Canada |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End of 2018 |
23.5 | 75.6 | 1,721.5 | 1,820.7 | 1,751.0 | 57.0 | 2,169.6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Technical Revisions |
(2.0 | ) | (8.0 | ) | (442.2 | ) | (452.2 | ) | (855.3 | ) | (11.2 | ) | (606.0 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Economic Factors |
(0.1 | ) | (1.3 | ) | (0.7 | ) | (2.0 | ) | (13.9 | ) | (0.5 | ) | (4.9 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Acquisitions |
| | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Dispositions |
| | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Discoveries |
0.1 | | | 0.1 | 0.1 | | 0.1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Extensions & Improved Recovery |
7.0 | 11.0 | 133.9 | 151.9 | 381.0 | 59.7 | 275.1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Production |
(2.6 | ) | (11.6 | ) | (47.0 | ) | (61.2 | ) | (108.5 | ) | (4.6 | ) | (83.9 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
End of 2019 |
26.0 | 65.7 | 1,365.6 | 1,457.3 | 1,154.4 | 100.3 | 1,750.0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Canada - Atlantic |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End of 2018 |
177.1 | | | 177.1 | | | 177.1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Technical Revisions |
(2.4 | ) | | | (2.4 | ) | | | (2.4 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Economic Factors |
| | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Acquisitions |
| | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Dispositions |
| | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Discoveries |
| | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Extensions & Improved Recovery |
0.3 | | | 0.3 | | | 0.3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Production |
(6.0 | ) | | | (6.0 | ) | | | (6.0 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
End of 2019 |
169.1 | | | 169.1 | | | 169.1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
China |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End of 2018 |
| | | | 638.7 | 22.4 | 128.8 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Technical Revisions |
| | | | 12.1 | 0.9 | 2.9 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Economic Factors |
| | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Acquisitions |
| | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Dispositions |
| | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Discoveries |
| | | | 26.8 | 1.0 | 5.5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Extensions & Improved Recovery |
| | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Production |
| | | | (62.4 | ) | (2.7 | ) | (13.1 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
End of 2019 |
| | | | 615.2 | 21.5 | 124.0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Indonesia |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End of 2018 |
| | | | 345.1 | 7.7 | 65.3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Technical Revisions |
| | | | (0.2 | ) | | (0.1 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Economic Factors |
| | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Acquisitions |
| | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Dispositions |
| | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Discoveries |
| | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Extensions & Improved Recovery |
| | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Production |
| | | | (11.8 | ) | (0.9 | ) | (2.9 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
End of 2019 |
| | | | 333.1 | 6.8 | 62.3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 38
Light & Medium Crude Oil (mmbbls) |
Heavy Crude Oil (mmbbls) |
Bitumen (mmbbls) |
Total Oil (mmbbls) |
Conventional Natural Gas (bcf) |
Natural Gas Liquids (mmbbls) |
Total (mmboe) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End of 2018 |
200.6 | 75.6 | 1,721.5 | 1,997.8 | 2,734.8 | 87.1 | 2,540.7 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Technical Revisions |
(4.4 | ) | (8.0 | ) | (442.2 | ) | (454.6 | ) | (843.4 | ) | (10.4 | ) | (605.5 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Economic Factors |
(0.1 | ) | (1.3 | ) | (0.7 | ) | (2.0 | ) | (13.9 | ) | (0.5 | ) | (4.9 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Acquisitions |
| | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Dispositions |
| | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Discoveries |
0.1 | | | 0.1 | 27.0 | 1.0 | 5.6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Extensions & Improved Recovery |
7.3 | 11.0 | 133.9 | 152.2 | 381.0 | 59.7 | 275.4 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Production |
(8.6 | ) | (11.6 | ) | (47.0 | ) | (67.2 | ) | (182.7 | ) | (8.2 | ) | (105.8 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
End of 2019 |
195.0 | 65.7 | 1,365.6 | 1,626.3 | 2,102.8 | 128.6 | 2,105.4 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Undeveloped Reserves
Undeveloped reserves are attributed internally in accordance with standards and procedures contained in the COGEH. Proved undeveloped oil and gas reserves are those reserves that can be estimated with a high degree of certainty to be recovered from new wells on undrilled acreage, or from existing wells where a relatively major expenditure is required for recompletion. Probable undeveloped oil and gas reserves are those reserves that are less certain to be recovered than proved reserves and are expected to be recovered from known accumulations where a significant expenditure is required to render them capable of production. There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities of crude oil and conventional natural gas reserves. Classifications of reserves as proved or probable are only attempts to define the degree of uncertainty associated with the estimates. In addition, whereas proved reserves are those reserves that can be estimated with a high degree of certainty to be economically producible, probable reserves are those reserves that are as likely as not to be recovered. Therefore, probable reserves estimates, by definition, have a higher degree of uncertainty than proved reserves.
Approximately 46% of Huskys gross proved undeveloped reserves are assigned to the Sunrise Energy Project. Production from Phase I of the project started in March 2015, and wells will be drilled in the future to keep the plant at full capacity. Approximately 36% of Huskys gross proved undeveloped reserves are assigned to 15 heavy oil thermal projects in the Lloydminster area that are classified as bitumen. Approximately 7% of Huskys gross proved undeveloped reserves are assigned to the West White Rose Project fields, 5% are assigned to the China and Indonesia projects, and 3% are assigned to the liquids-rich Wembley area.
Husky funds capital programs by cash generated from operating activities, cash on hand, equity issuances and short-term and long-term debt. Decisions on the priority and timing of developing the various proved undeveloped and probable undeveloped reserves , including decisions to defer development of proved undeveloped reserves beyond two years, are based on various factors including strategic considerations, changing economic conditions, changes to government regulations including the setting of production limits, technical performance, development plan optimization, facility capacity, pipeline constraints, and the size of the development program. The development opportunities are pursued at a pace dependent on capital availability and its allocation in accordance with Huskys business plans.
As at December 31, 2019, there were no material proved undeveloped reserves that have remained undeveloped for greater than five years, except as follows. The Sunrise Energy Project proved undeveloped bitumen reserves are scheduled to be developed and produced over the next 50 years to fully utilize the steam plant and processing capacity over the life of the current facilities. Similarly, the probable undeveloped bitumen reserves are scheduled to be developed and produced over the next 50 years which includes capital spending on facility debottlenecks, expansions and additions within the next five years. The four existing Lloydminster thermal bitumen projects are scheduled to start up from 2020 through 2022. One new Lloydminster thermal bitumen project received regulatory approval and is scheduled to be brought online in 2023. The Lloydminster thermal and Tucker bitumen proved and probable undeveloped locations are scheduled to be developed over the next one to 20 years to utilize each projects steam and processing capacities. The West White Rose Project is scheduled to have the first proved undeveloped reserves placed on production in 2022. The remaining proved and probable undeveloped locations are scheduled to be placed on production by 2028. Proved undeveloped reserves for Liuhua 29-1 are scheduled to be brought on production in 2020. Proved undeveloped reserves in Madura are scheduled to be brought on production in 2021. Wembleys proved and probable undeveloped locations are scheduled to be developed over the next five and seven years, respectively, in accordance with the Companys business plan for that project. The reasons these proved undeveloped reserves will be undeveloped for greater than five years are set out in the previous paragraph.
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 39
Proved Undeveloped Reserves
Light & Medium Crude Oil (mmbbls) |
Heavy Crude Oil (mmbbls) |
Bitumen (mmbbls) |
Total Oil (mmbbls) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
First Attributed |
Total at year-end |
First Attributed |
Total at year-end |
First Attributed |
Total at year-end |
First Attributed |
Total at year-end |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
2017 |
61.8 | 60.8 | | | 136.9 | 585.0 | 198.7 | 645.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2018 |
8.4 | 69.8 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 177.3 | 747.9 | 186.6 | 818.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2019 |
2.8 | 66.4 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 109.9 | 775.0 | 113.9 | 842.7 |
Conventional Natural Gas (bcf) |
Natural Gas Liquids (mmbbls) |
Total (mmboe) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
First Attributed |
Total at year-end |
First Attributed |
Total at year-end |
First Attributed |
Total at year-end |
|||||||||||||||||||
2017 |
71.9 | 451.6 | 1.0 | 3.6 | 211.7 | 724.8 | ||||||||||||||||||
2018 |
310.4 | 739.1 | 9.2 | 12.4 | 247.6 | 954.2 | ||||||||||||||||||
2019 |
133.1 | 367.6 | 18.3 | 23.1 | 154.5 | 927.1 |
Probable Undeveloped Reserves
Light & Medium Crude Oil (mmbbls) |
Heavy Crude Oil (mmbbls) |
Bitumen (mmbbls) |
Total Oil (mmbbls) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
First Attributed |
Total at year-end |
First Attributed |
Total at year-end |
First Attributed |
Total at year-end |
First Attributed |
Total at year-end |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
2017 |
0.3 | 80.8 | | | 42.3 | 810.9 | 42.7 | 891.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2018 |
0.7 | 71.2 | 1.9 | 2.2 | 265.6 | 778.4 | 268.2 | 851.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2019 |
3.4 | 65.4 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 20.9 | 368.9 | 28.4 | 438.4 |
Conventional Natural Gas (bcf) |
Natural Gas Liquids (mmbbls) |
Total (mmboe) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
First Attributed |
Total at year-end |
First Attributed |
Total at year-end |
First Attributed |
Total at year-end |
|||||||||||||||||||
2017 |
302.7 | 558.8 | 7.1 | 9.0 | 100.2 | 993.9 | ||||||||||||||||||
2018 |
139.0 | 472.2 | 4.9 | 7.8 | 296.2 | 938.3 | ||||||||||||||||||
2019 |
224.9 | 348.8 | 37.0 | 39.7 | 102.9 | 536.3 |
Significant Factors or Uncertainties Affecting Reserves Data
Huskys reserves can be affected significantly by material fluctuations in product pricing, development plans and capital expenditures, operating costs, regulatory changes that impact costs and/or royalties and production performance. Actual product prices may vary significantly from the forecast price assumptions used by the Company to estimate its reserves, altering the allocation and level of capital expenditures, and accelerating or delaying project schedules. As new information is obtained, the above factors that affect costs, royalties and production performance are reviewed and updated accordingly, which may result in positive or negative revisions to reserves. For additional information on risk factors please see Risk Factors Reserves Data and Future Net Revenue Estimates.
There are no significant abandonment or reclamation costs, no unusually high expected development costs or operating costs and no contractual obligations to produce and sell a significant portion of production at prices substantially below those which could be realized but for those contractual obligations that have affected, or that the Company reasonably expects to affect, anticipated development or production activities on properties with reserves. For further information on abandonment and reclamation costs in respect of the Companys properties, please refer to Note 17 of the Companys audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2019.
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 40
Future Development Costs
The Company expects to fund its future development costs by cash generated from operating activities, cash on hand and short and long-term debt. In addition, the Company has access to additional funding through credit facilities and the issuance of equity and debt through shelf prospectuses, subject to market conditions. The cost associated with this funding would not affect reserves and would not be material in comparison with future net revenues.
The following table includes estimates of the forecasted costs of developing the Companys proved and proved plus probable reserves as at December 31, 2019:
Canada | China | Indonesia | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year |
Proved Reserves ($ millions) |
Proved Plus Probable Reserves ($ millions) |
Proved Reserves ($ millions) |
Proved Plus Probable Reserves ($ millions) |
Proved Reserves ($ millions) |
Proved Plus Probable Reserves ($ millions) |
Proved Reserves ($ millions) |
Proved Plus Probable Reserves ($ millions) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
2020 |
2,097.2 | 2,171.3 | 390.9 | 390.9 | 42.1 | 60.4 | 2,530.2 | 2,622.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2021 |
1,460.6 | 1,516.4 | | | 10.2 | 32.2 | 1,470.8 | 1,548.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2022 |
1,342.4 | 1,505.7 | | | | | 1,342.4 | 1,505.7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2023 |
613.5 | 824.8 | | | | | 613.5 | 824.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2024 |
767.2 | 985.1 | | | | | 767.2 | 985.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Remaining |
7,570.7 | 10,902.2 | | | | | 7,570.7 | 10,902.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total |
13,851.6 | 17,905.4 | 390.9 | 390.9 | 52.3 | 92.6 | 14,294.8 | 18,388.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production Estimates
Yearly Production Estimates for 2020
Light & Medium Crude Oil (mbbls/day) |
Heavy Crude Oil (mbbls/day) |
Bitumen (mbbls/day) |
Total Oil (mbbls/day) |
Conventional Natural Gas (mmcf/day) |
Natural Gas Liquids (mbbls/day) |
Total (mboe/day) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Canada |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Gross Proved |
21.3 | 27.6 | 132.7 | 181.7 | 257.8 | 13.2 | 237.8 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total Gross Probable |
3.7 | 2.2 | 10.6 | 16.6 | 27.8 | 1.9 | 23.1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total Gross Proved Plus Probable |
25.0 | 29.9 | 143.4 | 198.2 | 285.6 | 15.1 | 260.9 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
China |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Gross Proved |
| 187.6 | 7.4 | 38.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Gross Probable |
| 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total Gross Proved Plus Probable |
| | | | 187.9 | 7.6 | 38.9 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Indonesia |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Gross Proved |
| 38.3 | 2.2 | 8.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Gross Probable |
| | 0.1 | 0.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total Gross Proved Plus Probable |
| | | | 38.3 | 2.3 | 8.6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Gross Proved |
21.3 | 27.6 | 132.7 | 181.7 | 483.6 | 22.7 | 285.0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total Gross Probable |
3.7 | 2.2 | 10.6 | 16.6 | 28.2 | 2.2 | 23.5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total Gross Proved Plus Probable |
25.0 | 29.9 | 143.4 | 198.2 | 511.8 | 24.9 | 308.4 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No individual property accounts for 20% or more of the estimated production disclosed.
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 41
The operations of the oil and gas industry are governed by a number of laws and regulations mandated by multiple levels of government and regulatory authorities in Canada, the U.S. and other foreign jurisdictions. These laws and regulations, along with global economic conditions, have shaped the developing trends of the industry. The following discussion summarizes the trends, legislation and regulations that Husky believes have the most significant impact on the short and long-term operations of the oil and gas industry.
Crude Oil and Natural Gas Production
Global crude oil inventories remained high in 2019, with the U.S. becoming a net oil exporter and the worlds largest oil producer. The U.S. Energy Information Administration estimated that U.S. crude oil production averaged 12.2 mmbbls/day in 2019 and will average 13.3 mmbbls/day in 2020 and 13.17 mmbbls/day in 2021, with the majority of the forecasted production growth in the Permian region of Texas and New Mexico.
On December 6, 2019, the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) and several non-OPEC members announced further production reductions of 0.5 mmbbls/day, from the previous 1.2 mmbbls/day in 2018, through to March 2020.
In Canada, the Alberta government set province-wide mandatory oil production cuts in an attempt to rebalance the market. This curtailment became effective January 1, 2019. During 2019, the production limit increased from 3.56 mmbbls/day, at January 2019, to 3.81 mmbbls/day at December 2019. The program has been extended to December 31, 2020.
U.S. dry natural gas production set a new record in 2019, averaging 92.0 bcf/day. The U.S. Energy Information Administration forecasts dry natural gas production will rise to 94.7 bcf/day in 2020 and then decline to 94.1 bcf/day in 2021. (1)
(1) | Short-Term Energy Outlook, January 2020, U.S. Energy Information Administration |
Commodity Pricing
Crude oil and natural gas producers negotiate purchase and sale contracts directly with respective buyers and these contracts are typically based on the prevailing market price of the commodity. The market price for crude oil is determined largely by global factors, and the contract price considers oil quality, transportation and other terms of the agreement. The price for natural gas in Canada is determined primarily by North America fundamentals because virtually all natural gas production in North America is consumed by North American customers, predominantly in the U.S. Commodity prices are based on supply and demand which may fluctuate due to market uncertainty and other factors beyond the control of entities operating in the industry.
Global crude oil benchmarks remained weakened in 2019 primarily due to a continued oversupply as the U.S became a net oil exporter and the worlds largest oil producer. Conversely, the WCS benchmark strengthened in 2019 as the Government of Alberta set province-wide mandatory production quotas to restrict oil supplies entering the market, and consequently the differential between the WCS benchmark and other North American benchmarks tightened in 2019 compared to 2018. The price of West Texas Intermediate (WTI) averaged US$57.03/bbl in 2019 compared to US$64.77/bbl in 2018. The price of Brent averaged US$64.30/bbl in 2019 compared to US$70.97/bbl in 2018. The price of WCS averaged US$44.28/bbl in 2019 compared to US$38.46/bbl in 2018.
Market Access(1)
The existing pipeline network servicing Western Canada is operating at capacity and producers are relying more on rail to move incremental volumes. Pipelines are the preferred mode of transporting large volumes of crude oil for long distances over land, given the inherent economies of scale associated with pipelines.
In Canada, the Alberta government set province-wide mandatory oil production cuts effective January 1, 2019 in an attempt to rebalance the market. This reduced the economic motivation to export crude by rail or develop longer term market access strategies.
Currently, there is insufficient pipeline capacity originating in Western Canada to transport crude oil out of the supply basin to meet the needs of producers. Both the Enbridge Mainline pipeline system and Trans Mountain pipeline continue to operate under apportionment, whereby the pipeline companies must reduce shippers nominated volumes to derive an aggregate amount which can be transported by the pipeline in accordance with its available capacity.
(1) | Crude Oil Forecast, Markets and Transportation, June 2019, Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers. |
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 42
Royalties, Incentives and Income Taxes
The amount of royalties payable on production from privately-owned lands is negotiated between the mineral freehold owner and the lessee, and this production may also be subject to certain provincial taxes and royalties. Royalty rates for production from Crown lands are determined by provincial governments. When setting royalty rates, commodity prices, levels of production and operating and capital costs are considered. Royalties payable are generally calculated as a percentage of the value of gross production and generally depend on prescribed reference prices, well productivity, geographical location, field discovery date, method of recovery, depth of well and the type or quality of the petroleum product produced. Other royalties and royalty-like interests are, from time to time, carved out of the owners working interest through non-public transactions. These are often referred to as overriding royalties, gross overriding royalties, net profits interests or net carried interests.
Land Tenure Regulation
In Canada, rights to natural resources are largely owned by the provincial and federal governments. Rights are granted to explore for and produce oil and natural gas subject to shared jurisdiction agreements, ELs, Significant Discovery Licences and production licences, leases, permits and provincial legislation which may include contingencies such as obligations to perform work or make payments.
For international jurisdictions, rights to natural resources are largely owned by national governments that grant rights in forms such as ELs and permits, production licences and PSCs. Companies in the oil and gas industry are subject to ongoing compliance with the regulatory requirements established by the relevant country for the right to explore, develop and produce petroleum and natural gas in that particular jurisdiction.
Environmental Regulations
General
Oil and natural gas operations are subject to environmental regulations pursuant to a variety of federal, provincial, state and local laws and regulations, as well as international conventions (collectively, environmental regulations).
Environmental regulations, policies and legal agreements regulate and impose restrictions, liabilities and obligations on how industry is required to handle, store, transport, treat and dispose of emissions, water/waste water, hazardous substances and wastes. Controls and limits on spills, releases and emissions to the environment, including emissions of greenhouse gases (GHG) are required to be diligently managed. Environmental regulations also require that wells and facilities be constructed, operated, maintained, abandoned and reclaimed in compliance with pertinent regulatory requirements. In addition, certain types of operations, including exploration and development projects and significant changes to certain existing projects, may require the submission and approval of environmental impact assessments.
Some examples of potential new or enhanced environmental regulations, and impacts of possible changes, include:
| conventional air pollutant and GHG emissions regulations and mandatory reductions. |
| calculation and regulation of carbon intensity of fuels, including transportation fuels. |
| fuel reformulation and substitution to support reduced GHG emissions. |
| managing air pollutant emissions at equipment and facility levels with the general goal of ensuring compliance with increasingly more stringent ambient air quality standards and air pollutant regulations. |
| potential for restrictive operating policies on development in areas of value to species at risk. |
| increased restrictions on freshwater licensing. |
| increased restrictions on activities in fish-bearing water courses. |
| enhanced groundwater and surface water monitoring. |
| enhanced water discharge criteria. |
| increased restrictions on waste water disposal. |
| enhanced water recycle criteria. |
| enhanced water crossing monitoring and reporting requirements. |
| enhanced requirements for environmental assessment, including the potential for more projects to require assessments, longer review times and additional information requirements. |
| water management for hydraulic fracturing. |
| wetland compensation. |
| induced seismicity. |
| feedstock and product transportation by rail, pipeline and roadway. |
| pipeline integrity management. |
| remediation regulation. |
| reclamation criteria. |
| constraints mapping, footprint reduction and land use. |
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 43
| measurement requirements for oil and gas operations. |
| investigations of operational upsets that result in emissions. |
Water
Numerous regulations are imposed on the oil and gas industrys operations with the general goal of ensuring surface water and fresh groundwater resources are protected. Guidelines cover the following:
| oil and gas well, pipeline and facility offsets from fresh surface water courses and domestic water wells. |
| drilling fluids, well construction materials and methods to isolate fresh groundwater aquifers from resource exploration, extraction and disposal activities. |
| downhole offsets for completions operations, ensuring isolation from fresh groundwater aquifers, with specific risk mitigation expectations for hydraulic fracturing. |
| monitoring of fresh groundwater aquifers and wetlands at major operating facilities. |
| monitoring of assets that cross fish bearing streams ensuring passage is unrestricted. |
| water discharge criteria for onshore and offshore facilities. |
| fluid transport, handling and storage. |
| process water recycling targets. |
Water withdrawals are regulated in Huskys operating jurisdictions with the goal of minimizing impacts to freshwater resources. Oil and gas companies have reporting requirements relating to most licensed freshwater withdrawals. Policies dictate water source selection and management. Water withdrawals are further governed by local watershed and/or industry water management plans.
Bill C-69
In Canada, Bill C-69, an Act to enact the Impact Assessment Act and the Canadian Energy Regulator Act, to amend the Navigation Protection Act and to make consequential amendments to other Acts, was passed by Parliament on June 21, 2019. The Impact Assessment Act, the Canadian Energy Regulator Act, the Canadian Navigable Waters Act, and associated regulations came into force on August 28, 2019. Of note, the Impact Assessment Act creates the new Impact Assessment Agency of Canada, repeals the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, 2012, and provides a new approach to the federal assessment of major projects in Canada. The Canadian Energy Regulator Act replaces the National Energy Board with the Canada Energy Regulator (CER) and defines its composition, mandate and powers. The role of the CER is to regulate the exploitation, development and transportation of energy within Parliaments jurisdiction.
The Canadian Navigable Waters Act increases protections of navigable waters, expanding the regulation of major works and obstructions, and setting requirements for minor works on all navigable waters.
Bill C-68 was also passed in parliament on June 21, 2019 and outlined amendments to the Fisheries Act which came into effect on August 28, 2019. The fish and fish habitat protection provisions under this Act strengthen some protections for aquatic species and protect the interests of people who depend on them, particularly Indigenous communities.
Transport Canada
Effective May 6, 2020, new Transport Canada regulations, entitled Transportation of Dangerous Goods by Rail Security Regulations, will require TDG by Rail specific security plans and training to be established. The new security regulations will affect sites which load prior to or unload following rail transportation, or offer for transportation of dangerous goods in quantities outlined in the regulations.
Migratory Birds and Species at Risk
Canadas oil and gas industry may affect migratory birds and bird habitat as well as habitat impacting sensitive species through land disturbance activities and operating practices (e.g., sludge ponds, vegetation clearing). Industry activities risk contravening the Migratory Bird Convention Act (Canada) (MBCA) or the Species at Risk Act (Canada) (SARA) and supporting legislation that prohibits the disturbance and destruction of migratory birds, their eggs and/or their nests and mandates the protection and management of sensitive species habitat. There are maximum fines of up to $6 million, with all subsequent fines doubling, for corporations that are convicted under the MBCA. For corporations, current penalties under SARA include fines of $1 million, with potential to double based on subsequent contraventions. U.S. operations are subject to similar requirements pursuant to the Migratory Bird Treat Act (USA).
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 44
Air and Climate Change
General
Societal attitudes toward climate change have evolved significantly in recent years. Public opposition to companies in the oil sands industry, and in oil and gas generally, has increased. Technology related to climate change is improving and expectations regarding climate change action are growing, resulting in increased stakeholder and consumer pressure to reduce carbon emissions and transition to a low or net zero carbon future. Third parties have initiated litigation related to climate change against certain oil and gas companies and governments around the world. Some oil and gas companies have begun setting net zero carbon emissions targets in response to one or more of these pressures.
The current regulatory environment related to air emissions and climate policy is also dynamic. The impacts of emerging policy are becoming clearer as various jurisdictions finalize and implement new regulations.
Husky operates in many jurisdictions that regulate or have proposed to regulate air pollutants including GHG emissions. Air regulations include:
| absolute and intensity-based emissions limits or targets. |
| market based frameworks. |
| equipment and/or facility level emissions performance standards and reporting. |
| other regulatory measures including low carbon fuel and renewable fuel standards. |
Risks associated with climate change trends and regulations are discussed under Risk Factors.
International Climate Change Agreements
Canada, Indonesia and China are all signatories to the Paris Agreement drafted at the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Conference of the Parties held in Paris, France in December 2015.
Canada has submitted a Nationally Determined Contribution to reduce GHG emissions by 30% below 2005 levels by 2030. Indonesia has pledged a 29% reduction below a business as usual baseline by 2030. China has pledged for total emissions to peak in 2030, but with reductions in emissions per unit GDP by 60-65% from 2005 levels.
There is a commitment to review and increase pledges every five years under the Paris Agreement.
In November 2018, China and Canada signed a memorandum of understanding on climate change cooperation.
On November 4, 2019, the U.S. issued formal notification of withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, to take effect on November 4, 2020.
Canadian Federal Regulations
The Government of Canada has begun addressing emissions from specific sectors of the economy, including working closely with the U.S. government on North American vehicle emissions standards. Canada has adopted renewable fuels regulations, requiring fuel producers and importers to have an average of at least 5% of their gasoline supply come from renewable sources (such as ethanol) and to have an average of at least 2% of their diesel supply come from renewable sources (such as biodiesel).
In 2012, the Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment agreed to implement a new Air Quality Management System (AQMS) to protect human health and the environment through the continuous improvement of air quality in Canada. AQMS includes three main components: Canadian Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS); Base-Level Industrial Emissions Requirements (BLIERs); and the management of air quality through local air zones and regional airsheds.
CAAQS are the AQMS driver and set the bar for air quality management across the country. New standards for ozone and fine particulate matter for 2015 and 2020 were published in 2013. New CAAQS for sulphur dioxide for 2020 and 2025 were announced in 2016, and new CAAQS for nitrogen dioxide for 2020 and 2025 were published in 2017.
Under the BLIERs, three regulations and a guideline were developed within the AQMS. The first of the Multi-Sector Air Pollutants Regulations was published in June 2016. These regulations have included three BLIERs developed under AQMS for the cement sector, reciprocating spark-ignited natural gas engines and non-utility boilers and heaters in industrial sectors. An emissions guideline under the Environmental Protection Act (Canada) for stationary gas turbines was published in November 2017. Other sectors and air pollutants are expected to be added to the regulations in the future. For example, a Code of Practice for the Management of Air Emissions from Pulp and Paper Facilities was published in July 2018.
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 45
The BLIERs pertaining to nitrogen oxides (NOx) emissions from boilers and heaters and NOx emissions from reciprocating engines in industrial facilities are applicable to Huskys Canadian upstream and downstream oil and gas facilities. The Boiler & Heater BLIER and Reciprocating Engine BLIER have introduced performance, design and monitoring standards for both existing and new equipment units, whereas the Stationary Gas Turbine BLIER has only introduced performance and design standards for new equipment.
On October 23, 2018, the Government of Canada announced the federal carbon pricing system would be implemented in part or in whole in Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Ontario and New Brunswick in 2019 as an element of the Pan Canadian Framework on Clean Growth and Climate Change. The remaining provinces and territories either elected to adopt the federal carbon pricing system or presented provincial policies that were deemed equivalent by the federal government. The federal carbon policy has two key elements: a carbon levy applied to fossil fuels ($20 per tonne starting on April 1, 2019 and increasing by $10 annually to $50 per tonne in 2022); and an output-based pricing system for industrial facilities emitting GHG above 50,000 tonnes per year.
On December 20, 2018, the Government of Canada published the Regulatory Proposal for the Output-Based Pricing System (OBPS) Regulation under the Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act. The federal OBPS includes sectorial Output-Based Standards, provisions pertaining to GHG emissions quantification and reporting, as well as details on the administration process and content of verification reports. The federal OBPS would be applicable to faciliites such as Huskys Minnedosa Ethanol Plant effective January 1, 2019.
A federal Clean Fuel Standard (CFS) Discussion Paper was released in February 2017. The CFS will be developed to achieve 30 megatonnes of annual reductions in GHG emissions by 2030 through requiring reductions in fuel carbon intensities based on a life-cycle analysis and will go beyond transportation fuels to include fuels used in industry and buildings. In December 2017, the CFS regulatory framework was published, and in December 2018, the Government of Canada published the Regulatory Design Paper on the CFS. The CFS Regulatory Design Paper focuses on the liquid fuel stream regulations, and key design elements include a carbon intensity reduction of 10 g CO2/MJ (approximately 11%) by 2030 from a 2016 baseline. A Proposed Regulatory Approach was also released in June 2019 that builds on the previous papers issued by Environment Canada. For liquid fuels, including transportation fuels, draft regulations are expected to be published in early 2020 and final regulations in 2021 with coming into force in 2022.
The Government of Canada is committed to reducing methane emissions from the oil and gas sector by 40% to 45% below 2012 levels by 2025. Final methane reduction regulations for the upstream oil and gas industry were published on April 26, 2018. Emissions sources subject to these regulations include venting from wells and batteries (including associated gas at oil facilities), storage tanks, pneumatic devices, well completions, compressors and fugitive equipment leaks. Final regulations apply to new and existing sources, with the first requirements coming into force in 2020, and the remaining requirements by 2023.
Draft Regulations Respecting Reduction in the Release of Methane and Certain Volatile Organic Compounds (Upstream Oil and Gas Sector) pertaining to the downstream oil and gas industry were published by the Government of Canada in May 2017. The regulations will require the implementation of comprehensive Leak Detection and Repair (LDAR) programs at refineries, upgraders and certain petrochemical facilities. These facilities will also be required to monitor the levels of certain volatile organic compounds at facility perimeters. The final regulations come into force effective January 1, 2020 with the fenceline monitoring requirements expected to be implemented starting in 2020.
Canadian Provincial Greenhouse Gas Regulations
The 2019 provincial election in Alberta brought change to climate policies that were implemented as part of the 2015 Climate Leadership Plan. The newly elected United Conservative Party repealed the provincial fuel levy that was imposed by the previous government. In response to the repeal of the provincial levy, the federal government announced the implementation of the Federal Fuel Levy in Alberta effective January 1, 2020 for any fuels not regulated under the provincial large emitters regulation. Emissions from the combustion of produced fuel at upstream oil and gas facilities emitting less than 100,000 tonnes of CO2e per year were exempt from the Alberta provincial fuel use levy until January 1, 2023, to allow time for these facilities to reduce methane emissions under provincial and federal methane regulations. Under federal jurisdiction, the provincial levy exemption for upstream oil will no longer apply, leaving this sector fully exposed to the cost of the Federal Fuel Levy.
The Alberta Technology Innovation and Emissions Reduction Regulation (TIER), effective January 1, 2020, was proposed as a hybrid policy drawing from elements of previous regulations, Specified Gas Emitters Regulation (SGER) and Carbon Competitiveness Incentive Regulation (CCIR). It regulates facilities emitting over 100,000 tonnes CO2e/year with an opt-in program for smaller emitters and for conventional oil and gas aggregate facilities. TIER allows for the option of a facility specific performance baseline or a sector specific best performance standard as the basis for reduction. The conventional oil and gas aggregated facility opt-in to TIER provides significant emissions intensive, trade exposed (EITE) protection for the sector as participation in the large emitters regulation exempts the facilities from the Federal Fuel Levy. Albertas TIER regulation is expected to lessen the financial burden associated with carbon compliance by allowing companies to improve emissions based on historical facility performance rather than being subject to sector intensity benchmarks that are typically set by the largest, most mature operations. Alberta is expected to follow federal pricing of $30/tonne CO2e in 2020 escalating to $50/tonne CO2e by 2022.
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 46
The AER is working to develop and implement a regulatory framework that achieves the Government of Albertas methane emissions reduction outcome of 45% by 2025. Alberta has announced that it intends to reduce methane emissions from oil and gas operations using the following approaches:
| Applying new emissions design standards to new Alberta facilities. |
| Improving measurement and reporting of methane emissions, as well as leak detection and repair requirements. |
| Developing a joint initiative on methane reduction and verification for existing facilities and backstopping this with regulated standards that take effect in 2020, with the general goal of ensuring the 2025 target is met. |
| On December 13, 2018, the AER released final methane regulations which are effective January 1, 2020. |
In December 2017, the Government of Saskatchewan released Prairie Resilience: A Made-In-Saskatchewan Climate Change Strategy that includes the implementation of sector-specific output-based performance standards on facilities emitting more than 25,000 tonnes of CO2e per year. The Management and Reduction of Greenhouse Gases Amendment Act (MRGHG), and various GHG regulations under the Act impose a carbon price (starting at $20 per tonne in 2019 escalating by $10/year up to $50/tonne in 2022) on facilities that emit more than 25,000 tonnes of CO2e/year. Facilities such as the Upgrader, and Huskys ethanol plant and Saskatchewan thermal projects are subject to MRGHG. As part of the October 23, 2018 Government of Canadas announcement on climate policy equivalency, the Province of Saskatchewan has a carbon tax that applies to all fuel for all facilities under that threshold. Saskatchewan has published the Management and Reduction of Greenhouse Gases (Upstream and Gas Aggregate Facility) and is allowing opt-in of the conventional oil and gas assets to provide EITE protection for the sector, as participation in the large emitters regulation exempts the facilities from the Federal Fuel Levy.
The Government of Saskatchewan published the Oil and Gas Emissions Management Regulations on December 14, 2018, effective January 1, 2019, which apply to oil and gas operations with aggregated emissions exceeding 50,000 tonnes of CO2e per year. These regulations seek to reduce methane emissions from the oil and gas sector by setting target emissions intensities for various regions within the province. The regulations are intended to reduce provincial methane emissions intensity by 45% by 2025.
On October 3, 2018, Manitoba announced it was canceling its carbon tax. As part of the October 23, 2018 announcement by the federal government, the federal carbon policy applies in full in Manitoba including the application of an output-based standard to Huskys Minnedosa ethanol plant.
On July 3, 2018, Ontario canceled its cap and trade program. As part of the October 23, 2018 announcement by the federal government, the federal carbon policy applies in full in Ontario. On July 4, 2019, Ontario passed the Emissions Performance Standards Regulation. The Emissions Performance Standards program ensures large industrial polluters, those emitting over 50,000 tonnes CO2e annually, are accountable for their GHG emissions and will help Ontario achieve its share of Canadas 2030 emissions reduction target, without a carbon tax.
On June 7, 2016 the Management of Greenhouse Gas Act passed in the House of Assembly of NL, establishing the legislative basis for a provincial industrial large emitters program and reporting regulations. The Management of Greenhouse Gas Reporting Regulations came into force on March 7, 2017. The Government of Newfoundland and Labrador, in consultation with industry, has developed and proposed GHG regulations for the offshore petroleum production sector to be incorporated by amendment to the Management of Greenhouse Gas Act and the Atlantic Accord. On October 23, 2018 the Government of Canada deemed the NL large emitter and fuel levy programs to price carbon as equivalent to federal standards. Subsequently, Bill C-86 was entered into the House of Commons on October 29, 2018 to amend the Atlantic Accord to enable the C-NLOPB to manage the requirements of the provincial GHG reporting regulations in the offshore petroleum sector.
The NL performance-based regulation imposes carbon pricing (beginning at $20/tonne in 2019 and escalating to $50/tonne in 2022) on petroleum production facilities with GHG emissions exceeding 25,000 tonnes/year. Beginning January 1, 2019, a levy of 4.42 cents per litre on gasoline and 5.37 cents per litre on diesel (both equivalent to $20/tonne) will be applied as part of the carbon tax. This provincial Gasoline and Diesel Tax will be adjusted with a goal of protecting economic competitiveness related to taxation (including carbon tax) of fuel products. The provincial carbon tax rates will only increase to match equivalent increases in carbon taxation programs in neighboring Atlantic provinces. There are noted exemptions for exploration drilling and aviation fuels. However, the addition of this carbon tax to marine diesel will increase operating costs for Atlantic region operations.
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 47
U.S. Greenhouse Gas Regulations
The U.S. does not have federal legislation establishing targets for the reduction of, or limits on, GHG emissions. However, the federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has and may continue to promulgate regulations concerning the reporting and control of GHG emissions. Since 2010, the EPAs Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) requires any facility releasing more than 25,000 tonnes of CO2e emissions per year to report those emissions on an annual basis. In addition to reporting direct CO2e emissions, the GHGRP requires refineries to estimate the CO2e emissions from the potential subsequent combustion of the refinerys products.
In May 2010, the EPA finalized the Greenhouse Gas Tailoring Rule. This rule updated the Clean Air Act by phasing in permitting requirements for GHG emissions, including Best Available Control Technology (BACT) requirements for new and modified sources of air emissions emitting more than a threshold quantity of GHG. In June 2014, the U.S. Supreme Court invalidated portions of the Tailoring Rule but upheld the EPAs authority to require BACT for GHG emissions associated with sources that must obtain Prevention of Significant Deterioration permits based on their non-GHG emissions.
U.S. Renewable Fuel Standard
The U.S. created its Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) program with the stated intention of reducing GHG emissions and expanding the renewable fuels sector, while reducing U.S. reliance on imported oil. The RFS program was authorized under the Energy Policy Act of 2005 and expanded under the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007. The EPA implements the RFS program in consultation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture and Department of Energy.
The RFS program is a national policy that requires a certain volume of renewable fuel to replace or reduce the quantity of petroleum-based transportation fuel. Obligated parties under the RFS program are refiners or importers of gasoline or diesel fuel. Compliance is achieved by blending renewable fuels into transportation fuels or by obtaining credits, called Renewable Identification Numbers (RINs) to meet an EPA-specified Renewable Volume Obligation (RVO). The RFS program, through the EPA-specified RVOs, requires refiners to add annually increasing amounts of renewable fuels to their petroleum products or to purchase RINS in lieu of such blending.
The EPA calculates and establishes RVOs every year through rulemaking. The standards are converted into a percentage, and obligated parties must demonstrate compliance annually.
Abandonment Liability
The AER manages abandonment liability and the licence transfer process using the provisions of Directive 006: Licencee Liability Rating Program and Licence Transfer Process. Directive 006 is designed to prevent Alberta taxpayers from incurring costs to suspend, abandon, remediate and reclaim a well, facility or pipeline. Under the Licencee Liability Rating Program, each licencee is assigned a Liability Management Rating. The Liability Management Rating is the ratio of a licencees eligible deemed assets under the Licencee Liability Rating Program, the Large Facility Liability Management Program and the Oilfield Waste Liability Program to its deemed liabilities in these programs. The Liability Management Rating assessment is designed to assess a licencees ability to address its suspension, abandonment, remediation and reclamation liabilities. This assessment is conducted monthly and on receipt of a licence transfer application in which the licencee is the transferor or transferee.
If a licencees deemed liabilities exceed its deemed assets, the licencee is required to post a security deposit with the AER to make up the shortfall. If a licencee fails to post security, if required, then the AER may take a number of steps to enforce these provisions, which include non-compliance fees, partial or full suspension of operations, suspension and/or cancellation of a permit, licence or approval and prevention of the transfer of licences held by licencees that do not meet the new requirements.
As a result of the Redwater Energy Corp. (Redwater) bankruptcy court ruling released in May 2016, whereby the court found that receivers and trustees of AER licencees may selectively disclaim unprofitable assets (and their associated abandonment and reclamation obligations) under section 14.06 of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada), the AER and the Orphan Well Association developed regulatory measures to mitigate the liability impact of licencees abandonment, reclamation and remediation obligations falling back to the industry.
Consequently, as of June 2016 a condition of transferring existing AER licences, approvals and permits requires transferees to demonstrate that they have a liability management ratio (LMR) of 2.0 or higher immediately following the transfer. If the transfer of the licence does not improve the purchasers LMR to 2.0 (or higher), the purchaser can post a security deposit, address existing abandonment obligations or transfer some of its assets.
Similar to the AER, the Government of Saskatchewan has established an LMR rating of 1.0 as its threshold for providing a deposit. If a licencees LMR is less than 1.0, meaning the liability is greater than the deemed assets, that licencee will be required to submit a deposit to the Saskatchewan Ministry of Energy and Resources (MER) for the difference.
In response to the Redwater ruling, all licence transfer applications in Saskatchewan will be reviewed in detail, and the MER will consider relevant factors in calculating transfer deposit requirements. In addition to increased deposit requirements, the MER may incorporate additional conditions with licence transfer approvals which may impact the decision to proceed with certain transactions.
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 48
The Government of Saskatchewan intervened in the Alberta Court proceedings regarding Redwaters bankruptcy with the general goal of ensuring their views are fully considered by the courts. The Saskatchewan Ministry of Justice has indicated opposition to any attempt by a receiver in Saskatchewan to renounce uneconomic oil and gas assets which are subject to the LMR program in Saskatchewan. The Saskatchewan ministry has stated that licence transfer applications in Saskatchewan will be considered nonroutine as the Saskatchewan ministry will not be strictly relying on the standard LMR calculations in evaluating deposit requirements.
In January 2019, the Supreme Court of Canadas ruling in Redwater was released, wherein the court held that abandonment and reclamation obligations of a debtor are binding on a Trustee, are not creditor claims nor claims provable in bankruptcy, and do not conflict with the general priority scheme in the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada). The court ruled that the provincial regulatory regime can coexist with and apply alongside the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada). The governments of Alberta and Saskatchewan have not yet made changes to the abandonment and reclamation obligations of licencees. Similarly, the Government of Canada has not yet made changes to the federal insolvency regime to account for the character and needs of Canadas natural resource industries.
Hydraulic Fracturing
Hydraulic fracturing is a method of increasing well production by injecting fluid under high pressure down a well to crack the hydrocarbon bearing rock. In the case of water-based fractures, the fluid typically consists of water, sand, and a relatively small amount of chemicals. This mixture flows into the cracks where the sand remains to keep the cracks open and enable natural gas or liquids to be recovered. Fracturing is designed so that the fracturing fluids can be produced back to the surface through the wellbore and are stored for reuse or future disposal in accordance with provincial regulations. The wells are designed and installed to provide multiple barriers protecting fresh groundwater aquifers from the fracturing process.
The Government of Canada manages use of chemicals through its Chemical Management Plan and New Substances Program. Some provinces require the details of fracturing fluids to be submitted to regulators. In Alberta, the AER requires that all fracturing operations submit reports regarding the quantity of fluids and additives. For Alberta and British Columbia, the website www.FracFocus.ca provides the public with access to individual well summaries of the fluids and chemicals reported.
In response to concerns that hydraulic fracturing may induce seismic events, the AER has imposed requirements for seismic monitoring, mitigation response plans and reporting in select areas of the province.
Inter-wellbore communication during hydraulic fracturing operations is the transfer of pressure from the wellbore being stimulated to an adjacent offset well. This event is dependent on a number of factors such as distance between wells, type of fluid used and whether an energizer is being used during operations. AER Directive 83 and Industry Recommended Practice (IRP) 24 provide rules and guidelines addressing this concern.
Land Use
In 2012, the Government of Alberta approved the Lower Athabasca Regional Plan (LARP), which covers the lower Athabasca region and includes Huskys oil sands assets and major projects in the province. The LARP was developed to consider cumulative effects within the region using formal management frameworks for: Air Quality, Surface Water Quality and Quantity, Groundwater Management and Biodiversity.
The use of each framework establishes approaches with the general goal of ensuring trends are identified and assessed, regional limits are not exceeded, and air, water and biodiversity remain healthy for the regions residents and ecosystems during oil sands development. To date, the Biodiversity Framework under the LARP has not been finalized.
The South Saskatchewan Regional Plan was approved by the Government of Alberta in 2014, and was subsequently amended in 2017, and covers the southern portion of Alberta, including some Husky Western Canada assets. The plan details Albertas long-term commitment to conservation, protection of watersheds, sustaining biodiversity and sensitive habitats.
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 49
Environmental, Social and Governance Considerations
Environmental, Social and Governance Policies
Husky has a corporate Health, Safety and Environment Policy that affirms its commitment to operational integrity. Operational integrity at Husky means conducting all activities safely and reliably so that the public is protected, impact to the environment is minimized, the health and wellbeing of employees is safeguarded, contractors and customers are safe and physical assets (such as facilities and equipment) are protected from damage and loss. Husky management also monitors environmental, social and governance (ESG) risks and reports to the Board through managements Enterprise Risk Management Framework.
The Health, Safety and Environment Committee of the Board (the HS&E Committee) is responsible for oversight of the Health, Safety and Environment Policy, oversight of audit results and monitoring compliance with Huskys environmental policies, key performance indicators and regulatory requirements. The mandate of the HS&E Committee is available on the Husky website at www.huskyenergy.com.
To reinforce the Health, Safety and Environment Policy, in 2019, Husky held a summit for leaders, attended by members of the HS&E Committee and led by Huskys Chief Executive Officer. During the summit, CEO awards are presented for the initiatives that demonstrate the highest level of operational integrity. Guest and internal speakers present on pertinent issues and the latest developments in the fields of operational integrity and corporate responsibility.
Husky is committed to conducting business fairly and ethically, and in compliance with applicable laws, as well as upholding high standards of business integrity. Husky seeks to deter wrongdoing and promote transparent, honest and ethical behaviour in all its business dealings. Husky has a Code of Business Conduct that is compliant with the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) Rules of Conduct and Recommendations to Combat Extortion and Bribery, and sets out the standards employees, contractors, officers and directors are expected to meet. This policy includes sections on compliance with laws, avoidance of conflict of interest, proper record-keeping, political contributions, safeguarding company resources, fair competition, avoidance of bribery or other offerings of improper payments, guidelines on accepting payments and entertainment, and other matters. The Code of Business Conduct is available on the Husky website at www.huskyenergy.com.
Husky has established an anonymous and confidential online reporting tool and toll-free telephone numbers (the Ethics Help Line) for employees, contractors and other stakeholders to report perceived breaches of Huskys Code of Business Conduct. The Ethics Help Line is hosted by EthicsPoint, an independent service provider. Information from submissions is captured and submitted anonymously to an Ethics Help Line committee made up of legal, audit, security, health, safety and environment, and human resources personnel.
Husky has an Anti-Bribery & Anti-Corruption Policy to reinforce the Code of Business Conduct with additional guidance regarding applicable anti-bribery and anti-corruption laws. All officers and employees, including temporary and contract staff, are expected to observe the highest standards of honesty, integrity, diligence and fairness in all business activities, and undertake mandatory annual training.
Husky and its personnel conduct business in many nations around the world and are subject to various sanctions and anti-money laundering laws. Huskys Sanctions & Anti-Money Laundering Policy applies to Husky and all of its subsidiaries and to all officers and employees including temporary and contract staff.
Husky complies with competition laws, the purpose of which are to preserve and promote a competitive market. Huskys Competition Act Compliance Policy assists employees by providing relevant information about competition laws and guidelines to follow in order to ensure these laws are complied with and that any issues are handled appropriately.
Husky is an equal opportunity employer dedicated to an environment free of discrimination, harassment and violence and where respectful treatment is the norm. Huskys Diversity and Respectful Workplace Policy applies to all employees and contractors.
As a responsible member of the communities in which it operates, Husky has a Corporate Citizenship Program that supports local charitable organizations. The Community Investment Policy provides guidance with the general goal of ensuring that contributions under the Community Investment Program are supported by a consistent and rigorous decision-making process and reflect Huskys core corporate values and business strategy.
Husky has an External Scholarships and Educational Support Policy that encourages advanced education by providing financial assistance to qualified students pursuing studies at several post-secondary educational institutions, reinforcing Huskys commitment to support the communities where it operates. This policy includes Huskys Scholarships for Aboriginal Students which assists Aboriginal students in achieving greater career success by encouraging them to pursue an advanced education.
Husky values education and professional development and provides employees with opportunities to continue to develop and advance their skills, knowledge and experience. Huskys Learning and Development Policy sets out guidelines, eligibility and support for employees.
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 50
Husky believes in securing and protecting personnel, physical assets, property and information from criminal, hostile or malicious acts, consistent with its Security Policy. This policy aims to reduce exposure to security risks with the general goal of ensuring the consistent application of security measures within Husky.
Husky is also committed to the safety of all personnel, the public and the environment when handling and transporting dangerous substances classified as dangerous goods. Huskys Transportation of Dangerous Goods (TDG) policy ensures dangerous goods are transported in compliance with all TDG laws and Husky standards and procedures.
Husky is committed to ensuring health and safety at work. The ability of every employee and contractor to perform his or her particular job duties satisfactorily and safely is critical to Huskys continued success. Husky recognizes that the use of illicit drugs and other mood-altering substances, and the inappropriate use of alcohol and medications, can have serious adverse effects on job performance and ultimately on the safety and well-being of employees, contractors, customers, the public and the environment. In light of this, and the safety-sensitive nature of Huskys operations, the Alcohol and Drug Policy outlines the standards and expectations associated with alcohol and other drug use, consistent with Huskys overall safety culture. In October 2019, edible cannabis, cannabis extracts and cannabis topicals became legal in Canada and are now being sold under the Cannabis Act (Canada). As such, Husky has clarified its Alcohol and Drug Policy to include cannabis edibles, extracts and topicals, and to provide ongoing clarity that misuse of and presence at work while under the influence of legalized cannabis in all its forms is prohibited.
The aforementioned policies are available to employees and contractors on the Huskys intranet. Communication of the policies is provided through direct e-mail and articles published on the Huskys intranet. Mandatory training is provided as relevant to the policy and the individuals role via various mechanisms including in-class, web-based and self-serve courses.
Husky Operational Integrity Management System
Husky seeks to manage operational risks by designing and building its facilities and conducting its operations in a safe and reliable manner. The Husky Operational Integrity Management System (HOIMS) is a set of interrelated policies, aims, requirements and processes that provides a systematic way for Husky to identify, assess and control safety, operational integrity and environmental hazards and associated risks. Additionally, HOIMS establishes standards and procedures integral to safe operations and protecting the environment. Enterprise risk management, emergency preparedness, business continuity and security policies and programs are in place for all operating areas. Strong leadership, with compliance to HOIMS, delivers on Huskys strategic operational integrity objectives and drives HS&E performance. In January 2020, Husky launched the updated HOIMS 2.0.
The fundamental elements of HOIMS 2.0 are:
Leadership and Accountability
| Leaders manage the risks associated with their respective business activities. They are role models who are competent, visible, purposeful and systematic. |
Training and Competency
| Personnel are trained and competent to perform their respective role responsibilities. |
Risk Management
| Hazards are identified and associated risks assessed, managed and prioritized to prevent incidents. |
Operational Integrity Information
| Operational integrity and process safety information is accurate, current and easily accessible |
Operating Procedures, Policies and Standards
| Document, maintain and follow operating procedures and standards to meet operational integrity goals. |
Management of Change
| Permanent, temporary and emergency changes that impact operational integrity are managed. |
| Risks associated with changes are managed. |
Emergency Management
| Emergency response, business continuity and security programs are implemented. |
| Husky is prepared to manage an emergency, business interruption or security event. |
Incident Reporting, Recording, Investigation and Learning
| Report, investigate and learn from Husky incidents and other external high-impact incidents to prevent recurrence. |
Safety Control of Work
| Formal processes are in place to allow work to be completed safety. |
Project Delivery
| Facilities are designed and built, and assets are developed, to meet business, HS&E and operational integrity requirements. |
Supply Chain and Contractor Management
| Supplied services and materials meet Huskys HS&E and operational integrity requirements. |
Asset Operation
| Assets and equipment are operated to meet operational integrity goals, preventing injury to people and damage to the environment |
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 51
Reliability & Integrity
| Reliability and integrity are achieved and improved. |
Regulatory Compliance
| Protect Huskys privilege to operate through verifying compliance with legal and regulatory, environmental and social governance requirements. |
Assurance, Performance & Improvement
| Performance meets HS&E and operational integrity goals and objectives, and continuously improves. |
Pipeline Integrity
Husky has a risk-based Pipeline Integrity Management (PIM) Program which is implemented across all Husky-owned and operated pipelines. The PIM program is a framework, supported by a suite of documents including the Pipeline Operations and Maintenance (POMM) Procedures Manual, which provides guidelines on safe operation and maintenance of pipelines. Numerous processes are implemented throughout the pipeline lifecycle to ensure a proactive approach to managing the integrity, operations and maintenance of the pipeline.
The major processes of managing pipeline integrity include:
| A risk management program, which is used to identify integrity threats throughout the pipeline lifecycle and the risk associated with each threat. Measures are taken to address these risks and reduce them to As Low As Reasonably Practicable (ALARP) level. |
| A Geohazard Integrity Management Program, which is used to identify and manage the risks associated with any potential geohazards (geotechnical and hydrotechnical) on pipelines. |
| Technology improvements, including fiber optic sensing technology, advanced technologies for flood monitoring at water crossings and satellite monitoring for landslides and in-line visual inspection for high-consequence pipelines. |
| Engineering assessment, which involves the evaluation of the fitness for service of pipelines when changes are made to design parameters and at the time of line reactivation to proactively mitigate the risk to process safety. |
| Incident investigation, which is used to establish the root cause(s) of failure and apply learnings to enhance pipeline safety and integrity, and to improve integrity programs. |
| Annual pipeline integrity reviews, which are conducted for all pipeline systems to review the effectiveness of integrity programs and, where applicable, make recommendations for improvement. |
| Training, including Huskys well-established Learning Management System, which defines training and experience requirements for the employees who are engaged in maintaining asset integrity. Husky also has a web-based PIM training program for all employees involved in the operation and maintenance of pipelines. |
| Performance targets, which are set annually and tracked quarterly. Immediate steps are taken to address any observed deficiencies. |
| A Management of Change process, which is followed for any changes that affect pipeline operational integrity. |
| POMM self-assessments, which are conducted to identify any gaps and steps are taken to address any observed deficiencies. |
| A PIM Program review, which is a regular review of the PIM program and supporting procedures for alignment with the latest code and regulatory requirements, taking into consideration Husky experience and pipeline industry standards and practices. |
Climate Change
As part of long range planning, Husky assesses future compliance costs associated with regulations of GHG emissions in its operations and the evaluation of future projects, based on Huskys outlook for carbon pricing under current and pending regulations. The impact of recently announced regulations is being evaluated as provinces and the federal government finalize carbon pricing regulations. Husky continues to monitor international and domestic efforts to address climate change, including international low carbon fuel standards and regulations and other emerging regulations in the jurisdictions in which Husky operates.
In 2018, Huskys gross Scope 1 GHG emissions were 10,265,000 tCO2e. Scope 2 GHG emissions in that year were 2,035,000 tCO2e. GHG emissions numbers for 2019 are expected to be published in Huskys ESG Report in July 2020. Husky uses an internal GHG management framework to guide the process of integrating climate change into its business strategy. Elements of the GHG management framework that inform corporate business strategy include GHG inventory and quantification, GHG reporting and verification, an emissions reduction strategy and a regulatory policy system.
By estimating its current and projected future emissions and understanding forthcoming regulations that may impact its business, Husky determines the areas of its operations that may face future compliance obligations or additional costs from regulation. Huskys Enterprise Risk Management Framework supports decision making via comprehensive and systematic identification and assessment of risks that could materially impact the results of Husky.
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 52
Huskys GHG management framework includes a process for climate-related technology assessment, including new innovations that can reduce emissions intensity, and innovations that could disrupt Huskys business strategy. As new technologies are identified by subject matter experts across Husky, they are shared through Huskys Carbon Management Critical Competency Network (CMCC) and as appropriate, are incorporated into regular updates to the Executive Health, Safety and Environment Committee and business unit leadership. Examples of risk from technological innovation that have been reviewed by the CMCC are the accelerating development of renewable energy infrastructure and electrification of the transportation sector. As part of its risk assessment process, Husky reviewed commonly accepted growth forecasts in these sectors to determine the impact to its short, medium and long-term strategy. Husky employs a Marginal Abatement Cost Curve tool as part of a process to review technologies that might qualify for external funding and enhance business cases for technology risk mitigation
Husky recognizes the recommendations of the Financial Stability Boards Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD). Husky voluntarily responds annually to the Climate Disclosure Project (CDP) climate change questionnaire, which as of 2018 has fully adopted the TCFD recommendations.
Environmental Protection
General
Huskys operations are subject to various environmental requirements under federal, provincial, state and local laws and regulations, as well as international conventions. These laws and multiple regulatory requirements cover matters such as: control of air emissions, management and recycling of wastewater, non-saline water use, protection of surface water and groundwater, land disturbances and handling and disposal of waste materials. These regulatory requirements have grown in number and complexity over time, covering a broader scope of industry operations and products. Husky is actively engaged with federal, state, provincial, local agencies and through industry associations to develop sustainable regulations that allow for compliant operations and are also protective of the environment. In addition to existing requirements, Husky recognizes that there are emerging regulatory frameworks that have a potential financial impact on Huskys operations. As part of Huskys review of proposed regulations that may affect its business and operations, Husky may, from time to time, audit and prepare an internal analysis of the possible or expected impact of new regulations, which are subject to various uncertainties. See Risk Factors and Industry Overview.
Husky minimizes impact on the landscape through consideration and application of the mitigation hierarchy, implementing avoidance and mitigation programs where appropriate. Monitoring the effectiveness of mitigation is to occur where mandated by regulatory requirements or stakeholder commitments and may occur when Husky recognizes the value, such as for complex projects or learning opportunities. Where monitoring indicates that corrective action is warranted, Huskys policy is to take an adaptive proactive management approach.
Water
Husky recognizes the importance of water security to the success of its operations and engages in dialogue on proposed regulatory changes, both directly and through industry associations. Husky believes it is sufficiently prepared to comply with new water regulations. Husky has a corporate Water Standard that mandates Water Risk Assessments and Water Management Plans for its facilities, which include consideration of regulatory risks. The purpose of these Water Risk Assessments is to try to identify and mitigate these risks. Water Risk Assessments consider both known proposed water regulations and possible future regulations (not currently proposed).
Monitoring of surface water and ground water quality relating to hydraulic fracturing operations is not regulated in the jurisdictions in which Husky has these operations. Husky has proactively implemented a recommended practice for completing baseline quality and quantity tests for water wells located in proximity to its hydraulic fracturing operations.
As an active member of the In-situ Water Technology Development Centre, Husky is developing new technologies to recycle waste water, reduce water use and improve energy efficiency. Husky dedicates teams to solving water management challenges by leveraging expertise in hydrogeology, surface water aquatics, hydrology, water treatment and drilling waste management. Husky continues to pursue opportunities to conserve water, through alternative water sources and recycling of produced water. At the Tucker Thermal Project, produced water is recycled and make-up water is sourced from saline, non-potable groundwater. The Sunrise Energy Project recycles produced water and supplements this with process-affected water from a nearby oil sands operation after it has been treated, and lower quality non-saline groundwater that is in contact with bitumen to generate steam for oil recovery. The Lima Refinery has a waste water reuse program that substantially reduces annualy its water needs. As a specific action related to water supply risk in its operations, Husky is participating in a research project to understand potential climate impacts to industrial water supplies on the North Saskatchewan River. This multi-year study is a collaborative project with academia and another industry partner.
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 53
Migratory Birds and Species at Risk
Husky has improved the protection of migratory birds through development of a Standard for Pre-Construction Migratory Bird Incidental Take Mitigation, as well as the preparation of a Bird Deterrent Guidance document to assist environmental staff and operators in the awareness and selection of the most appropriate deterrent systems for each facility. For Atlantic operations, in accordance with Huskys permit from the Canadian Wildlife Service (CWS), Huskys Seabird Handling Procedure provides guidance to personnel on how to handle birds that arrive on an installation. Oiled birds are cleaned and rehabilitated at Huskys Seabird Recovery Centre in consultation with CWS. Husky has improved protection of species at risk and their habitats by conducting environmental surveys and wildlife sweeps when appropriate to identify sensitive habitats, individuals and wildlife features (dens, for example) to allow implementation of appropriate mitigation measures.
Ice Management
Husky has several policies in place to protect people, equipment and the environment in the event of extreme weather conditions and adverse ice conditions. Husky has developed Adverse Weather Guidelines for the SeaRose FPSO and is managing physical risk through engineering for 1:100-year weather events.
Huskys Atlantic operations have a robust ice management program, which uses a range of resources including an industry-shared ice surveillance aircraft, as well as synergistic relationships with government agencies including Environment and Climate Change Canada, the Coast Guard and Canadian Ice Service. Regular ice surveillance flights commenced in February 2020 and continue until the risk has abated. In addition, Atlantic operators employ a series of supply and support vessels to actively manage ice and icebergs. These vessels are equipped with a variety of ice management tools including towing ropes, towing nets and water cannons. Husky also maintains a series of ad-hoc relationships with contractors, allowing the quick mobilization of additional resources as required.
Husky regularly assesses all aspects of its ice management program in order to ensure that the program continues to evolve as more information about the characteristics of ice and icebergs in the Atlantic becomes available and as new technologies are developed. Husky continues to look at ways to improve its ability to predict and respond to sea ice and icebergs with ongoing research and development. Recent initiatives include the design and fabrication of modular, heavy weather nets with sensors and development of a Common Operating Picture on Huskys contracted geographic information systems software module including ice flight information, location, drift models, and pack ice drift model runs. Husky now has a dedicated ice management room onshore, which mirrors the offshore and allows for real-time monitoring of field operations. Additional research and development activity related to ice management is continuing.
Abandonment, Reclamation and Remediation
Ongoing remediation and reclamation work is occurring at approximately 3,100 well sites and facilities in Western Canada. During 2019, Husky spent approximately $276 million on asset retirement obligations (ARO) in North America and Husky expects to spend approximately $112 million in 2020 on ARO and environmental site closure activities in North America, including abandonment, decommissioning, reclamation and remediation.
Husky has also pioneered a program-based approach to asset retirement whereby all retirement activities are undertaken as a single program, greatly increasing the efficiency and effectiveness of the work. The Alberta Energy Regulator (AER) has embraced Huskys approach, now referred to as Area-Based Closure, has used it as a template for all of industry to adopt where possible and has incorporated it into its closure regulations.
In Asia Pacific and in accordance with the provisions of the regulations of the Peoples Republic of China, Husky has deposited funds into separate accounts restricted to the funding of future ARO. As at December 31, 2019, Husky had deposited funds of $142 million, which were classified as non-current liabilities.
Husky completed a review of its ARO provisions, including estimated costs and projected timing of performing the abandonment and retirement operations. The results of this review have been incorporated into the estimated liability as disclosed in Note 17 of Huskys audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2019.
Husky has an ongoing environmental monitoring program at owned and leased retail locations and performs remediation where required. Husky also has ongoing monitoring programs at its downstream facilities, including refineries and the Upgrader.
Husky has several inactive facilities ranging from former refineries to retail locations. Management and remediation plans are prepared for these sites based on current and future land use.
Industry Collaboration Initiatives
Husky participates in industry associations and sustainability groups to better understand environmental, safety and social issues while benefitting from, and contributing to, industry innovation and good management practices.
Directly and through joint venture partnerships, Husky is a member of several industry associations that collaborate to identify and implement best practices on environmental performance. The International Petroleum Industry Environmental Conservation Association (IPIECA), the global oil and gas industry association for environmental and social issues, produces guidelines that
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 54
Husky uses to improve its operations and environmental practices, enhance its strategic planning and engage with regulators. Through Huskys membership in Canadas upstream industry association, the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers (CAPP), and the downstream industry association, the American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers (AFPM), which represents the U.S. refining and petrochemicals industry. Husky enhances its ability to identify and address potential policy and regulatory risks to its business and participates in advocacy related activity to reduce those risks. Husky participates on the CAPP Board of Governors, as well as various Executive Policy Groups and working level groups and committees that focus on areas of policy or regulation that have been identified as areas of interest or impact to Huskys business. Husky participates in technology research for energy efficiency and emissions reduction through membership and participation in the Petroleum Technology Alliance Canada (PTAC) and the Clean Resource Innovation Network (CRIN). In 2020, Husky joined Canadas Oil Sand Innovation Alliance (COSIA), whose purpose is to accelerate the pace of improvement in environmental performance in Canadas Oil Sands through collaborative action and innovations.
Husky is participating in IPIECAs Water Task Force and Climate Change Working Group as well as other topic-focused groups. Husky is also a member of Oil Spill Response Limited, an international industry-owned cooperative whose objective is to respond effectively to oil spills wherever in the world they may occur.
Husky also collaborates on water and carbon management and risk mitigation through involvement in industry initiatives and committees. As a member of the joint-industry Water Technology Development Centre and other joint-industry projects, Husky is committed to developing technologies that will reduce water and energy use for in-situ thermal bitumen operations.
Husky holds memberships with, or participates in, the following sustainability groups and industry associations: Alberta Industrial Fire and Emergency Management Association, Allen County Environmental Citizens Advisory Committee, Allen County Local Emergency Planning Committee, AFPM, Calgary Region Airshed Zone, COSIA, CAPP, Canadian Brownfields Network, Canadian Land Reclamation Association, Canadian Society for Unconventional Resources, Canadian Standards Association, Canadian Technical Asphalt Association, CDP, Center for Chemical Process Safety, an American Institute of Chemical Engineers Technological Community, China Offshore Environmental Services, China Offshore Oil Operation Safety Office Under Ministry of Emergency Management of the Peoples Republic of China, Chinas Marine Safety Administration, CHWMEG Inc., CRIN, Clearwater Mutual Aid CO-OP, Conference Board of CanadaCouncil on Emergency Management, Douglas County Local Emergency Planning Committee, Eastern Canada Response Corporation, Edson Mutual Aid Committee, Emergency Response Assistance Canada, Energy Safety Canada, Environmental Services Association of Alberta, Environmental Studies Research Funds, Foothills Research Institute, Foothills Stream Crossing Partnership, Hardisty Mutual Aid Plan, Indonesian Petroleum Association, Industrial Power Consumers Association of Alberta, Industry Footprint Reduction Operations Group, International Marine Contractors Association, International Oil & Gas Producers Association, IPIECA, Lakeland Industry and Community Association, Land Spill Emergency Program, Lima Area Security and Emergency Response Task Force, Lloydminster Emergency Preparedness Stakeholder Group, Mackenzie Delta Spill Response Corporation, Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the Peoples Republic of China, Monitoring Avian Productivity and Survivorship, Mutual Aid Alberta, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council FlareNet Network, North Saskatchewan Watershed Alliance, Ohio Chemistry Technology Council, Ohio Manufacturers Association, Oil Companies International Marine Forum North American Regional Marine Forum, Oil Sand Monitoring, Oil Spill Response Limited, One Ocean, Orphan Well Association, Ottawa River Coalition, Parkland Airshed Management Zone, Petroleum Research Newfoundland and Labrador, PTAC, Red Deer Air Quality Advisory Group, RM Wood Buffalo Mutual Aid Group, Saskatchewan Environmental Industry and Managers Association, Saskatchewan Industrial Energy Consumers Association, Saskatchewan Petroleum Industry Government Environmental Committee, Shawnee Industrial Neighbors Group, Strathcona District Mutual Assistance Emergency Response Assistance, Agreement, Superior Petroleum Partners, Transportation Community Awareness and Emergency Response, Well Abandonment and Integrity Society, Western Canada Marine Response Corporation, Western Canadian Spill Services, Western Lake Superior Port Area Committee, Western Yellowhead Air Management Zone, and Wood Buffalo Environmental Association.
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 55
The following summarizes what the Company believes to be the most significant risks relating to its operations which should be considered when purchasing securities of the Company. The Company has developed an enterprise risk matrix to identify risks to its people, the environment, its assets and its reputation, and to systematically mitigate these risks to an acceptable level. The risk matrix and associated mitigation strategies are reviewed quarterly by senior management and the Audit Committee, and annually by the Board.
Operational and Safety Incidents
The Companys businesses are subject to inherent operational risks which have the potential to impact safety, the environment, its assets and its reputation. In general, the Companys operations are subject to operational risks, including, but not limited to: fires, loss of containment, blowouts, power outages, freeze-ups and other similar events; oil and natural gas leaks; encountering unexpected formations or pressures; premature declines of reservoir pressure or productivity; uncontrollable flows of oil, natural gas and well fluids; spills at truck terminals and hubs; spills associated with the loading and unloading of potentially harmful substances onto trucks; release of tailings or harmful substances into a water system; the breakdown or failure of equipment, pipelines and facilities, information systems and processes; the performance of equipment at levels below those originally intended (whether due to misuse, unexpected degradation or design, construction or manufacturing defects); releases or spills from shipping vessels; failure to maintain adequate supplies of spare parts; the compromise of information technology and control systems and related data; operator error; labour disputes; disputes with interconnected facilities and carriers; operational disruptions or apportionment on third-party systems or refineries, which may prevent the full utilization of the companys facilities and pipelines; epidemics or pandemics; and catastrophic events, including, but not limited to, war, extreme weather events, natural disasters, explosions, acts of sabotage and other similar events.
Failure to manage the hazards and associated risks effectively could result in potential fatalities, environmental impacts, interruptions to activities or use of assets, or loss of license to operate. The Company, in accordance with industry practice, maintains insurance coverage against losses from certain of these risks. Nonetheless, insurance proceeds may not be sufficient to cover all losses, and insurance coverage may not be available for all types of operational risks.
Commodity Price Volatility.
The Companys results of operations and financial condition are dependent on the prices received for its refined products, crude oil, NGL and conventional natural gas production. Lower prices for crude oil, NGL and conventional natural gas could adversely affect the value and quantity of the Companys oil and gas reserves. The Companys reserves include significant quantities of heavier grades of crude oil that often trade at a discount to light crude oil. Heavier grades of crude oil are typically more expensive to produce, process, transport and refine into high-value refined products. Refining and transportation capacity for various grades of crude oil may be constrained from time to time, creating the need for additional refining and transportation capacity. Wider price differentials between heavier and lighter grades of crude oil could have a material adverse effect on the Companys results of operations and financial condition, reduce the value and quantities of the Companys heavier crude oil reserves and delay or cancel projects that involve the development of heavier crude oil resources. There is no guarantee that pipeline development projects or other transportation alternatives will provide sufficient transportation capacity and access to refining capacity to accommodate expected increases in North American heavy crude oil and bitumen production.
Prices for refined products and crude oil are based on world supply and demand. Supply and demand can be affected by a number of factors including, but not limited to, actions taken by OPEC, non-OPEC crude oil supply, social conditions in oil producing countries, the occurrence of natural disasters, general and specific economic conditions, technological developments, prevailing weather patterns, government regulation and policies and the availability of alternate sources of energy.
The Companys conventional natural gas production is currently located in Western Canada and Asia Pacific. Western Canadas conventional natural gas production is subject to North American market forces. North American natural gas supply and demand is affected by a number of factors including, but not limited to, the amount of natural gas available to specific market areas either from the wellhead of existing or accessible conventional or unconventional sources (such as from shale) or from storage facilities, technological developments, prevailing weather patterns, the U.S. and Canadian economies, the occurrence of natural disasters and pipeline restrictions.
In certain instances, the Company will use derivative instruments to manage exposure to price volatility on a portion of its refined product, oil and gas production, inventory or volumes in long-distance transit. The Company may also use firm commitments for the purchase or sale of crude oil and conventional natural gas.
The fluctuations in refined products, crude oil and natural gas prices are beyond the Companys control and could have a material adverse effect on the Companys results of operations and financial condition.
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 56
Commodity Price Risk
In certain instances, the Company uses derivative commodity instruments and futures contracts on commodity exchanges, including commodity put and call options under a short-term hedging program, to manage exposure to price volatility on a portion of its refined product, oil and gas production, and inventory or volumes in long distance transit. The Company may also use firm commitments for the purchase or sale of crude oil and natural gas.
The Companys results will be impacted by a decrease in the price of crude oil and natural gas inventory. The Company has crude oil inventories that are feedstock, held at terminals or part of the in-process inventories at its refineries and at offshore sites. Due to the integrated nature, the Company has a natural partial mitigation to the WCS differential risk. The Company also has natural gas inventory that could have an impact on earnings based on changes in natural gas prices. All these inventories are subject to a lower of cost or net realizable value test on a quarterly basis.
Reservoir Performance Risk
Lower than projected reservoir performance on the Companys key growth projects could have a material adverse effect on the Companys results of operations, financial condition, business strategy and reserves. Inaccurate appraisal of large project reservoirs could result in missed production, revenue and earnings targets and negatively affect the Companys reputation, investor confidence and the Companys ability to deliver on its growth strategy.
In order to maintain the Companys future production of crude oil, conventional natural gas and NGL and maintain the value of the reserves portfolio, additional reserves must be added through discoveries, extensions, improved recovery, performance related revisions and acquisitions. The production rate of oil and gas properties tends to decline as reserves are depleted while the associated unit operating costs increase. To mitigate the effects of this, the Company must undertake successful exploration and development programs, increase the recovery factor from existing properties through applied technology and identify and execute strategic acquisitions of proved developed and undeveloped properties and unproved prospects. Maintaining an inventory of projects that can be developed depends upon, but is not limited to, obtaining and renewing rights to explore, develop and produce oil and natural gas, drilling success, completion of long lead time capital intensive projects on budget and on schedule and the application of successful exploitation techniques on mature properties.
Restricted Market Access and Pipeline Interruptions
The Companys results of operations and financial condition depend upon the Companys ability to deliver products to the most attractive markets. The Companys results of operations could be materially adversely affected by restricted market access resulting from a lack of pipeline or other transportation alternatives to attractive markets as well as regulatory and/or other marketplace barriers. Interruptions and restrictions may be caused by the inability of a pipeline to operate, or they can be related to capacity constraints as the supply of feedstock into the system exceeds the infrastructure capacity. With growing oil production across North America and the limited availability of infrastructure to carry the Companys products to the marketplace, oil and natural gas transportation capacity is expected to be restricted in the next few years. Restricted market access may potentially have a material adverse effect on the Companys results of operations, financial condition and business strategy. Unplanned shutdowns and closures of its refineries or Upgrader may limit the Companys ability to deliver product with a material adverse effect on sales and results of operations.
Security and Terrorist Threats
Security threats and terrorist or activist activities may impact the Companys personnel, which could result in injury, death, extortion, hostage situations and/or kidnapping, including unlawful confinement. A security threat, terrorist attack or activist incident targeted at a facility, office or offshore vessel/installation owned or operated by the Company could result in the interruption or cessation of key elements of the Companys operations. Outcomes of such incidents could have a material adverse effect on the Companys results of operations, financial condition and business strategy. The risk to employees and board members due to social unrest in Hong Kong is being managed through reduced travel and increased awareness and monitoring of the situation. The potential for detention and/or incarceration of the Companys employees/contractors entering into or working in China has increased, and as a result, review and reconsideration for travel into China has become a business/corporate process.
The Company does not own proved or probable reserves in or near areas of armed conflict. According to the Uppsala Conflict Data Program, armed conflict is defined as contested incompatibility that concerns government and/or territory over which the use of armed force between the military forces of two parties, of which at least one is the government of a state, has resulted in at least 25 battle-related deaths each year.
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 57
International Operations
International operations can expose the Company to uncertain political, economic and other risks. The Companys operations in certain jurisdictions may be materially adversely affected by political, economic or social instability or events. These events may include, but are not limited to, onerous fiscal policy, renegotiation or nullification of agreements and treaties, imposition of onerous regulation, changes in laws governing existing operations, financial constraints, including currency restrictions and exchange rate fluctuations, unreasonable taxation and behaviour of public officials, joint venture partners or third-party representatives that could result in lost business opportunities for the Company. This could materially adversely affect the Companys interest in its foreign operations, results of operations and financial condition.
Major Project Execution
The Company manages a variety of oil and gas projects ranging from Upstream to Downstream assets across its global portfolio. The wide range of risks associated with project development and execution, as well as the commissioning and integration of new facilities with existing assets, can impact the economic viability of the Companys projects. Project risks may result in extended stakeholder consultation, additional environmental assessments and public hearings which may delay necessary environmental and regulatory approvals. Project risks may also manifest through schedule delays, cost overruns and commodity price drops. Some risks can impact the Companys safety and environmental records thereby negatively affecting the Companys reputation and social license to operate.
Litigation, Administrative Proceedings and Regulatory Actions
The Company may be subject to litigation, claims, administrative proceedings and regulatory actions, which may be material. Such claims could relate to environmental damage, climate change and the impacts thereof, failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations, breach of contract, tax, bribery and employment matters, which could result in an unfavourable decision, including fines, sanctions, monetary damages, temporary suspensions of operations or the inability to engage in certain operations or transactions. The outcome of such claims can be difficult to assess or quantify and may have a material adverse effect on the Companys reputation, financial condition and results of operations. The defence to such claims may be costly and could divert managements attention away from day-to-day operations.
Partner Misalignment
Joint venture partners operate or jointly control a portion of the Companys assets in which the Company has an ownership interest. This can reduce the Companys control and ability to manage risks. The Company is at times dependent upon its partners for the successful execution of various projects. If a dispute with partners were to occur over the development and operation of a project or if partners were unable to fund their contractual share of the capital expenditures, a project could be delayed and the Company could be partially or totally liable for its partners share of the project.
Reserves Data, Future Net Revenue and Resource Estimates
The reserves data contained or referenced in this AIF represent estimates only. The accurate assessment of oil and gas reserves is critical to the continuous and effective management of the Companys Upstream assets. Reserves estimates support various investment decisions about the development and management of oil and gas properties. In general, estimates of economically recoverable crude oil and conventional natural gas reserves and the future net cash flow therefrom are based upon a number of variable factors and assumptions, such as product prices, future operating and capital costs, historical production from the properties and the effects of regulation by government agencies, including with respect to royalty payments, all of which may vary considerably from actual results. The Company uses all available information at the effective date of the evaluation and internal qualified reserves evaluators to prepare the reserves estimates. As required by NI 51-101, the Company obtains the opinion of an independent reserves auditor on the Companys reserves. The audit covers more than 75% of the future net revenue discounted at 10% attributable to proved plus probable reserves with the remainder reviewed by the independent qualified reserves auditor. However, given the best technical information and evaluation techniques, all such estimates are still to some degree uncertain. All reserves estimates involve a degree of ambiguity and, at times, rely on indirect measurement techniques to estimate the size and recoverability of the resource. While new technologies have increased the accuracy of these techniques, there remains the potential for human or systemic error in recording and reporting the magnitude of the Companys oil and gas reserves. Estimates of the economically recoverable oil and gas reserves attributable to any particular property or group of properties, and estimates of future net revenues expected therefrom, may differ substantially from actual results even though the total company reserves are shown to be reliable through the historical total company technical reserves revisions. The Company has a diverse portfolio of assets by product type, reservoir type and location which is a factor in mitigating specific property risks. Inaccurate appraisal of large project reservoirs could result in missed production, revenue and earnings targets and could have a material adverse effect on the Companys reputation, investor confidence and ability to deliver on its growth business strategy.
Government Regulation
Given the scope and complexity of the Companys operations, the Company is subject to regulations and interventions by governments at the federal, provincial, state and municipal levels in the countries in which it conducts its operations, development or
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 58
exploratory activities. As these governments continually balance competing demands from different interest groups and stakeholders, the Company recognizes that the magnitude of regulatory risks has the potential to change over time. Changes in government policy, legislation or regulations could impact the Companys existing and planned projects as well as impose costs of compliance and increase capital expenditures and operating expenses. Examples of the Companys regulatory risks include, but are not limited to, uncertain or negative interactions with governments, uncertain energy policies, uncertain climate policies, uncertain environmental and safety policies, penalties, taxes, royalties, government fees, reserves access, limitations or increases in costs relating to the exportation of commodities, production restrictions, restrictions on the acquisition of exploration and production rights and land tenure, expropriation or cancellation of contract rights, limitations on control over the development and abandonment of fields and loss of licences to operate.
Environmental Risks
Changes in environmental regulations could have a material adverse effect on the Companys results of operations, financial condition and business strategy by requiring increased capital expenditures and operating costs or by impacting the quality of, formulation of or demand for the Companys products, which may or may not be offset through market pricing.
The Company anticipates that further changes in environmental legislation could occur, which may result in stricter standards and enforcement, larger fines and liabilities, the introduction of emissions limits, increased compliance costs and approval delays for critical licences and permits. Public interest in ESG issues has also increased significantly in recent years, as evidenced by the large number of signatories to the United Nations Principles for Responsible Investment.
It is not possible to accurately forecast the amount of additional investment in new or existing facilities required in the future for environmental protection or to address all new regulatory compliance requirements, such as reporting. See Industry OverviewEnvironmental Regulations and Environmental, Social and Governance ConsiderationsEnvironmental Protection.
Climate Change Risks
Regulatory
Climate change regulations may become more onerous over time as governments implement policies to further reduce GHG emissions. As these regulations continue to evolve, they could have a material adverse effect on the Companys competitiveness, financial condition and results of operations through increased capital and operating costs and change in demand for refined products such as transportation fuels. Costs associated with levy payments for emerging climate change regulations may be significant.
In December 2018, the Government of Canada published the Regulatory Design Paper on the CFS that focuses on the liquid fuel stream regulations. A Proposed Regulatory Approach for the CFS was published in June 2019 and proposed regulations are expected to be published in Canada Gazette, Part I for early 2020. The final regulations for liquid fuels are planned for early 2021, with the regulations expected to come into force in 2022. Due to the uncertainty of the gaseous and solid fuel regulations, the full impact of the CFS is still unknown.
The Companys U.S. refining business may be materially adversely affected by the implementation of the EPAs climate change rules by future U.S. GHG legislation that applies to the oil and gas industry or the consumption of petroleum products and by other U.S. climate change statutes at the federal or state level or by regulations imposed by other federal agencies or at the state or local level. Such legislation or regulations could require the Companys U.S. refining operations to significantly reduce emissions and/or purchase emissions credits, thereby increasing operating and capital costs, and could change the demand for refined products which may have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial condition and results of operations.
The Company complies with the RFS program in the U.S. by blending renewable fuels manufactured by third parties and by purchasing RINs on the open market. Due to regulatory uncertainty and in part due to the U.S. fuel supply reaching the blend wall (the 10% limit prescribed by most automobile warranties), the price and availability of RINs have been volatile. The Company cannot predict the future prices of RINs and renewable fuel blendstocks, and the costs to obtain the necessary RINs and blendstocks could be material. The Companys financial position and results of operations could be adversely affected if it is unable to pass the compliance costs on to its customers and if the Company pays significantly higher prices for RINs or blendstocks to comply with the RFS mandated standards.
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 59
Climatic Conditions
Extreme climatic conditions may also have material adverse effects on the Companys financial condition and results of operations. Weather and climate affect demand, and therefore, the predictability of the demand for energy is affected to a large degree by the predictability of weather and climate. In addition, the Companys exploration, production and construction operations, and the operations of major customers and suppliers, can be affected by extreme weather. This may result in cessation or diminishment of production, delay of exploration and development activities or delay of plant construction.
The Company operates in some of the harshest environments in the world, including offshore NL. Climate change may increase the frequency of severe weather conditions in these locations including winds, flooding and variable temperatures, which are contributing to the melting of northern ice and increased creation of icebergs. Icebergs off the coast of NL may threaten Atlantic oil production facilities, cause damage to equipment and possible production disruptions, spills, other asset damage and human impacts.
Transition
In addition to emissions regulations and the physical risks of climate change, climate-related transition risks could have a material adverse effect on the Companys business, financial condition and results of operations, and could adversely impact the Companys reputation. For example, increased public opposition to companies in the oil sands industry could lead to constrained access to insurance, liquidity and capital and changes in demand for the Companys products, which may impact revenue. Any increases in GHG emissions by the Company could lead to additional taxes and levies, which would increase the costs associated with certain projects. The potential need to develop new technologies to reduce the intensity of GHG emissions could require significant capital investment. Further, the Company may become subject to climate change litigation initiated by third parties. The Companys management monitors these risks and reports to the Board through managements Enterprise Risk Management framework.
Overall, the Company is not able to estimate at this time the degree to which climate change related regulatory, climatic conditions, and transition risks could impact the Companys financial and operating results.
Foreign Currency
The Companys results are affected by the exchange rates between various currencies including the Canadian and U.S. dollars. The majority of the Companys expenditures are in Canadian dollars while most of the Companys revenues are received in U.S. dollars from the sale of oil and gas commodities that receive prices determined by reference to U.S. benchmark prices. An increase in the value of the Canadian dollar relative to the U.S. dollar will decrease the revenues received from the sale of oil and gas commodities. Correspondingly, a decrease in the value of the Canadian dollar relative to the U.S. dollar will increase the revenues received from the sale of oil and gas commodities. In addition, a change in the value of the Canadian dollar against the U.S. dollar will result in an increase or decrease in the Companys U.S. dollar-denominated debt and related interest expense, as expressed in Canadian dollars. The fluctuations in exchange rates are beyond the Companys control and could have a material adverse effect on the Companys results of operations and financial condition.
The Company enters into short-dated foreign exchange contracts to fix the exchange rate for conversion of U.S. dollar denominated revenue to hedge against these potential fluctuations. The Company also designates its U.S. denominated debt as a hedge of the Companys net investment in selected foreign operations with a U.S. dollar functional currency.
Interest Rate
Interest rate risk is the impact of fluctuating interest rates on financial condition. In order to manage interest rate risk and the resulting interest expense, the Company mitigates some of its exposure to interest rate changes by maintaining a mix of both fixed and floating rate debt through the use of its credit facilities and various financial instruments. The optimal mix maintained will depend on market conditions. The Company may also enter into interest rate swaps from time to time as an additional means of managing current and future interest rate risk.
Counterparty Credit
Credit risk represents the financial loss that the Company would suffer if the Companys counterparties in a transaction fail to meet or discharge their obligation to the Company. The Company actively manages this exposure to credit and contract execution risk from both a customer and a supplier perspective. Internal credit policies govern the Companys credit portfolio and limit transactions according to a counterpartys and a suppliers credit quality. Counterparties for financial derivatives transacted by the Company are generally major financial institutions or counterparties with investment grade credit ratings.
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 60
Liquidity
Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company will not be able to meet its financial obligations as they become due. Liquidity risk also includes the risk of not being able to liquidate assets in a timely manner at a reasonable price. The Companys process for managing liquidity risk includes ensuring, to the extent possible, that it has access to multiple sources of capital including: cash and cash equivalents, cash from operating activities, undrawn credit facilities and capacity to raise capital from various debt and equity capital markets under its shelf prospectuses. The availability of capital under its shelf prospectuses is dependent on market conditions at the time of sale.
Debt Covenants
The Companys credit facilities include financial covenants, which contain a debt to capital covenant. If the Company does not comply with the covenants under these credit facilities, there is a risk that repayment could be accelerated.
Competition
The energy industry is highly competitive with respect to gaining access to the resources required to increase oil and gas reserves and production, and gaining access to markets. The Company competes with others to acquire prospective lands, retain drilling capacity and field operating and construction services, obtain sufficient pipeline and other transportation capacity, gain access to and retain adequate markets for its products and services and gain access to capital markets. The Companys ability to successfully complete development projects could be materially adversely affected if it is unable to acquire economic supplies and services due to competition. Subsequent increases in the cost of or delays in acquiring supplies and services could result in uneconomic projects. The Companys competitors comprise all types of energy companies, some of which have greater resources.
Credit Rating Risk
Credit ratings affect the Companys ability to obtain both short-term and long-term financing and the cost of such financing. Additionally, the ability of the Company to engage in ordinary course derivative or hedging transactions and maintain ordinary course contracts with customers and suppliers on acceptable terms depends on the Companys credit ratings. A reduction in the current rating on the Companys debt by one or more of its rating agencies, particularly a downgrade below investment grade ratings, or a negative change in the Companys ratings outlook could materially adversely affect the Companys cost of financing and its access to sources of liquidity and capital. Credit ratings are intended to provide investors with an independent measure of credit quality of any issuer of securities. The credit ratings accorded to the Companys securities by the rating agencies are not recommendations to purchase, hold or sell the securities in as much as such ratings do not comment as to market price or suitability for a particular investor. Any rating may not remain in effect for any given period of time or may be revised or withdrawn entirely by a rating agency in the future if in its judgment circumstances so warrant.
General Economic Conditions
General economic conditions may have a material adverse effect on the Companys results of operations and financial condition. A decline in economic activity will reduce demand for petroleum products and adversely affect the price the Company receives for its commodities. The Companys cash flow could decline, assets could be impaired, future access to capital could be restricted and major development projects could be delayed or abandoned.
Cost or Availability of Oil and Gas Field Equipment
The cost or availability of oil and gas field equipment may adversely affect the Companys ability to undertake exploration, development and construction projects. The oil and gas industry is cyclical in nature and is prone to shortages of supply of equipment and services including drilling rigs, geological and geophysical services, engineering and construction services and construction materials. These materials and services may not be available when required at reasonable prices. Without compromising safety, overall quality and environmental impacts, the Company continually develops its approved suppliers base to provide undisrupted access to materials, equipment and services, while maintaining a competitive cost baseline via cost escalation mitigation strategies.
Financial Controls
While the Company has determined that its disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls over financial reporting are effective, such controls can only provide reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and disclosure. Failure to prevent, detect and correct misstatements could have a material adverse effect on the Companys results of operations and financial condition.
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 61
Cybersecurity Threats
As an oil and gas producer, the Companys ability to operate effectively is dependent upon developing and maintaining information systems and infrastructure that support the financial and general operating aspects of the business. Concurrently, the oil and gas industry has become the subject of increased levels of cybersecurity threats.
The Company has security measures, policies and controls designed to protect and secure the integrity of its information technology systems. The Company takes a proactive approach by continuing to invest in technology, processes and people to help minimize the impact of the changing cyber landscape and enhance the Companys resilience to cyber incidents. However, cybersecurity threats frequently change and require ongoing monitoring and detection capabilities. Such cybersecurity threats include unauthorized access to information technology systems due to hacking, viruses and other causes for purposes of misappropriating assets or sensitive information, corrupting data or causing operational disruption. Cyber-attacks could result in the loss or exposure of confidential information related to retail credit card information, personnel files, exploration activities, corporate actions, executive officer communications and financial results. The significance of any such event is difficult to quantify, but if the breach is material in nature, it could adversely affect the financial performance of the Company, its operations, its reputation and standing and expose it to regulatory consequences and claims of third-party damage, all of which could materially adversely affect the Companys results of operations and financial condition if the situation is not resolved in a timely manner, or if the financial impact of such adverse effects is not alleviated through insurance policies.
Although to date the Company has not experienced any material losses relating to cyber attacks or other information security breaches, there can be no assurance that the Company will not incur such losses in the future. The Companys risk and exposure to these matters cannot be fully mitigated because of, among other things, the evolving nature of these threats. The Audit Committee of the Board has oversight of the Companys risk mitigation strategies related to cybersecurity.
Skilled Workforce Attraction and Retention
Successful execution of the Companys strategy is dependent on ensuring the Companys workforce possesses the appropriate skill level. Failure to attract and retain personnel with the required skill levels could have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial condition and results of operations.
Aviation Incidents
The Companys Offshore operations in Canada and China rely on regular travel by helicopter. A helicopter incident resulting in loss of life, facility shutdown or regulatory action could have a material adverse effect on the operations of the Company. This risk is managed through an aviation management process. Aviation Safety Reviews are conducted by third party specialist contractors to verify that helicopter service providers meet the Companys and industry standards with respect to aviation safety. The reviews include evaluation of aircraft type, effectiveness of the safety and maintenance management systems and competency and training programs for critical roles in the operation of helicopters. Helicopters chartered to support Husky Offshore operations must be fit for service and as such are fitted with multiple redundant systems to address a wide range of potential in-flight emergencies. Additional measures specific to the Companys challenging operating environments are specified in the Companys design requirements including anti-icing and floatation systems effective for the maximum allowable sea height operating limits. Pilots are trained to address potential emergency situations through regular real-time and simulator training aligned with industry best practice.
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 62
The number of Huskys permanent employees was as follows:
As at December 31, | ||||||||||||
2019 | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||||||
Number of permanent employees |
4,802 | 5,157 | 5,152 |
Dividend Amounts
The following table shows the aggregate amount of the dividends declared payable per share in respect of its last three financial years ended December 31, for the Companys common shares, Series 1 Preferred Shares, Series 2 Preferred Shares, Series 3 Preferred Shares, Series 5 Preferred Shares and Series 7 Preferred Shares:
2019 | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||||||
Dividends per Common Share |
$ | 0.50 | $ | 0.45 | $ | 0.08 | ||||||
Dividends per Series 1 Preferred Share |
$ | 0.60 | $ | 0.60 | $ | 0.60 | ||||||
Dividends per Series 2 Preferred Share |
$ | 0.85 | $ | 0.74 | $ | 0.57 | ||||||
Dividends per Series 3 Preferred Share |
$ | 1.13 | $ | 1.13 | $ | 1.13 | ||||||
Dividends per Series 5 Preferred Share |
$ | 1.13 | $ | 1.13 | $ | 1.13 | ||||||
Dividends per Series 7 Preferred Share |
$ | 1.15 | $ | 1.15 | $ | 1.15 |
Dividend Policy and Restrictions
The declaration and payment of dividends are at the discretion of the Board, which will consider earnings, commodity price outlook, future capital requirements and financial condition of Husky, the satisfaction of the applicable solvency test in Huskys governing corporate statute, the Business Corporations Act (Alberta) and other relevant factors.
Common Share Dividends
On February 28, 2018, the Board reinstated the quarterly common share cash dividend of $0.075 per share. On July 26, 2018, the Board increased the quarterly common share cash dividend to $0.125 per share.
The Board has the ability to declare dividends in common shares or in cash. Quarterly dividends are declared in an amount expressed in dollars per common share and can be paid by way of issuance of a fraction of a common share per outstanding common share determined by dividing the dollar amount of the dividend by the volume weighted average trading price of the common shares on the principal stock exchange on which the common shares are traded. The volume weighted average trading price of the common shares is calculated by dividing the total value by the total volume of common shares traded over the five-trading-day period immediately prior to the payment date of the dividend on the common shares.
The Companys dividend policy is reviewed on a regular basis and there can be no assurance that dividends will be declared or the amount of any future dividends.
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 63
Series 1 Preferred Share Dividends
Holders of Series 1 Preferred Shares were entitled to receive a cumulative quarterly fixed dividend, payable on the last day of March, June, September and December in each year, of 4.45% annually for the initial period ending March 31, 2016, as and when declared by the Board. Thereafter, the dividend rate will be reset every five years at a rate equal to the five-year Government of Canada bond yield plus 1.73%. Holders of Series 1 Preferred Shares had the right, at their option, to convert their shares into Series 2 Preferred Shares, subject to certain conditions, on March 31, 2016. In the first quarter of 2016, Husky announced it did not intend to exercise its right to redeem the Series 1 Preferred Shares on March 31, 2016. As a result, the holders of the Series 1 Preferred Shares had the right to choose to retain any or all of their Series 1 Preferred Shares and continue to receive an annual fixed rate dividend paid quarterly, or convert, on a one-for-one basis, any or all of their Series 1 Preferred Shares into Series 2 Preferred Shares, and receive a floating rate quarterly dividend. Holders of Series 1 Preferred Shares who retained their shares will receive the new fixed rate quarterly dividend applicable to the Series 1 Preferred Shares of 2.404% for the five-year period commencing March 31, 2016 to, but excluding, March 31, 2021. Effective March 31, 2016, Husky had 10,435,932 Series 1 Preferred Shares issued and outstanding. Holders of the Series 1 Preferred Shares will have the opportunity to convert their shares again on March 31, 2021, and on March 31 every five years thereafter as long as the shares remain outstanding.
Series 2 Preferred Share Dividends
Holders of the Series 2 Preferred Shares are entitled to receive a cumulative quarterly floating rate dividend, payable on the last day of March, June, September and December in each year, at a rate equal to the 90-day Government of Canada Treasury Bill yield plus 1.73% as and when declared by the Board. Effective March 31, 2016, Husky had 1,564,068 Series 2 Shares issued and outstanding. Holders of the Series 2 Shares have the right, at their option, to convert their shares into Series 1 Preferred Shares, subject to certain conditions, on March 31, 2021, and on March 31every five years thereafter as long as the shares remain outstanding.
Series 3 Preferred Share Dividends
Holders of the Series 3 Shares are entitled to receive a cumulative quarterly fixed dividend, payable on the last day of March, June, September and December in each year, of 4.50% annually for the initial period ending December 31, 2019 as declared by the Board of Directors. Thereafter, the dividend rate will be reset every five years at the rate equal to the five-year Government of Canada bond yield plus 3.13%. Holders of Series 3 Shares had the right, at their option, to convert their shares into Series 4 Preferred Shares, subject to certain conditions, on December 31, 2019. In the fourth quarter of 2019, Husky announced it did not intend to exercise its right to redeem the Series 3 Preferred Shares on December 31, 2019. As a result, the holders of the Series 3 Preferred Shares had the right to choose to retain any or all of their Series 3 Preferred Shares and continue to receive an annual fixed rate dividend paid quarterly, or convert, on a one-for-one basis, any or all of their Series 3 Preferred Shares into Series 4 Preferred Shares, and receive a floating rate quarterly dividend. Holders of the Series 3 Preferred Shares who retained their shares will receive the new fixed rate quarterly dividend applicable to the Series 3 Preferred Shares of 4.689% for the five-year period commencing December 31, 2019 to, but excluding, December 31, 2024. Effective December 31, 2019, Husky had 10,000,000 Series 3 Preferred Shares issued and outstanding and no Series 4 Preferred Shares were issued due to conditions for the conversion into Series 4 Preferred Shares not being satisfied. Holders of the Series 3 Preferred Shares will have the opportunity to convert their shares again on December 31, 2024, and on December 31 every five years thereafter as long as the shares remain outstanding.
Series 5 Preferred Share Dividends
Holders of the Series 5 Preferred Shares are entitled to receive a cumulative quarterly fixed dividend, payable on the last day of March, June, September and December in each year, of 4.50% annually for the initial period ending March 31, 2020 as declared by the Board. Thereafter, the dividend rate will be reset every five years at the rate equal to the five-year Government of Canada bond yield plus 3.57%. Holders of Series 5 Preferred Shares will have the right, at their option, to convert their shares into Series 6 Preferred Shares, subject to certain conditions, on March 31, 2020 and on March 31 every five years thereafter. Holders of the Series 6 Preferred Shares will be entitled to receive cumulative quarterly floating dividends at a rate equal to the 90-day Government of Canada Treasury Bill yield plus 3.57%.
Series 7 Preferred Share Dividends
Holders of the Series 7 Preferred Shares are entitled to receive a cumulative fixed dividend, payable on the last day of March, June, September and December in each year, of 4.60% annually for the initial period ending June 30, 2020 as declared by the Board. Thereafter, the dividend rate will be reset every five years at the rate equal to the five-year Government of Canada bond yield plus 3.52%. Holders of the Series 7 Preferred Shares will have the right, at their option, to convert their shares into Series 8 Preferred Shares, subject to certain conditions, on June 30, 2020 and on June 30 every five years thereafter. Holders of the Series 8 Preferred Shares will be entitled to receive cumulative quarterly floating dividends at a rate equal to the 90-day Government of Canada Treasury Bill yield plus 3.52%.
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 64
DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STRUCTURE
Common Shares
Husky is authorized to issue an unlimited number of no par value common shares. The holders of common shares are entitled to receive notice of and attend all meetings of shareholders, except meetings at which only holders of a specified class or series of shares are entitled to vote, and are entitled to one vote per common share held. Holders of common shares are also entitled to receive dividends as declared by the Board on the common shares payable in whole or in part as a stock dividend in fully paid and non-assessable common shares or by the payment of cash. Holders are also entitled to receive the remaining property of Husky upon dissolution in equal rank with the holders of all other common shares.
If the Board declares a dividend on the common shares payable in whole or in part as a stock dividend, unless otherwise determined by the Board in respect of a particular dividend, the value of the common shares for purposes of each stock dividend declared by the Board shall be deemed to be the volume weighted average trading price of the common shares on the principal stock exchange on which the common shares are traded, calculated by dividing the total value by the total volume of common shares traded over the five trading day period immediately prior to the payment date of the dividend on the common shares.
Preferred Shares
Husky is authorized to issue an unlimited number of no par value preferred shares. The preferred shares as a class have attached thereto the rights, privileges, restrictions and conditions set forth below.
The preferred shares may from time to time be issued in one or more series, and the Board may fix from time to time before such issue the number of preferred shares which is to comprise each series and the designation, rights, privileges, restrictions and conditions attached to each series of preferred shares including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, any voting rights, the rate or amount of dividends or, the method of calculating dividends, the dates of payment thereof, the terms and conditions of redemption, purchase and conversion if any, and any sinking fund or other provision.
The preferred shares of each series shall, with respect to the payment of dividends and the distribution of assets or return of capital in the event of liquidation, dissolution or winding up of Husky, whether voluntary or involuntary, or any other return of capital or distribution of assets of Husky amongst its shareholders for the purpose of winding up its affairs, be entitled to preference over the common shares of Husky and over any other shares of Husky ranking by their terms junior to the preferred shares of that series. The preferred shares of any series may also be given such other preferences over the common shares of Husky and any other such preferred shares.
If any cumulative dividends or amounts payable on the return of capital in respect of a series of preferred shares are not paid in full, all series of preferred shares shall participate ratably in respect of accumulated dividends and return of capital.
In 2011, Husky issued 12 million Series 1 Preferred Shares and authorized the issuance of 12 million Series 2 Preferred Shares. In 2014, Husky issued 10 million Series 3 Preferred Shares and authorized the issuance of 10 million Series 4 Preferred Shares. In 2015, Husky issued 8 million Series 5 Preferred Shares and 6 million Series 7 Preferred Shares and authorized the issuance of 8 million Series 6 Preferred Shares and 6 million Series 8 Preferred Shares. See Dividends Dividend Policy and Restrictions Series 1 Preferred Share Dividends and Dividends Dividend Policy and Restrictions Series 2 Preferred Share Dividends and Dividends Dividend Policy and Restrictions Series 3 Preferred Share Dividends and Dividends Dividend Policy and Restrictions Series 5 Preferred Share Dividends and Dividends Dividend Policy and Restrictions Series 7 Preferred Share Dividends. None of the issued preferred shares is entitled to vote, except in accordance with the provisions of the Business Corporations Act (Alberta).
Husky may, at its option, redeem all or any number of the then outstanding Series 1 Preferred Shares, subject to certain conditions, on March 31, 2021 and on March 31 every five years thereafter. Husky may, at its option, redeem all or any number of the then outstanding Series 2 Preferred Shares, subject to certain conditions, on March 31, 2021 and on March 31 every five years thereafter. Husky may, at its option, redeem all or any number of the then outstanding Series 3 Preferred Shares, subject to certain conditions, on December 31, 2024 and on December 31 every five years thereafter. Husky may, at its option, redeem all or any number of the then outstanding Series 5 Preferred Shares, subject to certain conditions, on March 31, 2020 and on March 31 every five years thereafter. Husky may, at its option, redeem all or any number of the then outstanding Series 7 Preferred Shares, subject to certain conditions, on June 30, 2020 and on June 30 every five years thereafter.
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 65
Liquidity Summary
Overview
The following information relating to Huskys current credit ratings is provided as it relates to Huskys financing costs, liquidity and operations. Specifically, credit ratings affect Huskys ability to obtain short-term and long-term financing and the cost of such financing. Additionally, the Companys ability to engage in certain collateralized business activities on a cost effective basis depends on Huskys credit ratings. A reduction in the current rating on Huskys debt by one or more of its rating agencies, particularly a downgrade below investment grade ratings, or a negative change in Huskys ratings outlook could adversely affect Huskys cost of financing and its access to sources of liquidity and capital. In addition, changes in credit ratings may affect Huskys ability to enter, and the associated costs of entering, (i) into ordinary course derivative or hedging transactions, which may require Husky to post additional collateral under certain of its contracts if certain adverse events occur with respect to credit ratings, and (ii) into, and maintaining, ordinary course contracts with customers and suppliers on acceptable terms.
Standard and Poors Rating |
Moodys Investor
Service |
Dominion Bond Rating | ||||
Outlook/Trend |
Stable | Stable | Stable | |||
Senior Unsecured Debt |
BBB | Baa2 | A(low) | |||
Series 1 Preferred Shares |
P-3(high) | Pfd-2(low) | ||||
Series 2 Preferred Shares |
P-3(high) | Pfd-2(low) | ||||
Series 3 Preferred Shares |
P-3(high) | Pfd-2(low) | ||||
Series 5 Preferred Shares |
P-3(high) | Pfd-2(low) | ||||
Series 7 Preferred Shares |
P-3(high) | Pfd-2(low) | ||||
Commercial Paper |
R-1(low) |
Credit ratings are intended to provide investors with an independent measure of credit quality of any issuer of securities. The credit ratings accorded to Huskys securities by the rating agencies are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell the securities in as much as such ratings do not comment as to market price or suitability for a particular investor. Any rating may not remain in effect for any given period of time or may be revised or withdrawn entirely by a rating agency in the future, if in its judgment, circumstances so warrant. The Company pays an annual fee to S&P, Moodys and DBRS. Additionally, Husky pays a fee to credit rating agencies in order to receive a rating for debt or equity instruments upon issuance.
Moodys
Moodys long-term credit ratings are on a rating scale that ranges from Aaa (highest) to C (lowest). A rating of Baa2 by Moodys is within the fourth highest of nine categories and is assigned to debt securities which are considered medium-grade (i.e., they are subject to moderate credit risk). Such debt securities may possess certain speculative characteristics. The addition of a 1, 2, or 3 modifier after a rating indicates the relative standing within a particular rating category. The modifier 1 indicates that the issue ranks in the higher end of its generic rating category, the modifier 2 indicates a mid-range ranking and the modifier 3 indicates a ranking in the lower end of that generic rating category.
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 66
Standard and Poors
Standard and Poors (S&P) long-term credit ratings are on a rating scale that ranges from AAA (highest) to D (lowest). A rating of BBB by S&P is within the fourth highest of 10 categories and indicates that the obligation exhibits adequate protection parameters. However, adverse economic conditions or changing circumstances are more likely to lead to a weakened capacity of the obligor to meet its financial commitment on the obligation. The addition of a plus (+) or minus (-) designation after a rating indicates the relative standing within the major rating categories.
S&P began rating Huskys Series 1 Preferred Shares and Series 2 Preferred Shares, Series 3 Preferred Shares, Series 5 Preferred Shares and Series 7 Preferred Shares on its Canadian preferred share scale on March 18, 2011, December 9, 2014, March 12, 2015 and June 17, 2015, respectively. Preferred share ratings are a forward-looking opinion about the creditworthiness of an issuer with respect to a specific preferred share obligation. There is a direct correspondence between the ratings assigned on the preferred share scale and S&Ps ratings scale for long-term credit ratings. According to S&Ps ratings system, a P-3 (high) rating on the Canadian preferred share rating scale is equivalent to a BB+ rating on the long-term credit rating scale. A rating of BB by S&P is within the fifth highest of 10 categories and indicates that the obligation is less vulnerable to nonpayment than other speculative issues. However, it faces major ongoing uncertainties or exposure to adverse business, financial, or economic conditions that could lead to the obligors inadequate capacity to meet its financial commitments on the issue.
Dominion Bond Rating Service
Dominion Bond Rating Services (DBRS) long-term credit ratings are on a rating scale that ranges from AAA (highest) to D (lowest). A rating of A (low) by DBRS is within the third highest of 10 categories and is assigned to debt securities considered to be of good credit quality. The capacity for payment of financial obligations is substantial, but of lesser credit quality than that of higher rated securities. Entities in the A category may be vulnerable to future events, but qualifying negative factors are considered manageable. The assignment of a (high) or (low) modifier within each rating category indicates relative standing within such category.
DBRS began rating Huskys Series 1 Preferred Shares and Series 2 Preferred Shares, Series 3 Preferred Shares, Series 5 Preferred Shares and Series 7 Preferred Shares on its Canadian preferred share scale on March 18, 2011, December 9, 2014, March 12, 2015 and June 17, 2015, respectively. Preferred share ratings are meant to give an indication of the risk that an issuer will not fulfill its full obligations in a timely manner, with respect to both dividend and principal commitments. DBRS preferred share ratings range from Pdf-1 (highest) to D (lowest). According to the DBRS ratings system, preferred shares rated Pfd-2 are of satisfactory credit quality where protection of dividends and principal is still substantial, but earnings, the balance sheet and coverage ratios are not as strong as Pfd-1 rated companies.
DBRS began rating Huskys commercial paper on September 4, 2014. Credit ratings on commercial paper are on a short-term debt rating scale that ranges from R-1 (high) to D1 representing the range of such securities rated from highest to lowest quality. A rating of R-1 (low) by DBRS is the third highest of 10 categories and is assigned to debt securities considered to be of good credit quality. The capacity for the payment of short-term financial obligations as they become due is substantial with overall strength not as favourable as higher rating categories. Entities in this category may be vulnerable to future events, but qualifying negative factors are considered manageable. The R-1 and R-2 commercial paper categories are denoted by (high), (middle) and (low) designations.
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 67
Huskys common shares, Series 1 Preferred Shares, Series 2 Preferred Shares, Series 3 Preferred Shares, Series 5 Preferred Shares, and Series 7 Preferred Shares are listed and posted for trading on the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX) under the respective trading symbols HSE, HSE.PR.A, HSE.PR.B, HSE.PR.C, HSE.PR.E and HSE.PR.G. The Series 1 Preferred Shares began trading on the TSX on March 18, 2011. The Series 2 Preferred Shares began trading on the TSX on March 31, 2016. The Series 3 Preferred Shares began trading on the TSX on December 9, 2014. The Series 5 Preferred Shares began trading on the TSX on March 12, 2015. The Series 7 Preferred Shares began trading on the TSX on June 17, 2015.
The following table discloses the trading price range and volume of Huskys common shares traded on the TSX during Huskys financial year ended December 31, 2019:
High | Low | Volume (000s) |
||||||||||
January |
18.05 | 13.48 | 56,599 | |||||||||
February |
16.02 | 14.50 | 32,088 | |||||||||
March |
14.98 | 13.24 | 51,931 | |||||||||
April |
14.90 | 13.21 | 34,792 | |||||||||
May |
14.62 | 12.31 | 32,484 | |||||||||
June |
13.03 | 12.18 | 55,149 | |||||||||
July |
12.77 | 9.78 | 39,416 | |||||||||
August |
10.18 | 8.48 | 43,124 | |||||||||
September |
10.21 | 8.61 | 51,942 | |||||||||
October |
9.69 | 8.56 | 40,615 | |||||||||
November |
10.56 | 9.25 | 67,520 | |||||||||
December |
10.79 | 9.26 | 48,754 |
The following table discloses the trading price range and volume of the Series 1 Preferred Shares traded on the TSX during Huskys financial year ended December 31, 2019:
High | Low | Volume (000s) |
||||||||||
January |
14.15 | 13.01 | 96 | |||||||||
February |
14.46 | 13.05 | 153 | |||||||||
March |
13.77 | 12.49 | 107 | |||||||||
April |
13.25 | 12.40 | 48 | |||||||||
May |
13.00 | 12.00 | 164 | |||||||||
June |
13.30 | 12.01 | 384 | |||||||||
July |
13.26 | 12.01 | 275 | |||||||||
August |
12.60 | 10.13 | 95 | |||||||||
September |
11.99 | 10.93 | 113 | |||||||||
October |
11.32 | 10.46 | 120 | |||||||||
November |
11.99 | 10.73 | 222 | |||||||||
December |
12.45 | 10.48 | 558 |
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 68
The following table discloses the trading price range and volume of the Series 2 Preferred Shares traded on the TSX during Huskys financial year ended December 31, 2019:
High | Low | Volume (000s) |
||||||||||
January |
14.99 | 13.74 | 16 | |||||||||
February |
14.63 | 13.93 | 7 | |||||||||
March |
14.20 | 13.00 | 18 | |||||||||
April |
13.50 | 13.10 | 5 | |||||||||
May |
13.96 | 13.00 | 20 | |||||||||
June |
13.01 | 12.37 | 8 | |||||||||
July |
13.24 | 12.85 | 10 | |||||||||
August |
13.00 | 11.24 | 29 | |||||||||
September |
11.93 | 11.20 | 26 | |||||||||
October |
11.50 | 10.98 | 97 | |||||||||
November |
12.00 | 11.02 | 45 | |||||||||
December |
12.40 | 10.90 | 50 |
The following table discloses the trading price range and volume of the Series 3 Preferred Shares traded on the TSX during Huskys financial year ended December 31, 2019:
High | Low | Volume (000s) |
||||||||||
January |
20.39 | 18.76 | 75 | |||||||||
February |
20.47 | 18.05 | 174 | |||||||||
March |
19.60 | 18.07 | 145 | |||||||||
April |
18.99 | 18.40 | 128 | |||||||||
May |
18.97 | 17.50 | 216 | |||||||||
June |
18.67 | 17.80 | 164 | |||||||||
July |
19.22 | 18.15 | 146 | |||||||||
August |
18.20 | 15.45 | 154 | |||||||||
September |
17.15 | 16.00 | 470 | |||||||||
October |
16.57 | 15.70 | 301 | |||||||||
November |
17.35 | 16.08 | 260 | |||||||||
December |
17.47 | 16.10 | 253 |
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 69
The following table discloses the trading price range and volume of the Series 5 Preferred Shares traded on the TSX during Huskys financial year ended December 31, 2019:
High | Low | Volume (000s) |
||||||||||
January |
21.50 | 19.38 | 129 | |||||||||
February |
21.65 | 19.06 | 188 | |||||||||
March |
20.41 | 19.30 | 164 | |||||||||
April |
20.75 | 19.50 | 99 | |||||||||
May |
20.88 | 18.99 | 137 | |||||||||
June |
20.20 | 18.81 | 147 | |||||||||
July |
20.46 | 19.35 | 96 | |||||||||
August |
19.21 | 16.30 | 111 | |||||||||
September |
18.52 | 16.79 | 246 | |||||||||
October |
18.17 | 16.92 | 118 | |||||||||
November |
18.60 | 17.30 | 162 | |||||||||
December |
19.00 | 17.06 | 294 |
The following table discloses the trading price range and volume of the Series 7 Preferred Shares traded on the TSX during Huskys financial year ended December 31, 2019:
High | Low | Volume (000s) |
||||||||||
January |
21.21 | 19.75 | 159 | |||||||||
February |
21.70 | 19.30 | 56 | |||||||||
March |
20.00 | 19.25 | 180 | |||||||||
April |
20.47 | 19.40 | 325 | |||||||||
May |
20.40 | 18.90 | 62 | |||||||||
June |
19.96 | 18.50 | 94 | |||||||||
July |
20.13 | 19.08 | 97 | |||||||||
August |
19.32 | 15.85 | 196 | |||||||||
September |
18.24 | 17.00 | 134 | |||||||||
October |
17.70 | 16.90 | 64 | |||||||||
November |
18.87 | 17.17 | 69 | |||||||||
December |
19.00 | 16.90 | 96 |
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 70
Directors
The following are the names and residences of the directors of Husky as of the date of this AIF, their positions and offices with Husky and their principal occupations for at least the five preceding years. Each director will hold office until the Companys next annual meeting or until his or her successor is appointed or elected.
Name & Residence |
Office or Position |
Principal Occupation During Past Five Years | ||
Li, Victor T. K. Hong Kong Special Administrative Region |
Co-Chair of the Board
Director since August 2000 |
Mr. Li is the Chairman and Group Co-Managing Director of CK Hutchison Holdings Limited. He is also the Chairman and Managing Director of CK Asset Holdings Limited. He is also the Chairman and Executive Director of CK Infrastructure Holdings Limited and CK Life Sciences Intl., (Holdings) Inc., a Non-Executive Director of Power Assets Holdings Limited and HK Electric Investments Manager Limited which is the trustee-manager of HK Electric Investments, and a Non-Executive Director and the Deputy Chairman of HK Electric Investments Limited. Mr. Li is also the Deputy Chairman of Li Ka Shing Foundation Limited and Li Ka Shing (Global) Foundation (formerly known as Li Ka Shing (Overseas) Foundation), Member Deputy Chairman of Li Ka Shing (Canada) Foundation, and a Non-Executive Director of The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited. | ||
Mr. Li serves as a member of the Standing Committee of the 12th National Committee of the Chinese Peoples Political Consultative Conference of the Peoples Republic of China. He is also a member of the Chief Executives Council of Advisers on Innovation and Strategic Development of the Hong Kong Specia Administrative Region and Vice Chairman of the Hong Kong General Chamber of Commerce. Mr. Li is the Honorary Consul of Barbados in Hong Kong. | ||||
Mr. Li holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Civil Engineering and a Master of Science degree in Civil Engineering, both received from Stanford University in 1987. He obtained an honorary degree, Doctor of Laws, honoris causa (LL.D.) from The University of Western Ontario in 2009. | ||||
Fok, Canning K. N. Hong Kong Special Administrative Region |
Co-Chair of the Board and Chair of the Compensation Committee | Mr. Fok is an Executive Director and Group Co-Managing Director of CK Hutchison Holdings Limited. | ||
Director since August 2000 | Mr. Fok is Chairman and a Director of Hutchison Telecommunications Hong Kong Holdings Limited, Hutchison Telecommunications (Australia) Limited, Hutchison Port Holdings Management Pte. Limited as the trustee-manager of Hutchison Port Holdings Trust, Power Assets Holdings Limited, HK Electric Investments Manager Limited as the trustee-manager of HK Electric Investments, and HK Electric Investments Limited. Mr. Fok is Deputy Chairman and an Executive Director of CK Infrastructure Holdings Limited. | |||
Mr. Fok obtained a Bachelor of Arts degree from St. Johns University, Minnesota in 1974 and a Diploma in Financial Management from the University of New England, Australia in 1976. He has been a member of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in Australia (which amalgamated with the New Zealand Institute of Chartered Accountants to become Chartered Accountants Australia and New Zealand) since 1979 and has been a Fellow of the Chartered Accountants Australia and New Zealand since 2015. |
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 71
Bradley, Stephen E. Hong Kong Special Administrative Region |
Member of the Audit Committee and the Corporate Governance Committee | Mr. Bradley is a Director of Broadlea Group Ltd., Senior Consultant, NEX Group plc (formerly known as ICAP (Asia Pacific) Ltd.). | ||
Director since July 2010 | Mr. Bradley entered the British Diplomatic Service in 1981 and served in various capacities including Director of Trade & Investment Promotions (Paris) from 1999 to 2002; Minister, Deputy Head of Mission & Consul-General (Beijing) from 2002 to 2003 and HM Consul-General (Hong Kong) from 2003 to 2008. Mr. Bradley also worked in the private sector as Marketing Director, Guinness Peat Aviation (Asia) from 1987 to 1988 and Associate Director, Lloyd George Investment Management (now part of BMO Global Asset Management) from 1993 to 1995. Mr. Bradley retired from the Diplomatic Service in 2009. | |||
Mr. Bradley obtained a Bachelor of Arts degree from Balliol College, Oxford University in 1980 and a post-graduate diploma from Fudan University, Shanghai in 1981. Mr. Bradley is a Member of the Hong Kong Securities and Investment Institute and holds an Institute of Corporate Directors designation (ICD.D). | ||||
Ghosh, Asim London, United Kingdom |
Member of the Health, Safety and Environment Committee | Mr. Ghosh has been on the Board of Directors of Husky Energy since May 2009 and was President & Chief Executive Officer from June 2010 until his retirement in December 2016. | ||
Director since May 2009 | Mr. Ghosh was the Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer of Vodafone Essar Limited (a telecommunications company) from August 1998 until March 2009. From 1991 to 1998 he held senior executive positions and then the position of Chief Executive Officer of the A S Watson Industries subsidiary (a manufacturer of consumer goods) of Hutchison Whampoa Limited. Prior thereto from 1989, Mr. Ghosh was the Chief Executive Officer of the Pepsi Foods (Frito Lay) start up in India.
Mr. Ghosh began his career with Proctor & Gamble in Canada in 1971 and subsequently worked with Rothmans International in what was then its Carling OKeefe subsidiary from 1980 to 1988, his last position being Senior Vice President of the brewery operations. | |||
Mr. Ghosh was Chairman of the Cellular Operators Association of India and of the National Telecom Committee of the Confederation of Indian Industries. He was an independent Director of Kotak Bank, a listed Indian Bank until 2016, and was on the Board of Directors of Vodafone Essar Limited until February 2010. | ||||
Mr. Ghosh received his Master of Business Administration from Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania, and obtained his undergraduate degree in Electrical Engineering from the Indian Institute of Technology. | ||||
Glynn, Martin J. G. British Columbia, Canada |
Chair of the Corporate Governance Committee and Member of the Audit Committee and the Compensation Committee | Mr. Glynn is a Director and Chair of Public Sector Pension Investment Board (PSP Investments), and a Director of Sun Life Financial Inc. and Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada. | ||
Director since August 2000 | Mr. Glynn was a Director from 2000 to 2006 and President and Chief Executive Officer of HSBC Bank USA N.A. from 2003 until his retirement in 2006. Mr. Glynn was a Director of HSBC Bank Canada from 1999 to 2006 and President and Chief Executive Officer from 1999 to 2003. | |||
Mr. Glynn obtained a Bachelor of Arts (Honours) degree from Carleton University in 1974 and a Masters degree in Business Administration from the University of British Columbia in 1976. |
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 72
Koh, Poh Chan Hong Kong Special Administrative Region |
Director since August 2000 | Ms. Koh is Finance Director of Harbour Plaza Hotel Management (International) Ltd. (a hotel management company) and also a Member of the Executive Committee of CK Asset Holdings Limited. | ||
Ms. Koh is qualified as a Fellow Member (FCA) of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales and is an Associate of the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (CPA, CA) and the Chartered Institute of Taxation in the U.K. (CTA). | ||||
Ms. Koh graduated from the London School of Accountancy in 1971 and was admitted to the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales in 1973, to the Chartered Institute of Taxation in the UK in 1976 as well as the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Ontario, Canada in 1980. | ||||
Kwok, Eva L. British Columbia, Canada |
Member of the Compensation Committee and the Corporate Governance Committee | Mrs. Kwok is Chairman, a Director and Chief Executive Officer of Amara Holdings Inc. (a private investment holding company). Mrs. Kwok is also a Director of CK Life Sciences Intl., (Holdings) Inc. and CK Infrastucture Holdings Limited. Mrs. Kwok is also a Director of the Li Ka Shing (Canada) Foundation. | ||
Director since August 2000 | Mrs. Kwok was a Director of Shoppers Drug Mart Corporation from 2004 to 2006 and of the Bank of Montreal Group of Companies from 1999 until March 2009. | |||
Mrs. Kwok obtained a Masters degree in Science from the University of London in 1967. | ||||
Kwok, Stanley T. L. British Columbia, Canada |
Member of the Health, Safety and Environment Committee | Mr. Kwok is a Director and President of Amara Holdings Inc. He is an independent Non-Executive Director of CK Hutchison Holdings Limited. | ||
Director since August 2000 | Mr. Kwok is a Director of Element Lifestyle Retirement Inc. He retired as a Director of the CTBC Bank of Canada in July, 2018.
Mr. Kwok obtained a Bachelor of Science degree (Architecture) from St. Johns University, Shanghai in 1949, and an A.A. Diploma from the Architectural Association School of Architecture in London, England in 1954. | |||
Ma, Frederick S. H. Hong Kong Special Administrative Region |
Member of the Audit Committee and the Health, Safety and Environment Committee | Professor Ma was born and educated in Hong Kong. He graduated with a Bachelor of Arts (Honours) degree from The University of Hong Kong in 1973, having majored in economics and history. After graduation, he filled various senior positions at local and overseas banks, financial institutions and major companies, including Chase Manhattan Bank, Royal Bank of Canada Dominion Securities, JP Morgan Chase, Kumagai Gumi (HK) Limited and Pacific Century Cyberworks Limited. | ||
Director since July 2010 | In 2002, he joined the Hong Kong SAR Government as Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury, and assumed the post of Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development in 2007. He resigned in July 2008 due to medical reasons. In October 2008, he was appointed Honorary Professor of the School of Economics and Finance at The University of Hong Kong. Professor Ma was appointed Member of the International Advisory Council of the China Investment Corporation in July 2009. In December 2011, he was appointed Honorary President of Hong Kong Special Schools Council. In January 2013, he was appointed Member of the Global Advisory Council of the Bank of America. | |||
In August of that year, he was appointed Honorary Professor of the Faculty of Business Administration at The Chinese University of Hong Kong. In October 2014, he was conferred Honorary Doctor of Social Sciences by Lingnan University, and in October 2016 he received the same honour from City University of Hong Kong. In April 2017, he was appointed as the Council Chairman of The Education University of Hong Kong in 2017. In March 2018, he was appointed as a Member of the Chief Executives Council of Advisers on Innovation and Strategic Development. He is currently an Independent Non-Executive Director of the FWD Group and a Director of New Frontier Corporation. |
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 73
Magnus, George C. Hong Kong Special Administrative Region |
Member of the Audit Committee | Mr. Magnus is a Non-Executive Director of CK Hutchison Holdings Limited and CK Infrastructure Holdings Limited, and an independent Non-Executive Director of HK Electric Investments Manager Limited. | ||
Director since July 2010 | Mr. Magnus acted as an Executive Director of Cheung Kong (Holdings) Limited from 1980 and as Deputy Chairman from 1985 until his retirement from these positions in October 2005. He served as Deputy Chairman of Hutchison Whampoa Limited from 1985 to 1993 and as Executive Director from 1993 to 2005. | |||
He also served as Chairman of Hongkong Electric Holdings Limited (now known as Power Assets Holdings Limited) from 1993 to 2005. He was a Non-Executive Director of Power Assets Holding Limited from 2005 to 2012 and then an independent Non-Executive Director until January 2014. | ||||
He also served as Chairman of Hongkong Electric Holdings Limited (now known as Power Assets Holdings Limited) from 1993 to 2005. He was a Non-Executive Director of Power Assets Holdings Limited from 2005 to 2012 and then an independent Non-Executive Director until January 2014. | ||||
Mr. Magnus obtained a Bachelor of Arts degree in 1959. He obtained a Masters degree in Economics from Kings College, Cambridge University in 1963. | ||||
McGee, Neil D. Luxembourg |
Member of the Health, Safety and Environment Committee
Director since November 2012 |
Mr. McGee is the Managing Director of Hutchison Whampoa Europe Investments S.à r.l. He is an Executive Director of Power Assets Holdings Limited. Prior to his joining Hutchison Whampoa Europe Investments S.à r.l., he served as Group Finance Director of Power Assets Holdings Limited from 2006 to 2012, Chief Financial Officer of Husky Oil Limited from 1998 to 2000 and Chief Financial Officer of Husky Energy Inc. from 2000 to 2005. | ||
Prior to joining Husky Oil Limited in 1998, Mr. McGee held various financial, legal and corporate secretarial positions with the CK Hutchison Holdings Group. Mr. McGee holds a Bachelor of Arts degree and a Bachelor of Laws degree from the Australian National University. | ||||
Peabody, Robert J. Alberta, Canada |
President & Chief Executive Officer
Director since December 2016 |
Mr. Peabody became a member of the Board of Directors and President and Chief Executive Officer of Husky on December 5, 2016.
Mr. Peabody was appointed Chief Operating Officer in 2006 and was responsible for leading Huskys Upstream and Downstream segments, including Western Canada Conventional and Unconventional, Heavy Oil, Oil Sands, Atlantic Region and Exploration, as well as Refining and Upgrading operations. He was also responsible for the Safety, Engineering, Project Management and Procurement functions. | ||
Prior to joining Husky, he led four major businesses for BP plc in Europe and the United States. Mr. Peabody holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering from the University of British Columbia and a Master of Science degree in Management (Sloan Fellow) from Stanford University. Mr. Peabody is a member of the Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of Alberta (APEGA) and Vice-Chairman of the Foothills Hospital Development Council. |
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 74
Russel, Colin S. Gloucestershire, United Kingdom |
Chair of the Health, Safety and Environment Committee and member of the Audit Committee | Mr. Russel is the founder and a Director of Emerging Markets Advisory Services Ltd. (a business advisory company). | ||
Director since February 2008 | Mr. Russel is a Director of CK Infrastructure Holdings Limited, CK Life Sciences Intl., (Holdings) Inc. and ARA Asset Management Pte. Ltd. Mr. Russel was the Canadian Ambassador to Venezuela; Consul General for Canada in Hong Kong; Director for China of the Department of Foreign Affairs, Ottawa; Director for East Asian Trade in Ottawa; Senior Trade Commissioner for Canada in Hong Kong; Director for Japan Trade in Ottawa and was in the Trade Commissioner Service for Canada in Spain, Hong Kong, Morocco, the Philippines, London and India. Previously Mr. Russel was an international project manager with RCA Ltd., Canada and development engineer with AEI Ltd., UK. | |||
Mr. Russel received a degree in Electrical Engineering in 1962 and a Masters degree in Business Administration in 1971, both from McGill University, Canada. | ||||
Shaw, Wayne E. Ontario, Canada |
Member of the Audit Committee and the Corporate Governance Committee, and the Health, Safety and Environment Committee | Mr. Shaw is the President of G.E. Shaw Investments Limited. Prior to his retirement in April 2013, he was a Senior Partner with Stikeman Elliott LLP, Barristers and Solicitors. Mr. Shaw is also a Director of the Li Ka Shing (Canada) Foundation. | ||
Director since August 2000 | Mr. Shaw holds a Bachelor of Arts degree and a Bachelor of Laws degree, both received from the University of Alberta in 1967. He is a member of the Law Society of Upper Canada. | |||
Shurniak, William Saskatchewan, Canada |
Deputy Chair of the Board and Chair of the Audit Committee | Mr. Shurniak was an independent Non-Executive Director of Hutchison Whampoa Limited until June 2015, when he became an independent Non-Executive Director of CK Hutchison Holdings Limited. | ||
Director since August 2000 | From May 2005 to June 2011 he was a Director and Chairman of Northern Gas Networks Limited (a private distributor of natural gas in Northern England). | |||
Mr. Shurniak also held the following positions until his return to Canada in 2005: Director and Chairman of ETSA Utilities (a utility company) since 2000, Powercor Australia Limited (a utility company) since 2000, CitiPower Pty Ltd. (a utility company) since 2002, and a Director of Envestra Limited (a natural gas distributor) since 2000, CrossCity Motorways Pty Ltd. (an infrastructure and transportation company) since 2002 and Lane Cove Tunnel Company Pty Ltd. (an infrastructure and transportation company) since 2004. | ||||
Mr. Shurniak has broad banking experience and he holds Honorary Doctor of Laws degrees from the University of Saskatchewan, the University of Western Ontario and the University of Regina. He was a recipient of the Saskatchewan Centennial Medal from the Lieutenant Governor of Saskatchewan in 2005 and the Saskatchewan Order of Merit by the Government of the Province of Saskatchewan in 2009. He was awarded the Queen Elizabeth II Diamond Jubilee Medal by the Lieutenant Governor of Saskatchewan in 2012, and the Meritorious Service Medal by the Governor General of Canada in 2016. | ||||
Sixt, Frank J. Hong Kong Special Administrative Region |
Member of the Compensation Committee
Director since August 2000 |
Mr. Sixt is an Executive Director, Group Finance Director and Deputy Managing Director of CK Hutchison Holdings Limited.
Mr. Sixt is also the Non-Executive Chairman of TOM Group Limited, an Executive Director of CK Infrastructure Holdings Limited, a Director of Hutchison Telecommunications (Australia) Limited (HTAL) and an Alternate Director to a Director of HTAL, HK Electric Investments Manager Limited as the trustee-manager of HK Electric Investments and HK Electric Investments Limited. Mr. Sixt is also a Director of the Li Ka Shing (Canada) Foundation.
Mr. Sixt obtained a Masters degree in Arts from McGill University, Canada in 1978 and a Bachelors degree in Civil Law from Université de Montréal in 1978. He is a member of the Bar and of the Law Society of the Provinces of Quebec and Ontario, Canada. |
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 75
Officers
The following are the names and residences of the executive officers of Husky as of the date of this AIF, their positions and offices with Husky and their principal occupations for at least the five preceding years.
Name and Residence |
Office or Position |
Principal Occupation During Past Five Years | ||
Li, Victor T. K. Hong Kong Special Administrative Region |
Co-Chair of the Board | Group Co-Managing Director and Deputy Chairman of CK Hutchison Holdings Limited; Managing Director and Deputy Chairman of CK Asset Holdings Limited (formerly known as Cheung Kong Property Holdings Limited); Chairman and Executive Director of CK Infrastructure Holdings Limited (formerly known as Cheung Kong Infrastructure Holdings Limited) and CK Life Sciences Intl., (Holdings) Inc.; a Non-Executive Director of Power Assets Holdings Limited and HK Electric Investments Manager Limited which is the trustee-manager of HK Electric Investments; and a Non-Executive Director and the Deputy Chairman of HK Electric Investments Limited. | ||
Fok, Canning K. N. Hong Kong Special Administrative Region |
Co-Chair of the Board | Executive Director and Group Co-Managing Director of CK Hutchison Holdings Limited; Chairman and a Director of Hutchison Telecommunications Hong Kong Holdings Limited, Hutchison Telecommunications (Australia) Limited, Hutchison Port Holdings Management Pte. Limited as the trustee-manager of Hutchison Port Holdings Trust, Power Assets Holdings Limited, HK Electric Investments Manager Limited as the trustee-manager of HK Electric Investments, and HK Electric Investments Limited; and Deputy Chairman and an Executive Director of CK Infrastructure Holdings Limited (formerly known as Cheung Kong Infrastructure Holdings Limited). | ||
Shurniak, William Saskatchewan, Canada | Deputy Chair of the Board | Deputy Chair of the Board since August 2000. | ||
Peabody, Robert J. Alberta, Canada | President & Chief Executive Officer | President & Chief Executive Officer of Husky since December 2016. Chief Operating Officer of Husky from April 2006 to December 2016. | ||
Hart, Jeffrey R. Alberta, Canada |
Chief Financial Officer | Chief Financial Officer of Husky since November 2018. Acting Chief Financial Officer of Husky from April 2018 to November 2018. Vice President, Controller of Husky from February 2015 to April 2018. | ||
Symonds, Robert W. P. Alberta, Canada |
Chief Operating Officer | Chief Operating Officer of Husky since March 2017. Senior Vice President, Western Canada Production of Husky Oil Operations Limited from April 2012 to March 2017. | ||
Girgulis, James D. Alberta, Canada |
Senior Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary | Senior Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary since April 2012. Vice President, Legal & Corporate Secretary of Husky from August 2000 to April 2012. |
As at February 15, 2020, the directors and executive officers of Husky, as a group, beneficially owned or controlled or directed, directly or indirectly, 944,844.08 common shares of Husky, representing less than 1% of the issued and outstanding common shares.
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 76
Conflicts of Interest
The executive officers and directors of Husky may also become officers and/or directors of other companies engaged in the oil and gas business generally and which may own interests in oil and gas properties in which Husky holds or may in the future, hold an interest. As a result, situations may arise where the interests of such directors and officers conflict with their interests as directors and officers of other companies. In the case of the directors, the resolution of such conflicts is governed by applicable corporate laws that require that directors act honestly, in good faith and with a view to the best interests of Husky and, in respect of the Business Corporations Act (Alberta), Huskys governing statute that directors declare, and refrain from voting on, any matter in which a director may have a conflict of interest.
Corporate Cease Trade Orders or Bankruptcies
None of those persons who are directors or executive officers of Husky is or have been within the past ten years, a director, chief executive officer or chief financial officer of any company, including Husky and any personal holding companies of such person that, while such person was acting in that capacity, was the subject of a cease trade or similar order or an order that denied the Company access to any exemption under securities legislation, for a period of more than 30 consecutive days, or after such persons ceased to be a director, chief executive officer or chief financial officer of the Company was the subject of a cease trade or similar order or an order that denied the Company access to any exemption under securities legislation, for a period of more than 30 consecutive days, which resulted from an event that occurred while such person was acting in such capacity.
In addition, none of those persons who are directors or executive officers of Husky is, or has been within the past ten years, a director or executive officer of any company, including Husky and any personal holding companies of such persons, that while such person was acting in that capacity, or within a year of that person ceasing to act in that capacity became bankrupt, made a proposal under any legislation relating to bankruptcy or insolvency or was subject to or instituted any proceedings, arrangement or compromise with creditors or had a receiver, receiver manager or trustee appointed to hold its assets, other than as follows. Mr. Glynn was director of MF Global Holdings Ltd. when it filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in the U.S. on October 31, 2011. Mr. Glynn is no longer a director of MF Global Holdings Ltd.
Individual Penalties, Sanctions or Bankruptcies
None of the persons who are directors or executive officers of Husky (or any personal holding companies of such persons) have, within the past ten years become bankrupt, made a proposal under any legislation relating to bankruptcy or insolvency or were subject to or instituted any proceedings, arrangement or compromise with creditors or had a receiver, receiver manager or trustee appointed to hold his or her assets.
None of the persons who are directors or executive officers of the Company (or any personal holding companies of such persons) have been subject to any penalties or sanctions imposed by a court relating to securities legislation or by a securities regulatory authority or have entered into a settlement agreement with a securities regulatory authority or been subject to any other penalties or sanctions imposed by a court or regulatory body that would likely be considered important to a reasonable investor in making an investment decision.
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 77
AUDIT COMMITTEE
Composition
The members of Huskys Audit Committee (the Committee) are William Shurniak (Chair), Stephen E. Bradley, Martin J.G. Glynn, Frederick S. H. Ma, George C. Magnus, Colin S. Russel and Wayne E. Shaw. Each of the members of the Committee is independent in that each member does not have a direct or indirect material relationship with the Company. Multilateral Instrument 52-110 Audit Committees provides that a material relationship is a relationship which could, in the view of the Board, reasonably interfere with the exercise of a members independent judgment.
The Committees Mandate provides that the Committee is to be comprised of at least three members of the Board, all of whom shall be independent and meet the financial literacy requirements of applicable laws and regulations. Each member of the Committee is financially literate in that each has the ability to read and understand a set of financial statements that present a breadth and level of complexity of accounting issues that are generally comparable to the breadth and complexity of the issues that can reasonably be expected to be raised by the Companys financial statements.
The education and experience of each Committee member that is relevant to the performance of his responsibilities as a Committee member is as follows.
William Shurniak (Chair) - Mr. Shurniak was an independent Non-Executive Director of Hutchison Whampoa Limited until June 2015, when he became an independent Non-Executive Director of CK Hutchison Holdings Limited, a newly listed company on The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited. From May 2005 to June 2011 he was a Director and Chairman of Northern Gas Networks Limited (a private distributor of natural gas in Northern England).
Stephen E. Bradley - Mr. Bradley is a Director of Broadlea Group Ltd., and Senior Consultant NEX Group plc (formerly known as ICAP (Asia Pacific) Ltd.).
Martin J.G. Glynn - Mr. Glynn is the Chairman and a Director of the Public Sector Pension Investment Board and a Director of Sun Life FInancial Inc. and Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada. Mr. Glynn was a Director from 2000 to 2006 and President and Chief Executive Officer of HSBC Bank USA N.A. from 2003 until his retirement in 2006. Mr. Glynn was a Director of HSBC Bank Canada from 1999 to 2006 and President and Chief Executive Officer from 1999 to 2003.
Frederick S. H. Ma - Professor Ma has held senior management positions in international financial institutions and Hong Kong publicly listed companies. He has also held Principal Official positions (minister equivalent) with the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Government. Professor Ma is currently a member of the International Advisory Council of China Investment Corporation, Chinas Sovereign Fund, as well as an Honorary Professor of the University of Hong Kong.
George C. Magnus - Mr. Magnus is a Non-Executive Director of CK Hutchison Holdings Limited and CK Infrastructure Holdings Limited, and an independent Non-Executive Director of HK Electric Investments Manager Limited.
Colin S. Russel - Mr. Russel is the founder and director of Emerging Markets Advisory Services Ltd. Mr. Russel is a director and an audit committee member of CK Infrastructure Holdings Limited, CK Life Sciences Intl., (Holdings) Inc. and CK Asset Holdings Limited.
Wayne E. Shaw - Mr. Shaw is the President of G.E. Shaw Investments ULC. Prior to his retirement in April 2013, he was a Senior Partner with Stikeman Elliott LLP, Barristers and Solicitors. Mr. Shaw is also a Director of the Li Ka Shing (Canada) Foundation.
The Committee Mandate is attached hereto as Appendix A.
External Auditor Service Fees
The following table provides information about the fees billed to the Company for professional services rendered by KPMG LLP, the Companys external auditors, during the fiscal years indicated:
($ thousands) |
2019 | 2018 | ||||||
Audit Fees |
4,133 | 3,612 | ||||||
Audit-related Fees |
235 | 249 | ||||||
Tax Fees |
283 | 226 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
4,651 | 4,087 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 78
Audit fees consist of fees for the audit of the Companys annual financial statements or services that are normally provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Audit-related fees included fees for attest services not required by statute or regulation. Tax fees included fees for tax planning and various taxation matters.
The Committee has the sole authority to review in advance, and grant any appropriate pre-approvals of, all non-audit services to be provided by the independent auditors and to approve fees in connection therewith. The Committee pre-approved all of the audit-related and tax services provided by KPMG LLP in 2019.
The Company is involved in various claims and litigation arising in the normal course of business. While the outcome of these matters is uncertain and there can be no assurance that such matters will be resolved in the Companys favour, the Company does not currently believe that the outcome of adverse decisions in any pending or threatened proceedings related to these or other matters or any amount which it may be required to pay by reason thereof would have a material adverse impact on its financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.
INTEREST OF MANAGEMENT AND OTHERS IN MATERIAL TRANSACTIONS
None of the Companys directors, executive officers or persons or companies that beneficially own or control or direct, directly or indirectly or a combination of both, more than 10% of Huskys common shares, or their associates and affiliates, had any material interest, direct or indirect, in any transaction with the Company within the three most recently completed financial years or during the current financial year that has materially affected or would reasonably be expected to materially affect the Company.
TRANSFER AGENTS AND REGISTRARS
Huskys transfer agent and registrar is Computershare Trust Company of Canada. In the United States, the transfer agent and registrar is Computershare Trust Company, Inc. The registers for transfers of the Companys common and preferred shares are maintained by Computershare Trust Company of Canada at its principal offices in the cities of Calgary, Alberta and Toronto, Ontario. Queries should be directed to Computershare Trust Company at 1-800-564-6253 or 1-514-982-7555.
Certain information relating to the Companys reserves included in this AIF has been calculated by the Company and audited, reviewed and opined upon as at December 31, 2019 by Sproule. Sproule is an independent petroleum engineering consultant retained by Husky, and such reserves information has been so included in reliance on the opinion and analysis of Sproule, given upon the authority of said firm as experts in reserves engineering. The partners, employees and consultants of Sproule, as a group, beneficially own, directly or indirectly, less than 1% of the Companys securities of any class.
KPMG LLP are the auditors of the Company and have confirmed that they are independent with respect to the Company within the meaning of the relevant rules and related interpretations prescribed by the relevant professional bodies in Canada and any applicable legislation or regulations and also that they are independent accountants with respect to the Company under all relevant U.S. professional and regulatory standards.
Additional information, including directors and officers remuneration, principal shareholders of Huskys common shares and a description of options to purchase common shares is contained in Huskys Management Information Circular prepared in connection with the annual meeting of shareholders held on April 26, 2019.
Additional financial information is provided in Huskys audited consolidated financial statements and managements discussion and analysis (MD&A) for the financial year ended December 31, 2019.
Additional information relating to Husky Energy Inc. is available on the System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval (SEDAR) at www.sedar.com and on the Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval system (EDGAR) at www.sec.gov.
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 79
Forward-looking Statements
Certain statements in this AIF are forward-looking statements and information (collectively forward-looking statements), within the meaning of the applicable Canadian securities legislation, Section 21E of the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 27A of the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The forward-looking statements contained in this AIF are forward-looking and not historical facts.
Some of the forward-looking statements may be identified by statements that express, or involve discussions as to, expectations, beliefs, plans, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance (often, but not always, through the use of words or phrases such as will likely result, are expected to, will continue, is anticipated, is targeting, estimated, intend, plan, projection, could, aim, vision, goals, objective, target, schedules and outlook). In particular, forward-looking statements in this AIF include, but are not limited to, references to:
| with respect to the business, operations and results of the Company generally: the Companys general strategic plans and growth strategies; expected effects of abandonment and reclamation costs, development costs and operating costs on anticipated development or production activities on properties with attributed reserves and on properties with no attributed reserves; scheduled timing of development of the Companys proved and probable undeveloped reserves; expected sources of funding for future development costs; estimates of the forecasted costs of developing the Companys proved and proved plus probable reserves as at December 31, 2019; the Companys 2020 production estimates broken down by product type and location; and anticipated effects of and cost of compliance with certain future or proposed laws and regulations on the Companys operations; |
| with respect to the Companys thermal developments in the Integrated Corridor: estimated production and expected timing of first production from the Spruce Lake Central, Spruce Lake North, Spruce Lake East, Edam Central and Dee Valley 2 projects; plans to drill two new sustainment pads, and timing for a major plant turnaround, at the Tucker Thermal Project; and timing for a turnaround on Plant 1B at the Sunrise Energy Project; |
| with respect to the Companys Western Canada operations in the Integrated Corridor: strategic and drilling plans; and timing to complete the sale of certain assets in the Hussar area; |
| with respect to the Companys infrastructure and marketing business in the Integrated Corridor: growth projects for HMLP; and the expansion of the Hardisty terminal; |
| with respect to the Companys Canadian refined products business in the Integrated Corridor, the potential sale of the Canadian Retail and Commercial Fuels Network; |
| with respect to the Companys U.S. refining and marketing business in the Integrated Corridor: the expected timing of ramp-up to full rates at the Lima Refinery; the expected timeframe, and investment, for the rebuild of the Superior Refinery and the timing that operations will resume; and anticipation that a substantial portion of the investment to rebuild the Superior Refinery will be recovered from property damages insurance and that lost income through April 2020 will be compensated by business interruption insurance; |
| with respect to the Companys Offshore business in Asia Pacific: the expected timing of construction of, and first gas production from, Liuhua 29-1; target production from Liuhua 29-1 when fully ramped up; drilling plans for Block 15/33; the expected timing of drilling five MDA field production wells and two MBH field production wells, and the expected timing of first gas production and sales therefrom; timing for the development of a floating production unit at MDA and MBH; and the expected timing of development and tie-in of the additional MDK shallow water field; and |
| with respect to the Companys Offshore business in Atlantic, development and construction plans, expected timing of first oil and expected volume and timing of peak production, at the West White Rose Project. |
In addition, statements relating to reserves are deemed to be forward-looking statements as they involve the implied assessment based on certain estimates and assumptions that the reserves described can be profitably produced in the future. There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities of reserves and in projecting future rates of production and the timing of development expenditures. The total amount or timing of actual future production may vary from reserve and production estimates.
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 80
Although the Company believes that the expectations reflected by the forward-looking statements presented in this AIF are reasonable, the Companys forward-looking statements have been based on assumptions and factors concerning future events that may prove to be inaccurate. Those assumptions and factors are based on information currently available to the Company about itself and the businesses in which it operates. Information used in developing forward-looking statements has been acquired from various sources, including third party consultants, suppliers and regulators, among others. The material factors and assumptions used to develop the forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to:
| with respect to the business, operations and results of the Company generally: the absence of significant adverse changes to commodity prices, interest rates, applicable royalty rates and tax laws, and foreign exchange rates; the absence of significant adverse changes to energy markets, competitive conditions, the supply and demand for crude oil, natural gas, NGL and refined petroleum products, or the political, economic and social stability of the jurisdictions in which the Company operates; continuing availability of economical capital resources, labour and services; demand for products and cost of operations; the absence of significant adverse legislative and regulatory changes, in particular changes to the legislation and regulation governing fiscal regimes and environmental issues; and stability of general domestic and global economic, market and business conditions; |
| with respect to the Companys Offshore business in Asia Pacific and Atlantic and upstream operations in the Integrated Corridor (including the infrastructure and marketing and Canadian refined products businesses): the accuracy of future production rates and reserve estimates; the securing of sales agreements to underpin the commercial development and regulatory approvals for the development of the Companys properties; the absence of significant delays in the procurement, development, construction or commissioning of the Companys projects, for which the Company or a third party is the designated operator, that may result from the inability of suppliers to meet their commitments, lack of regulatory or third-party approvals or other governmental actions, harsh weather or other calamitous event; the absence of significant disruption of operations such as may result from harsh weather, natural disaster, accident, civil unrest or other calamitous event; the absence of significant unexpected technological or commercial difficulties that adversely affect exploration, development, production, processing or transportation; the sufficiency of budgeted capital expenditures in carrying out planned activities; and the absence of significant increases in the cost of major growth projects; and |
| with respect to the Companys downstream operations in the Integrated Corridor: the absence of significant delays in the development, construction or commissioning of the Companys projects that may result from the inability of suppliers to meet their commitments, lack of regulatory or third-party approvals or other governmental actions, harsh weather or other calamitous event; the absence of significant disruption of operations such as may result from harsh weather, natural disaster, accident, civil unrest or other calamitous event; the absence of significant unexpected technological or commercial difficulties that adversely affect processing or transportation; the sufficiency of budgeted capital expenditures in carrying out planned activities; and the absence of significant increase in the cost of major growth projects. |
Because actual results or outcomes could differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements, investors should not place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements. By their nature, forward-looking statements involve numerous assumptions, inherent risks and uncertainties, both general and specific, which contribute to the possibility that the predicted outcomes will not occur. Some of these risks, uncertainties and other factors are similar to those faced by other oil and gas companies
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 81
and some are unique to Husky. The risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are beyond Huskys control, that could cause actual results to differ (potentially significantly) from those expressed in the forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to:
| with respect to the business, operations and results of the Company generally: those risks, uncertainties and other factors described under Risk Factors in this AIF and throughout the Companys MD&A for the year ended December 31, 2019; the demand for the Companys products and prices received for crude oil and natural gas production and refined petroleum products; the economic conditions of the markets in which the Company conducts business; the exchange rate between the Canadian and U.S. dollar; the foreign currency risk relating to gas and liquids sales agreements which are denominated in Chinese Yuan; the ability to replace reserves of oil and gas, whether sourced from exploration, improved recovery or acquisitions; potential actions of governments, regulatory authorities and other stakeholders that may impose operating costs or restrictions in the jurisdictions where the Company has operations; changes to royalty regimes; changes to government fiscal, monetary and other financial policies; changes in workforce demographics; and the cost and availability of capital, including access to capital markets at acceptable rates; |
| with respect to the Companys Offshore business in Asia Pacific and Atlantic and upstream operations in the Integrated Corridor (including the infrastructure and marketing and Canadian refined products businesses): the availability of prospective drilling rights; the costs to acquire exploration rights, undertake geological studies, appraisal drilling and project development; the availability and cost of labour, technical expertise, material and equipment to efficiently, effectively and safely undertake capital projects; the costs to operate properties, plants and equipment in an efficient, reliable and safe manner; prevailing climatic conditions in the Companys operating locations; regulations to deal with climate change issues; the competitive actions of other companies, including increased competition from other oil and gas companies; business interruptions because of unexpected events such as fires, blowouts, freeze-ups, equipment failures and other similar events affecting the Company or other parties whose operations or assets directly or indirectly affect the Company and that may or may not be financially recoverable; the co-operation of business partners especially where the Company is not operator of production projects or developments in which it has an interest; the inability to obtain regulatory approvals to operate existing properties or develop significant growth projects; risk associated with transportation of production or product to market or transportation of feedstock to processing facilities resulting from an interruption in pipeline and other transportation services both owned and contracted, due to calamitous event or regulatory obligation; and the inability to reach estimated production levels from existing and future oil and gas development projects as a result of technological or commercial difficulties; the continued availability of third-party owned equipment for operations; and |
| with respect to the Companys downstream operations in the Integrated Corridor: the costs to operate properties, plants and equipment in an efficient, reliable and safe manner; regulatory (environmental, license to operate, social and political) and prevailing climatic conditions in the Companys operating locations; regulations to deal with climate change issues; the competitive actions of other companies, including increased competition from other oil and gas companies; business interruptions because of unexpected events such as fires, loss of containment, freeze-ups, equipment failures and other similar events affecting Husky or other parties whose operations or assets directly or indirectly affect the Company and that may or may not be financially recoverable; risk associated with transportation of production or product to market or transportation of feedstock to processing facilities resulting from an interruption in pipeline and other transportation services both owned and contracted, due to calamitous event or regulatory obligation; and the inability to obtain regulatory approvals to operate existing properties or develop significant growth projects. |
These and other factors are discussed throughout this AIF and in the MD&A for the year ended December 31, 2019, which is available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and on EDGAR at www.sec.gov.
In the discussions above, the Company has categorized the material factors and assumptions used to develop the forward-looking statements, and the risks, uncertainties and other factors that could influence actual results, by region, properties, plays and segments. These categories reflect the Companys current views regarding the factors, assumptions, risks and uncertainties most relevant to the particular region, property, play or segment. Other factors, assumptions, risks or uncertainties could impact a particular region, property, play or segment, and a factor, assumption, risk or uncertainty categorized under a particular region, property, play or segment could also influence results with respect to another region, property, play or segment.
New factors emerge from time to time and it is not possible for management to predict all of such factors and to assess in advance the impact of each such factor on the Companys business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement. The impact of any one factor on a particular forward-looking statement is not determinable with certainty as such factors are dependent upon other factors, and the Companys course of action would depend upon managements assessment of the future considering all information available to it at the relevant time. Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which such statement is made and, except as required by applicable securities laws, the Company undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which such statement is made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.
Non-GAAP Measures
This AIF contains the term operating netback, which is a common non-GAAP metric used in the oil and gas industry and is not used to enhance the Companys reported financial performance or position. Management believes this measure assists management and investors to evaluate the specific operating performance by product at the oil and gas lease level. Operating netback is calculated as gross revenue less royalties, production and operating and transportation costs on a per unit basis.
This AIF contains the term funds from operations, which is a non-GAAP measure that does not have a standardized meaning prescribed by IFRS and therefore is unlikely to be comparable to similar measures presented by other issues. It is common in the reports of other companies but may differ by definition and application. Funds from operations should not be considered an alternative to, or more meaningful than, cash flow - operating activities as determined in accordance with IFRS, as an indicator of financial performance. Funds from operations equals cash flow - operating activities excluding change in non-cash working capital. Management believes that impacts of non-cash working capital items on cash flow - operating activities may reduce comparability between periods, accordingly, funds from operations is presented in the Companys financial reports to assist management and investors in analyzing operating performance of the Company in the stated period compared to prior periods.
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 82
Disclosure of Oil and Gas Information
Unless otherwise indicated: (i) reserves estimates have been prepared by internal qualified reserves evaluators in accordance with the Canadian Oil and Gas Evaluation Handbook, has been audited and reviewed by Sproule, an independent qualified reserves auditor, have an effective date of December 31, 2019 and represent the Companys working interest share (ii) projected and historical production volumes quoted are gross, which represents the total or the Companys working interest, as applicable share before deduction of royalties (iii) all Husky working interest production volumes quoted are before deduction of royalties; and (iv) historical production volumes provided are for the year ended December 31, 2019.
The Company uses the term barrels of oil equivalent (or boe), which is consistent with other oil and gas companies disclosures, and is calculated on an energy equivalence basis applicable at the burner tip whereby one barrel of crude oil is equivalent to six thousand cubic feet of natural gas. The term boe is used to express the sum of the total company products in one unit that can be used for comparisons. Readers are cautioned that the term boe may be misleading, particularly if used in isolation. This measure is used for consistency with other oil and gas companies and does not represent value equivalency at the wellhead.
The Company uses the term reserves replacement ratio, which is consistent with other oil and gas companies disclosures. Reserves replacement ratios for a given period are determined by taking the Companys incremental proved reserve additions for that period divided by the Companys Upstream gross production for the same period. The reserves replacement ratio measures the amount of reserves added to a companys reserves base during a given period relative to the amount of oil and gas produced during that same period. A companys reserves replacement ratio must be at least 100% for the company to maintain its reserves. The reserves replacement ratio only measures the amount of reserves added to a companys reserve base during a given period. Reserves replacement ratios that exclude economic factors will exclude the impacts that changing oil and gas prices, inflation, and exchange rates and the regulatory curtailment imposed by the Alberta government have.
This document includes an estimate of net pay thickness at White Rose A-78, which estimate may be considered to be anticipated results under NI 51-101. The estimate was prepared internally. The risks and uncertainties associated with recovery of resources from A-78 include, but are not limited to: that Husky may encounter unexpected drilling results; the occurrence of unexpected events in the exploration for, and the operation and development of, oil and gas; delays in anticipated timing of drilling and completion of wells; geological, technical, drilling and processing problems; and other difficulties in producing petroleum reserves.
Note to U.S. Readers
The Company reports its reserves and resources information in accordance with Canadian practices and specifically in accordance with National Instrument 51-101 Standards of Disclosure for Oil and Gas Activities, adopted by the Canadian securities regulators. Because the Company is permitted to prepare its reserves and resources information in accordance with Canadian disclosure requirements, it may use certain terms in that disclosure that U.S. oil and gas companies generally do not include or may be prohibited from including in their filings with the SEC.
All currency is expressed in Canadian dollars unless otherwise directed.
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 83
Husky Energy Inc.
Audit Committee Mandate
Purpose
The Audit Committee (the Committee) is a committee of the Board of Directors (the Board) of Husky Energy Inc. (the Corporation). The Committees primary function is to assist the Board in carrying out its responsibilities with respect to:
1. | the quarterly and annual financial statements and quarterly and annual MD&A, which are to be provided to shareholders and the appropriate regulatory agencies; |
2. | earnings press releases before the Corporation publicly discloses this information; |
3. | the system of internal controls that management has established; |
4. | the internal and external audit process; |
5. | the appointment of external auditors; |
6. | the appointment of qualified reserves evaluators or auditors; |
7. | the filing of statements and reports with respect to the Corporations oil and gas reserves; and |
8. | the identification, management and mitigation of major financial risk exposures of the Corporation. |
In addition, the Committee provides an avenue for communication between the Board and each of the Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation and other senior financial management, internal audit, the external auditors, external qualified reserves evaluators or auditors and internal qualified reserves evaluators. It is expected that the Committee will have a clear understanding with the external auditors and the external reserve evaluators or auditors that an open and transparent relationship must be maintained with the Committee.
While the Committee has the responsibilities and powers set forth in this Mandate, the role of the Committee is oversight. The members of the Committee are not full time employees of the Corporation and may or may not be accountants or auditors by profession or experts in the fields of accounting, or auditing and, in any event, do not serve in such capacity. Consequently, it is not the duty of the Committee to plan or conduct financial audits or reserve audits or evaluations, or to determine that the Corporations financial statements are complete, accurate and are in accordance with applicable accounting or reserve principles. This is the responsibility of management and the external auditors and, as to reserves, the external reserve evaluators or auditors. Management and the external auditors will also have the responsibility to conduct investigations and to assure compliance with laws and regulations and the Corporations business conduct guidelines.
Composition
The Committee will consist of not less than three directors, all of whom will be independent and will satisfy the financial literacy requirements of securities regulatory requirements.
One of the members of the Committee will be an audit committee financial expert as defined in applicable securities regulatory requirements.
Members of the Committee will be appointed annually at a meeting of the Board, on the recommendation of the Corporate Governance Committee to the Co-Chairs of the Board and will be listed in the annual report to shareholders.
Committee members may be removed or replaced at any time by the Board, and will, in any event, cease to be a member of the Committee upon ceasing to be a member of the Board. Where a vacancy occurs at any time in the membership of the Committee, it may be filled by the Board.
The Committee Chair will be appointed by the Board, on the recommendation of the Corporate Governance Committee to the Co-Chairs of the Board.
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 84
Meetings
The Committee will meet at least four times annually on dates determined by the Chair or at the call of the Chair or any other Committee member, and as many additional times as the Committee deems necessary.
Committee members will strive to be present at all meetings either in person, by telephone or other communications facilities as permit all persons participating in the meeting to hear each other.
A majority of Committee members, present in person, by telephone, or by other permissible communication facilities will constitute a quorum.
The Committee will appoint a secretary, who need not be a member of the Committee, or a director of the Corporation. The secretary will keep minutes of the meetings of the Committee. Minutes will be sent to all Committee members, on a timely basis.
As necessary or desirable, but in any case at least quarterly, the Committee shall meet with members of management and representatives of the external auditors and internal audit in separate executive sessions to discuss any matters that the Committee or any of these groups believes should be discussed privately.
As necessary or desirable, but in any case at least annually, the Committee will meet the management and representatives of the external reserves evaluators or auditors and internal reserves evaluators in separate executive sessions to discuss matters that the Committee or any of these groups believes should be discussed privately.
Authority
Subject to any prior specific directive by the Board, the Committee is granted the authority to investigate any matter or activity involving financial accounting and financial reporting, the internal controls of the Corporation and the reporting of the Corporations reserves and oil and gas activities.
The Committee has the authority to engage and set the compensation of independent counsel and other advisors, at the Corporations expense, as it determines necessary to carry out its duties.
In recognition of the fact that the external auditors are ultimately accountable to the Committee, the Committee will have the authority and responsibility to recommend to the Board the external auditors that will be proposed for nomination at the annual general meeting. The external auditors will report directly to the Committee, and the Committee will evaluate and, where appropriate, replace the external auditors. The Committee will approve the fees and terms for all audit engagements and all non-audit engagements with the external auditors. The Committee will consult with management and the internal audit group regarding the engagement of the external auditors but will not delegate these responsibilities.
The external qualified reserves evaluators or auditors will report directly to the Committee, and the Committee will evaluate and, where appropriate, replace the external qualified reserves evaluators or auditors. The Committee will approve the fees and terms for all reserves evaluators or audit engagements. The Committee will consult with management and the internal qualified reserves evaluators group regarding the engagement of the external qualified reserves evaluators or auditors but will not delegate these responsibilities.
Specific Duties & Responsibilities
The Committee will have the oversight responsibilities and specific duties as described below.
Audit
1. | Review and reassess the adequacy of this Mandate annually and recommend any proposed changes to the Corporate Governance Committee and the Board for approval. |
2. | Review with the Corporations management, internal audit and the external auditors and recommend to the Board for approval the Corporations annual financial statements and annual MD&A which is to be provided to shareholders and the appropriate regulatory agencies and any financial statement contained in a prospectus, information circular, registration statement or other similar document. |
3. | Review with the Corporations management, internal audit and the external auditors and approve the Corporations quarterly financial statements and quarterly MD&A which is to be provided to shareholders and the appropriate regulatory agencies. |
4. | Review with the Corporations management and approve earnings press releases before the Corporation publicly discloses this information. |
5. | Be responsible for the oversight of the work of the external auditors, including the resolution of disagreements between management of the Corporation and the external auditors regarding financial reporting. |
6. | Review with the Corporations management, internal audit and the external auditors the Corporations accounting and financial reporting controls and obtain annually, in writing from the external auditors their observations, if any, on material weaknesses in internal controls over financial reporting as noted during the course of their work. |
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 85
7. | Review with the Corporations management, internal audit and the external auditors significant accounting and reporting principles, practices and procedures applied by the Corporation in preparing its financial statements, and discuss with the external auditors their judgments about the quality (not just the acceptability) of the Corporations accounting principles used in financial reporting. |
8. | Review the scope of internal audits work plan for the year and receive a summary report of major findings by internal audit and how management is addressing the conditions reported. |
9. | Review the scope and general extent of the external auditors annual audit, such review to include an explanation from the external auditors of the factors considered in determining the audit scope, including the major risk factors, and the external auditors confirmation whether or not any limitations have been placed on the scope or nature of their audit procedures. |
10. | Inquire as to the independence of the external auditors and obtain from the external auditors, at least annually, a formal written statement delineating all relationships between the external auditors and the Corporation as contemplated by Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1, Independence Discussions with Audit Committees. |
11. | Arrange with the external auditors that (a) they will advise the Committee, through its Chair and management of the Corporation, of any matters identified through procedures followed for the review of interim quarterly financial statements of the Corporation, such notification is to be made prior to the related press release and (b), for written confirmation at the end of each of the first three quarters of the year, that they have nothing to report to the Committee, if that is the case, or the written enumeration of required reporting issues. |
12. | Review at the completion of the annual audit, with senior management, internal audit and the external auditors the following: |
i. | the annual financial statements and related footnotes and financial information to be included in the Corporations annual report to shareholders; |
ii. | results of the audit of the financial statements and the related report thereon and, if applicable, a report on changes during the year in accounting principles and their application; |
iii. | significant changes to the audit plan, if any, and any serious disputes or difficulties with management encountered during the audit; |
iv. | inquire about the cooperation received by the external auditors during their audit, including access to all requested records, data and information; and |
v. | inquire of the external auditors whether there have been any material disagreements with management, which, if not satisfactorily resolved, would have caused them to issue a non-standard report on the Corporations financial statements. |
13. | Discuss (a) with the external auditors, without management being present, (i) the quality of the Corporations financial and accounting personnel, and (ii) the completeness and accuracy of the Corporations financial statements, and (b) elicit the comments of senior management regarding the responsiveness of the external auditors to the Corporations needs. |
14. | Meet with management to discuss any relevant significant recommendations that the external auditors may have, particularly those characterized as material or serious (typically, such recommendations will be presented by the external auditors in the form of a Letter of Comments and Recommendations to the Committee) and review the responses of management to the Letter of Comments and Recommendations and receive follow-up reports on action taken concerning the aforementioned recommendations. |
15. | Review and approve disclosures required to be included in periodic reports filed with Canadian and U.S. securities regulators with respect to non-audit services performed by the external auditors. |
16. | Establish adequate procedures for the review of the Corporations disclosure of financial information extracted or derived from the Corporations financial statements, and periodically assess the adequacy of those procedures. |
17. | Establish procedures for (a) the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints received by the Corporation regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters, and (b) the confidential, anonymous submission by employees of the Corporation of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters. |
18. | Review and approve the Corporations hiring policies regarding partners, employees and former partners and employees of the present and former external auditors. |
19. | Review the appointment and replacement of the senior internal audit executive. |
20. | Review with management, internal audit and the external auditors the methods used to establish and monitor the Corporations policies with respect to unethical or illegal activities by the Corporations employees that may have a material impact on the financial statements or other reporting of the Corporation. |
21. | Reviewing generally, as part of the review of the annual financial statements, a report, from the Corporations general counsel concerning legal, regulatory and compliance matters that may have a material impact on the financial statements or other reporting of the Corporation. |
22. | Review and discuss with management, on a regular basis, the identification, management and mitigation of major financial risk exposures across the Corporation. In addition, the Committee oversees the Corporations risk management framework and related processes. |
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 86
Reserves
23. | Review, with reasonable frequency, the Corporations procedures relating to the disclosure of information with respect to the Corporations oil and gas reserves, including the Corporations procedures for complying with the disclosure requirements and restrictions of applicable regulatory requirements. |
24. | Review with management the appointment of the external qualified reserves evaluators or auditors, and in the case of any proposed change in such appointment, determine the reasons for the change and whether there have been disputes between management and the appointed external qualified reserves evaluators or auditors. |
25. | Review, with reasonable frequency, the Corporations procedures for providing information to the external qualified reserves evaluators or auditors who report on reserves and data for the purposes of compliance with applicable securities regulatory requirements. |
26. | Meet, before the approval and release of the Corporations reserves data and the report of the qualified reserve evaluators or auditors thereon, with senior management, the external qualified reserves evaluators or auditors and the internal qualified reserves evaluators to determine whether any restrictions affect their ability to report on reserves data without reservation and to review the reserves data and the report of the qualified reserves evaluators or auditors. |
27. | Recommend to the Board for approval of the content and filing of required statements and reports relating to the Corporations disclosure of reserves data as prescribed by applicable regulatory requirements. |
Miscellaneous
28. | Review and approve (a) any change or waiver in the Corporations Code of Business Conduct for the President and Chief Executive Officer and senior financial officers and (b) any public disclosure made regarding such change or waiver and, if satisfied, refer the matter to the Board for approval. |
29. | Act in an advisory capacity to the Board. |
30. | Carry out such other responsibilities as the Board may, from time to time, set forth. |
31. | Advise and report to the Co-Chairs of the Board and the Board, relative to the duties and responsibilities set out above, from time to time, and in such details as is reasonably appropriate. |
Effective Date: May 6, 2014
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 87
Husky Energy Inc.
Report on Reserves Data by Independent Qualified Reserves Auditor
To the board of directors of Husky Energy Inc. (the Company):
(1) | We have audited or reviewed the Companys reserves data as at December 31, 2019. The reserves data are estimates of proved reserves and probable reserves and related future net revenue as at December 31, 2019, estimated using forecast prices and costs. |
(2) | The reserves data are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the reserves data based on our audit and review. |
(3) | We carried out our audit and review in accordance with standards set out in the Canadian Oil and Gas Evaluation Handbook as amended from time to time (the COGE Handbook), maintained by the Society of Petroleum Evaluation Engineers (Calgary Chapter). |
(4) | Those standards require that we plan and perform an audit and review to obtain reasonable assurance as to whether the reserves data are free of material misstatement. An audit and review also includes assessing whether the reserves data are in accordance with the principles and definitions presented in the COGE Handbook. |
(5) | The following table shows the net present value of future net revenue (before deduction of income taxes) attributed to proved plus probable reserves, estimated using forecast prices and costs and calculated using a discount rate of 10%, included in the reserves data of the Company audited and reviewed for the year ended December 31, 2019, and identifies the respective portions thereof that we have audited and reviewed and reported on to the Companys management and board of directors. |
Independent Qualified Reserves Evaluator or Auditor |
Effective Date | Location of Reserves (Country) |
Net Present Value of Future Net Revenue (Before Income Taxes,10% Discount Rate) |
|||||||||||||||
Audited (MM$) | Evaluated | Reviewed | Total (MM$)(2) | |||||||||||||||
Sproule Associates |
December 31, 2019 | Canada | 15,796.4 | Nil | (59.8 | )(1) | 15,736.7 | |||||||||||
Limited |
China | 4,334.8 | Nil | | 4,334.8 | |||||||||||||
Indonesia | 779.2 | Nil | | 779.2 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
20,910.4 | Nil | (59.8 | )(1) | 20,850.6 |
(1) | Negative NPV10 results from inclusion of Canadian Abandonment and Reclamation costs for all existing assets |
(2) | Numbers may not add due to rounding |
(6) | In our opinion, the reserves data audited by us have, in all material respects, been determined and are in accordance with the COGE Handbook, consistently applied. We express no opinion on the reserves data that we reviewed but did not audit or evaluate. |
(7) | We have no responsibility to update our report referred to in paragraph 5 for events and circumstances occurring after the effective date of our report. |
(8) | Because the reserves data are based on judgments regarding future events, actual results will vary and the variations may be material. |
Sproule Associates Limited
Calgary, Alberta
January 31, 2020
/s/ Art McMullen, P. Eng. |
/s/ Alec Kovaltchouk, P. Geo. | |||
Art McMullen, P. Eng. | Alec Kovaltchouk, P. Geo. | |||
Senior Manager, Engineering and Regional Director, Asia Pacific | VP, Geoscience | |||
/s/ Charles Wong |
/s/ Cameron P. Six, P. Eng. | |||
Charles Wong, P. Eng. | Cameron P. Six, P. Eng. | |||
Petroleum Engineer | President and Chief Executive Officer |
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 88
Husky Energy Inc.
Report of Management and Directors on Oil and Gas Disclosure
Management of Husky Energy Inc. (the Company) are responsible for the preparation and disclosure of information with respect to Huskys oil and gas activities in accordance with securities regulatory requirements. This information includes reserves data.
An independent qualified reserves auditor has audited and reviewed the Companys reserves data. The report of the independent qualified reserves auditor will be filed with securities regulatory authorities concurrently with this report.
The Audit Committee of the board of directors of the Company has:
a. | reviewed the Companys procedures for providing information to the independent qualified reserves auditor; |
b. | met with the independent qualified reserves auditor to determine whether any restrictions affected the ability of the independent qualified reserves auditor to report without reservation; and |
c. | reviewed the reserves data with management and the independent qualified reserves auditor. |
The Audit Committee of the board of directors has reviewed the Companys procedures for assembling and reporting other information associated with oil and gas activities and has reviewed that information with management. The board of directors has, on the recommendation of the Audit Committee, approved:
a. | the content and filing with securities regulatory authorities of Form 51-101F1 containing reserves data and other oil and gas information; |
b. | the filing of Form 51-101F2, which is the report of the independent qualified reserves auditor on the reserves data; and |
c. | the content and filing of this report. |
Because the reserves data are based on judgments regarding future events, actual results will vary and the variations may be material.
/s/ Robert J. Peabody |
February 26, 2020 | |||
Robert J. Peabody President & Chief Executive Officer |
||||
/s/ Robert W. P. Symonds |
February 26, 2020 | |||
Robert W. P. Symonds Chief Operating Officer |
||||
/s/ William Shurniak |
February 26, 2020 | |||
William Shurniak Director |
||||
/s/ Stephen E. Bradley |
February 26, 2020 | |||
Stephen E. Bradley Director |
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 89
Husky Energy Inc.
Independent Qualified Reserves Auditor Audit Opinion
Husky Energy Inc.
707 - 8th Avenue S.W.
Calgary, Alberta
T2P 3G7
Attention: Mr. Richard Leslie, Director, Reserves
Re: Audit of Husky Energy Inc.s 2019 Year-End Reserves
As requested by Husky Energy Inc. (Husky or the Company), Sproule has conducted an audit of Huskys reserves estimates and the respective net present values as at December 31, 2019. Husky internally evaluates all of their properties. Huskys detailed reserves information was provided to us for this audit. Sproules responsibility is to express an independent opinion on the reasonableness of the reserves estimates and the respective net present value estimates, in the aggregate, based on our audit tests and to assess the quality of the Companys processes and guidelines applied in the preparation of the reserves information.
We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted audit standards as recommended by the Society of Petroleum Engineers and the Canadian Oil and Gas Evaluation Handbook (section 5.3.3 of the Third Edition). As part of our audit, Sproule reviewed and assessed the policies, procedures, documentation and guidelines the Company has in place with respect to the estimation, review, documentation, and approval of Huskys reserves information. The audit included confirming on a test basis that there is adherence on the part of Huskys internal reserve evaluators and other employees to the reserves management and administration policies and procedures established by the Company. As well, the audit also included conducting reserves evaluation on a sufficient number of the Companys internally evaluated properties as considered necessary in order to express an opinion.
For the 2019 year-end audit Sproule also reviewed the internal Husky reserve evaluation for all of the intermediate and minor properties that were not audited. Thus, for the 2019 year-end Sproule has either audited or reviewed every Husky property that was assigned reserves.
Based on the results of our audit, it is our opinion that Huskys internally generated proved and probable reserves and net present values based on forecast and constant price assumptions are, in aggregate, reasonable, and have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted oil and gas engineering and evaluation practices as set out in the COGE Handbook.
The results of the Husky internally generated reserves and net present values (based on forecast prices) supplied to us as part of the audit process are summarized below:
Husky Energy Inc. Internally Evaluated Reserves and Net Present Values Forecast Prices and Costs As of December 31, 2019 | ||||
Working Interest Before Royalty Company Share of Remaining Reserves (mmboe) |
Company Share of Net Present Value Before Income Tax (MM$) @ 10% | |||
Total Proved |
1,431 | 12,292 | ||
Total Proved Plus Probable |
2,105 | 20,851 |
Sincerely,
Sproule Associates Limited
/s/ Cameron P. Six, P. Eng. |
Cameron P. Six, P. Eng. President and Chief Executive Officer Calgary, Alberta January 31, 2020 |
Husky Energy Inc. | Annual Information Form 2019 | 90
Document B
Form 40-F
Consolidated Financial Statements and
Auditors Report to Shareholders
For the Year Ended December 31, 2019
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of Husky Energy Inc.:
Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Husky Energy Inc. (the Company) as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the related consolidated statements of income (loss), comprehensive income (loss), changes in shareholders equity, and cash flows for each of the years then ended, and the related notes (collectively, the consolidated financial statements). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the results of its financial performance and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Companys internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, and our report dated February 26, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
Change in Accounting Principle
As discussed in Note 3(ab) to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has changed its method of accounting for leases as of January 1, 2019 due to the adoption of International Financial Reporting Standard 16, Leases.
Basis for Opinion
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.
Assessment of the recoverable amount of the Northern, Rainbow, Sunrise and White Rose cash generating units
As discussed in note 9 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $2,240 million related to the Northern, Rainbow, Sunrise and White Rose cash generating units (collectively the CGUs). The Company identified an indicator of impairment at December 31, 2019 for the CGUs and performed an impairment test to estimate the recoverable amount of the CGUs. The estimated recoverable amount of the CGUs involves numerous estimates, including the cash flows associated with the estimated proved and probable oil and gas reserves, and for the White Rose cash generating unit the possible reserves, and the discount rate. The estimation of proved, probable and possible oil and gas reserves involves the expertise of qualified reserves evaluators, who take into consideration assumptions related to forecasted production, forecasted operating, royalty and capital cost assumptions and forecasted oil and gas prices (reserve assumptions). The Company engages independent qualified reserves evaluators to audit the estimate of proved and probable oil and gas reserves associated with the CGUs.
We identified the assessment of the recoverable amount of the CGUs as a critical audit matter. Complex auditor judgment was required in evaluating the Companys estimate of the proved and probable oil and gas reserves for the CGUs, and for the White Rose cash generating unit the possible reserves, and the discount rate, which were inputs into the calculation of the recoverable amount of the CGUs. Auditor judgment was also required to evaluate the reserve assumptions used in the estimate of the reserves associated with the CGUs.
The primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included the following. We tested certain internal controls over the Companys determination of the recoverable amount of the CGUs, including controls related to the development of the discount rate and the estimation of the oil and gas reserves associated with the CGUs. We evaluated the competence, capabilities and objectivity of the independent qualified reserves evaluators engaged by the Company, who audited the estimate of proved and probable oil and gas reserves associated with the CGUs. We evaluated the competence, capabilities and objectivity of the internal qualified reserves evaluators who estimated the possible oil reserves associated with the White Rose cash generating unit. We evaluated the methodology used by the independent qualified reserves evaluators to audit the estimate of proven and probable reserves associated with the CGUs for compliance with regulatory standards. We evaluated the methodology used by the internal qualified reserves evaluators to estimate the possible oil reserves associated with White Rose cash generating unit for compliance with regulatory standards. We compared the 2019 actual production, operating, royalty and capital costs of the Company to those estimates used in the prior years estimate of proved reserves to assess the Companys ability to accurately forecast. We compared the forecasted commodity prices used in the estimate of proved, probable and possible reserves to those published by other reserve engineering companies. We compared estimates of forecasted production, forecasted operating, royalty and capital cost assumptions used in the estimate of proved, probable and possible reserves to historical results. We involved a valuation professional with specialized skills and knowledge, who assisted in evaluating the Companys discount rate, by comparing it against market data and other external data. The valuations specialist estimated the recoverable amount of the CGUs using the estimate of the cash flows associated with the CGUs reserves and the discount rate evaluated by the specialist and compared the results to market data and other external pricing data.
Assessment of the recoverable amount of the Lima cash generating unit
As discussed in note 11 to the consolidated financial statements, the goodwill balance as of December 31, 2019 was $656 million, all of which relates to the Companys Lima refinery. The Lima refinery is a cash generating unit (Lima CGU) and is tested for impairment on an annual basis or when circumstances indicate that the carrying value may be impaired. The estimated recoverable amount of the Lima CGU involves numerous assumptions, including the estimated future revenue net of oil purchases used in the production of gas, diesel and other petroleum products, future capital expenditures and the discount rate.
We identified the assessment of the recoverable amount of the Lima CGU as a critical audit matter. The estimated recoverable amount of the Lima CGU was subject to estimates and judgment in determining the future cash flows associated with the CGU, and therefore resulted in the application of a higher degree of auditor judgment. Complex auditor judgment was required in evaluating estimated future revenue net of oil purchases used in the production of gas, diesel and other petroleum products, future capital expenditures and the discount rate.
The primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included the following. We tested certain internal controls related to the assessment of the recoverable amount of the Lima CGU, including controls related to the development of the estimated future revenue net of oil purchases, future capital expenditures and discount rate assumptions. We performed sensitivity analyses over the estimated future revenue net of oil purchases, future capital expenditures and discount rate assumptions to assess their impact on the Companys determination that the recoverable amount of the Lima CGU exceeded its carrying value. We compared the Companys historical revenue net of oil purchases and capital expenditure forecasts to actual results to assess the Companys ability to accurately forecast. We involved a valuation professional with specialized skills and knowledge, who assisted in evaluating the Companys discount rate, by comparing it against market data and other external data. The valuations professional estimated the recoverable amount of the Lima CGU using the cash flow forecast of the Lima CGU and the discount rate evaluated by the specialist and compared the result to market data and other external pricing data.
Assessment of the impact of estimated oil and gas reserves on depletion expense related to oil and gas properties
As discussed in Note 3(d) to the consolidated financial statements, the Company depletes its oil and gas properties using the unit-of-production method. Under such method, capitalized costs are depleted over proved developed reserves of the particular field, except in the case of assets whose useful life is shorter or longer than the lifetime of the proved developed reserves of that field, in which case either the straight-line method or a unit-of-production method based on total proved plus probable reserves is applied as appropriate in the circumstances. As indicated in Note 9, for the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company recorded depletion expense related to oil and gas properties of $1,842 million. The estimation of proved and probable oil and gas reserves, which are used in the calculation of depletion expense, involves the expertise of qualified reserves evaluators, who take into consideration reserve assumptions. The Company engages independent qualified reserves evaluators to audit the Companys proved and probable oil and gas reserves.
We identified the assessment of the impact of estimated proved and probable oil and gas reserves on the calculation of depletion expense as a critical audit matter. Complex auditor judgment was required in evaluating the Companys estimate of proved and probable oil and gas reserves, which was an input to the calculation of depletion expense. Auditor judgment was also required to evaluate the reserve assumptions used to estimate the proved and probable reserves.
The primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included the following. We tested certain internal controls over the calculation of depletion expense, including controls over the estimation of proved and probable oil and gas reserves. We analyzed and assessed the calculation of depletion expense for compliance with regulatory standards. We evaluated the competence, capabilities and objectivity of the independent qualified reserves evaluators engaged by the Company, who audited the proved and probable oil and gas reserves. We evaluated the methodology used by the independent qualified reserves evaluators to audit the estimate of proved and probable reserves for compliance with regulatory standards. We compared the Companys 2019 actual production, operating, royalty and capital costs to those estimates used in the prior year estimate of proved reserves to assess the Companys ability to accurately forecast. We compared the forecasted commodity prices used in the estimate of proved and probable reserves to those published by other reserve engineering companies. We compared estimates of forecasted production, forecasted operating, royalty and capital cost assumptions used in the estimate of proved and probable reserves to historical results.
/s/ KPMG LLP |
KPMG LLP |
Chartered Professional Accountants |
We have served as the Companys auditor since 1951. |
Calgary, Canada |
February 26, 2020 |
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of Husky Energy Inc.:
Opinion on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
We have audited Husky Energy Inc.s (the Company) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the related consolidated statements of income (loss), comprehensive income (loss), shareholders equity, and cash flows for the years then ended, and the related notes (collectively, the consolidated financial statements), and our report dated February 26, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
Basis for Opinion
The Companys management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Managements Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting included in Managements Discussion and Analysis. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Companys internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ KPMG LLP |
KPMG LLP |
Chartered Professional Accountants |
Calgary, Canada |
February 26, 2020 |
MANAGEMENTS REPORT
The management of Husky Energy Inc. (the Company) is responsible for the financial information and operating data presented in this financial document.
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared by management in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board. When alternative accounting methods exist, management has chosen those it deems most appropriate in the circumstances. Financial statements are not precise as they include certain amounts based on estimates and judgments. Management has determined such amounts on a reasonable basis in order to ensure that the financial statements are presented fairly, in all material respects. Financial information presented elsewhere in this financial document has been prepared on a basis consistent with that in the consolidated financial statements.
The Company maintains systems of internal accounting and administrative controls. These systems are designed to provide reasonable assurance that the financial information is relevant, reliable and accurate and that the Companys assets are properly accounted for and adequately safeguarded. Managements evaluation concluded that the Companys internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2019. The system of internal controls is further supported by an internal audit function.
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, composed of independent non-management directors, meets regularly with management, internal auditors as well as the external auditors, to discuss audit (external, internal and joint venture), internal controls, accounting policy and financial reporting matters as well as the reserves determination process. The Committee reviews the annual consolidated financial statements with both management and the independent auditors and reports its findings to the Board of Directors before such statements are approved by the Board. The Committee is also responsible for the appointment of the external auditors for the Company.
The consolidated financial statements have been audited by KPMG LLP, the independent auditors, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) on behalf of the shareholders. KPMG LLP has full and free access to the Audit Committee.
Robert J. Peabody |
Robert J. Peabody |
President & Chief Executive Officer |
Jeffrey R. Hart |
Jeffrey R. Hart |
Chief Financial Officer |
Calgary, Canada |
February 26, 2020 |
Husky Energy Inc. | Consolidated Financial Statements | 1
Independent auditors report
To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of Husky Energy Inc.:
Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Husky Energy Inc. (the Company) as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the related consolidated statements of income (loss), comprehensive income (loss), changes in shareholders equity, and cash flows for each of the years then ended, and the related notes (collectively, the consolidated financial statements). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the results of its financial performance and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Companys internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, and our report dated February 26, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
Change in Accounting Principle
As discussed in Note 3(ab) to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has changed its method of accounting for leases as of January 1, 2019 due to the adoption of International Financial Reporting Standard 16, Leases.
Basis for Opinion
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.
Husky Energy Inc. | Consolidated Financial Statements | 2
Assessment of the recoverable amount of the Northern, Rainbow, Sunrise and White Rose cash generating units
As discussed in note 9 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $2,240 million related to the Northern, Rainbow, Sunrise and White Rose cash generating units (collectively the CGUs). The Company identified an indicator of impairment at December 31, 2019 for the CGUs and performed an impairment test to estimate the recoverable amount of the CGUs. The estimated recoverable amount of the CGUs involves numerous estimates, including the cash flows associated with the estimated proved and probable oil and gas reserves, and for the White Rose cash generating unit the possible reserves, and the discount rate. The estimation of proved, probable and possible oil and gas reserves involves the expertise of qualified reserves evaluators, who take into consideration assumptions related to forecasted production, forecasted operating, royalty and capital cost assumptions and forecasted oil and gas prices (reserve assumptions). The Company engages independent qualified reserves evaluators to audit the estimate of proved and probable oil and gas reserves associated with the CGUs.
We identified the assessment of the recoverable amount of the CGUs as a critical audit matter. Complex auditor judgment was required in evaluating the Companys estimate of the proved and probable oil and gas reserves for the CGUs, and for the White Rose cash generating unit the possible reserves, and the discount rate, which were inputs into the calculation of the recoverable amount of the CGUs. Auditor judgment was also required to evaluate the reserve assumptions used in the estimate of the reserves associated with the CGUs.
The primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included the following. We tested certain internal controls over the Companys determination of the recoverable amount of the CGUs, including controls related to the development of the discount rate and the estimation of the oil and gas reserves associated with the CGUs. We evaluated the competence, capabilities and objectivity of the independent qualified reserves evaluators engaged by the Company, who audited the estimate of proved and probable oil and gas reserves associated with the CGUs. We evaluated the competence, capabilities and objectivity of the internal qualified reserves evaluators who estimated the possible oil reserves associated with the White Rose cash generating unit. We evaluated the methodology used by the independent qualified reserves evaluators to audit the estimate of proven and probable reserves associated with the CGUs for compliance with regulatory standards. We evaluated the methodology used by the internal qualified reserves evaluators to estimate the possible oil reserves associated with White Rose cash generating unit for compliance with regulatory standards. We compared the 2019 actual production, operating, royalty and capital costs of the Company to those estimates used in the prior years estimate of proved reserves to assess the Companys ability to accurately forecast. We compared the forecasted commodity prices used in the estimate of proved, probable and possible reserves to those published by other reserve engineering companies. We compared estimates of forecasted production, forecasted operating, royalty and capital cost assumptions used in the estimate of proved, probable and possible reserves to historical results. We involved a valuation professional with specialized skills and knowledge, who assisted in evaluating the Companys discount rate, by comparing it against market data and other external data. The valuations specialist estimated the recoverable amount of the CGUs using the estimate of the cash flows associated with the CGUs reserves and the discount rate evaluated by the specialist and compared the results to market data and other external pricing data.
Assessment of the recoverable amount of the Lima cash generating unit
As discussed in note 11 to the consolidated financial statements, the goodwill balance as of December 31, 2019 was $656 million, all of which relates to the Companys Lima refinery. The Lima refinery is a cash generating unit (Lima CGU) and is tested for impairment on an annual basis or when circumstances indicate that the carrying value may be impaired. The estimated recoverable amount of the Lima CGU involves numerous assumptions, including the estimated future revenue net of oil purchases used in the production of gas, diesel and other petroleum products, future capital expenditures and the discount rate.
We identified the assessment of the recoverable amount of the Lima CGU as a critical audit matter. The estimated recoverable amount of the Lima CGU was subject to estimates and judgment in determining the future cash flows associated with the CGU, and therefore resulted in the application of a higher degree of auditor judgment. Complex auditor judgment was required in evaluating estimated future revenue net of oil purchases used in the production of gas, diesel and other petroleum products, future capital expenditures and the discount rate.
The primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included the following. We tested certain internal controls related to the assessment of the recoverable amount of the Lima CGU, including controls related to the development of the estimated future revenue net of oil purchases, future capital expenditures and discount rate assumptions. We performed sensitivity analyses over the estimated future revenue net of oil purchases, future capital expenditures and discount rate assumptions to assess their impact on the Companys determination that the recoverable amount of the Lima CGU exceeded its carrying value. We compared the Companys historical revenue net of oil purchases and capital expenditure forecasts to actual results to assess the Companys ability to accurately forecast. We involved a valuation professional with specialized skills and knowledge, who assisted in evaluating the Companys discount rate, by comparing it against market data and other external data. The valuations professional estimated the recoverable amount of the Lima CGU using the cash flow forecast of the Lima CGU and the discount rate evaluated by the specialist and compared the result to market data and other external pricing data.
Husky Energy Inc. | Consolidated Financial Statements | 3
Assessment of the impact of estimated oil and gas reserves on depletion expense related to oil and gas properties
As discussed in Note 3(d) to the consolidated financial statements, the Company depletes its oil and gas properties using the unit-of-production method. Under such method, capitalized costs are depleted over proved developed reserves of the particular field, except in the case of assets whose useful life is shorter or longer than the lifetime of the proved developed reserves of that field, in which case either the straight-line method or a unit-of-production method based on total proved plus probable reserves is applied as appropriate in the circumstances. As indicated in Note 9, for the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company recorded depletion expense related to oil and gas properties of $1,842 million. The estimation of proved and probable oil and gas reserves, which are used in the calculation of depletion expense, involves the expertise of qualified reserves evaluators, who take into consideration reserve assumptions. The Company engages independent qualified reserves evaluators to audit the Companys proved and probable oil and gas reserves.
We identified the assessment of the impact of estimated proved and probable oil and gas reserves on the calculation of depletion expense as a critical audit matter. Complex auditor judgment was required in evaluating the Companys estimate of proved and probable oil and gas reserves, which was an input to the calculation of depletion expense. Auditor judgment was also required to evaluate the reserve assumptions used to estimate the proved and probable reserves.
The primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included the following. We tested certain internal controls over the calculation of depletion expense, including controls over the estimation of proved and probable oil and gas reserves. We analyzed and assessed the calculation of depletion expense for compliance with regulatory standards. We evaluated the competence, capabilities and objectivity of the independent qualified reserves evaluators engaged by the Company, who audited the proved and probable oil and gas reserves. We evaluated the methodology used by the independent qualified reserves evaluators to audit the estimate of proved and probable reserves for compliance with regulatory standards. We compared the Companys 2019 actual production, operating, royalty and capital costs to those estimates used in the prior year estimate of proved reserves to assess the Companys ability to accurately forecast. We compared the forecasted commodity prices used in the estimate of proved and probable reserves to those published by other reserve engineering companies. We compared estimates of forecasted production, forecasted operating, royalty and capital cost assumptions used in the estimate of proved and probable reserves to historical results.
/s/ KPMG LLP KPMG LLP |
Chartered Professional Accountants
We have served as the Companys auditor since 1951.
Calgary, Canada
February 26, 2020
Husky Energy Inc. | Consolidated Financial Statements | 4
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(millions of Canadian dollars) |
December 31, 2019 | December 31, 2018 | ||||||
Assets |
||||||||
Current assets |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents (note 4) |
1,775 | 2,866 | ||||||
Accounts receivable (notes 5, 25) |
1,499 | 1,355 | ||||||
Income taxes receivable |
30 | 112 | ||||||
Inventories (note 6) |
1,486 | 1,232 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses |
148 | 123 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
4,938 | 5,688 | |||||||
Restricted cash (notes 7, 17) |
142 | 128 | ||||||
Exploration and evaluation assets (note 8) |
643 | 997 | ||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net (note 9) |
23,623 | 25,800 | ||||||
Right-of-use assets, net (note 10) |
1,202 | | ||||||
Goodwill (note 11) |
656 | 690 | ||||||
Investment in joint ventures (note 12) |
1,182 | 1,319 | ||||||
Long-term income taxes receivable |
212 | 243 | ||||||
Other assets (note 13) |
524 | 360 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total Assets |
33,122 | 35,225 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
||||||||
Current liabilities |
||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities (note 15) |
3,465 | 3,159 | ||||||
Short-term debt (note 16) |
550 | 200 | ||||||
Long-term debt due within one year (note 16) |
400 | 1,433 | ||||||
Lease liabilities (note 10) |
109 | | ||||||
Asset retirement obligations (note 17) |
112 | 202 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
4,636 | 4,994 | |||||||
Long-term debt (note 16) |
4,570 | 4,114 | ||||||
Other long-term liabilities (note 18) |
454 | 1,107 | ||||||
Lease liabilities (note 10) |
1,353 | | ||||||
Asset retirement obligations (note 17) |
2,643 | 2,222 | ||||||
Deferred tax liabilities (note 19) |
2,170 | 3,174 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total Liabilities |
15,826 | 15,611 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Shareholders equity |
||||||||
Common shares (note 20) |
7,293 | 7,293 | ||||||
Preferred shares (note 20) |
874 | 874 | ||||||
Contributed surplus |
2 | 2 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
8,365 | 10,273 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
748 | 1,160 | ||||||
Non-controlling interest |
14 | 12 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total Shareholders Equity |
17,296 | 19,614 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
33,122 | 35,225 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.
On behalf of the Board: |
||
Robert J. Peabody |
William Shurniak | |
Robert J. Peabody |
William Shurniak | |
Director |
Director |
Husky Energy Inc. | Consolidated Financial Statements | 5
Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss)
Years ended December 31, | ||||||||
(millions of Canadian dollars, except share data) |
2019 | 2018 | ||||||
Gross revenues |
20,117 | 21,919 | ||||||
Royalties |
(323 | ) | (335 | ) | ||||
Marketing and other |
189 | 668 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Revenues, net of royalties |
19,983 | 22,252 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Expenses |
||||||||
Purchases of crude oil and products |
12,817 | 14,555 | ||||||
Production, operating and transportation expenses (note 21) |
3,017 | 2,803 | ||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses (note 21) |
693 | 654 | ||||||
Depletion, depreciation, amortization and impairment (notes 9, 10) |
5,496 | 2,591 | ||||||
Exploration and evaluation expenses (note 8) |
547 | 149 | ||||||
Gain on sale of assets (note 9) |
(8 | ) | (4 | ) | ||||
Other net (note 13) |
(584 | ) | (591 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
21,978 | 20,157 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Earnings (loss) from operating activities |
(1,995 | ) | 2,095 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Share of equity investment income (note 12) |
59 | 69 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Financial items (note 22) |
||||||||
Net foreign exchange gain |
44 | 14 | ||||||
Finance income |
74 | 64 | ||||||
Finance expenses |
(351 | ) | (314 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
(233 | ) | (236 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Earnings (loss) before income taxes |
(2,169 | ) | 1,928 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Provisions for (recovery of) income taxes (note 19) |
||||||||
Current |
175 | 75 | ||||||
Deferred |
(974 | ) | 396 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
(799 | ) | 471 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net earnings (loss) |
(1,370 | ) | 1,457 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Earnings (loss) per share (note 20) |
||||||||
Basic |
(1.40 | ) | 1.41 | |||||
Diluted |
(1.41 | ) | 1.40 | |||||
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding (note 20) |
||||||||
Basic (millions) |
1,005.1 | 1,005.1 | ||||||
Diluted (millions) |
1,005.1 | 1,006.1 |
The accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.
Husky Energy Inc. | Consolidated Financial Statements | 6
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Years ended December 31, | ||||||||
(millions of Canadian dollars) |
2019 | 2018 | ||||||
Net earnings (loss) |
(1,370 | ) | 1,457 | |||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) |
||||||||
Items that will not be reclassified into earnings, net of tax: |
||||||||
Remeasurements of pension plans (note 23) |
| 46 | ||||||
Items that may be reclassified into earnings, net of tax: |
||||||||
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedge |
(6 | ) | (13 | ) | ||||
Equity investment share of other comprehensive loss |
(2 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||
Exchange differences on translation of foreign operations |
(550 | ) | 857 | |||||
Hedge of net investment (note 25) |
146 | (262 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) |
(412 | ) | 626 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Comprehensive income (loss) |
(1,782 | ) | 2,083 | |||||
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.
Husky Energy Inc. | Consolidated Financial Statements | 7
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders Equity
Attributable to Equity Holders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AOCI (1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(millions of Canadian dollars) |
Common Shares |
Preferred Shares |
Contributed Surplus |
Retained Earnings |
Foreign Currency Translation |
Hedging | Non- Controlling Interest |
Total Shareholders Equity |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance as at December 31, 2017 |
7,293 | 874 | 2 | 9,207 | 559 | 21 | 11 | 17,967 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Net earnings |
| | | 1,457 | | | | 1,457 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Remeasurements of pension plans |
| | | 46 | | | | 46 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges (net of tax recovery of $5 million) (notes 19, 25) |
| | | | | (13 | ) | | (13 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity investment share of other comprehensive loss |
| | | | | (2 | ) | | (2 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Exchange differences on translation of foreign operations (net of tax expense of $87 million) (note 19) |
| | | | 857 | | | 857 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hedge of net investment (net of tax recovery of $41 million) (notes 19, 25) |
| | | | (262 | ) | | | (262 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income (loss) |
| | | 1,503 | 595 | (15 | ) | | 2,083 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Transactions with owners recognized directly in equity: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends declared on common shares (note 20) |
| | | (402 | ) | | | | (402 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends declared on preferred shares (note 20) |
| | | (35 | ) | | | | (35 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-controlling interest in subsidiary |
| | | | | | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Balance as at December 31, 2018 |
7,293 | 874 | 2 | 10,273 | 1,154 | 6 | 12 | 19,614 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Net loss |
| | | (1,370 | ) | | | | (1,370 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Remeasurements of pension plans |
| | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges (net of tax recovery of $3 million) (note 19) |
| | | | | (6 | ) | | (6 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity investment share of other comprehensive loss |
| | | | | (2 | ) | | (2 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Exchange differences on translation of foreign operations (net of tax recovery of $58 million) (note 19) |
| | | | (550 | ) | | | (550 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Hedge of net investment (net of tax expense of $30 million) (notes 19, 25) |
| | | | 146 | | | 146 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income (loss) |
| | | (1,370 | ) | (404 | ) | (8 | ) | | (1,782 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Transactions with owners recognized directly in equity: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends declared on common shares (note 20) |
| | | (503 | ) | | | | (503 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends declared on preferred shares (note 20) |
| | | (35 | ) | | | | (35 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-controlling interest in subsidiary |
| | | | | | 2 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Balance as at December 31, 2019 |
7,293 | 874 | 2 | 8,365 | 750 | (2 | ) | 14 | 17,296 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | Accumulated other comprehensive income. |
The accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.
Husky Energy Inc. | Consolidated Financial Statements | 8
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Years ended December 31, | ||||||||
(millions of Canadian dollars) |
2019 | 2018 | ||||||
Operating activities |
||||||||
Net earnings (loss) |
(1,370 | ) | 1,457 | |||||
Items not affecting cash: |
||||||||
Accretion (notes 17, 22) |
106 | 97 | ||||||
Depletion, depreciation, amortization and impairment (notes 9, 10) |
5,496 | 2,591 | ||||||
Inventory write-down to net realizable value (note 6) |
15 | 60 | ||||||
Exploration and evaluation expenses (note 8) |
355 | 29 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes (note 19) |
(974 | ) | 396 | |||||
Foreign exchange |
(26 | ) | (6 | ) | ||||
Stock-based compensation (notes 20, 21) |
(2 | ) | 44 | |||||
Gain on sale of assets (note 9) |
(8 | ) | (4 | ) | ||||
Unrealized mark to market loss (gain) (note 25) |
44 | (150 | ) | |||||
Share of equity investment income (note 12) |
(59 | ) | (69 | ) | ||||
Gain on insurance recoveries for damage to property (note 13) |
(207 | ) | (253 | ) | ||||
Other |
12 | 21 | ||||||
Settlement of asset retirement obligations (note 17) |
(276 | ) | (181 | ) | ||||
Deferred revenue (note 18) |
(42 | ) | (100 | ) | ||||
Distribution from joint ventures (note 12) |
187 | 72 | ||||||
Change in non-cash working capital (note 24) |
(280 | ) | 130 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash flow operating activities |
2,971 | 4,134 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Financing activities |
||||||||
Long-term debt issuance (note 16) |
1,000 | | ||||||
Long-term debt repayment (note 16) |
(1,389 | ) | | |||||
Short-term debt issuance, net (note 16) |
350 | | ||||||
Debt issue costs (note 16) |
(9 | ) | | |||||
Dividends on common shares (note 20) |
(503 | ) | (402 | ) | ||||
Dividends on preferred shares (note 20) |
(35 | ) | (35 | ) | ||||
Finance lease payments (note 10) |
(233 | ) | | |||||
Other |
(1 | ) | (8 | ) | ||||
Change in non-cash working capital (note 24) |
3 | 120 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash flow financing activities |
(817 | ) | (325 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Investing activities |
||||||||
Capital expenditures |
(3,432 | ) | (3,578 | ) | ||||
Capitalized interest (note 22) |
(177 | ) | (108 | ) | ||||
Corporate acquisition (note 9) |
| (15 | ) | |||||
Proceeds from asset sales (note 9) |
277 | 4 | ||||||
Investment in joint ventures (note 12) |
(40 | ) | (40 | ) | ||||
Other |
2 | (19 | ) | |||||
Change in non-cash working capital (note 24) |
173 | 235 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash flow investing activities |
(3,197 | ) | (3,521 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
(1,043 | ) | 288 | |||||
Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents |
(48 | ) | 65 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
2,866 | 2,513 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year |
1,775 | 2,866 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Supplementary cash flow information |
||||||||
Net interest paid |
(330 | ) | (285 | ) | ||||
Net Income taxes paid |
(41 | ) | (37 | ) |
The accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.
Husky Energy Inc. | Consolidated Financial Statements | 9
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1 Description of Business and Segmented Disclosures
Husky Energy Inc. (Husky or the Company) is an international integrated energy company incorporated under the Business Corporations Act (Alberta). The Companys common shares are listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX) under the symbol HSE and the Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares, Series 1, Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares, Series 2, Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares, Series 3, Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares, Series 5 and Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares, Series 7 are listed under the symbols, HSE.PR.A, HSE.PR.B, HSE.PR.C, HSE.PR.E and HSE.PR.G, respectively. The registered office is located at 707, 8th Avenue S.W., PO Box 6525, Station D, Calgary, Alberta, T2P 3G7.
Management has identified segments for the Companys business based on differences in products, services and management responsibility. The Companys business is conducted predominantly through two major business segments Upstream and Downstream.
Upstream operations in the Integrated Corridor and Offshore include exploration for, and development and production of, crude oil, bitumen, natural gas and natural gas liquids (NGL) (Exploration and Production) and the marketing of the Companys and other producers crude oil, natural gas, NGL, sulphur and petroleum coke. Additionally, Upstream operations include pipeline transportation, the blending of crude oil and natural gas and storage of crude oil, diluent and natural gas (Infrastructure and Marketing). Infrastructure and Marketing markets and distributes products to customers on behalf of Exploration and Production and is grouped in the Upstream business segment based on the nature of its interconnected operations. The Companys Upstream operations are located primarily in Alberta, Saskatchewan, and British Columbia (Western Canada), offshore east coast of Canada (Atlantic) and offshore China and offshore Indonesia (Asia Pacific).
Downstream operations in the Integrated Corridor in Canada include upgrading heavy crude oil feedstock into synthetic crude oil and diesel (Upgrading), refining crude oil, producing ethanol and marketing heavy and synthetic crude oil, refined petroleum products including gasoline, diesel, ethanol-blended fuels, asphalt and ancillary products (Canadian Refined Products). It also includes crude oil refining in the U.S. to produce and market diesel fuels, gasoline, jet fuel and asphalt (U.S. Refining and Marketing). Upgrading, Canadian Refined Products and U.S. Refining and Marketing all process and refine natural resources into marketable products and are grouped together as the Downstream business segment due to the similar nature of their products and services.
Husky Energy Inc. | Consolidated Financial Statements | 10
Segmented Financial Information
Upstream | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
($ millions) |
Exploration and Production(1) |
Infrastructure and Marketing(2) |
Total | |||||||||||||||||||||
Years ended December 31, |
2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | ||||||||||||||||||
Gross revenues |
4,958 | 4,330 | 2,342 | 2,211 | 7,300 | 6,541 | ||||||||||||||||||
Royalties |
(323 | ) | (335 | ) | | | (323 | ) | (335 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Marketing and other |
| | 189 | 668 | 189 | 668 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Revenues, net of royalties |
4,635 | 3,995 | 2,531 | 2,879 | 7,166 | 6,874 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Expenses |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchases of crude oil and products |
| | 2,336 | 2,087 | 2,336 | 2,087 | ||||||||||||||||||
Production, operating and transportation expenses |
1,634 | 1,527 | 21 | 23 | 1,655 | 1,550 | ||||||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
297 | 296 | 9 | 5 | 306 | 301 | ||||||||||||||||||
Depletion, depreciation, amortization and impairment |
4,312 | 1,811 | 12 | | 4,324 | 1,811 | ||||||||||||||||||
Exploration and evaluation expenses |
547 | 149 | | | 547 | 149 | ||||||||||||||||||
Loss (gain) on sale of assets |
(3 | ) | (2 | ) | | | (3 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Other net |
86 | (120 | ) | | 2 | 86 | (118 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
6,873 | 3,661 | 2,378 | 2,117 | 9,251 | 5,778 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Earnings (loss) from operating activities |
(2,238 | ) | 334 | 153 | 762 | (2,085 | ) | 1,096 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Share of equity investment income |
50 | 51 | 9 | 18 | 59 | 69 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Financial items |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net foreign exchange gain |
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Finance income |
3 | 12 | | | 3 | 12 | ||||||||||||||||||
Finance expenses |
(163 | ) | (109 | ) | (3 | ) | | (166 | ) | (109 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
(160 | ) | (97 | ) | (3 | ) | | (163 | ) | (97 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Earnings (loss) before income taxes |
(2,348 | ) | 288 | 159 | 780 | (2,189 | ) | 1,068 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Provisions for (recovery of) income taxes |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current |
32 | (484 | ) | | 354 | 32 | (130 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Deferred |
(674 | ) | 549 | 43 | (141 | ) | (631 | ) | 408 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
(642 | ) | 65 | 43 | 213 | (599 | ) | 278 | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Net earnings (loss) |
(1,706 | ) | 223 | 116 | 567 | (1,590 | ) | 790 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Intersegment revenues |
1,660 | 1,155 | | | 1,660 | 1,155 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | Includes allocated depletion, depreciation, amortization and impairment related to assets in Infrastructure and Marketing, as these assets provide a service to Exploration and Production. |
(2) | Includes $201 million of revenue (2018 - $172 million) and $269 million of associated costs (2018 - $142 million) for construction contracts, inclusive of $193 million of revenue (2018 - $172 million) and $261 million of costs (2018 - $142 million) for contracts in progress with revenue recognized as performance obligations are met. |
(3) | Eliminations relate to sales and operating revenues between segments recorded at transfer prices based on current market prices. Segment results include transactions between business segments. |
Husky Energy Inc. | Consolidated Financial Statements | 11
Segmented Financial Information Cont
Downstream | Corporate and Eliminations(3) |
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Upgrading | Canadian Refined Products |
U.S. Refining and Marketing |
Total |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1,777 | 1,750 | 3,122 | 3,412 | 9,940 | 11,770 | 14,839 | 16,932 | (2,022 | ) | (1,554 | ) | 20,117 | 21,919 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | (323 | ) | (335 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | 189 | 668 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
1,777 | 1,750 | 3,122 | 3,412 | 9,940 | 11,770 | 14,839 | 16,932 | (2,022 | ) | (1,554 | ) | 19,983 | 22,252 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
1,303 | 928 | 2,571 | 2,760 | 8,629 | 10,334 | 12,503 | 14,022 | (2,022 | ) | (1,554 | ) | 12,817 | 14,555 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
217 | 195 | 278 | 265 | 869 | 795 | 1,364 | 1,255 | (2 | ) | (2 | ) | 3,017 | 2,803 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9 | 7 | 53 | 47 | 33 | 22 | 95 | 76 | 292 | 277 | 693 | 654 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
115 | 123 | 218 | 115 | 735 | 450 | 1,068 | 688 | 104 | 92 | 5,496 | 2,591 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | 547 | 149 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | (6 | ) | (2 | ) | 1 | | (5 | ) | (2 | ) | | | (8 | ) | (4 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | (1 | ) | (654 | ) | (464 | ) | (654 | ) | (465 | ) | (16 | ) | (8 | ) | (584 | ) | (591 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
1,644 | 1,253 | 3,114 | 3,184 | 9,613 | 11,137 | 14,371 | 15,574 | (1,644 | ) | (1,195 | ) | 21,978 | 20,157 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
133 | 497 | 8 | 228 | 327 | 633 | 468 | 1,358 | (378 | ) | (359 | ) | (1,995 | ) | 2,095 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | 59 | 69 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | 44 | 14 | 44 | 14 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | 71 | 52 | 74 | 64 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1 | ) | (1 | ) | (15 | ) | (12 | ) | (18 | ) | (14 | ) | (34 | ) | (27 | ) | (151 | ) | (178 | ) | (351 | ) | (314 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
(1 | ) | (1 | ) | (15 | ) | (12 | ) | (18 | ) | (14 | ) | (34 | ) | (27 | ) | (36 | ) | (112 | ) | (233 | ) | (236 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
132 | 496 | (7 | ) | 216 | 309 | 619 | 434 | 1,331 | (414 | ) | (471 | ) | (2,169 | ) | 1,928 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
63 | 168 | 38 | 100 | 17 | 9 | 118 | 277 | 25 | (72 | ) | 175 | 75 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(28 | ) | (33 | ) | (40 | ) | (42 | ) | 52 | 129 | (16 | ) | 54 | (327 | ) | (66 | ) | (974 | ) | 396 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
35 | 135 | (2 | ) | 58 | 69 | 138 | 102 | 331 | (302 | ) | (138 | ) | (799 | ) | 471 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
97 | 361 | (5 | ) | 158 | 240 | 481 | 332 | 1,000 | (112 | ) | (333 | ) | (1,370 | ) | 1,457 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
263 | 290 | 99 | 109 | | | 362 | 399 | | | 2,022 | 1,554 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Husky Energy Inc. | Consolidated Financial Statements | 12
Segmented Financial Information
Upstream | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
($ millions) |
Exploration and Production(1) |
Infrastructure and Marketing |
Total | |||||||||||||||||||||
Years ended December 31, |
2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | ||||||||||||||||||
Expenditures on exploration and evaluation assets(2) |
46 | 242 | | | 46 | 242 | ||||||||||||||||||
Expenditures on property, plant and equipment(2) |
2,300 | 2,414 | 2 | | 2,302 | 2,414 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
As at December 31, |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exploration and evaluation assets |
643 | 997 | | | 643 | 997 | ||||||||||||||||||
Developing and producing assets at cost |
46,587 | 44,196 | | | 46,587 | 44,196 | ||||||||||||||||||
Accumulated depletion, depreciation, amortization and impairment |
(31,348 | ) | (27,379 | ) | | | (31,348 | ) | (27,379 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Other property, plant and equipment at cost |
| | 101 | 101 | 101 | 101 | ||||||||||||||||||
Accumulated depletion, depreciation and amortization |
| | (51 | ) | (50 | ) | (51 | ) | (50 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total exploration and evaluation assets and property, plant and equipment, net |
15,882 | 17,814 | 50 | 51 | 15,932 | 17,865 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total right-of-use assets, net |
520 | | 90 | | 610 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
17,533 | 19,175 | 1,661 | 1,301 | 19,194 | 20,476 |
(1) | Includes allocated depletion, depreciation, amortization and impairment related to assets in Infrastructure and Marketing, as these assets provide a service to Exploration and Production. |
(2) | Excludes capitalized costs related to asset retirement obligations and capitalized interest incurred during the year. Includes Exploration and Production assets acquired through acquisition, but excludes assets acquired through corporate acquisition. |
Geographical Financial Information
($ millions) |
Canada | United States | ||||||||||||||
Years ended December 31, |
2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | ||||||||||||
Gross revenues(1) |
9,120 | 9,000 | 9,940 | 11,770 | ||||||||||||
Royalties |
(264 | ) | (269 | ) | | | ||||||||||
Marketing and other |
189 | 668 | | | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Revenue, net of royalties |
9,045 | 9,399 | 9,940 | 11,770 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
As at December 31, |
||||||||||||||||
Restricted cash non-current |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Exploration and evaluation assets |
599 | 935 | | | ||||||||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
14,630 | 16,433 | 6,053 | 6,336 | ||||||||||||
Right-of-use assets, net |
1,044 | | 156 | | ||||||||||||
Goodwill |
| | 656 | 690 | ||||||||||||
Investment in joint ventures |
666 | 669 | | | ||||||||||||
Long-term income tax receivable |
212 | 243 | | | ||||||||||||
Other assets(2) |
47 | 58 | 458 | 276 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total non-current assets |
17,198 | 18,338 | 7,323 | 7,302 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | Sales to external customers are based on the location of the seller. |
(2) | Includes insurance proceeds of $435 million (2018 - $253 million ), related to the Superior Refinery incident. |
Husky Energy Inc. | Consolidated Financial Statements | 13
Segmented Financial Information Cont
Downstream | Corporate and Eliminations |
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Upgrading | Canadian Refined Products |
U.S. Refining and Marketing |
Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | 46 | 242 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
59 | 62 | 119 | 74 | 768 | 665 | 946 | 801 | 138 | 121 | 3,386 | 3,336 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | 643 | 997 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | 46,587 | 44,196 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | (31,348 | ) | (27,379 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2,721 | 2,659 | 2,360 | 2,789 | 9,534 | 9,746 | 14,615 | 15,194 | 1,377 | 1,251 | 16,093 | 16,546 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1,700) | (1,585 | ) | (1,449 | ) | (1,581 | ) | (3,481 | ) | (3,410 | ) | (6,630 | ) | (6,576 | ) | (1,028 | ) | (937 | ) | (7,709 | ) | (7,563 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
1,021 | 1,074 | 911 | 1,208 | 6,053 | 6,336 | 7,985 | 8,618 | 349 | 314 | 24,266 | 26,797 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | 143 | | 157 | | 300 | | 292 | | 1,202 | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1,203 | 1,149 | 1,287 | 1,431 | 8,691 | 8,566 | 11,181 | 11,146 | 2,747 | 3,603 | 33,122 | 35,225 |
Geographical Financial Information Cont
China | Other International | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||
2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | |||||||||||||||||
1,057 | 1,149 | | | 20,117 | 21,919 | |||||||||||||||||
(59 | ) | (66 | ) | | | (323 | ) | (335 | ) | |||||||||||||
| | | | 189 | 668 | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
998 | 1,083 | | | 19,983 | 22,252 | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
142 | 128 | | | 142 | 128 | |||||||||||||||||
39 | 57 | 5 | 5 | 643 | 997 | |||||||||||||||||
2,938 | 3,030 | 2 | 1 | 23,623 | 25,800 | |||||||||||||||||
2 | | | | 1,202 | | |||||||||||||||||
| | | | 656 | 690 | |||||||||||||||||
| | 516 | 650 | 1,182 | 1,319 | |||||||||||||||||
| | | | 212 | 243 | |||||||||||||||||
| | 19 | 26 | 524 | 360 | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
3,121 | 3,215 | 542 | 682 | 28,184 | 29,537 | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Husky Energy Inc. | Consolidated Financial Statements | 14
Disaggregation of Revenue
Upstream | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
($ millions) |
Exploration and Production |
Infrastructure and Marketing |
Total | |||||||||||||||||||||
Years ended December 31, |
2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | ||||||||||||||||||
Primary Geographical Markets |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Canada |
3,901 | 3,181 | 2,342 | 2,211 | 6,243 | 5,392 | ||||||||||||||||||
United States |
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
China |
1,057 | 1,149 | | | 1,057 | 1,149 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total revenue |
4,958 | 4,330 | 2,342 | 2,211 | 7,300 | 6,541 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Major Product Lines |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Light & medium crude oil |
670 | 948 | | | 670 | 948 | ||||||||||||||||||
Heavy crude oil |
603 | 527 | | | 603 | 527 | ||||||||||||||||||
Bitumen |
2,302 | 1,367 | | | 2,302 | 1,367 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total crude oil |
3,575 | 2,842 | | | 3,575 | 2,842 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
NGL |
291 | 381 | | | 291 | 381 | ||||||||||||||||||
Natural gas |
1,092 | 1,107 | | | 1,092 | 1,107 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total exploration and production |
4,958 | 4,330 | | | 4,958 | 4,330 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total infrastructure and marketing |
| | 2,342 | 2,211 | 2,342 | 2,211 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Synthetic crude |
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Gasoline |
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Diesel & distillates |
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Asphalt |
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Other |
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total refined products |
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total revenue |
4,958 | 4,330 | 2,342 | 2,211 | 7,300 | 6,541 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Husky Energy Inc. | Consolidated Financial Statements | 15
Disaggregation of Revenue Cont
Downstream | Corporate and Eliminations |
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Upgrading | Canadian Refined Products |
U.S. Refining and Marketing |
Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1,777 | 1,750 | 3,122 | 3,412 | | | 4,899 | 5,162 | (2,022 | ) | (1,554 | ) | 9,120 | 9,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | 9,940 | 11,770 | 9,940 | 11,770 | | | 9,940 | 11,770 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | 1,057 | 1,149 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
1,777 | 1,750 | 3,122 | 3,412 | 9,940 | 11,770 | 14,839 | 16,932 | (2,022 | ) | (1,554 | ) | 20,117 | 21,919 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | 670 | 948 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | 603 | 527 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | 2,302 | 1,367 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | 3,575 | 2,842 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | 291 | 381 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | 1,092 | 1,107 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | 4,958 | 4,330 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | 2,342 | 2,211 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
1,505 | 1,445 | | | | | 1,505 | 1,445 | | | 1,505 | 1,445 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | 904 | 1,070 | 5,414 | 6,157 | 6,318 | 7,227 | | | 6,318 | 7,227 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
260 | 278 | 1,152 | 1,303 | 3,644 | 4,297 | 5,056 | 5,878 | | | 5,056 | 5,878 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | 452 | 454 | 136 | 165 | 588 | 619 | | | 588 | 619 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12 | 27 | 614 | 585 | 746 | 1,151 | 1,372 | 1,763 | | | 1,372 | 1,763 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
1,777 | 1,750 | 3,122 | 3,412 | 9,940 | 11,770 | 14,839 | 16,932 | | | 14,839 | 16,932 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
1,777 | 1,750 | 3,122 | 3,412 | 9,940 | 11,770 | 14,839 | 16,932 | (2,022 | ) | (1,554 | ) | 20,117 | 21,919 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Husky Energy Inc. | Consolidated Financial Statements | 16
Note 2 Basis of Presentation
a) Basis of Measurement and Statement of Compliance
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared by management on a historical cost basis with some exceptions, as detailed in the accounting policies set out below in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). These accounting policies have been applied consistently for all periods presented in these consolidated financial statements.
These consolidated financial statements were approved by the Board of Directors on February 26, 2020.
Certain prior years amounts have been reclassified to conform with current presentation.
b) Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Husky Energy Inc. and its subsidiaries. Subsidiaries are defined as any entities, including unincorporated entities such as partnerships, for which the Company has the power to govern their financial and operating policies to obtain benefits from their activities. The Companys accounts reflect the proportionate share of the assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses and cash flows from the Companys activities that are conducted jointly with third parties. Intercompany balances, net earnings and unrealized gains and losses arising from intercompany transactions are eliminated in preparing the consolidated financial statements. A portion of the Companys activities relate to joint ventures (see Note 12), which are accounted for using the equity method.
c) Use of Estimates, Judgments and Assumptions
The timely preparation of the consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingencies, if any, as at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the period. Actual results may differ from these estimates, judgments and assumptions.
Estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognized in the period in which the estimates are revised and on a prospective basis. By their nature, estimates are subject to measurement uncertainty and changes in such estimates in future years could require a material change in the consolidated financial statements. These underlying assumptions are based on historical experience and other factors that management believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, and are subject to change as new events occur, as more industry experience is acquired, as additional information is obtained, and as the Companys operating environment changes. Specifically, amounts recorded for depletion, depreciation, amortization and impairment, recoveries from insurance claims, asset retirement obligations, assets and liabilities measured at fair value, employee future benefits, income taxes and reserves and contingencies are based on estimates.
Management makes judgments regarding the application of IFRS for each accounting policy. Critical judgments that have the most significant effect on the amounts recognized in the consolidated financial statements include determination of technical feasibility and commercial viability, impairment assessments, the determination of cash generating units (CGUs), changes in reserves estimates, the determination of a joint arrangement, the designation of the Companys functional currency and the fair value of related party transactions.
Significant estimates, judgments and assumptions made by management in the preparation of these consolidated financial statements are outlined in detail in Note 3.
d) Functional and Presentation Currency
The consolidated financial statements are presented in Canadian dollars, which is the Companys functional currency. All financial information is presented in millions of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts and unless otherwise stated.
The designation of the Companys functional currency is a management judgment based on the currency of the primary economic environment in which the Company operates.
Husky Energy Inc. | Consolidated Financial Statements | 17
Note 3 Significant Accounting Policies
a) Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash on hand less outstanding cheques and deposits with an original maturity of less than three months at the time of purchase. When outstanding cheques are in excess of cash on hand and short-term deposits, and the Company has the ability to net settle, the excess is reported in bank operating loans.
Cash and cash equivalents held that are not available for use are classified as restricted cash. When restricted cash is not expected to be used within 12 months, it is classified as a non-current asset.
b) Inventories
Crude oil, natural gas, refined petroleum products and sulphur inventories are valued at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Cost is determined using average cost or on a first-in, first-out basis, as appropriate. Materials, parts and supplies are valued at the lower of average cost or net realizable value. Cost consists of raw material, labour, direct overhead, operating costs, transportation and depreciation, depletion and amortization. Commodity inventories held for trading purposes are carried at fair value and measured at fair value less costs to sell based on Level 2 observable inputs, refer to policy Note 3 (m). Any changes in commodity trading inventory fair value are included as gains or losses in Marketing and Other in the consolidated statements of income (loss) during the period of change. Previous inventory impairment provisions are reversed when there is a change in the condition that caused the impairment and the inventory remains on hand. Unrealized intersegment net earnings on inventory sales are eliminated.
c) Precious Metals
The Company uses precious metals in conjunction with a catalyst as part of the downstream upgrading and refining processes. These precious metals remain intact; however, there is a loss during the reclamation process. The estimated loss is amortized to production and operating expenses over the period that the precious metal is in use, which is approximately two to five years. After the reclamation process, the actual loss is compared to the estimated loss and any difference is recognized in net earnings (loss). Precious metals are included in other assets on the balance sheet.
d) Exploration and Evaluation Assets and Property, Plant and Equipment
i) Cost
Oil and gas properties and other property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost, including expenditures that are directly attributable to the purchase or development of an asset. Borrowing costs directly attributable to the acquisition, construction or production of a qualifying asset are included in the asset cost. Capitalization ceases when substantially all activities necessary to prepare the qualifying asset for its intended use are complete.
ii) Exploration and Evaluation Costs
The accounting treatment of costs incurred for oil and natural gas exploration, evaluation and development is determined by the classification of the underlying activities as either exploratory or developmental. The results from an exploration drilling program can take considerable time to analyze, and the determination that commercial reserves have been discovered requires determination of technical feasibility, commercial viability and industry experience. Exploration activities can fluctuate from year to year, due to such factors as the level of exploratory spending, the level of risk sharing with third parties participating in exploratory drilling and the degree of risk associated with drilling in particular areas. Properties that are assumed to be productive may, over a period of time, actually deliver oil and gas in quantities different than originally estimated because of changes in reservoir performance.
Husky Energy Inc. | Consolidated Financial Statements | 18
Costs incurred after the legal right to explore an area has been obtained and before technical feasibility and commercial viability of the area have been established are capitalized as exploration and evaluation assets. These costs include costs to acquire acreage and exploration rights, legal and other professional fees and land brokerage fees. Pre-license costs and geological and geophysical costs associated with exploration activities are expensed in the period incurred. Costs directly associated with an exploration well are initially capitalized as an exploration and evaluation asset until the drilling of the well is complete and the results have been evaluated. If extractable hydrocarbons are found and are likely to be developed commercially, but are subject to further appraisal activity, which may include the drilling of wells, the costs continue to be carried as an exploration and evaluation asset while sufficient and continued progress is made in assessing the commercial viability of the hydrocarbons. Capitalized exploration and evaluation costs or assets are not depreciated and are carried forward until technical feasibility and commercial viability of the area is determined or the assets are determined to be impaired. Management determines technical feasibility and commercial viability when exploration and evaluation assets are reclassified to property, plant and equipment. This decision considers several factors, including the existence of reserves, establishing commercial and technical feasibility and whether the asset can be developed using a proved development concept and has received internal approval. Upon the determination of technical feasibility and commercial viability, capitalized exploration and evaluation assets are then transferred to property, plant and equipment. All such carried costs are subject to technical, commercial and management review, as well as review for impairment indicators, at least every reporting period to confirm the continued intent to develop or otherwise extract value from the discovery. These costs are also tested for impairment when transferred to property, plant and equipment. Capitalized exploration and evaluation expenditures related to wells that do not find reserves, or where no future activity is planned, are expensed as exploration and evaluation expenses.
The application of the Companys accounting policy for exploration and evaluation costs requires judgment in determining whether it is likely that future economic benefit exists when activities have not reached a stage where technical feasibility and commercial viability can be reasonably determined. Judgments may change as new information becomes available.
iii) Development Costs
Expenditures, including borrowing costs, on the construction, installation and completion of infrastructure facilities, such as platforms, pipelines and the drilling of development wells, are capitalized as oil and gas properties. Costs incurred to operate and maintain wells and equipment to lift oil and gas to the surface are expensed as production and operating expenses.
iv) Other Property, Plant and Equipment
Repair and maintenance costs, other than major turnaround costs, are expensed as incurred. Major turnaround costs are capitalized as part of property, plant and equipment when incurred and are amortized over the estimated period of time to the anticipated date of the next turnaround.
v) Depletion, Depreciation and Amortization
Oil and gas properties are depleted on a unit-of-production basis over the proved developed reserves of the particular field, except in the case of assets whose useful life is shorter or longer than the lifetime of the proved developed reserves of that field, in which case the straight-line method or a unit-of-production method based on total proved plus probable reserves is applied. The unit-of-production rate for the depletion of oil and gas properties related to total proved plus probable reserves takes into account expenditures incurred to date together with sanctioned future development expenditures required to develop the field.
Oil and gas reserves are evaluated internally and audited by independent qualified reserve engineers. The estimation of reserves is an inherently complex process and involves the exercise of professional judgment. Estimates are based on projected future rates of production, estimated commodity prices, engineering data and the timing of future expenditures, all of which are subject to uncertainty. Changes in reserve estimates can have an impact on reported net earnings (loss) through revisions to depletion, depreciation and amortization expense, in addition to determining possible impairments and reversal of impairments of property, plant and equipment.
Net reserves represent the Companys undivided gross working interest in total reserves after deducting crown, freehold and overriding royalty interests. Assumptions reflect market and regulatory conditions, as applicable, as at the balance sheet date and could differ significantly from other points in time throughout the year or future periods. Changes in market and regulatory conditions and assumptions can materially impact the estimation of net reserves.
Depreciation for substantially all other property, plant and equipment is provided using the straight-line method based on the estimated useful lives of assets, which range from five to forty-five years. The useful lives of assets are estimated based upon the period the asset is expected to be available for use by the Company.
Depletion, depreciation and amortization rates for all capitalized costs associated with the Companys activities are reviewed at least annually, or when events or conditions occur that impact capitalized costs, reserves and estimated service lives.
Husky Energy Inc. | Consolidated Financial Statements | 19
e) Joint Arrangements
Joint arrangements represent activities where the Company has joint control established by a contractual agreement. Joint control requires unanimous consent for financial and operational decisions. A joint arrangement is either a joint operation, whereby the parties have rights to the assets and obligations for the liabilities, or a joint venture, whereby the parties have rights to the net assets.
For a joint operation, the consolidated financial statements include the Companys proportionate share of the assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses and cash flows of the joint arrangement. The Company reports items of a similar nature to those on the financial statements of the joint arrangement, on a line-by-line basis, from the date that joint control commences until the date that joint control ceases.
Joint ventures are accounted for using the equity method of accounting and recognized at cost and adjusted thereafter for the post-acquisition change in the Companys share of the joint ventures net assets. The Companys consolidated financial statements include its share of the joint ventures profit or loss and other comprehensive income (OCI) included in investment in joint ventures, until the date that joint control ceases.
Classification of a joint arrangement as either joint operation or joint venture requires judgment. Managements considerations include, but are not limited to, determining if the arrangement is structured through a separate vehicle and whether the legal form and contractual arrangements give the entity direct rights to the assets and obligations for the liabilities within the normal course of business. Other facts and circumstances are also assessed by management, including the entitys rights to the economic benefits of assets and its involvement and responsibility for settling liabilities associated with the arrangement.
f) Investments in Associates
An associate is an entity for which the Company has significant influence and thereby has the power to participate in the financial and operational decisions but does not control or jointly control the investee. Investments in associates are accounted for using the equity method of accounting and are recognized at cost and adjusted thereafter for the post-acquisition change in the Companys share of the investees net assets. The Companys consolidated financial statements include its share of the investees profit or loss and OCI until the date that significant influence ceases.
g) Business Combinations
Business combinations are accounted for using the acquisition method. Determining whether an acquisition meets the definition of a business combination or represents an asset purchase requires judgment on a case-by-case basis. If the acquisition meets the definition of a business combination, the assets and liabilities are recognized based on the contractual terms, economic conditions, the Companys operating and accounting policies and other factors that exist on the acquisition date, which is the date on which control is transferred to the Company. The identifiable assets and liabilities are measured at their fair values on the acquisition date with limited exceptions. Any additional consideration payable, contingent upon the occurrence of a future event, is recognized at fair value on the acquisition date; subsequent changes in the fair value of the liability are recognized in net earnings (loss). Acquisition costs incurred are expensed and included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of income (loss).
h) Goodwill
Goodwill is the excess of the purchase price paid over the recognized amount of net assets acquired through business combinations, which is inherently imprecise as judgment is required in the determination of the fair value of assets and liabilities. Goodwill, which is not amortized, is assigned to appropriate CGUs or groups of CGUs. Goodwill is tested for impairment annually and when circumstances indicate that the carrying value may be impaired. Impairment losses are recognized in net earnings (loss) and are not subject to reversal. On the disposal or termination of a previously acquired business, any remaining balance of associated goodwill is included in the determination of the gain or loss on disposal.
Husky Energy Inc. | Consolidated Financial Statements | 20
i) Impairment and Reversals of Impairment on Non-Financial Assets
The carrying amounts of the Companys non-financial assets, other than inventories and deferred tax assets but including right-of-use assets, are reviewed at the end of each reporting period to determine whether there is an indication of impairment or reversal of previously recorded impairment. If such indication exists, the recoverable amount is estimated.
Determining whether there are any indications of impairment or impairment reversals requires significant judgment of external factors, such as an extended change in prices or margins for oil and gas commodities or refined products, a significant change in an assets market value, a significant revision of estimated volumes, revision of future development costs, a change in the entitys market capitalization or significant changes in the technological, market, economic or legal environment that would have an impact on the Companys CGUs. If any indication of impairment or impairment reversals exist, an estimate of the assets recoverable amount is calculated as the higher of the fair value less costs to sell (FVLCS) and the assets value in use (VIU) for an individual asset or CGU. If the asset does not generate cash inflows that are largely independent of those from other assets or groups of assets, the asset is tested as part of a CGU, which is the smallest identifiable group of assets, liabilities and associated goodwill that generates cash inflows that are largely independent of the cash inflows from other assets or groups of assets. Determination of the Companys CGUs is subject to managements judgment.
FVLCS is the amount that would be obtained from the sale of a CGU in an arms length transaction between knowledgeable and willing parties. The FVLCS is generally determined as the net present value of the estimated future cash flows expected to arise from a CGU, including any expansion prospects, and its eventual disposal, using assumptions that an independent market participant may take into account. These cash flows are discounted using a rate that would be applied by a market participant to arrive at a net present value of the CGU, less cost to dispose.
VIU is the net present value of the estimated future cash flows expected to arise from the continued use of the asset in its present form and its eventual disposal. VIU is determined by applying assumptions specific to the Companys continued use and can only take into account sanctioned future development costs. Estimates of future cash flows used in the evaluation of impairment of assets are made using managements forecasts of commodity prices, royalty rates, operating costs and future capital expenditures, forecasted crack spreads, growth rate, discount rate and, in the case of oil and gas properties, expected production volumes. Expected production volumes take into account assessments of field reservoir performance and include expectations about proved and probable volumes and where applicable economically recoverable resources associated with interests in certain Husky properties which are risk-weighted utilizing geological, production, recovery, market price and economic projections. Either the cash flow estimates or the discount rate is risk-adjusted to reflect local conditions as appropriate.
Given that the calculations for recoverable amounts require the use of estimates and assumptions, including forecasts of commodity prices, marketing supply and demand, product margins and in the case of oil and gas properties, expected production volumes, it is possible that the assumptions may change, which may impact the estimated life of the CGU and may require a material adjustment to the carrying value of goodwill and non-financial assets.
An impairment loss is recognized if the carrying amount of an asset or its CGU exceeds its estimated recoverable amount. Impairment losses recognized with respect to CGUs are allocated first to reduce the carrying amount of any goodwill allocated to the units and then to reduce the carrying amounts of the other assets in the CGU or group of CGUs on a pro rata basis. Impairment losses are recognized in depletion, depreciation, amortization and impairment in the consolidated statements of income (loss).
Impairment losses recognized in prior years are assessed at the end of each reporting period for indications that the impairment has decreased or no longer exists. An impairment loss is reversed only to the extent that the carrying amount of the asset or CGU does not exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined, net of depletion, depreciation and amortization, if no impairment loss had been recognized.
j) Asset Retirement Obligations (ARO)
A liability is recognized for future legal or constructive retirement obligations associated with the Companys assets. The Company has significant obligations to remove tangible assets and restore land after operations cease and the Company retires or relinquishes the asset. The retirement of Upstream and Downstream assets consists primarily of plugging and abandoning wells, abandoning surface and subsea plant and equipment and facilities and restoring land to a state required by regulation or contract. The amount recognized is the net present value of the estimated future expenditures determined in accordance with local conditions, current technology and current regulatory requirements. The obligation is calculated using the current estimated costs to retire the asset inflated to the estimated retirement date and then discounted using a credit-adjusted risk-free discount rate. The liability is recorded in the period in which an obligation arises with a corresponding increase to the carrying value of the related asset. The liability is progressively accreted over time as the effect of discounting unwinds, creating an expense recognized in finance expenses. The costs capitalized to the related assets are amortized in a manner consistent with the depletion, depreciation and amortization of the underlying assets. Actual retirement expenditures are charged against the accumulated liability as incurred.
Husky Energy Inc. | Consolidated Financial Statements | 21
Liabilities for ARO are adjusted every reporting period for changes in estimates. These adjustments are accounted for as a change in the corresponding capitalized cost, except where a reduction in the provision is greater than the undepreciated capitalized cost of the related assets, in which case the capitalized cost is reduced to nil and the remaining adjustment is recognized in net earnings (loss). Changes to the amount of capitalized costs will result in an adjustment to future depletion, depreciation and amortization, and to finance expenses.
Estimating the ARO requires significant judgment as restoration technologies and costs are constantly changing, as are regulatory, political, environmental and safety considerations. Inherent in the calculation of the ARO are numerous assumptions including the ultimate settlement amounts, future third-party pricing, inflation factors, risk-free discount rates, credit risk, timing of settlement and changes in the legal, regulatory, environmental and political environments. Future revisions to these assumptions may result in material changes to the ARO liability. Adjustments to the estimated amounts and timing of future ARO cash flows are a regular occurrence in light of the significant judgments and estimates involved.
k) Legal and Other Contingent Matters
Provisions and liabilities for legal and other contingent matters are recognized in the period when the circumstance becomes probable that a future cash outflow resulting from past operations or events will occur and the amount of the cash outflow can be reasonably estimated. The timing of recognition and measurement of the provision requires the application of judgment to existing facts and circumstances, which can be subject to change, and the carrying amounts of provisions and liabilities are reviewed regularly and adjusted accordingly. The Company is required to both determine whether a loss is probable based on judgment and interpretation of laws and regulations, and determine that the loss can be reasonably estimated. When a loss is recognized, it is charged to net earnings (loss). The Company continually monitors known and potential contingent matters and makes appropriate disclosure and provisions when warranted by the circumstances present.
l) Share Capital
Preferred shares are classified as equity since they are cancellable and redeemable only at the Companys option and dividends are discretionary and payable only if declared by the Board of Directors. Incremental costs directly attributable to the issuance of shares and stock options are recognized as a deduction from equity, net of tax. Common share dividends are paid out in common shares, or in cash, and preferred share dividends are paid in cash. Both common and preferred share dividends are recognized as distributions within equity.
m) Financial Instruments
Financial instruments are any contracts that give rise to a financial asset of one entity and a financial liability or equity instrument of another entity. Financial assets are classified in one of the following categories: subsequently measured at amortized cost, fair value through other comprehensive income (FVTOCI), or fair value through profit or loss (FVTPL). Financial liabilities are initially recognized at fair value, and subsequently measured based on classification in one of the following categories: subsequently measured at amortized cost and FVTPL. Financial assets and liabilities are not offset unless there is a currently enforceable legal right to offset the recognized amounts and there is an intention to settle on a net basis, to realize the assets and settle the liabilities simultaneously.
Financial assets and liabilities subsequently measured at amortized costs are measured using the effective interest method. The effective interest method is a method of calculating the amortized costs of a financial liability and of allocating interest expense over the relevant period. Transaction costs that are directly attributable to the acquisition or issue of a financial instrument are measured at amortized cost and added to the fair value initially recognized.
Financial instruments at FVTPL are stated at fair value, with any gains or losses arising on remeasurement recognized in profit or loss. Unrealized gains and losses on FVTPL financial instruments related to trading activities are recognized in marketing and other in the consolidated statements of income (loss), and unrealized gains and losses on all other FVTPL financial instruments are recognized in other net. Transaction costs directly attributable to the acquisition of financial assets or liabilities at FVTPL are recognized immediately in profit or loss.
Financial instruments at FVTOCI are stated at fair value, with any gains or losses arising on remeasurement recognized in OCI except for impairment gains or losses and foreign exchange gains and losses.
Financial instruments subsequently revalued at fair value are further categorized using a three-level hierarchy that reflects the significance of the inputs used in determining fair value. Level 1 fair value is determined by reference to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities. Level 2 fair value is based on inputs that are independently observable for similar assets or liabilities. Level 3 fair value is not based on independently observable market data. The disclosure of the fair value hierarchy excludes financial assets and liabilities where book value approximates fair value.
Husky Energy Inc. | Consolidated Financial Statements | 22
A financial asset is derecognized when the contractual rights to the cash flows from the financial asset have expired, or it transfers the contractual rights to receive the cash flows of the financial assets and the Company has transferred substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership of the financial asset. A financial liability is derecognized when the liability is extinguished, discharged, cancelled or expires.
n) Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
Derivatives are financial instruments for which the fair value changes in response to market risks, require little or no initial investment and are settled at a future date. Derivative instruments are utilized by the Company to manage various market risks including volatility in commodity prices, foreign exchange rates and interest rate exposures. The Companys policy is not to utilize derivative instruments for speculative purposes. The Company may enter into swap and other derivative transactions to hedge or mitigate the Companys commercial risk, including derivatives that reduce risks that arise in the ordinary course of the Companys business. The Company may choose to apply hedge accounting to derivative instruments.
The fair values of derivatives are determined using valuation models that require assumptions concerning the amount and timing of future cash flows and discount rates. These estimates are also subject to change with fluctuations in commodity prices, interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and estimates of non-performance. When able, the Company will determine fair value by incorporating forward market prices and rates that are compared to quotes received from financial institutions to ensure reasonability. The actual settlement of a derivative instrument could differ materially from the fair value recorded and could impact future results.
i) Derivative Instruments
All derivative instruments, other than those designated as effective hedging instruments or certain non-financial derivative contracts that meet the Companys own use requirements, are classified as FVTPL and are recorded at fair value. Gains and losses on these instruments are recorded in the consolidated statements of income (loss) in the period they occur.
The Company may enter into commodity price contracts in order to offset fixed or floating prices with market rates to manage exposures to fluctuations in commodity prices. The estimation of the fair value of commodity derivatives incorporates forward prices and adjustments for quality or location. The related inventory is measured at fair value based on exit prices. Gains and losses from these derivative contracts, which are not designated as effective hedging instruments, are recognized in revenues or purchases of crude oil and products and are initially recorded at settlement date. Derivative instruments that have been designated as effective hedging instruments are further classified as either fair value or cash flow hedges (see Hedging Activities).
ii) Embedded Derivatives
Derivatives embedded within a hybrid contract containing a financial asset host are not accounted for separately, rather the whole instrument is classified as FVTPL. Derivatives embedded in other hybrid contracts are recorded separately when the economic characteristics and risks of the embedded derivative are not clearly and closely related to those of the host contract and the host contract is not measured at FVTPL. The definition of an embedded derivative is the same as freestanding derivatives. Embedded derivatives are measured at fair value with gains and losses recognized in net earnings (loss).
iii) Hedging Activities
At the inception of a derivative transaction, if the Company elects to use hedge accounting, formal designation and documentation is required. The documentation must include: identification of the hedged item or transaction, the hedging instrument, the nature of the risk being hedged, the Companys risk management objective and strategy for undertaking the hedge and how the Company will assess the hedging instruments effectiveness in offsetting the exposure to changes in the hedged item.
A hedge is assessed at inception and at the end of each reporting period to ensure that it is highly effective in offsetting changes in fair values or cash flows of the hedged item. For a fair value hedge, the gain or loss from remeasuring the hedging instrument at fair value is recognized immediately in net earnings (loss) with the offsetting gain or loss on the hedged item. When fair value hedge accounting is discontinued, the carrying amount of the hedging instrument is deferred and amortized to net earnings (loss) over the remaining maturity of the hedged item.
For a cash flow hedge, the effective portion of the gain or loss is recorded in OCI. Any hedge or portion of a hedge that is ineffective is immediately recognized in net earnings (loss). Hedge accounting is discontinued on a prospective basis when the hedging relationship no longer qualifies for hedge accounting. Any gain or loss on the hedging instrument resulting from the discontinuation of a cash flow hedge is deferred in OCI until the forecasted transaction date. If the forecasted transaction date is no longer expected to occur, the gain or loss is recognized in net earnings (loss) in the period of discontinuation.
Husky Energy Inc. | Consolidated Financial Statements | 23
A net investment hedge of a foreign operation is accounted for similarly to a cash flow hedge. The Company may designate certain U.S. dollar denominated debt as a hedge of its net investment in foreign operations for which the U.S. dollar is the functional currency. The unrealized foreign exchange gains and losses arising from the translation of the debt are recorded in OCI, net of tax, and are limited to the translation gain or loss on the net investment.
o) Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Comprehensive income (loss) consists of net earnings (loss) and OCI. OCI is comprised of the change in the fair value of the effective portion of the derivatives used as hedging items in a cash flow hedge or net investment hedge, the exchange gains and losses arising from the translation of foreign operations with a functional currency that is not Canadian dollars and the actuarial gains and losses on defined benefit pension plans. Amounts included in OCI are shown net of tax. Other reserves is an equity category comprised of the cumulative amounts of OCI, relating to foreign currency translation and hedging.
p) Impairment of Financial Assets
A financial asset is assessed at the end of each reporting period to determine whether it is impaired, based on objective evidence indicating that one or more events have had a negative effect on the estimated future cash flows of that asset. Objective evidence used by the Company to assess impairment of financial assets includes quoted market prices for similar financial assets and historical collection rates.
An impairment loss with respect to a financial asset measured at amortized cost is calculated as the difference between its carrying amount and the net present value of the estimated future cash flows discounted at the original effective interest rate, according to the expected credit loss model. Significant financial assets are tested for impairment on an individual basis. The remaining financial assets are assessed for lifetime expected credit losses collectively in groups that share similar credit risk characteristics. All impairment losses are recognized in net earnings (loss). An impairment loss is reversed if the reversal can be related objectively to an event occurring after the impairment loss was recognized.
Given that the calculations for the net present value of estimated future cash flows related to derivative financial assets require the use of estimates and assumptions, including forecasts of commodity prices, marketing supply and demand, product margins and expected production volumes, it is possible that the assumptions may change, which may require a material adjustment to the carrying value of financial assets.
q) Pensions and Other Post-employment Benefits
The Company maintains various defined contribution and defined benefit pension plans for its employees.
The cost of the pension benefits earned by employees in the defined contribution pension plans is expensed as incurred. The cost of the benefits earned by employees in the defined benefit pension plans is determined using the projected unit credit funding method. Actuarial gains and losses are recognized in retained earnings as incurred.
The defined benefit asset or liability is comprised of the fair value of plan assets from which the obligations are to be settled and the present value of the defined benefit obligation. Plan assets are measured at fair value based on the closing bid price when there is a quoted price in an active market. Plan assets are assets that are held by a long-term employee benefit fund or qualifying insurance policies. Plan assets are not available to the Companys creditors. The value of any defined benefit asset is restricted to the sum of any past service costs and the present value of refunds from and reductions in future contributions to the plan. Defined benefit obligations are estimated by discounting expected future payments using the year-end market rate of interest for high-quality corporate debt instruments with cash flows that match the timing and amount of expected benefit payments.
Post-retirement medical benefits are also provided to qualifying retirees. In some cases the benefits are provided through medical care plans to which the Company, the employees, the retirees and covered family members contribute. In some plans there is no funding of the benefits before retirement. These plans are recognized on the same basis as described above for the defined benefit pension plan.
Husky Energy Inc. | Consolidated Financial Statements | 24
The determination of the cost of the defined benefit pension plan and the other post-retirement benefit plans reflects a number of assumptions that affect the expected future benefit payments. The valuation of these plans is prepared by an independent actuary engaged by the Company. These assumptions include, but are not limited to, the estimate of expected plan investment performance, salary escalation, retirement age, attrition, future health care costs and mortality. The fair value of the plan assets is used for the purposes of calculating the expected return on plan assets.
The assumptions for each pension plan are reviewed each year and are adjusted where necessary to reflect changes in fund experience and actuarial recommendations. Mortality rates are based on the latest available standard mortality tables for the individual countries concerned. The rate of return on pension plan assets is based on a projection of real long-term bond yields and an equity risk premium, which are combined with local inflation assumptions and applied to the actual asset mix of each plan. The amount of the expected return on plan assets is calculated using the expected rate of return for the year and the fair value of assets at the beginning of the year. Future salary increases are based on expected future inflation rates for the individual countries.
r) Income Taxes
Current income tax is recognized in net earnings (loss) in the period unless it relates to items recognized directly to equity, including OCI, in which case the deferred income tax is also recorded in equity. Management periodically evaluates positions taken in the Companys tax returns with respect to situations in which applicable tax regulations are subject to interpretation and reassessment and establishes provisions where appropriate.
Deferred tax is measured using the liability method on temporary differences at the reporting date between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts for financial reporting purposes.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized at expected tax rates in effect in the year when the asset is expected to be realized or the liability settled, based on tax rates and tax laws that have been enacted or substantively enacted at the reporting date. Deferred income tax balances are adjusted to reflect changes in income tax rates that are substantively enacted with the adjustment being recognized in net earnings (loss) in the period that the change occurs unless it relates to items recognized directly to equity, including OCI, in which case the deferred income tax is also recorded in equity. Deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are offset if a legally enforceable right exists to set off current tax assets against current income tax liabilities and the deferred taxes relate to the same taxable entity and the same taxation authority.
The determination of the Companys income and other tax liabilities requires interpretation of complex laws and regulations often involving multiple jurisdictions. Estimates that require significant judgments are also made with respect to the timing of temporary difference reversals, the realizability of tax assets and in circumstances where the transaction and calculations for which the ultimate tax determination are uncertain. All tax filings are subject to audit and potential reassessment after the lapse of considerable time. Accordingly, the actual income tax liability may differ significantly from that estimated and recorded by management.
s) Asset Exchange Transactions
Asset exchange transactions are measured at cost if the transaction lacks commercial substance or the fair value of neither the asset received nor the asset given up is reliably measurable. Otherwise, asset exchange transactions are measured at the fair value of the asset given up, unless the fair value of the asset received is more clearly evident. If the acquired item is not measured at fair value, its cost is measured at the carrying amount of the asset given up. Gains and losses are recorded in other net in the consolidated statements of income in the period they occur.
t) Revenue Recognition
Revenue is recognized when the performance obligations are satisfied and revenue can be reliably measured. Revenue is measured at the consideration specified in the contract and represents amounts receivable for goods or services provided in the normal course of business, net of discounts, customs duties and sales taxes. The Company has no obligations for returns, refunds, warranties or similar obligations.
Husky Energy Inc. | Consolidated Financial Statements | 25
i) Nature of Goods or Services
The following is a description of the principal activities, by operating segment, from which the Company generates revenue.
a) Upstream
The Upstream segment includes Exploration and Production, and Infrastructure and Marketing.
i) Exploration and Production
Exploration and Production principally generates revenue from the sale of crude oil, bitumen, natural gas, and NGLs, as well as crude oil and natural gas processing services. Performance obligations associated with sales of these products are satisfied at the point in time when the products are delivered to and title passes to the customer. Performance obligations associated with the sale of processing services are satisfied at the point in time when the services are provided. Royalties are recognized as a reduction to gross revenues. Sales, services and royalties are billed and paid on a monthly basis.
Under take-or-pay contracts, the Company makes a long-term supply commitment in return for a commitment from the buyer to pay for minimum quantities, whether or not the customer takes delivery. If a buyer has a right to get a make-up delivery at a later date the performance obligation is not satisfied and revenue is deferred and recognized only when the product is delivered or the make-up product can no longer be taken. Determining when the make-up product can no longer be taken, or how much can no longer be taken, requires estimates of future deliveries. Changes in these estimates may result in a material difference in deferred revenue recognized. If no such option exists within the contractual terms, performance obligation is satisfied, and revenue is recognized when the take-or-pay penalty is triggered.
Physical exchanges of inventory are recognized as non-monetary exchanges and are reported on a net basis for swaps of similar items, as are sales and purchases made with a common counterparty as part of an arrangement similar to a physical exchange.
ii) Infrastructure and Marketing
Infrastructure and Marketing principally generates revenue from marketing the Companys and other producers crude oil, natural gas, NGL, sulphur and petroleum coke, pipeline transportation, the blending of crude oil and natural gas, and storage of crude oil, diluent and natural gas. Performance obligations associated with sales of these products are satisfied at the point in time when the products are delivered to and title passes to the customer. Performance obligations associated with transportation, blending and storage are satisfied at the point in time when the services are provided. Sales, services and royalties are billed and paid on a monthly basis. Infrastructure and Marketing also includes revenue from construction services provided to Husky Midstream Limited Partnership (HMLP), of which the Company owns 35%. The Company acts as the general contractor for HMLP projects for fixed price and cost plus contracts. Revenue from fixed price contracts is recognized as performance obligations are met. Revenue from cost plus contracts are recognized as services are performed. Construction services are billed and paid on a monthly basis, or on completion of the project.
b) Downstream
The Downstream segment includes Upgrading, Canadian Refined Products, and U.S. Refining and Marketing.
i) Upgrading
Upgrading principally generates revenue from the sale of synthetic crude oil and diesel in Canada, upgraded from heavy oil feedstock. Performance obligations associated with sales of these products are satisfied at the point in time when the products are delivered to and title passes to the customer. Sales are billed and paid on a monthly basis.
ii) Canadian Refined Products
Canadian Refined Products principally generates revenue from refining of crude oil and marketing of refined petroleum products, including gasoline, diesel, ethanol blended fuels, asphalt and ancillary products, and production of ethanol. Canadian Refined Products also includes, the Companys retail gasoline and diesel distribution and sales network. Performance obligations associated with sales of these products are satisfied at the point in time when the products are delivered to and title passes to the customer. Performance obligations associated with marketing services are satisfied when the services are performed. Sales for retail gasoline, diesel and ancillary products are billed and paid upon delivery. All other sales and services are billed and paid on a weekly or monthly basis.
Husky Energy Inc. | Consolidated Financial Statements | 26
iii) U.S. Refining and Marketing
U.S. Refining and Marketing primarily generates revenue from refining crude oil to produce and market gasoline, jet fuel and diesel fuels. Performance obligations associated with sale of these products are satisfied at the point in time when the products are delivered to and title passes to the customer. All sales are billed and paid on a weekly or monthly basis.
Performance obligations associated with the sale of crude oil, natural gas, natural gas liquids, synthetic crude oil, purchased commodities and refined petroleum products are satisfied at the point in time when the products are delivered to and title passes to the customer. Performance obligations associated with the sale of transportation, processing and natural gas storage services are satisfied at the point in time when the services are provided. All amounts are due upon delivery of goods or when services are provided.
c) Corporate and Eliminations
Corporate and Eliminations primarily generates revenue from finance income. Finance income is recognized as the interest accrues using the effective interest rate, which is the rate that discounts estimated future cash receipts through the expected life of the financial instrument to the net carrying amount of the financial asset. Corporate and Eliminations also includes the elimination of sales of crude oil, bitumen, natural gas and NGLs between segments.
u) Foreign Currency
Functional currency is the currency of the primary economic environment in which the Company and its subsidiaries operate and is normally the currency in which the entity primarily generates and expends cash. The financial statements of Huskys subsidiaries are translated into Canadian dollars, which is the presentation and functional currency of the Company. The assets and liabilities of subsidiaries whose functional currencies are other than Canadian dollars are translated into Canadian dollars at the foreign exchange rate at the balance sheet date, while revenues and expenses of such subsidiaries are translated using average monthly foreign exchange rates, which approximate the foreign exchange rates on the dates of the transactions. Foreign exchange differences arising on translation are included in OCI.
The Companys transactions in foreign currencies are translated to the appropriate functional currency at the foreign exchange rate on the dates of the transactions. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated to the functional currency at the foreign exchange rate at the balance sheet date and differences arising on translation are recognized in net earnings (loss). Non-monetary assets that are measured in terms of historical cost in a foreign currency are translated using the exchange rate at the dates of the transactions.
v) Share-based Payments
In accordance with the Companys stock option plan, stock options to acquire common shares may be granted to officers and certain other employees. The Company records compensation expense over the vesting period based on the fair value of options granted. Compensation expense is recorded in net earnings (loss) as part of selling, general and administrative expenses.
The Companys stock option plan is a tandem plan that provides the stock option holder with the right to exercise the stock option or surrender the option for a cash payment. A liability for the stock options is accrued over their vesting period and measured at fair value using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The liability is revalued each reporting period until it is settled to reflect changes in the fair value of the options. The net change is recognized in net earnings (loss). When stock options are surrendered for cash, the cash settlement paid reduces the outstanding liability. When stock options are exercised for common shares, consideration paid by the stock option holders and the previously recognized liability associated with the stock options are recorded as share capital.
The Companys Performance Share Unit Plan provides a time-vested award to certain officers and employees of the Company. Performance Share Units (PSU) entitle participants to receive cash based on the Companys share price at the time of vesting. The amount of cash payment is contingent on the Companys total shareholder return relative to a peer group of companies and achieving a return on capital in use (ROCIU) target. ROCIU equals net earnings (loss) plus after tax interest expense divided by the two-year average capital employed, less any capital invested in assets that are not in use. Net earnings (loss) is adjusted for the difference between actual realized and budgeted commodity prices and foreign exchange rates and other actual and budgeted exceptional items. A liability for expected cash payments is accrued over the vesting period of the PSUs and is revalued at each reporting date based on the market price of the Companys common shares and the expected vesting percentage. Upon vesting, a cash payment is made to the participants and the outstanding liability is reduced by the payment amount.
Husky Energy Inc. | Consolidated Financial Statements | 27
w) Earnings (loss) per share
The number of basic common shares outstanding is the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for each period. Shares issued during the period are included in the weighted average number of shares from the date consideration is received. The calculation of basic earnings (loss) per common share is based on net earnings (loss) attributable to common shareholders divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding.
The number of diluted common shares outstanding is calculated using the treasury stock method, which assumes that any proceeds received from in-the-money stock options would be used to buy back common shares at the average market price for the period. The calculation of diluted earnings (loss) per share is based on net earnings (loss) attributable to common shareholders divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding adjusted for the effects of all potential dilutive common share issuances, which are comprised of common shares issuable upon exercise of stock options granted to employees. Stock options granted to employees provide the holder with the ability to settle in cash or equity. For the purposes of the diluted earnings (loss) per share calculation, the Company must adjust the numerator for the more dilutive effect of cash-settlement versus equity-settlement despite how the stock options are accounted for in net earnings (loss). As a result, net earnings (loss) reported based on accounting of cash-settled stock options may be adjusted for the results of equity-settlements for the purposes of determining the numerator for the diluted earnings (loss) per share calculation.
x) Government Grants
Government grants are recognized when there is reasonable assurance that the grant will be received and all attached conditions will be complied with. If a grant is received but reasonable assurance and compliance with conditions is not achieved, the grant is recognized as a deferred liability until such conditions are fulfilled. When the grant relates to an expense item, it is recognized as income in the period in which the costs are incurred. Where the grant relates to an asset, it is recognized as a reduction to the net book value of the related asset and recognized in net earnings (loss) in equal amounts over the expected useful life of the related asset through lower depletion, depreciation and amortization.
y) Related Party Judgments and Estimates
The Company entered into transactions and agreements in the normal course of business with certain related parties, joint arrangements and associates. Proceeds for disposition of assets to related parties are recognized at fair value, based on discounted cash flow forecast from those assets. Independent opinions of the fair value may be obtained. Changes in the assumptions used to determine these fair values may result in a material difference in the proceeds and any gain or loss on disposition.
z) Leases
Contractual arrangements, which signify a right to control the use of an identified asset for a period of time are considered leases. Each contractual arrangement is assessed to determine if the Company obtains substantially all the economic benefit from use of the identified asset. Leases for which the Company is a lessee are capitalized at the earlier of commencement of the lease term or when the asset becomes available for use, at the present value of the lease payments applying the implicit interest rate, if readily determined, or the Companys incremental borrowing rate. Adjustments to the lease asset are made if the contractual arrangement includes costs to dismantle the asset or any incentives received. Generally, lease components are considered in the present value calculation, with non-lease components expensed as incurred. Leased assets are depreciated over the shorter of the estimated useful life of the asset or the lease term. The lease liability is remeasured when there is a change in future lease payments arising from a change in rate, if there is a change to the Companys expected residual value guarantee payable, or if there are changes in the assessment for exercising a purchase, termination or extension option. If this occurs, a corresponding adjustment to the carrying value of the right-of-use asset is completed. If the carrying amount of the right-of-use asset has already been reduced to zero, the adjustment is recognized in profit or loss. The Company applies the recognition exemption for short-term leases 12 months or less in length, and leases for which the underlying asset is of low value. The expenses for these leases are recognized systematically over the lease term in either production, operating and transportation expense, purchases of crude oil and products or selling, general and administrative expenses.
Husky Energy Inc. | Consolidated Financial Statements | 28
i) Nature of Leasing Activities
Oil and Gas Properties
The Company leases offshore vessels and associated equipment for use in developing reserves on oil and gas properties. These leases vary in length and, in certain cases, expenses incurred are allocated to the carrying value of other assets in property, plant and equipment. Additionally, the Company leases land, buildings and equipment for sustainment of the Companys upstream oil and gas operations.
Processing Transportation and Storage
The Company leases tanks with dedicated storage capacity at terminals or facilities while transporting various oil and gas products. The Company also records leases for any pipelines where the Company has a right to substantially all the economic benefits. The terms of these leases vary depending on capacity constraints by third parties and negotiations of take-or-pay arrangements. The Company also employs rail transportation, where the Company leases dedicated rail cars.
Upgrading
The Company does not have any significant leasing arrangements in the upgrading asset class.
Refining
The Company leases supply facilities and pipelines for products used in the refining process when the Company has the right to substantially all the capacity of the asset. The Company also uses rail transportation, where it enters into arrangements for dedicated rail cars.
Retail and Other
The Company leases land and buildings for its office space and retail marketing locations. The leases of office space and marketing locations typically run for approximately 10-20 years with the option to renew for additional periods. When extension options are reasonably certain to be exercised, they are included in the non-cancellable lease term at lease commencement. If there is a significant change in circumstances, extension options are reassessed. Terms and conditions are often renegotiated upon renewals to allow for operational flexibility. The Company leases dedicated tanks or facilities for storage of refined products.
aa) Recent Accounting Standards
The Company has not early adopted any standard, interpretation or amendment that has been issued but is not yet effective.
ab) Change in Accounting Policy
i) Leases
In January 2016, the IASB issued IFRS 16 Leases (IFRS 16), which replaces the existing IFRS guidance on leases: IAS 17 Leases (IAS 17). Under IAS 17, lessees were required to determine if the lease is a finance or operating lease, based on specified criteria of whether the lease transferred significantly all the risks and rewards associated with ownership of the underlying asset. Finance leases were recognized on the balance sheet while operating leases were recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) when the expense was incurred. Under IFRS 16, lessees must recognize a lease liability and a right-of-use asset for most lease contracts. The recognition of the present value of the lease payments for certain contracts previously classified as operating leases resulted in increases to assets, liabilities, depletion, depreciation and amortization and finance expense, and a decrease to production, operating and transportation expense, purchases of crude oil and products and selling, general and administrative expenses.
The Company adopted IFRS 16 on January 1, 2019 using the modified retrospective approach. The modified retrospective approach does not require restatement of prior period financial information as it recognizes the cumulative effect as an adjustment to opening retained earnings and applies the standard prospectively. Accordingly, comparative information in the Companys financial statements are not restated.
Husky Energy Inc. | Consolidated Financial Statements | 29
On adoption, lease liabilities were measured at the present value of the remaining lease payments discounted using the Companys incremental borrowing rate on January 1, 2019. Right-of-use assets were measured at an amount equal to the lease liability. For leases previously classified as operating leases, the Company applied the exemption not to recognize right-of-use assets and liabilities for leases with a lease term of less than 12 months, excluded initial direct costs from measuring the right-of-use asset at the date of initial application and applied a single discount rate to a portfolio of leases with similar characteristics. For leases that were previously classified as finance leases under IAS 17, the carrying amount of the lease asset and lease liability remain unchanged upon transition and were determined at the carrying amount immediately before adoption date. Additionally, instead of an impairment review, the Company adjusted the right-of-use assets by the amount of IAS 37 onerous contract provision immediately before the date of initial application.
No adjustments were required upon transition to IFRS 16 for leases where the Company is a lessor. Under IFRS 16, the Company is required to assess the classification of a sub-lease with reference to the right-of-use asset, not the underlying asset. On transition, the Company reassessed the classification of any sub-lease contracts previously assessed under IAS 17. No changes to sublease classification or associated accounting treatment was required.
Financial Statement Impact
The recognition of the present value of lease payments resulted in an additional $1.3 billion of right-of-use assets and associated lease liabilities. The Company has recognized lease liabilities in relation to lease arrangements previously disclosed as operating lease commitments under IAS 17 that meet the criteria of a lease under IFRS 16. Upon recognition in the consolidated statement of financial position, the Companys weighted average incremental borrowing rate used in measuring lease liabilities was 3.58%.
Note 4 Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents at December 31, 2019 included $327 million of cash (December 31, 2018 $187 million) and $1,448 million of short-term investments with original maturities less than three months at the time of purchase (December 31, 2018 $2,679 million).
Note 5 Accounts Receivable
Accounts Receivable
($ millions) |
December 31, 2019 | December 31, 2018 | ||||||
Trade receivables |
1,327 | 1,146 | ||||||
Provision for expected credit losses |
(34 | ) | (39 | ) | ||||
Derivatives due within one year |
38 | 43 | ||||||
Other(1) |
168 | 205 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
End of year |
1,499 | 1,355 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
(1) | Includes insurance proceeds of $114 million (2018 $143 million), related to the Superior Refinery incident. |
Note 6 Inventories
Inventories
($ millions) |
December 31, 2019 | December 31, 2018 | ||||||
Crude oil, natural gas and NGL |
627 | 445 | ||||||
Refined petroleum products |
553 | 435 | ||||||
Trading inventories measured at fair value less costs to sell |
155 | 200 | ||||||
Materials, supplies and other |
151 | 152 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
End of year |
1,486 | 1,232 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
Impairment of inventory to net realizable value for the year ended December 31, 2019 was $15 million (December 31, 2018 $60 million), as a result of declining market benchmark prices.
Trading inventories measured at fair value less costs to sell consist of natural gas inventories and crude oil inventories. The fair value measurement incorporates exit commodity prices and adjustments for quality and location.
Husky Energy Inc. | Consolidated Financial Statements | 30
Note 7 Restricted Cash
In accordance with the provisions of the regulations of the Peoples Republic of China, the Company is required to deposit funds into separate accounts restricted to the funding of future asset retirement obligations in offshore China. As at December 31, 2019, the Company had deposited funds of $142 million which have been classified as non-current (2018 $128 million).
Note 8 Exploration and Evaluation Costs
Exploration and Evaluation Assets
($ millions) |
2019 | 2018 | ||||||
Beginning of year |
997 | 838 | ||||||
Additions |
46 | 287 | ||||||
Disposals |
| (23 | ) | |||||
Transfers to property, plant and equipment (note 9) |
(44 | ) | (79 | ) | ||||
Expensed exploration expenditures previously capitalized |
(355 | ) | (29 | ) | ||||
Exchange adjustments |
(1 | ) | 3 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
End of year |
643 | 997 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
During 2019, $331 million of the $355 million in total expensed exploration expenditures previously capitalized was primarily related to a write-down related to certain crude oil assets in the Atlantic and Western Canada. The write-down was primarily due to changes in managements future development plans resulting from sustained declines in forecasted short and long-term crude oil prices.
The following exploration and evaluation expenses for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 relate to activities associated with the exploration for and evaluation of crude oil and natural gas resources and were recorded in the Upstream Exploration and Production business.
Exploration and Evaluation Expense Summary
($ millions) |
2019 | 2018 | ||||||
Seismic, geological and geophysical |
131 | 102 | ||||||
Expensed drilling |
409 | 41 | ||||||
Expensed land |
7 | 6 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
547 | 149 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
Husky Energy Inc. | Consolidated Financial Statements | 31
Note 9 Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, Plant and Equipment
($ millions) |
Oil and Gas Properties |
Processing, Transportation and Storage |
Upgrading | Refining | Retail and Other |
Total | ||||||||||||||||||
Cost |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2017 |
41,815 | 86 | 2,599 | 9,191 | 2,930 | 56,621 | ||||||||||||||||||
Additions |
2,465 | 12 | 62 | 744 | 151 | 3,434 | ||||||||||||||||||
Acquisitions |
64 | | | 3 | | 67 | ||||||||||||||||||
Transfers from exploration and evaluation (note 8) |
79 | | | | | 79 | ||||||||||||||||||
Intersegment transfers |
| | | (5 | ) | 5 | | |||||||||||||||||
Changes in asset retirement obligations (note 17) |
43 | 2 | (2 | ) | (5 | ) | 7 | 45 | ||||||||||||||||
Disposals and derecognition |
(632 | ) | | | (10 | ) | (1 | ) | (643 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Exchange adjustments |
362 | 1 | | 773 | 3 | 1,139 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
December 31, 2018 |
44,196 | 101 | 2,659 | 10,691 | 3,095 | 60,742 | ||||||||||||||||||
Transfers to right-of-use assets(1) (note 10) |
(336 | ) | | | (180 | ) | | (516 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Additions(2) |
2,340 | 2 | 58 | 899 | 160 | 3,459 | ||||||||||||||||||
Acquisitions |
10 | | | | | 10 | ||||||||||||||||||
Transfers from exploration and evaluation (note 8) |
44 | | | | | 44 | ||||||||||||||||||
Transfers from right-of-use assets(3) (note 10) |
101 | | | | | 101 | ||||||||||||||||||
Intersegment transfers |
2 | | | 27 | (29 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||
Changes in asset retirement obligations (note 17) |
469 | 1 | 5 | 19 | 23 | 517 | ||||||||||||||||||
Disposals and derecognition |
(16 | ) | (2 | ) | (1 | ) | (943 | ) | (2 | ) | (964 | ) | ||||||||||||
Exchange adjustments |
(223 | ) | (1 | ) | | (496 | ) | (2 | ) | (722 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
December 31, 2019 |
46,587 | 101 | 2,721 | 10,017 | 3,245 | 62,671 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Accumulated depletion, depreciation, amortization and impairment |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2017 |
(26,016 | ) | (47 | ) | (1,462 | ) | (3,176 | ) | (1,842 | ) | (32,543 | ) | ||||||||||||
Depletion, depreciation, amortization and impairment |
(1,811 | ) | (2 | ) | (123 | ) | (503 | ) | (152 | ) | (2,591 | ) | ||||||||||||
Disposals and derecognition |
586 | | | 10 | | 596 | ||||||||||||||||||
Exchange adjustments |
(138 | ) | (1 | ) | | (264 | ) | (1 | ) | (404 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
December 31, 2018 |
(27,379 | ) | (50 | ) | (1,585 | ) | (3,933 | ) | (1,995 | ) | (34,942 | ) | ||||||||||||
Transfers to right-of-use assets(1) (note 10) |
12 | | | 40 | | 52 | ||||||||||||||||||
Depletion, depreciation, amortization and impairment |
(4,082 | ) | (2 | ) | (115 | ) | (736 | ) | (239 | ) | (5,174 | ) | ||||||||||||
Intersegment transfers |
| | | (17 | ) | 17 | | |||||||||||||||||
Disposals and derecognition |
8 | | | 724 | 2 | 734 | ||||||||||||||||||
Exchange adjustments |
93 | 1 | | 187 | 1 | 282 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
December 31, 2019 |
(31,348 | ) | (51 | ) | (1,700 | ) | (3,735 | ) | (2,214 | ) | (39,048 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Net book value |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2018 |
16,817 | 51 | 1,074 | 6,758 | 1,100 | 25,800 | ||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2019 |
15,239 | 50 | 1,021 | 6,282 | 1,031 | 23,623 |
(1) | Transfer to right-of-use assets due to the adoption of IFRS 16 on January 1, 2019. |
(2) | Includes $5 million of interest expense on lease liabilities allocated to the carrying amount of assets in Oil and Gas Properties. |
(3) | Includes capitalized depreciation from right-of-use assets. |
Costs of property, plant and equipment, including major development projects, not subject to depletion, depreciation and amortization as at December 31, 2019 were $6.8 billion (December 31, 2018 $5.2 billion) including undeveloped land assets of $127 million as at December 31, 2019 (December 31, 2018 $117 million).
Husky Energy Inc. | Consolidated Financial Statements | 32
Included in depletion, depreciation, amortization and impairment for the year ended December 31, 2019 is a pre-tax impairment expense of $2,240 million (December 31, 2018 $nil) on assets on CGUs located at Sunrise, Western Canada and White Rose in the Exploration and Production segment. The impairment charge, reflected in the fourth quarter of 2019 and attributed to the CGUs noted above, was a result of sustained declines in forecasted short and long-term crude oil and natural gas prices and managements decision to reduce capital investment in those CGUs. The recoverable amount of the impaired CGUs was estimated based on fair value less costs to sell methodology using estimated after-tax discounted cash flows on proved plus probable reserves for Sunrise and Western Canada CGUs, and proved plus probable and possible reserves for the White Rose CGU (Level 3). The Company used an after-tax discount rate of 10% (Level 3).
The following table summarizes impairment for each Upstream CGU:
CGU
($ millions) |
Impairment recorded |
|||
Northern |
421 | |||
Rainbow |
241 | |||
|
|
|||
Western Canada CGUs total |
662 | |||
White Rose CGU |
871 | |||
Sunrise CGU |
707 | |||
|
|
|||
Upstream CGUs total |
2,240 | |||
|
|
The recoverable amount of the Upstream CGUs was $5.6 billion as at December 31, 2019. The recoverable amount is sensitive to commodity price, discount rate, production volumes, royalties, operating costs and future capital expenditures. Commodity prices are based on market indicators at the end of the period. Managements long-term assumptions are benchmarked against forward price curve and pricing forecasts prepared by external firms.
The table below summarizes the forecasted prices used in determining the recoverable amounts:
WTI ($US/bbl) |
Brent ($US/bbl) |
Edmonton Light ($CDN/bbl) |
AECO ($CDN/mcf) |
Foreign Exchange ($US/$CDN) |
||||||||||||||||
2020 |
61.00 | 66.00 | 72.37 | 2.00 | 0.76 | |||||||||||||||
2021 |
64.00 | 68.00 | 76.62 | 2.25 | 0.77 | |||||||||||||||
2022 |
66.00 | 70.00 | 78.85 | 2.50 | 0.78 | |||||||||||||||
2023 |
68.00 | 72.00 | 80.38 | 2.75 | 0.79 | |||||||||||||||
2024 |
70.00 | 74.00 | 82.91 | 2.80 | 0.79 | |||||||||||||||
2025 |
71.40 | 75.48 | 84.57 | 2.86 | 0.79 | |||||||||||||||
2026(1) |
72.83 | 76.99 | 86.26 | 2.91 | 0.79 |
(1) | Prices are escalated at 2% thereafter. |
The discount rate for FVLCS represents the rate a market participant would apply to the cash flows in a market transaction. The discount rate is derived from the Companys post-tax weighted average cost of capital with appropriate adjustments made to reflect the risks specific to the CGUs. Production volumes, operating costs, royalties and future capital expenditures are based on managements best estimates included in the long range plan approved by the Board of Directors.
A change in the discount rate or forward price over the life of the reserves will result in the following impact on the Upstream CGUs:
Discount Rate | Commodity Price | |||||||||||||||
($ millions) |
1% Increase in Discount Rate |
1% Decrease in Discount Rate |
5% Increase in Forward Price |
5% Decrease in Forward Price |
||||||||||||
Impairment of PP&E Increase (Decrease) |
528 | (605 | ) | (910 | ) | 904 |
Husky Energy Inc. | Consolidated Financial Statements | 33
Also included in depletion, depreciation, amortization and impairment for the year ended December 31, 2019 is a pre-tax impairment expense of $90 million (December 31, 2018 $nil) at the Lloyd and Minnedosa Ethanol plants within the Canadian Refined Products segment. The impairment charge, reflected in the fourth quarter of 2019 and attributed to the CGUs noted above, was a result of sustained declines in forecasted ethanol margins. The recoverable amount of the impaired CGUs was estimated using after-tax discounted cash flows (Level 3). The Company used comparative market multipliers to corroborate discounted cash flow results.
The recoverable amount of these Downstream CGUs was $106 million as at December 31, 2019.
The following table summarizes impairment for each CGU in downstream:
CGU
($ millions) |
Impairment recorded | |||
Minnedosa Ethanol Plant |
78 | |||
Lloydminster Ethanol Plant |
12 | |||
|
|
|||
Downstream CGUs total |
90 | |||
|
|
Depletion, depreciation, amortization and impairment for the year ended December 31, 2019 also included a $254 million pre-tax derecognition of the carrying value of components replaced as part of the crude oil flexibility project at the Lima Refinery in the U.S Refining and Marketing segment (December 31, 2018 a pre-tax impairment expense of $56 million related to the Superior Refinery in the U.S. Refining and Marketing segment).
Assets Dispositions
On November 1, 2019, the Company completed the sale of its Prince George Refinery to Tidewater Midstream and Infrastructure Ltd. for $215 million in cash plus an inventory closing adjustment of approximately $53.5 million. Upon completion of the sale of the Prince George Refinery, the Company entered into a supply agreement to purchase substantially all of the refinerys production, resulting in a $55 million sale leaseback. The transaction resulted in a pre-tax gain of $2 million and an after-tax gain of $1 million. The assets and related liabilities were recorded in the Canadian Refined Products segment.
Note 10 Right-of-use Assets and Lease Liabilities
Right-of-use Assets
($ millions) |
Oil and Gas Properties |
Processing, Transportation and Storage |
Upgrading | Refining | Retail and Other |
Total | ||||||||||||||||||
January 1, 2019 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Transfers from property, plant and equipment, net (note 9) |
324 | | | 140 | | 464 | ||||||||||||||||||
Initial recognition |
721 | 100 | | 70 | 412 | 1,303 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
1,045 | 100 | | 210 | 412 | 1,767 | |||||||||||||||||||
Additions |
1 | | | 80 | 5 | 86 | ||||||||||||||||||
Transfers to property, plant and equipment (note 9) |
(101 | ) | | | | | (101 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Disposals and derecognition |
(11 | ) | | | (31 | ) | 2 | (40 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Revaluation |
(194 | ) | 1 | | (1 | ) | 8 | (186 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation and impairment |
(222 | ) | (11 | ) | | (50 | ) | (39 | ) | (322 | ) | |||||||||||||
Other |
2 | | | (4 | ) | | (2 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
December 31, 2019 |
520 | 90 | | 204 | 388 | 1,202 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2019, $165 million of right-of-use assets were expensed related to impairment recorded within the Exploration and Production segment. Refer to Note 9.
Husky Energy Inc. | Consolidated Financial Statements | 34
Lease Liabilities
Balance Sheets
($ millions) |
December 31, 2019 | |||
Current lease liabilities(1) |
109 | |||
Non-current lease liabilities(1) |
1,353 |
(1) | Includes $489 million previously recorded in accrued liabilities and other long-term liabilities as at December 31, 2018. |
Reconciliation to Operating Lease Commitments
($ millions) |
||||
Operating agreements included in commitments at December 31, 2018(1) |
2,343 | |||
Expenses relating to short-term leases |
(9 | ) | ||
Discounting |
(986 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Additional lease liability recognized due to adoption of IFRS 16 on January 1, 2019 |
1,348 | |||
|
|
(1) | Includes commitments from operating agreements, firm transportation agreements, and unconditional purchase obligations. |
Maturity Analysis
Within 1 year | After 1 year but no more than 5 years |
More than 5 years | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
($ millions) |
2019 | 2018(1) | 2019 | 2018(1) | 2019 | 2018(1) | 2019 | 2018(1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Future lease payments |
205 | 69 | 653 | 242 | 2,174 | 1,014 | 3,032 | 1,325 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest |
96 | 48 | 352 | 175 | 1,122 | 613 | 1,570 | 836 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Present value of lease payments |
109 | 21 | 301 | 67 | 1,052 | 401 | 1,462 | 489 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | Amounts for 2018 were future payments under finance leases obligations, prior to the adoption of IFRS 16. |
Results of Operations
($ millions) |
December 31, 2019 | |||
Interest expense on lease liabilities(1) (note 22) |
106 | |||
Expenses relating to short-term leases |
18 |
(1) | Includes $5 million of interest allocated to the carrying amount of assets in Oil and Gas Properties for the year ended December 31, 2019. |
Cash Flow Summary
($ millions) |
December 31, 2019 | |||
Total cash flow used for leases |
339 |
The Companys major office building leases contain extension options that are exercisable by the Company up to one year prior to the end of the non-cancellable lease term. As at December 31, 2019, $380 million of lease liabilities related to office buildings have been recognized. Discounted potential lease payments associated with extension options not included in lease liabilities amount to $238 million.
During 2019, the Company revalued the Henry Goodrich right-of-use asset due to a shortened contract term, resulting in a reduction of the right-of-use asset and lease liability by $185 million.
Husky Energy Inc. | Consolidated Financial Statements | 35
Note 11 Goodwill
Goodwill
($ millions) |
December 31, 2019 | December 31, 2018 | ||||||
Beginning of year |
690 | 633 | ||||||
Exchange adjustments |
(34 | ) | 57 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
End of year |
656 | 690 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
As at December 31, 2019, the Companys goodwill balance related entirely to the Lima Refinery. For impairment testing purposes, the recoverable amount of the Lima Refinery CGU was estimated using the FVLCS methodology based on cash flows expected over a 50-year period and an after-tax discount rate of 9% (2018 8%).
Management used the FVLCS calculation for the Lima Refinery CGU, which is sensitive to changes in discount rate, forecasted crack spreads and future capital expenditures. The discount rate is derived from the post-tax weighted average cost of capital, of a group of relevant peers, considered to represent the rate of return that would be required by a typical market participant for similar assets, with appropriate adjustments made to reflect the risks specific to the refinery. Forecasted crack spreads are based on WTI and prices for gasoline and diesel, and are consistent with crack spreads used in the Companys long range plan.
After-tax cash flow projections for the initial 10-year period are based on long range plan future cash flows and inflated by long-term growth rates of 1% and 2%, for future EBITDA and capital expenditures, respectively, for the remaining 40-year period. The inflation rate was based upon an average expected inflation rate for the U.S. of 2% (2018 2%). As at December 31, 2019, the recoverable value of the CGU exceeded the carrying amount and no impairment was identified.
The Company used comparative market multipliers to corroborate discounted cash flow results.
Note 12 Joint Arrangements
Joint Operations
BP-Husky Refining LLC
The Company holds a 50% ownership interest in BP-Husky Refining LLC, which owns and operates the BP-Husky Toledo Refinery in Ohio.
Sunrise Oil Sands Partnership
The Company holds a 50% interest in the Sunrise Oil Sands Partnership, which is engaged in operating an oil sands project in Northern Alberta.
Joint Venture
Husky-CNOOC Madura Ltd.
The Company holds 40% joint control in Husky-CNOOC Madura Ltd., which is engaged in the exploration for and production of oil and gas resources in Indonesia. Results of the joint venture are included in the consolidated statements of income (loss) in the Exploration and Production in the Upstream segment.
Summarized below is the financial information for Husky-CNOOC Madura Ltd. accounted for using the equity method:
Results of Operations
($ millions, except share of equity investment) |
2019 | 2018 | ||||||
Revenues |
424 | 441 | ||||||
Expenses |
(267 | ) | (273 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net earnings |
157 | 168 | ||||||
Share of equity investment |
40 | % | 40 | % | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Proportionate share of equity investment |
50 | 51 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
Husky Energy Inc. | Consolidated Financial Statements | 36
Balance Sheets
($ millions, except share of equity investment) |
December 31, 2019 | December 31, 2018 | ||||||
Current assets(1) |
208 | 373 | ||||||
Non-current assets |
1,840 | 2,072 | ||||||
Current liabilities |
(70 | ) | (123 | ) | ||||
Non-current liabilities(2) |
(1,427 | ) | (1,917 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net assets |
551 | 405 | ||||||
Share of net assets |
40 | % | 40 | % | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Carrying amount in balance sheet |
516 | 650 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
(1) | Includes cash and cash equivalents of $42 million (2018 $203 million). |
(2) | Includes deferred revenue of nil (2018 $2 million) related to take-or-pay commitments, with respect to natural gas production volumes from the BD Project, not taken by the purchaser. As per the terms of the agreement, the purchaser has until the end of the agreement to take these volumes. |
The Companys share of equity investment and carrying amount of share of net assets does not equal the 40% joint control of the expenses and net assets of Husky-CNOOC Madura Ltd. due to differences in the accounting policies of the joint venture and the Company and non-current liabilities of the joint venture which are not included in the Companys carrying amount of net assets due to equity accounting.
Husky Midstream Limited Partnership
The Company holds a 35% interest in HMLP, which owns midstream assets in Alberta and Saskatchewan. The assets are held by HMLP, of which Husky owns 35%, Power Assets Holdings Ltd. (PAH) owns 48.75% and CK Infrastructure Holdings Ltd. (CKI) owns 16.25%. Results of the joint venture are included in the consolidated statements of income (loss) in Infrastructure and Marketing in the Upstream segment.
Summarized below is the financial information for HMLP accounted for using the equity method:
Results of Operations
($ millions, except share of equity investment) |
2019 | 2018 | ||||||
Revenues |
316 | 296 | ||||||
Expenses |
(228 | ) | (177 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net earnings |
88 | 119 | ||||||
Share of equity investment |
35 | % | 35 | % | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Proportionate share of equity investment |
9 | 18 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet
($ millions, except share of net assets) |
December 31, 2019 | December 31, 2018 | ||||||
Current assets(1) |
171 | 115 | ||||||
Non-current assets |
3,031 | 2,849 | ||||||
Current liabilities |
(163 | ) | (153 | ) | ||||
Non-current liabilities |
(1,059 | ) | (825 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net assets |
1,980 | 1,986 | ||||||
Share of net assets |
35 | % | 35 | % | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Carrying amount in balance sheet |
666 | 669 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
(1) | Current assets include cash and cash equivalents of $86 million (2018 $16 million). |
The Companys share of equity investment and carrying amount of share of net assets does not equal the 35% joint control of the net income and net assets of HMLP due to the potential fluctuation in the partnership profit structure.
Husky Energy Inc. | Consolidated Financial Statements | 37
Note 13 Other Assets
Other Assets
($ millions) |
December 31, 2019 | December 31, 2018 | ||||||
Long-term receivables(1) |
489 | 319 | ||||||
Precious metals |
22 | 23 | ||||||
Other |
13 | 18 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
End of year |
524 | 360 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
(1) | Includes insurance proceeds of $435 million (2018 $253 million), related to the Superior Refinery incident. |
For the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company accrued pre-tax recoveries for rebuild costs, incident costs and business interruption associated with the Superior Refinery incident of $630 million (December 31, 2018 $468 million), which is included in other-net in the consolidated statements of income (loss).
Note 14 Bank Operating Loans
At December 31, 2019, the Company had unsecured short-term borrowing lines of credit with banks totalling $900 million(1) (December 31, 2018 $900 million) and letters of credit under these lines of credit totalling $436 million (December 31, 2018 $439 million). As at December 31, 2019, bank operating loans were nil (December 31, 2018 nil). Interest payable is based on Bankers Acceptance, CAD Prime Rate, U.S. LIBOR, or U.S. Base Rates.
Sunrise Oil Sands Partnership has an unsecured demand credit facility of $10 million (December 31, 2018 $10 million) available for general purposes. The Companys proportionate share of the credit facility is $5 million (December 31, 2018 $5 million). As at December 31, 2019, there was no balance outstanding under this credit facility (December 31, 2018 no balance).
(1) | Includes $125 million demand facilities available specifically for letters of credit only. |
Note 15 Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities
Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities
($ millions) |
December 31, 2019 | December 31, 2018 | ||||||
Trade payables |
1,178 | 1,121 | ||||||
Accrued liabilities |
1,954 | 1,712 | ||||||
Dividend payable (note 20) |
126 | 126 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation |
19 | 32 | ||||||
Derivatives due within one year |
21 | 39 | ||||||
Other |
167 | 129 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
End of year |
3,465 | 3,159 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
Husky Energy Inc. | Consolidated Financial Statements | 38
Note 16 Debt and Credit Facilities
Short-term Debt
($ millions) |
December 31, 2019 | December 31, 2018 | ||||||
Commercial paper(1) |
550 | 200 |
(1) | The commercial paper is supported by the Companys syndicated credit facilities and the Company is authorized to issue commercial paper up to a maximum of $1.0 billion having a term not to exceed 365 days. The weighted average interest rate as at December 31, 2019 was 1.98% per annum (December 31, 2018 2.20%). |
Long-term Debt
Canadian $ Amount | U.S. $ Denominated | |||||||||||||||||||
($ millions) |
Maturity | December 31, 2019 |
December 31, 2018 |
December 31, 2019 |
December 31, 2018 |
|||||||||||||||
Long-term debt 5.00% notes(5) |
2020 | | 400 | | | |||||||||||||||
3.95% notes(1)(4) |
2022 | 648 | 682 | 500 | 500 | |||||||||||||||
4.00% notes(1)(4) |
2024 | 973 | 1,023 | 750 | 750 | |||||||||||||||
3.55% notes(5) |
2025 | 750 | 750 | | | |||||||||||||||
3.60% notes(5) |
2027 | 750 | 750 | | | |||||||||||||||
4.40% notes(1)(4) |
2029 | 973 | | 750 | | |||||||||||||||
6.80% notes(1)(4) |
2037 | 501 | 528 | 387 | 387 | |||||||||||||||
Debt issue costs(2) |
(25 | ) | (19 | ) | | | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Long-term debt |
4,570 | 4,114 | 2,387 | 1,637 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Long-term debt due within one year |
||||||||||||||||||||
6.15% notes(1)(3) |
2019 | | 410 | | 300 | |||||||||||||||
7.25% notes(1)(4) |
2019 | | 1,023 | | 750 | |||||||||||||||
5.00% notes(5) |
2020 | 400 | | | | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Long-term debt due within one year |
400 | 1,433 | | 1,050 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | The U.S. dollar denominated debt is designated as a hedge of the Companys net investment in selected foreign operations with a U.S. dollar functional currency. Refer to Note 25 for Foreign Currency Risk Management. |
(2) | Calculated using the effective interest rate method. |
(3) | The 6.15% notes represent unsecured securities under a trust indenture dated June 14, 2002. |
(4) | The 7.25%, the 3.95%, the 4.00%, the 4.40% and the 6.80% notes represent unsecured securities under a trust indenture dated September 11, 2007. |
(5) | The 5.00%, the 3.55% and the 3.60% notes represent unsecured securities under a trust indenture dated December 21, 2009. |
Credit Facilities
The Company has two $2.0 billion revolving unsecured syndicated credit facilities that mature on June 19, 2022 and March 9, 2024.
As at December 31, 2019 the covenants under the Companys syndicated credit facilities are debt to capital covenants, calculated as total debt (long-term debt including long-term debt due within one year and short-term debt) and certain adjusting items specified in the agreement divided by total debt, shareholders equity and certain adjusting items specified in the agreement. These covenants are used to assess the Companys financial strength. If the Company does not comply with the covenants under the syndicated credit facilities, there is risk that repayment could be accelerated. The Company was in compliance with the syndicated credit facility covenants at December 31, 2019, and assessed the risk of non-compliance to be low. As at December 31, 2019, the Company had no direct borrowings under its $2.0 billion facility expiring June 19, 2022 (December 31, 2018 no direct borrowings) and no direct borrowings under its $2.0 billion facility expiring March 9, 2024 (December 31, 2018 no direct borrowings).
Interest payable is based on Bankers Acceptance, CAD Prime Rate, U.S. LIBOR, or U.S. Base Rates, depending on the borrowing option selected and credit ratings assigned by certain credit rating agencies to the Company.
Husky Energy Inc. | Consolidated Financial Statements | 39
Notes
On January 29, 2018, the Company filed a universal short form base shelf prospectus (the 2018 U.S. Shelf Prospectus) with the Alberta Securities Commission. On January 30, 2018, the Companys related U.S. registration statement with the SEC containing the 2018 U.S. Shelf Prospectus became effective which enables the Company to offer up to US$3.0 billion of debt securities, common shares, preferred shares, subscription receipts, warrants and units of the Company in the U.S. up to and including February 29, 2020.
On December 4, 2018, the Company entered into cash flow hedges using forward interest rate swaps to fix the underlying U.S. $500 million 10-year note fixed rate to December 15, 2019. During the three months ended March 31, 2019, the Company discontinued these cash flow hedges and these interest rate swaps were settled and derecognized during the year.
On March 15, 2019, the Company issued US$750 million in senior unsecured notes. The notes bear an annual interest rate of 4.40% and are due on April 15, 2029. The Company raised the net proceeds of the offering for general corporate purposes, which included the repayment of certain outstanding debt securities that matured in 2019.
On May 1, 2019, the Company filed a universal short form base shelf prospectus (the 2019 Canadian Shelf Prospectus) with applicable securities regulators in each of the provinces of Canada that enables the Company to offer up to $3.0 billion of common shares, preferred shares, debt securities, subscription receipts, warrants and other units in Canada up to and including June 1, 2021.
On June 17, 2019, the Company repaid the maturing 6.15% notes. The amount paid to note holders was $402 million.
On December 16, 2019, the Company repaid the maturing 7.25% notes. The amount paid to note holders was $987 million.
The Companys notes, credit facilities and short-term lines of credit rank equally in right of payment.
Base Shelf Prospectus
At December 31, 2019, the Company had unused capacity of $3.0 billion under its 2019 Canadian Shelf Prospectus and US$2.25 billion under its 2018 U.S. Shelf Prospectus and related U.S. registration statement.
Reconciliation of Changes of Liabilities to Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Liabilities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
($ millions) |
Short-term debt |
Long-term debt due within one year |
Long-term debt |
Other long-term liabilities |
Lease liabilities due within one year |
Lease liabilities |
||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2018 |
200 | 1,433 | 4,114 | 1,107 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Changes from financing cash flows |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Long-term debt issuance |
| | 1,000 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Long-term debt repayment |
| (1,389 | ) | | | | | |||||||||||||||||
Short-term debt issuance, net |
350 | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Debt issue costs |
| | (9 | ) | | | | |||||||||||||||||
Finance lease payments |
| | | | (233 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total change from financing cash flows |
350 | (1,389 | ) | 991 | | (233 | ) | | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Other changes liability-related |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Initial recognition of lease liabilities (note 10) |
| | | (467 | ) | 22 | 1,815 | |||||||||||||||||
Foreign exchange |
| | (8 | ) | (12 | ) | | (3 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Fair value changes |
| | | (4 | ) | | (240 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Net additions of lease liabilities |
| | | | | 89 | ||||||||||||||||||
Reclassification |
| 400 | (400 | ) | (114 | ) | 319 | (319 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Deferred revenue |
| | | (42 | ) | | | |||||||||||||||||
Amortization of debt issuance costs |
| | 5 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Foreign exchange recognized in OCI |
| (44 | ) | (132 | ) | | | | ||||||||||||||||
Other |
| | | (14 | ) | 1 | 11 | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total other changes liability related |
| 356 | (535 | ) | (653 | ) | 342 | 1,353 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
December 31, 2019 |
550 | 400 | 4,570 | 454 | 109 | 1,353 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Husky Energy Inc. | Consolidated Financial Statements | 40
Note 17 Asset Retirement Obligations
At December 31, 2019, the estimated total undiscounted inflation-adjusted amount required to settle the Companys ARO was $10.0 billion (December 31, 2018 $9.2 billion). These obligations will be settled based on the useful lives of the underlying assets, which currently extend an average of 45 years (December 31, 2018 45 years) into the future. This amount has been discounted using credit-adjusted risk-free rates of 3.9% to 4.4% (December 31, 2018 3.8% to 5.0%) and an inflation rate of 2% (December 31, 2018 2%). Obligations related to future environmental remediation and cleanup of oil and gas assets are included in the estimated ARO.
While the provision is based on managements best estimates of future costs, discount rates and the economic lives of the assets, there is uncertainty regarding the amount and timing of incurring these costs.
A reconciliation of the carrying amount of asset retirement obligations at December 31, 2019 and 2018 is set out below:
Asset Retirement Obligations
($ millions) |
2019 | 2018 | ||||||
Beginning of year |
2,424 | 2,526 | ||||||
Additions |
76 | 40 | ||||||
Liabilities settled |
(276 | ) | (270 | ) | ||||
Liabilities disposed |
(6 | ) | (11 | ) | ||||
Change in discount rate |
285 | (68 | ) | |||||
Change in estimates |
156 | 93 | ||||||
Exchange adjustment |
(10 | ) | 17 | |||||
Accretion (note 22) |
106 | 97 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
End of year |
2,755 | 2,424 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Expected to be incurred within 1 year |
112 | 202 | ||||||
Expected to be incurred beyond 1 year |
2,643 | 2,222 |
At December 31, 2019, the Company had deposited funds of $142 million into the restricted accounts for funding of future asset retirement obligations in offshore China (December 31, 2018 $128 million). These amounts have been classified as non-current and included in restricted cash.
Note 18 Other Long-term Liabilities
Other Long-term Liabilities
($ millions) |
December 31, 2019 | December 31, 2018 | ||||||
Employee future benefits (note 23) |
214 | 205 | ||||||
Finance lease obligations (note 10) |
| 467 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation |
19 | 42 | ||||||
Deferred revenue |
152 | 205 | ||||||
Other |
69 | 188 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
End of year |
454 | 1,107 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
Deferred revenue
Deferred revenue relates to take-or-pay commitments, with respect to natural gas production volumes from the Liwan 3-1 field in Asia Pacific, not taken by the purchaser. As per the terms of the agreement, the purchaser has until the end of the agreement to take these volumes.
($ millions) |
December 31, 2019 | December 31, 2018 | ||||||
Beginning of year |
205 | 284 | ||||||
Revenue recognized |
(42 | ) | (100 | ) | ||||
Exchange adjustment |
(11 | ) | 21 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
End of year |
152 | 205 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
Husky Energy Inc. | Consolidated Financial Statements | 41
Note 19 Income Taxes
The major components of income tax expense (recovery) for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 were as follows:
Income Tax Expense (Recovery)
($ millions) |
2019 | 2018 | ||||||
Current income tax |
||||||||
Current income tax charge |
174 | 86 | ||||||
Adjustments to current income tax estimates |
1 | (11 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
175 | 75 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Deferred income tax |
||||||||
Relating to origination and reversal of temporary differences |
(723 | ) | 378 | |||||
Adjustments to deferred income tax estimates |
(251 | ) | 18 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
(974 | ) | 396 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
Deferred Tax Items in OCI
($ millions) |
2019 | 2018 | ||||||
Deferred tax items expensed (recovered) directly in OCI |
||||||||
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges |
(3 | ) | (5 | ) | ||||
Remeasurement of pension plans |
1 | 17 | ||||||
Exchange differences on translation of foreign operations |
(58 | ) | 87 | |||||
Hedge of net investment |
30 | (41 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
(30 | ) | 58 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
The provision for income taxes in the consolidated statements of income (loss) reflects an effective tax rate which differs from the expected statutory tax rate. Differences for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 were accounted for as follows:
Reconciliation of Effective Tax Rate
($ millions, except tax rate) |
2019 | 2018 | ||||||
Earnings (loss) before income taxes |
||||||||
Canada |
(3,170 | ) | 734 | |||||
United States |
337 | 493 | ||||||
Other foreign jurisdictions |
664 | 701 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
(2,169 | ) | 1,928 | ||||||
Statutory Canadian income tax rate |
26.8 | % | 27.2 | % | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Expected income tax |
(582 | ) | 525 | |||||
Effect on income tax resulting from: |
||||||||
Foreign jurisdictions |
61 | (36 | ) | |||||
Non-taxable items |
(25 | ) | (13 | ) | ||||
Adjustments with respect to previous year |
(250 | ) | 7 | |||||
Revaluation of foreign tax pools |
(4 | ) | (4 | ) | ||||
Other net |
1 | (8 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Income tax expense (recovery) |
(799 | ) | 471 | |||||
|
|
|
|
The statutory tax rate is 26.8% in 2019 (2018 27.2%). The 2019 and 2018 tax rates were changed due to a 0.5% decrease to the Alberta Provincial corporate tax rate that was substantively enacted in the second quarter of 2019 resulting in a deferred tax recovery of $233 million.
Husky Energy Inc. | Consolidated Financial Statements | 42
The following reconciles the movements in the deferred income tax liabilities and assets:
Deferred Tax Liabilities and Assets
($ millions) |
January 1, 2019 | Recognized in Earnings |
Recognized in OCI |
Other | December 31, 2019 |
|||||||||||||||
Deferred tax liabilities |
||||||||||||||||||||
Exploration and evaluation assets and property, plant and equipment |
(4,089 | ) | 967 | 69 | | (3,053 | ) | |||||||||||||
Foreign exchange gains taxable on realization |
(174 | ) | 51 | (27 | ) | | (150 | ) | ||||||||||||
Debt issue costs |
(4 | ) | (1 | ) | | | (5 | ) | ||||||||||||
Other temporary differences |
(28 | ) | (124 | ) | | | (152 | ) | ||||||||||||
Deferred tax assets |
||||||||||||||||||||
Pension plans |
8 | 9 | (1 | ) | | 16 | ||||||||||||||
Asset retirement obligations |
654 | 16 | (4 | ) | | 666 | ||||||||||||||
Loss carry-forwards |
468 | 56 | (7 | ) | | 517 | ||||||||||||||
Financial assets at fair value |
(9 | ) | | | | (9 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
(3,174 | ) | 974 | 30 | | (2,170 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Tax Liabilities and Assets
($ millions) |
January 1, 2018 | Recognized in Earnings |
Recognized in OCI |
Other | December 31, 2018 |
|||||||||||||||
Deferred tax liabilities |
||||||||||||||||||||
Exploration and evaluation assets and property, plant and equipment |
(3,727 | ) | (260 | ) | (106 | ) | 4 | (4,089 | ) | |||||||||||
Foreign exchange gains taxable on realization |
(177 | ) | (43 | ) | 46 | | (174 | ) | ||||||||||||
Debt issue costs |
(3 | ) | (1 | ) | | | (4 | ) | ||||||||||||
Other temporary differences |
(90 | ) | 62 | | | (28 | ) | |||||||||||||
Deferred tax assets |
||||||||||||||||||||
Pension plans |
40 | (15 | ) | (17 | ) | | 8 | |||||||||||||
Asset retirement obligations |
679 | (29 | ) | 4 | | 654 | ||||||||||||||
Loss carry-forwards |
523 | (70 | ) | 15 | | 468 | ||||||||||||||
Financial assets at fair value |
31 | (40 | ) | | | (9 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
(2,724 | ) | (396 | ) | (58 | ) | 4 | (3,174 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has temporary differences associated with its investments in its foreign subsidiaries, branches, and interests in joint ventures. At December 31, 2019, the Company had nil deferred tax liabilities in respect to these investments (December 31, 2018 nil).
At December 31, 2019, the Company had $2,105 million (December 31, 2018 $1,806 million) of tax losses that will expire between 2030 and 2039. The Company has recorded deferred tax assets in respect of these losses, as there are sufficient taxable temporary differences in the various jurisdictions to utilize these losses.
Husky Energy Inc. | Consolidated Financial Statements | 43
Note 20 Share Capital
Common Shares
The Company is authorized to issue an unlimited number of no par value common shares.
Common Shares |
Number of Shares | Amount ($ millions) |
||||||
December 31, 2017 |
1,005,120,012 | 7,293 | ||||||
Options exercised(1) |
1,726 | | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
December 31, 2018 |
1,005,121,738 | 7,293 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
December 31, 2019 |
1,005,121,738 | 7,293 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
(1) | Stock options exercised was less than $1 million. |
Quarterly dividends may be declared in an amount expressed in dollars per common share or could be paid by way of issuance of a fraction of a common share per outstanding common share determined by dividing the dollar amount of the dividend by the volume-weighted average trading price of the Common Shares on the principal stock exchange on which the common shares are traded. The volume-weighted average trading price of the common shares is calculated by dividing the total value by the total volume of common shares traded over the five trading day period immediately prior to the payment date of the dividend on the common shares.
Common Share Dividends
2019 | 2018 | |||||||||||||||
($ millions) |
Declared | Paid | Declared | Paid | ||||||||||||
503 | 503 | 402 | 276 |
At December 31, 2019, Common Share dividends payable were $126 million (December 31, 2018 $126 million).
Preferred Shares
The Company is authorized to issue an unlimited number of no par value preferred shares.
Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares |
Number of Shares | Amount ($ millions) |
||||||
December 31, 2017 |
36,000,000 | 874 | ||||||
December 31, 2018 |
36,000,000 | 874 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
December 31, 2019 |
36,000,000 | 874 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares Dividends
2019 | 2018 | |||||||||||||||
($ millions) |
Declared | Paid | Declared | Paid | ||||||||||||
Series 1 Preferred Shares |
6 | 6 | 6 | 8 | ||||||||||||
Series 2 Preferred Shares |
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
Series 3 Preferred Shares |
12 | 12 | 12 | 14 | ||||||||||||
Series 5 Preferred Shares |
9 | 9 | 9 | 11 | ||||||||||||
Series 7 Preferred Shares |
7 | 7 | 7 | 9 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
35 | 35 | 35 | 43 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2019, Preferred Share dividends payable were nil (December 31, 2018 nil).
Holders of the Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares, Series 1 (the Series 1 Preferred Shares) are entitled to receive a cumulative quarterly fixed dividend yielding 2.404% annually for a five year period ending March 31, 2021, as and when declared by the Companys Board of Directors. Thereafter, the dividend rate will be reset every five years at a rate equal to the five-year Government of Canada bond yield plus 1.73%. Holders of Series 1 Preferred Shares have the right, at their option, to convert their shares into Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares, Series 2 (the Series 2 Preferred Shares), subject to certain conditions, on March 31, 2021 and on March 31 every five years thereafter.
Husky Energy Inc. | Consolidated Financial Statements | 44
Holders of the Series 2 Preferred Shares are entitled to receive a cumulative quarterly floating rate dividend that is reset every quarter for a five year period ending March 31, 2021, as and when declared by the Companys Board of Directors. The dividend rate applicable to the Series 2 Preferred Shares, for the three month period commencing September 30, 2019 but excluding December 31, 2019, was 3.368% based on the sum of the Government of Canada 90 day Treasury bill rate on August 20, 2019 plus 1.73%. Holders of Series 2 Preferred Shares have the right, at their option, to convert their shares into Series 1 Preferred Shares, subject to certain conditions, on March 31, 2021 and on March 31 every five years thereafter.
Holders of the Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares, Series 3 (the Series 3 Preferred Shares) are entitled to receive a cumulative quarterly fixed dividend yielding 4.689% annually for the initial period ending December 31, 2024 as and when declared by the Companys Board of Directors. Thereafter, the dividend rate will be reset every five years at the rate equal to the five-year Government of Canada bond yield plus 3.13%. Holders of Series 3 Preferred Shares will have the right, at their option, to convert their shares into Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares, Series 4 (the Series 4 Preferred Shares), subject to certain conditions, on December 31, 2024 and on December 31 every five years thereafter. Holders of the Series 4 Preferred Shares will be entitled to receive cumulative quarterly floating dividends at a rate equal to the 90-day Government of Canada Treasury Bill yield plus 3.13%.
Holders of the Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares, Series 5 (the Series 5 Preferred Shares) are entitled to receive a cumulative quarterly fixed dividend yielding 4.50% annually for the initial period ending March 31, 2020 as declared by the Board of Directors. Thereafter, the dividend rate will be reset every 5 years at the rate equal to the five-year Government of Canada bond yield plus 3.57%. Holders of Series 5 Preferred Shares will have the right, at their option, to convert their shares into Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares, Series 6 (the Series 6 Preferred Shares), subject to certain conditions, on March 31, 2020 and on March 31 every five years thereafter. Holders of the Series 6 Preferred Shares will be entitled to receive cumulative quarterly floating dividends at a rate equal to the 90-day Government of Canada Treasury Bill yield plus 3.57%.
Holders of the Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares, Series 7 (the Series 7 Preferred Shares) are entitled to receive a cumulative fixed dividend yielding 4.60% annually for the initial period ending June 30, 2020 as declared by the Board of Directors. Thereafter, the dividend rate will be reset every 5 years at the rate equal to the five-year Government of Canada bond yield plus 3.52%. Holders of the Series 7 Preferred Shares will have the right, at their option, to convert their shares into Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares, Series 8 (the Series 8 Preferred Shares), subject to certain conditions, on June 30, 2020 and on June 30 every 5 years thereafter. Holders of the Series 8 Preferred Shares will be entitled to receive cumulative quarterly floating dividends at a rate equal to the 90-day Government of Canada Treasury Bill yield plus 3.52%.
Stock Option Plan
Pursuant to the Incentive Stock Option Plan (the Option Plan), the Company may grant from time to time to executive officers and certain employees of the Company options to purchase common shares of the Company. The term of each option is five years, and vests one-third on each of the first three anniversary dates from the grant date. The Option Plan provides the option holder with the right to exercise the option to acquire one common share at the exercise price or surrender the option for a cash payment. The exercise price of the option is equal to the weighted average trading price of the Companys common shares during the five trading days prior to the grant date. When the stock option is surrendered to the Company, the cash payment is equal to the excess of the aggregate fair market value of the common shares able to be purchased pursuant to the vested and exercisable portion of such stock options on the date of surrender over the aggregate exercise price for those common shares pursuant to those stock options. The fair market value of common shares is calculated as the closing price of the common shares on the date on which board lots of common shares have traded immediately preceding the date a holder of the stock options provides notice to the Company that they wish to surrender their stock options to the Company in lieu of exercise.
Included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities and other long-term liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2019 was $4 million (December 31, 2018 $11 million) representing the estimated fair value of options outstanding. The total recovery recognized in selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of income (loss) for the Option Plan for the year ended December 31, 2019 was $6 million (December 31, 2018 recovery of $3 million). At December 31, 2019, the intrinsic value of stock options exercisable for cash was less than one million (December 31, 2018 nil).
Husky Energy Inc. | Consolidated Financial Statements | 45
The following options to purchase common shares have been awarded to officers and certain other employees:
Outstanding and Exercisable Options
2019 | 2018 | |||||||||||||||
Number of Options (thousands) |
Weighted Average Exercise Prices ($) |
Number of Options (thousands) |
Weighted Average Exercise Prices ($) |
|||||||||||||
Outstanding, beginning of year |
19,967 | 21.48 | 22,645 | 23.96 | ||||||||||||
Granted(1) |
4,241 | 14.31 | 5,610 | 17.21 | ||||||||||||
Exercised for common shares |
| | (2 | ) | 15.67 | |||||||||||
Surrendered for cash |
(4 | ) | 15.67 | (1,772 | ) | 15.82 | ||||||||||
Expired or forfeited |
(5,706 | ) | 28.27 | (6,514 | ) | 27.69 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Outstanding, end of year |
18,498 | 17.75 | 19,967 | 21.48 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Exercisable, end of year |
10,596 | 19.27 | 10,461 | 25.87 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | Options granted during the year ended December 31, 2019 were attributed a fair value of $2.34 per option (December 31, 2018 $2.90) at grant date. |
Outstanding and Exercisable Options
Outstanding Options | Exercisable Options | |||||||||||||||||||
Range of Exercise Price |
Number of Options (thousands) |
Weighted Average Exercise Prices ($) |
Weighted Average Contractual Life (years) |
Number of Options (thousands) |
Weighted Average Exercise Prices ($) |
|||||||||||||||
$9.28 - $16.31 |
10,341 | 15.34 | 2.65 | 5,350 | 15.86 | |||||||||||||||
$16.32 - $25.41 |
8,157 | 20.80 | 1.86 | 5,246 | 22.75 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
December 31, 2019 |
18,498 | 17.75 | 2.30 | 10,596 | 19.27 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of the share options is estimated at each reporting date using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, taking into account the terms and conditions upon which the share options are granted and for the performance options, the current likelihood of achieving the specified target. The following table lists the assumptions used in the Black-Scholes option pricing model for the share options and performance options:
Black-Scholes Assumptions
December 31, 2019 | December 31, 2018 | |||||||
Tandem Options |
Tandem Options |
|||||||
Dividend per option |
0.42 | 0.56 | ||||||
Range of expected volatilities used (percent) |
27.5 - 35.5 | 16.8 - 44.4 | ||||||
Range of risk-free interest rates used (percent) |
1.66 - 1.74 | 1.6 - 1.9 | ||||||
Expected life of share options from vesting date (years) |
1.97 | 1.95 | ||||||
Expected forfeiture rate (percent) |
8.8 | 8.9 | ||||||
Weighted average exercise price |
18.19 | 22.46 | ||||||
Weighted average fair value |
0.25 | 0.65 |
The expected life of the share options is based on historical data and current expectations and is not necessarily indicative of exercise patterns that may occur. The expected volatility reflects the assumption that the historical volatility over a period similar to the expected life of the options is indicative of future trends, which may also not necessarily be the actual outcome.
Husky Energy Inc. | Consolidated Financial Statements | 46
Performance Share Units
The Company has a Performance Share Unit Plan for executive officers and certain employees of the Company. The term of each PSU is three years, and the PSU vests on the second and third anniversary dates of the grant date in percentages determined by the Compensation Committee based on the Companys total shareholder return relative to a peer group of companies and achieving a ROCIU target set by the Company. ROCIU equals net earnings (loss) plus after tax interest expense divided by the two-year average capital employed, less any capital invested in assets that are not in use. Net earnings (loss) is adjusted for the difference between actual realized and budgeted commodity prices and foreign exchange rates and other actual and budgeted exceptional items. Upon vesting, PSU holders receive a cash payment equal to the number of vested PSUs multiplied by the weighted average trading price of the Companys common shares for the five preceding trading days. As at December 31, 2019, the carrying amount of the liability relating to PSUs was $34 million (December 31, 2018 $63 million). The total expense recognized in selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of income (loss) for the PSUs for the year ended December 31, 2019 was $4 million (2018 $47 million). The Company paid out $34 million (2018 $24 million) for performance share units which vested in the year. The weighted average contractual life of the PSUs at December 31, 2019 was two years (December 31, 2018 two years).
The number of PSUs outstanding was as follows:
Performance Share Units |
2019 | 2018 | ||||||
Beginning of year |
11,606,644 | 8,361,918 | ||||||
Granted |
7,673,960 | 6,108,430 | ||||||
Exercised |
(2,429,816 | ) | (1,354,316 | ) | ||||
Forfeited |
(2,532,146 | ) | (1,509,388 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Outstanding, end of year |
14,318,642 | 11,606,644 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Vested, end of year |
3,264,840 | 4,487,585 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per Share
Earnings (loss) per Share
($ millions) |
2019 | 2018 | ||||||
Net earnings (loss) |
(1,370 | ) | 1,457 | |||||
Effect of dividends declared on preferred shares in the year |
(35 | ) | (35 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net earnings (loss) basic |
(1,405 | ) | 1,422 | |||||
Dilutive effect of accounting for stock options(1) |
(15 | ) | (13 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net earnings (loss) diluted |
(1,420 | ) | 1,409 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
(millions) |
||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding basic |
1,005.1 | 1,005.1 | ||||||
Effect of stock dividends declared in the year |
| 1.0 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding diluted |
1,005.1 | 1,006.1 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Earnings (loss) per share basic ($/share) |
(1.40 | ) | 1.41 | |||||
Earnings (loss) per share diluted ($/share) |
(1.41 | ) | 1.40 | |||||
|
|
|
|
(1) | For the year ended December 31, 2019, equity-settlement of stock options was used to calculate diluted earnings (loss) per share as it was considered more dilutive than cash-settlement (December 31, 2018 equity-settlement method was used). Stock-based compensation recovery was $6 million based on cash-settlement for the year ended December 31, 2019 (2018 recovery of $3 million). Stock-based compensation expense would have been $9 million based on equity-settlement for the year ended December 31, 2019 (2018 $10 million). |
For the year ended December 31, 2019, 18 million tandem options (2018 13 million) were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings (loss) per share as these options were anti-dilutive.
Husky Energy Inc. | Consolidated Financial Statements | 47
Note 21 Production, Operating and Transportation and Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
The following table summarizes production, operating and transportation expenses in the consolidated statements of income (loss) for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018:
Production, Operating and Transportation Expenses
($ millions) |
2019 | 2018 | ||||||
Services and support costs |
1,255 | 1,039 | ||||||
Salaries and benefits |
773 | 762 | ||||||
Materials, equipment rentals and leases |
250 | 243 | ||||||
Energy and utility |
482 | 405 | ||||||
Licensing fees |
204 | 191 | ||||||
Transportation |
17 | 24 | ||||||
Other |
36 | 139 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total production, operating and transportation expenses |
3,017 | 2,803 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of income (loss) for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018:
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
($ millions) |
2019 | 2018 | ||||||
Employee costs(1) |
450 | 332 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation expense (recovery)(2) |
(2 | ) | 44 | |||||
Contract services |
133 | 104 | ||||||
Equipment rentals and leases |
11 | 39 | ||||||
Maintenance and other |
101 | 135 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total selling, general and administrative expenses |
693 | 654 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
(1) | Employee costs are comprised of salary and benefits earned during the year, plus cash bonuses awarded during the year. Annual bonus awards settled in shares are included in stock-based compensation expense. |
(2) | Stock-based compensation expense represents the cost to the Company for participation in share-based payment plans. |
Note 22 Financial Items
Financial Items
($ millions) |
2019 | 2018 | ||||||
Foreign exchange gain (loss) |
||||||||
Non-cash working capital |
17 | (3 | ) | |||||
Other foreign exchange |
27 | 17 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net foreign exchange gain |
44 | 14 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Finance income |
74 | 64 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Finance expenses |
||||||||
Long-term debt |
(310 | ) | (320 | ) | ||||
Lease liabilities(1) (note 10) |
(106 | ) | | |||||
Other |
(6 | ) | (5 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
(422 | ) | (325 | ) | |||||
Interest capitalized(2) |
177 | 108 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
(245 | ) | (217 | ) | |||||
Accretion of asset retirement obligations (note 17) |
(106 | ) | (97 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Finance expenses |
(351 | ) | (314 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total Financial Items |
(233 | ) | (236 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
(1) | Includes $5 million of interest allocated to the carrying amount of assets in Oil and Gas Properties. |
(2) | Interest capitalized on project costs is calculated using the Companys annualized effective interest rate of 5% (2018 5%). |
Husky Energy Inc. | Consolidated Financial Statements | 48
Note 23 Pensions and Other Post-employment Benefits
The Company currently provides defined contribution pension plans for all qualified employees and other post-employment benefit plans to its retirees. The other post-employment benefit plans provide certain retired employees with health care and dental benefits. The Company also maintains one defined benefit pension plan, which is closed to new entrants. The defined benefit pension plan provides pension benefits to certain employees based on years of service and final average earnings. The amount and timing of funding of this plan is subject to the funding policy as approved by the Board of Directors.
The measurement date of all plan assets and the accrued benefit obligations was December 31, 2019. The Company is required to file an actuarial valuation of its defined benefit pension with the provincial or state regulator at least every three years. The most recent actuarial valuation was December 31, 2018 for the U.S defined benefit plan. The most recent actuarial valuation was April 30, 2018 for the Canadian Other Post-employment benefit plan. The most recent actuarial valuation of the U.S. Other Post-employment benefit plan was January 18, 2019.
Defined Contribution Pension Plan
During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company recognized a $59 million expense (2018 $54 million) for the defined contribution and U.S. 401(k) plans in net earnings (loss).
Defined Benefit Pension Plans (DB Pension Plan) and Other Post-employment Benefit Plans (OPEB Plans)
Defined Benefit Obligations
DB Pension Plans | OPEB Plans | |||||||||||||||
($ millions) |
2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | ||||||||||||
Beginning of year |
79 | 76 | 199 | 244 | ||||||||||||
Current service cost |
| 1 | 10 | 11 | ||||||||||||
Interest cost |
2 | 3 | 7 | 8 | ||||||||||||
Benefits paid |
(3 | ) | (2 | ) | (4 | ) | (4 | ) | ||||||||
Past service cost |
3 | | (29 | ) | | |||||||||||
Settlements |
(49 | ) | | | | |||||||||||
Remeasurements |
||||||||||||||||
Actuarial (gain) loss experience |
| 2 | (1 | ) | (13 | ) | ||||||||||
Actuarial (gain) loss financial assumptions |
9 | (4 | ) | 20 | (45 | ) | ||||||||||
Effect of changes in foreign exchange rates |
(2 | ) | 3 | (1 | ) | (2 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
End of year |
39 | 79 | 201 | 199 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value of Plan Assets
DB Pension Plans | OPEB Plans | |||||||||||||||
($ millions) |
2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | ||||||||||||
Beginning of year |
71 | 67 | | | ||||||||||||
Contributions by employer |
(1 | ) | 1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
Benefits paid |
(3 | ) | (2 | ) | (2 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||||||
Interest income |
2 | 2 | | | ||||||||||||
Return on plan assets greater than discount rate |
16 | | | | ||||||||||||
Settlements |
(52 | ) | | | | |||||||||||
Effect of changes in foreign exchange rates |
(2 | ) | 3 | | | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
End of year |
31 | 71 | | | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status
DB Pension Plans | OPEB Plans | |||||||||||||||
($ millions) |
2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | ||||||||||||
Net asset (liability) |
(8 | ) | (8 | ) | (201 | ) | (199 | ) |
The Company has accrued the total net liability for the DB Pension Plan and the OPEB Plans in the consolidated balance sheets in other long-term liabilities.
Husky Energy Inc. | Consolidated Financial Statements | 49
On July 25, 2019, the Company completed the transaction related to the Canadian DB Pension Plan initiated on July 25, 2017. The transaction settled the remaining service costs for active plan members, thereby settling the defined benefit obligation related to active plan members. This resulted in the Company recognizing a $5 million actuarial gain (net of tax of $1 million) in other comprehensive income (loss) in 2019.
The composition of the DB Pension Plan assets at December 31, 2019 and 2018 was as follows:
DB Pension Plan Assets
(percent) |
Target allocation range |
2019 | 2018 | |||||||||
Money market type funds |
| | 5 | |||||||||
Equity securities |
35 | 35 | | |||||||||
Debt securities |
65 | 65 | 95 |
The following table summarizes amounts recognized in net earnings (loss) and OCI for the DB Pension Plans and the OPEB Plans for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018:
DB Pension Plans | OPEB Plans | |||||||||||||||
($ millions) |
2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | ||||||||||||
Amounts recognized in net earnings (loss) |
||||||||||||||||
Current service cost |
| 1 | 10 | 11 | ||||||||||||
Past service cost |
3 | | (29 | ) | | |||||||||||
Net Interest cost |
| 1 | 7 | 8 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Benefit cost |
3 | 2 | (12 | ) | 19 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Remeasurements |
||||||||||||||||
Actuarial loss (gain) due to liability experience |
| 2 | (1 | ) | (13 | ) | ||||||||||
Actuarial loss (gain) due to liability assumption changes |
9 | (4 | ) | 20 | (45 | ) | ||||||||||
(Gain) loss on plan assets |
(16 | ) | | | | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Remeasurement effects recognized in OCI |
(7 | ) | (2 | ) | 19 | (58 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following long-term assumptions were used to estimate the value of the defined benefit obligations, the plan assets and the OPEB Plans:
Assumptions
DB Pension Plans | OPEB Plans | |||||||||||||||
(percent) |
2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | ||||||||||||
Discount rate for benefit expense and obligation |
2.3 - 4.2 | 3.4 - 3.6 | 3.0 - 3.7 | 3.4 - 3.7 | ||||||||||||
Rate of compensation expense |
3.5 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
The average health care cost trend rate used for the benefit expense for the Canadian OPEB Plan was 6.0% for 2018, 2019 and 2020, grading 0.5% per year for 2 years to 5.0% in 2022 and thereafter. The average health care cost trend rate used for the obligation related to the Canadian OPEB Plan was 6.0% for 2018, 2019 and 2020, grading 0.5% per year for 2 years to 5.0% in 2022 and thereafter.
The average health care cost trend rate used for the benefit expense for the U.S. OPEB Plan was 6.0% for 2018, grading 0.25% per year for 5 years to 5.0% per year in 2022 and thereafter. The average health care cost trend rate used for the obligation related to the U.S. OPEB Plan was 6.5% for 2019 and 2020, grading 0.25% per year for 6 years to 5.0% in 2026 and thereafter.
The sensitivity of the defined benefit and OPEB obligations to changes in relevant actuarial assumption is shown below:
Sensitivity Analysis
DB Pension Plans | OPEB Plans | |||||||||||||||
($ millions) |
1% increase | 1% decrease | 1% increase | 1% decrease | ||||||||||||
Discount rate |
(4 | ) | 5 | (23 | ) | 28 | ||||||||||
Health care cost trend rate |
N/A | N/A | (16 | ) | 18 |
Husky Energy Inc. | Consolidated Financial Statements | 50
Note 24 Cash Flows Change in Non-cash Working Capital
Non-cash Working Capital
($ millions) |
2019 | 2018 | ||||||
Decrease (increase) in non-cash working capital |
||||||||
Accounts receivable |
(176 | ) | 127 | |||||
Inventories |
(502 | ) | 393 | |||||
Prepaid expenses |
(30 | ) | 30 | |||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
604 | (65 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Change in non-cash working capital |
(104 | ) | 485 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Relating to: |
||||||||
Operating activities |
(280 | ) | 130 | |||||
Financing activities |
3 | 120 | ||||||
Investing activities |
173 | 235 |
Note 25 Financial Instruments and Risk Management
Financial Instruments
The Companys financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, restricted cash, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, short-term debt, long-term debt, derivatives, portions of other assets, lease liabilities and other long-term liabilities. Derivative instruments are measured at fair value through profit or loss (FVTPL). The Companys remaining financial instruments are measured at amortized cost. For financial instruments measured at amortized cost, the carrying values approximate their fair value with the exception of long-term debt.
The following table summarizes the Companys financial instruments that are carried at fair value in the consolidated balance sheets:
Financial Instruments at Fair Value
($ millions) |
December 31, 2019 | December 31, 2018 | ||||||
Commodity contracts fair value through profit or loss (FVTPL) |
||||||||
Natural gas(1) |
31 | (9 | ) | |||||
Crude oil(2) |
11 | 89 | ||||||
Crude oil call options(3) |
(2 | ) | | |||||
Crude oil put options(3) |
(4 | ) | | |||||
Foreign currency contracts FVTPL |
||||||||
Foreign currency forwards |
2 | (1 | ) | |||||
Other assets FVTPL |
1 | 1 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
End of year |
39 | 80 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
(1) | Natural gas contracts includes a $4 million decrease at December 31, 2019 (December 31, 2018 $10 million decrease) to the fair value of held-for-trading inventory, recognized in the consolidated balance sheets, related to third party physical purchase and sale contracts for natural gas held in storage. Total fair value of the related natural gas storage inventory was $19 million at December 31, 2019 (December 31, 2018 $15 million). |
(2) | Crude oil contracts includes a $12 million increase at December 31, 2019 (December 31, 2018 $67 million increase) to the fair value of held-for-trading inventory, recognized in the consolidated balance sheets, related to third party crude oil physical purchase and sale contracts. Total fair value of the related crude oil inventory was $136 million at December 31, 2019 (December 31, 2018 $185 million). |
(3) | Excludes net unsettled premiums of $6 million. |
The fair value of long-term debt represents the present value of future cash flows associated with the debt. Market information, such as treasury rates and credit spreads, are used to determine the appropriate discount rates. These fair value determinations are compared to quotes received from financial institutions to ensure reasonability. At December 31, 2019, the carrying value of the Companys long-term debt was $5.0 billion and the estimated fair value was $5.3 billion (December 31, 2018 carrying value of $5.5 billion, estimated fair value of $5.7 billion).
All financial assets and liabilities are classified as Level 2 fair value measurements, except commodity put and call options under a short-term hedging program, which are classified as Level 1 fair value measurements as they are determined using quoted market prices. During the year ended December 31, 2019, there were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements, and no transfers into or out of Level 3 fair value measurements.
Husky Energy Inc. | Consolidated Financial Statements | 51
Risk Management Overview
The Company is exposed to risks related to the volatility of commodity prices, foreign exchange rates and interest rates. It is also exposed to financial risks related to liquidity, credit and contract risks. Risk management strategies and policies are employed to ensure that any exposures to risk are in compliance with the Companys business objectives and risk tolerance levels. Responsibility for the oversight of risk management is held by the Companys Board of Directors and is implemented and monitored by senior management within the Company.
a) Market Risk
I) Commodity Price Risk Management
The Company uses derivative commodity instruments from time to time to manage exposure to price volatility on a portion of its crude oil and natural gas production, and it also uses firm commitments for the purchase or sale of crude oil and natural gas. These contracts meet the definition of a derivative instrument and have been recorded at their fair value in accounts receivable, inventory, other assets, accounts payable and accrued liabilities and other long-term liabilities. All derivatives are measured at fair value through profit or loss other than non-financial derivative contracts that meet the Companys own use requirements.
At December 30, 2019, the Company was party to crude oil purchase and sale derivative contracts to mitigate its exposure to fluctuations in the benchmark price between the time a sales agreement is entered into and the time inventory is delivered. The Company was also party to third party physical natural gas purchase and sale derivative contracts in order to mitigate commodity price fluctuations. For the year ended December 31, 2019, the net unrealized loss recognized on the derivative contracts was $38 million (2018 net unrealized gain of $150 million).
During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company entered into a commodity short-term hedging program using put and call options to manage risks related to volatility of commodity prices.
Western Texas Intermediate Crude Oil Call and Put Option Contracts(1)
Type |
Transaction | Term | Volume (bbls/day) | Call Price (US$bbl) | Put Price (US$bbl) | |||||||||||
Call options | Sold | January - March 2020 | 35,714 | 60.50 | | |||||||||||
Put options | Bought | January - March 2020 | 36,263 | | 55.61 | |||||||||||
Put options | Sold | January - March 2020 | 20,055 | | 50.77 |
(1) | Prices reported are the weighted average prices for the period. |
For the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company incurred an unrealized loss of $6 million (December 31, 2018 nil). For the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company incurred a realized gain of $16 million (December 31, 2018 nil).These amounts are recorded in other net in the consolidated statements of income (loss).
II) Foreign Exchange Risk Management
The Companys results are affected by the exchange rates between various currencies and the Companys functional currency in Canadian dollars. As the majority of the Companys revenues are denominated in U.S. dollars or based upon a U.S. benchmark price, fluctuations in the value of the Canadian dollar relative to the U.S. dollar may affect revenues significantly. To limit the exposure to foreign exchange risk, the Company hedges against these fluctuations by entering into short-dated foreign exchange contracts to fix the exchange rate for conversion of U.S. revenue dollars.
Foreign exchange fluctuations will result in a change in value of the U.S. dollar denominated debt and related finance expense when expressed in Canadian dollars. At December 31, 2019, the Company had designated US $2.4 billion denominated debt as a hedge of the Companys selected net investments in its foreign operations with a U.S. dollar functional currency (December 31, 2018 US$2.7 billion). For the year ended December 31, 2019, the unrealized gain arising from the translation of the debt was $146 million (December 31, 2018 unrealized loss of $262 million), net of tax expense of $30 million (December 31, 2018 recovery of $41 million), which was recorded in hedge of net investment within OCI.
III) Interest Rate Risk Management
The Company is exposed to fluctuations in short-term interest rates as the Company maintains a portion of its debt capacity in revolving and floating rate bank facilities and commercial paper and invests surplus cash in short-term debt instruments and money market instruments. The Company is also exposed to interest rate risk when fixed rate debt instruments are maturing and require refinancing or when new debt capital needs to be raised.
By maintaining a mix of both fixed and floating rate debt, the Company mitigates some of its exposure to interest rate changes. The optimal mix maintained will depend on market conditions. The Company may also enter into fair value or cash flow hedges using interest rate swaps.
Husky Energy Inc. | Consolidated Financial Statements | 52
IV) Offsetting Financial Assets and Liabilities
The tables below outline the financial assets and financial liabilities that are subject to set-off rights and related arrangements, and the effect of those rights and arrangements on the consolidated balance sheets:
Offsetting Financial Assets and Liabilities
As at December 31, 2019 | ||||||||||||
($ millions) |
Gross Amount | Amount Offset | Net Amount | |||||||||
Financial Assets |
||||||||||||
Financial derivatives |
79 | (26 | ) | 53 | ||||||||
Normal purchase and sale agreements |
817 | (274 | ) | 543 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
End of year |
896 | (300 | ) | 596 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Financial Liabilities |
||||||||||||
Financial derivatives |
(48 | ) | 25 | (23 | ) | |||||||
Normal purchase and sale agreements |
(843 | ) | 281 | (562 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
End of year |
(891 | ) | 306 | (585 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offsetting Financial Assets and Liabilities
As at December 31, 2018 | ||||||||||||
($ millions) |
Gross Amount | Amount Offset | Net Amount | |||||||||
Financial Assets |
||||||||||||
Financial derivatives |
188 | (120 | ) | 68 | ||||||||
Normal purchase and sale agreements |
625 | (335 | ) | 290 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
End of year |
813 | (455 | ) | 358 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Financial Liabilities |
||||||||||||
Financial derivatives |
(107 | ) | 62 | (45 | ) | |||||||
Normal purchase and sale agreements |
(756 | ) | 307 | (449 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
End of year |
(863 | ) | 369 | (494 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
V) Market Risk Sensitivity Analysis
A sensitivity analysis for commodities and foreign currency exchange risks has been calculated by increasing or decreasing commodity prices or foreign currency exchange rates, as appropriate. These sensitivities represent the increase or decrease in earnings (loss) before income taxes resulting from changing the relevant rates, with all other variables held constant. These sensitivities have only been applied to financial instruments held at fair value. The Companys process for determining these sensitivities has not changed during the year.
Commodity Price Risk(1)
($ millions) |
10% price increase | 10% price decrease | ||||||
Crude oil price |
13 | (13 | ) | |||||
Natural gas price |
(2 | ) | 2 |
Foreign Exchange Rate(2)
($ millions) |
Canadian dollar $0.01 increase |
Canadian dollar $0.01 decrease |
||||||
U.S. dollar per Canadian dollar |
1 | (1 | ) |
(1) | Based on average crude oil and natural gas market prices as at December 31, 2019. |
(2) | Based on the U.S./Canadian dollar exchange rate as at December 31, 2019. |
Husky Energy Inc. | Consolidated Financial Statements | 53
b) Financial Risk
i) Liquidity Risk Management
Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company will not be able to meet its financial obligations as they become due. Liquidity risk also includes the risk of not being able to liquidate assets in a timely manner at a reasonable price. The Companys processes for managing liquidity risk include ensuring, to the extent possible, that it has access to multiple sources of capital including cash and cash equivalents, cash from operating activities, undrawn credit facilities and capacity to raise capital from various debt and equity capital markets under its shelf prospectuses. The Company prepares annual capital expenditure budgets, which are monitored and updated as required. In addition, the Company requires authorizations for expenditures on projects, which assists with the management of capital.
Since the Company operates in the oil and gas industry, it requires significant cash to fund capital programs necessary to maintain or increase production, develop reserves, acquire strategic oil and gas assets and repay maturing debt. The Companys capital programs are funded principally by cash provided from operating activities and issuances of debt and equity. During times of low oil and gas prices, a portion of capital programs can generally be deferred. However, due to the long cycle times and the importance to future cash flow of maintaining the Companys production, it may be necessary to utilize alternative sources of capital to continue the Companys strategic investment plan during periods of low commodity prices. As a result, the Company frequently evaluates the options available with respect to sources of short and long-term capital resources. Occasionally, the Company will economically hedge a portion of its production to protect cash flow in the event of commodity price declines.
The Company had the following available credit facilities as at December 31, 2019:
Credit Facilities
($ millions) |
Available | Unused | ||||||
Operating facilities(1) (note 14) |
900 | 464 | ||||||
Syndicated bank facilities(2) (note 16) |
4,000 | 3,450 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
End of year |
4,900 | 3,914 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
(1) | Consists of demand credit facilities. |
(2) | Commercial paper outstanding is supported by the Companys Syndicated credit facilities. |
In addition to the credit facilities listed above, the Company had unused capacity under the Canadian Shelf Prospectus of $3.0 billion and unused capacity under the U.S Shelf Prospectus and related U.S registration statement of US$2.25 billion. The ability of the Company to raise additional capital utilizing these Shelf Prospectuses is dependent on market conditions.
The Company believes it has sufficient funding through the use of these facilities and access to the capital markets to meet its future capital requirements.
ii) Credit and Contract Risk Management
Credit and contract risk represent the financial loss that the Company would suffer if a counterparty in a transaction fails to meet its obligations in accordance with the agreed terms. The Company actively manages its exposure to credit and contract execution risk from both a customer and a supplier perspective. The Companys accounts receivables are broad based with customers in the energy industry and midstream and end user segments and are subject to normal industry risks. The Companys policy to mitigate credit risk includes granting credit limits consistent with the financial strength of the counterparties and customers, requiring financial assurances as deemed necessary, reducing the amount and duration of credit exposures and close monitoring of all accounts. The Company had one external customer that constituted more than 10% of gross revenues during the years ended December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018. Sales to this customer were approximately $3.9 billion for the year ended December 31, 2019 (December 31, 2018 $4.2 billion).
Cash and cash equivalents include cash bank balances and short-term deposits maturing in less than three months. The Company manages the credit exposure related to short-term investments by monitoring exposures daily on a per issuer basis relative to predefined investment limits.
The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and restricted cash represent the Companys maximum credit exposure.
Husky Energy Inc. | Consolidated Financial Statements | 54
The Companys accounts receivable was aged as follows at December 31, 2019:
Accounts Receivable Aging
($ millions) |
December 31, 2019 | |||
Current |
1,418 | |||
Past due (1 - 30 days) |
64 | |||
Past due (31 - 60 days) |
4 | |||
Past due (61 - 90 days) |
| |||
Past due (more than 90 days) |
47 | |||
Provision for expected credit losses |
(34 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
1,499 | ||||
|
|
The Company recognizes a valuation provision when collection of accounts receivable is in doubt. Accounts receivable are impaired directly when collection is no longer expected. For the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company wrote off $4 million (December 31, 2018 $3 million) of uncollectible receivables.
Note 26 Related Party Transactions
The following table lists the Companys significant subsidiaries and jointly-controlled entities and their respective places of incorporation, continuance or organization, as the case may be, and the Companys percentage equity interest (to the nearest whole number) as at December 31, 2019. All of the entities listed below, except as otherwise indicated, are 100% beneficially owned, or controlled or directed, directly or indirectly, by the Company.
Significant Subsidiaries and Joint Operations |
% | Jurisdiction | ||||||
Husky Oil Operations Limited |
100 | Alberta | ||||||
Husky Energy International Corporation |
100 | Alberta | ||||||
Lima Refining Company |
100 | Delaware | ||||||
Husky Marketing and Supply Company |
100 | Delaware | ||||||
Husky Oil Limited Partnership |
100 | Alberta | ||||||
Husky Terra Nova Partnership(1) |
100 | Alberta | ||||||
Husky Downstream General Partnership(1) |
100 | Alberta | ||||||
Husky Energy Marketing Partnership |
100 | Alberta | ||||||
Sunrise Oil Sands Partnership |
50 | Alberta | ||||||
BP-Husky Refining LLC |
50 | Delaware |
(1) | Dissolved effective January 1, 2020, assets were transferred to 2188787 Alberta ULC. |
The Company performs management services as the operator of the assets held by HMLP for which it recovers shared service costs. The Company is also the contractor for HMLP and constructs its assets on a cost recovery basis with certain restrictions. HMLP charges an access fee to the Company for the use of its pipeline systems in performing the Companys blending business, and the Company also pays for transportation and storage services. These transactions are related party transactions, as the Company has a 35% ownership interest in HMLP and the remaining ownership interests in HMLP belong to PAH and CKI, which are affiliates of one of the Companys principal shareholders. For the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company charged HMLP $424 million (December 31, 2018 $448 million) related to construction costs and management services. For the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company had purchases from HMLP of $219 million (December 31, 2018 $200 million) related to the use of the pipeline for the Companys blending activities, transportation and storage activities, received distributions of $94 million (December 31, 2018 $139 million) and paid capital contributions of $37 million (December 31, 2018 $40 million). At December 31, 2019, the Company had $143 million due from HMLP, of which nil relates to unbilled revenue from construction contracts (December 31, 2018 $140 million and nil, respectively). At December 31, 2019, the Company had $16 million due to HMLP (December 31, 2018 nil).
Husky Energy Inc. | Consolidated Financial Statements | 55
Key management includes Directors (executive and non-executive), Executive Officers and Senior Vice Presidents of the Company. The amounts disclosed in the table below are the amounts recognized as an expense during the reporting period related to key management personnel:
Compensation of Key Management Personnel
($ millions) |
2019 | 2018 | ||||||
Short-term employee benefits(1) |
18 | 17 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation(2) |
26 | 33 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
44 | 50 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
(1) | Short-term employee benefits are comprised of salary and benefits earned during the year, plus cash bonuses awarded during the year. Annual bonus awards settled in shares are included in stock-based compensation expense. |
(2) | Stock-based compensation expense represents the cost to the Company for participation in share-based payment plans. |
Note 27 Commitments and Contingencies
At December 31, 2019, the Company had commitments that require the following minimum future payments, which are not accrued in the consolidated balance sheets:
Minimum Future Payments for Commitments
($ millions) |
Within 1 year | After 1 year but not more than 5 years |
More than 5 years | Total | ||||||||||||
Operating agreements(1) |
75 | 310 | 666 | 1,051 | ||||||||||||
Firm transportation agreements(1) |
576 | 2,377 | 4,203 | 7,156 | ||||||||||||
Unconditional purchase obligations(2) |
2,224 | 5,517 | 5,143 | 12,884 | ||||||||||||
Lease rentals and exploration work agreements |
79 | 215 | 866 | 1,160 | ||||||||||||
Obligations to fund equity investee(3) |
54 | 290 | 359 | 703 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
3,008 | 8,709 | 11,237 | 22,954 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | Included in operating agreements and firm transportation agreements are blending and storage agreements and transportation commitments of $1.1 billion and $1.8 billion respectively with HMLP. |
(2) | Includes processing services, distribution services, insurance premiums, drilling services, natural gas purchases and the purchase of refined petroleum products. |
(3) | Equity investee refers to the Companys investment in Husky-CNOOC Madura Ltd. joint venture, which is accounted for under the equity method for consolidated financial statement purposes. |
During the three months ended December 31, 2019, the Company entered into an agreement totaling an incremental $2.2 billion for a term of 5 years to purchase refined products to support the retail network.
The Company has income tax and royalty filings that are subject to audit and potential reassessment. The findings may impact the liabilities of the Company. The final results are not reasonably determinable at this time, and management believes that it has adequately provided for current and deferred income taxes.
The Company is involved in various claims and litigation arising in the normal course of business. While the outcome of these matters is uncertain and there can be no assurance that such matters will be resolved in the Companys favour, the Company does not currently believe that the outcome of adverse decisions in any pending or threatened proceedings related to these and other matters would have a material adverse impact on its financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
Husky Energy Inc. | Consolidated Financial Statements | 56
Note 28 Capital Disclosures
The Companys objectives when managing capital are to maintain a flexible capital structure, which optimizes the cost of capital at acceptable risk, and to maintain investor, creditor and market confidence to sustain the future development of the business. The Company manages its capital structure and makes adjustments as economic conditions and the risk characteristics of its underlying assets change. The Company considers its capital structure to include shareholders equity and debt which was $22.8 billion as at December 31, 2019 (December 31, 2018 $25.4 billion). To maintain or adjust the capital structure, the Company may, from time to time, issue shares, raise debt and/or adjust its capital spending to manage its current and projected debt levels.
The Company monitors its financing requirements and capital structure using, among other things, non-GAAP financial metrics consisting of debt to capital employed and debt to funds from operations. Debt to capital employed is defined as long-term debt, long-term debt due within one year, and short-term debt divided by capital employed which is equal to long-term debt, long-term debt due within one year, short-term debt and shareholders equity. Debt to funds from operations is defined as long-term debt, long-term debt due within one year and short-term debt divided by funds from operations which is equal to cash flow operating activities excluding change in non-cash working capital.
At December 31, 2019, debt to capital employed was 24.2% (December 31, 2018 22.7%) and debt to funds from operations was 1.7 times (December 31, 2018 1.4 times). The Company is subject to a leverage covenant in its credit facilities that limits debt to capital (subject to specific definitions in the credit agreements) to less than 65%. The Company is in compliance with this covenant and considers the risk of non-compliance low. The Company also targets a debt to funds from operations ratio of less than 2.0 times over the longer term.
To facilitate the management of these ratios, the Company prepares annual budgets, which are updated depending on varying factors such as general market conditions and successful capital deployment. The annual budget is approved by the Board of Directors.
There were no changes in the Companys approach to capital management from the previous year.
Note 29 Subsequent Event
Reclassification of Segmented Financial Information
Commencing in the first quarter of 2020, the Companys segmented financial information will be reported as the Integrated Corridor and Offshore business segments.
Integrated Corridor
The Companys business in the Integrated Corridor includes: crude oil, bitumen, conventional natural gas, NGL and ethanol production from Western Canada; marketing and transportation of the Companys and other producers production; the Upgrader and Asphalt Refinery; Husky Midstream Limited Partnership (35% working interest and operatorship); the Lima Refinery, the BP-Husky Toledo Refinery (50% working interest) and the Superior Refinery in the U.S. Midwest; and the marketing of refined petroleum products including gasoline, diesel and ethanol blended fuels through petroleum outlets. Conventional natural gas production from the Western Canada portfolio is closely aligned with the Companys energy requirements for refining and thermal bitumen production and acts as a natural hedge.
Offshore
The Companys Offshore business includes operations, development and exploration in Asia Pacific and Atlantic.
The revised segmentation is consistent with the Companys strategic view of its business and is in alignment with how the Companys results are assessed by management. If the reclassification of the segmented financial information were to have occurred in 2019, the 2018 and 2019 segmented financial information would have reflected this change as follows:
Husky Energy Inc. | Consolidated Financial Statements | 57
Segmented Financial Information - Reclassified
Integrated Corridor | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
($ millions) |
Lloyd Heavy Oil Value Chain |
Oil Sands | Western Canada Production |
U.S. Refining | Canadian Refined Products |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year ended December 31, |
2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross revenues |
5,117 | 5,308 | 931 | 405 | 506 | 661 | 10,250 | 11,777 | 2,425 | 2,752 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Royalties |
(160 | ) | (137 | ) | (13 | ) | (12 | ) | (41 | ) | (58 | ) | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Marketing and other |
60 | 458 | 4 | 166 | 101 | 86 | 24 | (42 | ) | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues, net of royalties |
5,017 | 5,629 | 922 | 559 | 566 | 689 | 10,274 | 11,735 | 2,425 | 2,752 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchases of crude oil and products |
1,829 | 2,217 | 528 | 306 | 39 | 140 | 8,935 | 10,342 | 2,174 | 2,435 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Production, operating and transportation expenses |
1,209 | 1,121 | 140 | 132 | 308 | 302 | 869 | 795 | 153 | 151 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
154 | 129 | 27 | 28 | 105 | 106 | 51 | 40 | 9 | 10 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depletion, depreciation, amortization and impairment |
941 | 887 | 938 | 95 | 1,034 | 292 | 735 | 450 | 83 | 80 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exploration and evaluation expenses |
54 | 32 | 2 | 18 | 111 | 28 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loss (gain) on sale of assets |
| (1 | ) | | | (2 | ) | (1 | ) | 1 | | (6 | ) | (2 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other net |
103 | (106 | ) | (28 | ) | | 2 | 5 | (654 | ) | (464 | ) | | (1 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
4,290 | 4,279 | 1,607 | 579 | 1,597 | 872 | 9,937 | 11,163 | 2,413 | 2,673 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Earnings (loss) from operating activities |
727 | 1,350 | (685 | ) | (20 | ) | (1,031 | ) | (183 | ) | 337 | 572 | 12 | 79 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Share of equity investment income |
9 | 18 | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Financial items |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net foreign exchange gain (loss) |
| | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Finance income |
| | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Finance expenses |
(48 | ) | (43 | ) | (59 | ) | (21 | ) | (24 | ) | (19 | ) | (18 | ) | (14 | ) | (13 | ) | (11 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
(48 | ) | (43 | ) | (59 | ) | (21 | ) | (24 | ) | (19 | ) | (18 | ) | (14 | ) | (13 | ) | (11 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Earnings (loss) before income taxes |
688 | 1,325 | (744 | ) | (41 | ) | (1,055 | ) | (202 | ) | 319 | 558 | (1 | ) | 68 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Provisions for (recovery of) income taxes |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current |
(2 | ) | (3 | ) | 10 | | | | 17 | 9 | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deferred |
186 | 365 | (209 | ) | (11 | ) | (283 | ) | (55 | ) | 54 | 115 | | 19 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
184 | 362 | (199 | ) | (11 | ) | (283 | ) | (55 | ) | 71 | 124 | | 19 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Net earnings (loss) |
504 | 963 | (545 | ) | (30 | ) | (772 | ) | (147 | ) | 248 | 434 | (1 | ) | 49 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Intersegment revenues |
452 | 693 | | | 205 | 233 | | 5 | 4 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenditures on exploration and evaluation assets(1) |
17 | 18 | | | 3 | 99 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenditures on property, plant and equipment(1) |
939 | 1,070 | 38 | 51 | 191 | 322 | 768 | 666 | 73 | 40 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
As at December 31, |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
8,312 | 2,757 | 1,709 | 8,645 | 838 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | Excludes capitalized costs related to asset retirement obligations and capitalized interest incurred during the year. Includes Exploration and Production assets acquired through acquisition, but excludes assets acquired through corporate acquisition. |
Husky Energy Inc. | Consolidated Financial Statements | 58
Segmented Financial Information - Reclassified Cont
Integrated Corridor | Offshore | Corporate | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Eliminations | Total |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(664 | ) | (937 | ) | 18,565 | 19,966 | 1,552 | 1,953 | | | 20,117 | 21,919 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | (214 | ) | (207 | ) | (109 | ) | (128 | ) | | | (323 | ) | (335 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| | 189 | 668 | | | | | 189 | 668 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
(664 | ) | (937 | ) | 18,540 | 20,427 | 1,443 | 1,825 | | | 19,983 | 22,252 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
(664 | ) | (937 | ) | 12,841 | 14,503 | (24 | ) | 52 | | | 12,817 | 14,555 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | 2,679 | 2,501 | 340 | 304 | (2 | ) | (2 | ) | 3,017 | 2,803 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | 346 | 313 | 55 | 58 | 292 | 283 | 693 | 654 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | 3,731 | 1,804 | 1,661 | 695 | 104 | 92 | 5,496 | 2,591 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | 167 | 78 | 380 | 71 | | | 547 | 149 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | (7 | ) | (4 | ) | (1 | ) | | | | (8 | ) | (4 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | (577 | ) | (566 | ) | 9 | (19 | ) | (16 | ) | (6 | ) | (584 | ) | (591 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
(664 | ) | (937 | ) | 19,180 | 18,629 | 2,420 | 1,161 | 378 | 367 | 21,978 | 20,157 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
| | (640 | ) | 1,798 | (977 | ) | 664 | (378 | ) | (367 | ) | (1,995 | ) | 2,095 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
| | 9 | 18 | 50 | 51 | | | 59 | 69 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | 44 | 14 | 44 | 14 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | 3 | 12 | 71 | 52 | 74 | 64 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | (162 | ) | (108 | ) | (38 | ) | (28 | ) | (151 | ) | (178 | ) | (351 | ) | (314 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
| | (162 | ) | (108 | ) | (35 | ) | (16 | ) | (36 | ) | (112 | ) | (233 | ) | (236 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
| | (793 | ) | 1,708 | (962 | ) | 699 | (414 | ) | (479 | ) | (2,169 | ) | 1,928 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | 25 | 6 | 125 | 141 | 25 | (72 | ) | 175 | 75 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | (252 | ) | 433 | (393 | ) | 35 | (329 | ) | (72 | ) | (974 | ) | 396 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
| | (227 | ) | 439 | (268 | ) | 176 | (304 | ) | (144 | ) | (799 | ) | 471 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
| | (566 | ) | 1,269 | (694 | ) | 523 | (110 | ) | (335 | ) | (1,370 | ) | 1,457 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
| | 661 | 937 | | | | | 661 | 937 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
| | 20 | 117 | 26 | 125 | | | 46 | 242 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | 2,009 | 2,149 | 1,246 | 1,066 | 131 | 121 | 3,386 | 3,336 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
| 22,261 | 0.008077 | 0.002784 | 33,122 | 35,225 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Husky Energy Inc. | Consolidated Financial Statements | 59
Document C
Form 40-F
Managements Discussion and Analysis
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
1.0 Financial Summary
Selected Annual Information ($ millions, except where indicated) |
2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |||||||||
Gross revenues and Marketing and other |
20,306 | 22,587 | 18,946 | |||||||||
Net earnings (loss) by business segment |
||||||||||||
Upstream |
(1,590 | ) | 790 | 260 | ||||||||
Downstream |
332 | 1,000 | 448 | |||||||||
Corporate |
(112 | ) | (333 | ) | 78 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net earnings |
(1,370 | ) | 1,457 | 786 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net earnings (loss) per share basic |
(1.40 | ) | 1.41 | 0.75 | ||||||||
Net earnings (loss) per share diluted |
(1.41 | ) | 1.40 | 0.75 | ||||||||
Cash flow operating activities |
2,971 | 4,134 | 3,704 | |||||||||
Funds from operations(1) |
3,251 | 4,004 | 3,306 | |||||||||
Ordinary dividends per common share declared for the year |
0.500 | 0.450 | 0.075 | |||||||||
Dividends per cumulative redeemable preferred share, series 1 |
0.60 | 0.60 | 0.60 | |||||||||
Dividends per cumulative redeemable preferred share, series 2 |
0.85 | 0.74 | 0.57 | |||||||||
Dividends per cumulative redeemable preferred share, series 3 |
1.13 | 1.13 | 1.13 | |||||||||
Dividends per cumulative redeemable preferred share, series 5 |
1.13 | 1.13 | 1.13 | |||||||||
Dividends per cumulative redeemable preferred share, series 7 |
1.15 | 1.15 | 1.15 | |||||||||
Total assets |
33,122 | 35,225 | 32,927 | |||||||||
Total debt(2) |
5,520 | 5,747 | 5,440 | |||||||||
Net debt(2) |
3,745 | 2,881 | 2,927 |
(1) | Funds from operations is a non-GAAP measure. Refer to Section 9.3 for a reconciliation to the corresponding GAAP measure. |
(2) | Total debt is a non-GAAP measure that equals the sum of long-term debt, long-term debt due within one year and short-term debt. Net debt is a non-GAAP measure that equals total debt less cash and cash equivalents. Refer to Section 9.3 for reconciliations to the corresponding GAAP measures. |
Husky Energy Inc. | Managements Discussion and Analysis 2019 | 1
2.0 Husky Business Overview
Husky Energy Inc. (Husky or the Company) is an international integrated energy company and is based in Calgary, Alberta. The Companys common shares are listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX) under the symbol HSE and the Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares Series 1, Series 2, Series 3, Series 5 and Series 7 are listed under the symbols HSE.PR.A, HSE.PR.B, HSE.PR.C, HSE.PR.E and HSE.PR.G, respectively. The Company operates in Canada, the United States and the Asia Pacific region with Upstream and Downstream business segments.
2.1 Corporate Strategy
The Companys business strategy is to generate returns from investing in a deep portfolio of projects and other opportunities across two main businesses: (i) an integrated Canada-U.S. Upstream and Downstream corridor ( Integrated Corridor); and (ii) production located offshore the east coast of Canada ( Atlantic) and offshore China and Indonesia ( Asia Pacific and collectively with Atlantic, Offshore). These investments are intended to provide for increasing margins, funds from operations and earnings. A strong balance sheet, deep physical integration and largely fixed price contracts in Asia Pacific provide resilience to market volatility, while preserving upside exposure to rising commodity prices.
Integrated Corridor
The Companys business in the Integrated Corridor includes crude oil, bitumen, natural gas and natural gas liquids (NGL) production from Western Canada, the Lloydminster upgrading and asphalt refining complex, Husky Midstream Limited Partnership (35% working interest and operatorship) and the Lima Refinery, the BP-Husky Toledo Refinery (50% working interest) and the Superior Refinery in the U.S. Midwest. Natural gas production from the Western Canada portfolio is closely aligned with the Companys energy requirements for refining and thermal bitumen production and acts as a natural hedge.
Offshore
The Companys Offshore business includes operations, development and exploration in Asia Pacific and Atlantic.
2.2 Operations Overview and 2019 Highlights
Upstream Operations
Upstream operations in the Integrated Corridor and Offshore include exploration for, and development and production of, crude oil, bitumen, natural gas and NGL (Exploration and Production) and the marketing of the Companys and other producers crude oil, natural gas, NGL, sulphur and petroleum coke. Additionally, Upstream operations include pipeline transportation, the blending of crude oil and natural gas and storage of crude oil, diluent and conventional natural gas (Infrastructure and Marketing). Infrastructure and Marketing markets and distributes products to customers on behalf of Exploration and Production and is grouped in the Upstream business segment based on the nature of its interconnected operations. The Companys Upstream operations are located primarily in Western Canada, Atlantic and Asia Pacific.
Exploration and Production
Thermal Developments
The Company continued to advance its inventory of thermal projects in 2019, with the commencement of production in August 2019 at its Dee Valley Thermal Project in Saskatchewan. These long-life developments are being built with modular, repeatable designs and require low sustaining capital once brought online.
Total thermal bitumen production, including Lloyd thermal projects, the Tucker Thermal Project and the Sunrise Energy Project, averaged 128,800 bbls/day in 2019 (Husky working interest). Production was impacted by government-mandated production quotas in Alberta and planned turnarounds at the Sunrise Energy Project and nine of the Saskatchewan thermal plants.
Husky Energy Inc. | Managements Discussion and Analysis 2019 | 2
Lloyd Thermal Projects
The following table shows major projects and their status as at December 31, 2019:
Project Name |
Nameplate Capacity (bbls/day) |
Expected Project |
Project Status | |||||
Dee Valley |
10,000 | On production August 2019 | First steam was achieved on June 30, 2019, with first oil on August 24, 2019. Reached nameplate capacity on September 30, 2019. | |||||
Spruce Lake Central(1) |
10,000 | Mid-Year 2020 | Central Processing Facility (CPF) construction is complete and module setting on well pads has begun. Overall project is 90% complete. | |||||
Spruce Lake North |
10,000 | Around the end of 2020 | CPF fabrication and module setting is complete. Overall project is 50% complete. | |||||
Spruce Lake East |
10,000 | Around the end of 2021 | Regulatory approvals have been received, and lease construction is complete. Procurement and fabrication programs are in progress. | |||||
Edam Central |
10,000 | 2022 | Regulatory approvals have been received. | |||||
Dee Valley 2 |
10,000 | 2023 | Project sanctioned in November 2019, and regulatory approvals have been received. |
(1) | Previously expected to start production by the second half of 2020. |
Tucker Thermal Project
Total annual production in 2019 averaged 23,700 bbls/day and was impacted by the government-mandated production quotas in Alberta.
Sunrise Energy Project
Total annual production in 2019 averaged 49,200 bbls/day (24,600 bbls/day Husky working interest) and was impacted by the government-mandated production quotas in Alberta and a planned turnaround at one of the two CPFs in the second quarter of 2019.
Non-Thermal Developments
The Company is managing the natural decline in cold heavy oil production with sand (CHOPS) operations with an active optimization program as well as using waterflooding and polymer injection technology.
Production in Cold and Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) consists of a combination of production technologies including CHOPS, horizontal wells and EOR projects.
In 2018, the Company sanctioned a full-field polymer injection project at Aberfeldy, and injection began in 2019.
During 2019, the Company operated three carbon dioxide (CO2) injection EOR pilot projects and a CO2 capture and liquefaction plant at the Lloydminster Ethanol Plant. The liquefied CO2 is used in the ongoing EOR piloting program. The Company is also piloting several types of CO2 capture technology at its Pikes Peak South facility in Saskatchewan.
Total annual production in 2019 averaged 34,400 bbls/day and was also impacted by the government-mandated production quotas in Alberta.
Western Canada
The Company continues to execute its resource play strategy in Western Canada to advance developments in the Montney Formation.
Oil and Natural Gas Resource Plays
The Company drilled five wells at Wembley and Karr, which completed the 2019 Montney drilling program. The Company had six Wembley wells producing at the end of 2019 with five Karr wells producing in January 2020.
Husky Energy Inc. | Managements Discussion and Analysis 2019 | 3
Asia Pacific
The Companys Asia Pacific business produces conventional natural gas and NGL in the South China Sea and the Madura Strait offshore Indonesia. Conventional natural gas is sold into the South China and East Java markets under long-term contracts. NGL in both regions is sold at market prices.
The Companys interests include participating interests in the Liwan 3-1, Liuhua 34-2 and Liuhua 29-1 fields on Block 29/26, and Blocks 15/33, 16/25, 22/11 and 23/07 located in the South China Sea. The Madura Strait assets consist of the producing BD field, the MDA, MBH, MDK and MAC developments and three additional discoveries. The Company has participating interests in additional exploration blocks offshore Taiwan and Indonesia, and has signed a Strategic Cooperation Agreement with China National Offshore Oil Corporation Limited (CNOOC) covering two offshore areas in the South China Sea for additional exploration opportunities.
The Company continues to develop its contracted price natural gas business in China and Indonesia, further protecting the Company from commodity price instability.
China
Block 29/26
Total production from Liwan 3-1 and Liuhua 34-2 averaged 73,200 boe/day (35,900 boe/day Husky working interest) in 2019. Total production consisted of conventional natural gas production of 349 mmcf/day and NGL production of 15,100 bbls/day.
Substantial construction work was completed in 2019 at the Liuhua 29-1 development project, the third deepwater gas field to be developed as part of the Liwan Gas Project. During 2019, the remaining three wells were drilled, and all seven wells in the full field development were fully completed. The production pipeline and the mono-ethylene glycol supply line were engineered, fabricated and installed. The project is now approximately 80% complete, and construction activities will resume in March 2020. During 2020, the control system and connecting flow lines will be installed and the Field will be placed in production. First gas production from the Liuhua 29-1 field is expected by the end of 2020. Husky holds a 75% working interest in this field. CNOOC holds the remaining 25% working interest.
Block 15/33
The Company is progressing commercial development plans following the successful drilling and testing of the XJ34-3-2 exploration well. The block boundaries have been expanded and additional exploration and appraisal drilling is planned in 2020.
The Company is the operator of the block with a working interest of 100% during the exploration phase. In the event of a commercial discovery, CNOOC may assume a participating partnership interest of up to 51% in the block.
Block 16/25
The Company drilled one exploration well in the third quarter of 2018, which encountered non-commercial hydrocarbons. This block was released and the costs written off in 2019 after technical evaluations were completed.
Blocks 22/11 and 23/07
The Company and CNOOC signed two Production Sharing Contracts (PSC) for Blocks 22/11 and 23/07 in the Beibu Gulf area of the South China Sea in the first half of 2018. Initial evaluation work of existing data on these two blocks is currently being carried out to assess exploration potential. The Company has elected to move into the second exploration phase for Block 23/07.
The Company is the operator of both blocks with a working interest of 100% during the exploration phase. In the event of a commercial discovery, CNOOC may assume a participating partnership interest of up to 51% in either or both blocks.
Indonesia
Madura Strait
Total production averaged 19,700 boe/day (7,900 boe/day Husky working interest) in 2019. Production consisted of conventional natural gas production of 82 mmcf/day and NGL production of 6,100 bbls/day.
At the MDA and MBH fields, the two shallow water platforms have been fully installed. Five MDA and two MBH field production wells are expected to be drilled in the 2020 timeframe pending regulatory approval. Contracting for a floating production unit to process the gas is also planned to be finalized during 2020 with fabrication to take place in 2020/2021. Gas production and sales are planned to commence in 2021 with gas sales under government approved contracts into the East Java gas market. Subsequently, an additional shallow water field, MDK, is scheduled to be developed via a separate platform and tied into the MDA and MBH infrastructure.
Anugerah
The Company previously acquired 2-D and 3-D seismic survey data on the contract area. An analysis of that data and data from offset blocks indicated that exploratory drilling would not be economic. The block will be relinquished in February 2020.
Husky Energy Inc. | Managements Discussion and Analysis 2019 | 4
Atlantic
The Companys Atlantic business provides production growth opportunities offshore Newfoundland and Labrador.
White Rose Field and Satellite Extensions
A staged and orderly ramp-up of production commenced in January 2019 following a November 2018 spill from a flowline connector at the South White Rose Extension (SWRX). The flowline connector was replaced in the second quarter of 2019. Full production was restored to the White Rose field and satellite extensions in mid-August, following regulatory approvals to resume operations from the SWRX and North Amethyst Drill Centres.
Construction of the West White Rose Project continued on multiple fronts including the platforms concrete gravity structure. A fourth slipform was completed on the platforms outer caisson, and the first three interior decks were installed. The project is now approximately 57% complete. First production is expected around the end of 2022.
Atlantic Exploration
The Company continued to evaluate the results of a recent discovery at the A-24 exploration well north of the White Rose field. The Company has a 68.875% ownership interest, with partners Suncor Energy and Nalcor Energy Oil and Gas holding 26.125% and 5%, respectively.
Infrastructure and Marketing
Husky Midstream Limited Partnership
Husky Midstream Limited Partnership (HMLP) has approximately 2,200 kilometres of pipeline in the Lloydminster region, storage at Hardisty and Lloydminster, and other ancillary assets. The pipeline systems transport blended heavy crude oil to Lloydminster, providing feedstock for the Upgrader and Asphalt Refinery, and to Hardisty where it connects to downstream pipelines accessing markets across Canada and the United States. The Hardisty Terminal acts as the exclusive blending hub for Western Canada Select (WCS). HMLP is in the process of diversifying its operations beyond the Lloydminster and Hardisty area and has completed construction of the Ansell Corser Gas Plant.
Saskatchewan Gathering System Expansion
A multi-year expansion program is underway and will provide transportation of diluent and heavy oil blend for several additional thermal plants.
Ansell Corser Gas Plant
The new gas processing plant is now in service, adding 120 mmcf/day of processing capacity.
Hardisty Tanks
Construction is underway for 1.5 mmbbls of storage at the Hardisty Terminal and is scheduled for completion by the end of 2020.
Commodity Marketing
The Company has developed its commodity marketing operations to include the acquisition of third-party volumes to enhance the value of its midstream assets. The Company markets both its own and third-party production of crude oil, synthetic crude oil, NGL, natural gas and sulphur. Additionally, the Company markets petroleum coke, a by-product from the Upgrader and its Ohio and Wisconsin refineries.
Downstream Operations
Downstream operations in the Integrated Corridor in Canada include upgrading heavy crude oil feedstock into synthetic crude oil and diesel (Upgrading), refining of crude oil, producing ethanol and marketing heavy and synthetic crude oil, refined petroleum products including gasoline, diesel, ethanol-blended fuels, asphalt and ancillary products (Canadian Refined Products). It also includes crude oil refining in the U.S. to produce and market diesel fuels, gasoline, jet fuel and asphalt (U.S. Refining and Marketing). Upgrading, Canadian Refined Products and U.S. Refining and Marketing all process and refine natural resources into marketable products and are grouped together as the Downstream business segment due to the similar nature of their products and services.
The Companys Downstream operations target three primary objectives: increasing feedstock flexibility to bring the best-priced crude to the Companys refineries; improving the range of its products to capitalize on opportunities; and enhancing market access to achieve the best returns. The Companys focused integration strategy helps to capture margins on refined product pricing for its Western Canada heavy oil, bitumen and light oil production and assists in mitigating market volatility.
Husky Energy Inc. | Managements Discussion and Analysis 2019 | 5
Upgrading
The Upgrader has a throughput capacity of 80,000 bbls/day. The Upgrader produces synthetic crude oil, diluent and ultra-low sulphur diesel. Synthetic crude oil is used as refinery feedstock for the production of transportation fuels in Canada and the U.S. In addition, the Upgrader recovers diluent, which is blended with the heavy crude oil and bitumen prior to pipeline transportation to reduce viscosity and facilitate its movement, and returns it to the field to be reused.
Canadian Refined Products
Lloydminster Asphalt Refinery
The Lloydminster Asphalt Refinery in Lloydminster, Alberta, has a throughput capacity of 30,000 bbls/day and is integrated with the local heavy oil and bitumen production, as well as transportation and upgrading infrastructure. The Company is the largest marketer of paving asphalt in Western Canada.
Ethanol Plants
The Company is the largest producer of ethanol in Western Canada. The Company has two ethanol plants, one in Lloydminster, Saskatchewan and one in Minnedosa, Manitoba, with a combined capacity of 260 million litres per year.
Prince George Refinery
On November 1, 2019, the Company completed the sale of its Prince George Refinery to Tidewater Midstream and Infrastructure Ltd. for $215 million in cash plus an inventory closing adjustment of approximately $53.5 million.
Retail and Commercial Network
The Company is a major regional motor fuel marketer with an average of 553 retail marketing locations in 2019, including bulk plants and travel centres, with strategic land positions in Western Canada and Ontario.
On January 8, 2019, the Company announced its intention to market and potentially sell its Canadian Retail and Commercial Fuels Network. The strategic review continues to progress.
U.S. Refining and Marketing
Lima Refinery
The Lima Refinery in Ohio has a crude oil throughput capacity of 175,000 bbls/day, depending on the crude slate, and produces low sulphur gasoline, gasoline blend stocks, ultra-low sulphur diesel, jet fuel, petrochemical feedstock and other by-products.
The crude oil flexibility project at the Lima Refinery is designed to allow for the processing of up to 40,000 bbls/day of heavy crude oil feedstock from Western Canada, providing the ability to swing between light and heavy crude oil feedstock. The Refinery completed a planned turnaround in the fourth quarter of 2019 and made final tie-ins for the project. The project was completed in early 2020 and the refinery will ramp up to full rates during the first quarter of 2020.
BP-Husky Toledo Refinery
The BP-Husky Toledo Refinery in Ohio has a nameplate throughput capacity of 160,000 bbls/day and produces low sulphur gasoline, ultra-low sulphur diesel, aviation fuels, and by-products. The crude oil refinery is owned 50% by the Company and 50% by BP Corporation North America Inc. (BP), and is operated by BP. The Company and BP completed a feedstock optimization project in 2016, allowing the refinery to process up to 70,000 bbls/day of high-TAN crude oil to support production from the Sunrise Energy Project. The refinerys nameplate capacity remained unchanged.
During the second and third quarters of 2019, the refinery underwent a planned turnaround.
Superior Refinery
The Superior Refinery has a permitted throughput capacity of 50,000 bbls/day and an operating capacity of 45,000 bbls/day as configured. The refinery produces motor fuel products and asphalt from light and heavy crude oil originating from North Dakota and Western Canada.
On April 26, 2018, the Superior Refinery experienced an incident while preparing for a major turnaround and was taken out of operation. During 2019, demolition, site preparation work and permitting were completed, and the rebuild work commenced. The investment in the rebuild is estimated to be approximately US$750 million, of which the Company anticipates a substantial portion will be recovered from property damage insurance. This represents a change from the previous estimate of greater than US$400 million, with the change being due to a more complete assessment of the extent of equipment damage from the April 26, 2018 incident. The Company anticipates that lost income through April 2020 will be compensated by business interruption insurance. The refinery is being rebuilt with the same configuration, and with the capability to run continuously at the 45,000 bbl/day operating capacity and will be able to produce a full slate of products, including asphalt, gasoline and diesel. Full operations are expected to resume in 2021.
Husky Energy Inc. | Managements Discussion and Analysis 2019 | 6
2.3 Business Segments - January 1, 2020
Effective January 1, 2020, the Companys businesses were reorganized under two new business segments: (i) an integrated Canada-U.S. Upstream and Downstream corridor (Integrated Corridor); and (ii) production located offshore the east coast of Canada ( Atlantic) and offshore China and Indonesia ( Asia Pacific and collectively with Atlantic, Offshore). The Company will no longer operate under Upstream and Downstream business segments.
Integrated Corridor
The Companys business in the Integrated Corridor includes: crude oil, bitumen, conventional natural gas, NGL and ethanol production from Western Canada; marketing and transportation of the Companys and other producers production; the Upgrader and Asphalt Refinery; Husky Midstream Limited Partnership (35% working interest and operatorship); the Lima Refinery, the BP-Husky Toledo Refinery (50% working interest) and the Superior Refinery in the U.S. Midwest; and the marketing of refined petroleum products including gasoline, diesel and ethanol blended fuels through petroleum outlets. Conventional natural gas production from the Western Canada portfolio is closely aligned with the Companys energy requirements for refining and thermal bitumen production and acts as a natural hedge.
Offshore
The Companys Offshore business includes operations, development and exploration in Asia Pacific and Atlantic.
2.4 Financial Strategic Plan
The Company is committed to ensuring it has sufficient liquidity, financial flexibility and access to long-term capital to fund its growth. The Company maintains undrawn committed term credit facilities with a portfolio of creditworthy financial institutions and other sources of liquidity to provide timely access to funding to supplement cash flow.
The Company intends to maintain a healthy balance sheet to provide financial flexibility. Management of debt levels is a priority for Husky given long-term growth plans and future expected volatility in commodity prices. The Companys long-term objective is to maintain a debt to funds from operations ratio of less than 2.0 times. Debt to funds from operations is a non-GAAP measure (refer to Sections 6.4 and 9.3). The Company is also committed to retaining its investment grade credit ratings to support access to debt capital markets and has taken measures to maintain its strong financial position through commodity cycles. Past measures included, but were not limited to, a reduction of budgeted capital spending, temporary suspension of the quarterly common share dividend, the sale of non-core assets and the continued transition to higher margin production. Refer to Section 6.0 for additional information on the Companys liquidity and capital resources.
Husky Energy Inc. | Managements Discussion and Analysis 2019 | 7
3.0 The 2019 Business Environment
The Companys operations were significantly influenced by domestic and international factors in 2019, including, but not limited to, the following:
| Global crude oil inventory levels remained high as the U.S. became a net oil exporter and the worlds largest oil producer. |
| North American natural gas benchmarks continued to be weak due to infrastructure constraints combined with lower demand for Canadian natural gas in the U.S. as a result of increased U.S. shale production. |
| The Government of Alberta set province-wide mandatory production quotas to restrict oil supplies entering the market. |
| A continued emphasis on health and safety, the environment, the impacts of climate change, enterprise risk management, resource sustainability and corporate social responsibility concerns. |
| Transportation constraints on crude oil produced in Western Canada. The oil and gas industry continues to work with stakeholders to develop a strong network of transportation infrastructure, including pipelines, rail, marine and trucks. The development of this network continues to be an important challenge for the industry to obtain market access for the growing supply of crude oil from the Western Canadian oil sands. |
| Alternative and improved extraction methods have rapidly evolved in North American and international onshore and offshore regions. |
The Company considers major business factors in formulating its short and long-term business strategies.
The Company is exposed to a number of risks inherent in the exploration for, and development, production, marketing, transportation, storage, refining, and sale of, crude oil, liquids-rich natural gas and related products. For a discussion on risk and risk management, see Section 5.0 and the Companys Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2019.
Average Benchmarks
Commodity prices, refining crack spreads and foreign exchange rates are some of the most significant factors that affect the results of the Companys operations. The following average benchmarks have been provided to assist in understanding the Companys financial results.
Average Benchmarks Summary |
2019 | 2018 | ||||||||||
West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil(1) |
(US$/bbl | ) | 57.03 | 64.77 | ||||||||
Brent crude oil(2) |
(US$/bbl | ) | 64.30 | 70.97 | ||||||||
Light sweet at Edmonton |
($/bbl | ) | 69.22 | 69.31 | ||||||||
WCS at Hardisty(3) |
(US$/bbl | ) | 44.28 | 38.46 | ||||||||
Lloyd heavy crude oil at Lloydminster |
($/bbl | ) | 54.21 | 39.33 | ||||||||
WTI/Lloyd crude blend differential |
(US$/bbl | ) | 12.40 | 26.09 | ||||||||
Condensate at Edmonton |
(US$/bbl | ) | 52.86 | 60.95 | ||||||||
NYMEX natural gas(4) |
(US$/mmbtu | ) | 2.63 | 3.09 | ||||||||
Nova Inventory Transfer (NIT) natural gas |
($/GJ | ) | 1.54 | 1.45 | ||||||||
Chicago Regular Unleaded Gasoline |
(US$/bbl | ) | 70.29 | 78.07 | ||||||||
Chicago Ultra-low Sulphur Diesel |
(US$/bbl | ) | 78.00 | 87.08 | ||||||||
Chicago 3:2:1 crack spread |
(US$/bbl | ) | 15.80 | 15.94 | ||||||||
U.S./Canadian dollar exchange rate |
(US$ | ) | 0.754 | 0.772 | ||||||||
Canadian $ Equivalents(5) |
||||||||||||
WTI crude oil |
($/bbl | ) | 75.64 | 83.90 | ||||||||
Brent crude oil |
($/bbl | ) | 85.27 | 91.93 | ||||||||
WCS at Hardisty |
($/bbl | ) | 58.72 | 49.82 | ||||||||
WTI/Lloyd crude blend differential |
($/bbl | ) | 16.45 | 33.80 | ||||||||
NYMEX natural gas |
($/mmbtu | ) | 3.49 | 4.00 |
(1) | Calendar month average of settled prices for WTI at Cushing, Oklahoma. |
(2) | Calendar month average of settled prices for Dated Brent. |
(3) | WCS is a heavy blended crude oil, comprised of conventional and bitumen crude oils blended with diluent which terminals at Hardisty, Alberta. Quoted prices are indicative of the Index for WCS at Hardisty, Alberta, set in the month prior to delivery. |
(4) | Prices quoted are average settlement prices during the period. |
(5) | Prices quoted are calculated using U.S. dollar benchmark commodity prices and U.S./Canadian dollar exchange rates. |
Husky Energy Inc. | Managements Discussion and Analysis 2019 | 8
As an integrated producer, the Companys profitability is largely determined by realized prices for crude oil and natural gas, margins on committed pipeline capacity and refinery margins, as well as the effect of changes in the U.S./Canadian dollar exchange rate. All of the Companys crude oil production and the majority of its natural gas production receive the prevailing market prices. The price realized for crude oil is determined by North American and global factors. The price realized for natural gas production from Western Canada is determined primarily by North American fundamentals since virtually all natural gas production in North America is consumed by North American customers. In Asia Pacific, the natural gas price is determined by long-term contracts.
The Downstream segment is heavily impacted by the price of crude oil and natural gas, as the largest cost factor in the Downstream segment is crude oil feedstock, a portion of which is heavy crude oil and bitumen. In the Upgrading business, heavy crude oil feedstock is processed into light synthetic crude oil. The Companys U.S. Refining and Marketing business processes a mix of different types of crude oil from various sources, but the mix is primarily light sweet crude oil at the Lima Refinery and approximately 46% heavy crude oil and bitumen feedstock at the BP-Husky Toledo Refinery. The Companys Canadian Retail and Commercial Fuels Network relies primarily on supply contracts to purchase refined products for resale in the retail distribution network, as well as diesel from the Lloydminster Upgrader.
Crude Oil Benchmarks
Global crude oil benchmarks remained weakened in 2019 primarily due to a continued oversupply as the U.S became a net oil exporter and the worlds largest oil producer. Conversely, the WCS benchmark strengthened in 2019 as the Government of Alberta set province-wide mandatory production quotas to restrict oil supplies entering the market, and consequently the differential between the WCS benchmark and other North American benchmarks tightened in 2019 compared to 2018. WTI averaged US$57.03/bbl in 2019 compared to US$64.77/bbl in 2018. Brent averaged US$64.30/bbl in 2019 compared to US$70.97/bbl in 2018. WCS averaged US$44.28/bbl in 2019 compared to US$38.46/bbl in 2018.
The price received by the Company for crude oil production from Western Canada is primarily driven by the price of WTI, adjusted to Western Canada for location and quality. The price received by the Company for crude oil production from Atlantic and for NGL production from Asia Pacific is primarily driven by the price of Brent. A significant portion of the Companys crude oil production from Western Canada is classified as either heavy crude oil or bitumen, which trades at a discount to light crude oil. The Companys crude oil and NGL production was 77% heavy crude oil and bitumen in 2019 compared to 75% in 2018.
The Companys heavy crude oil and bitumen production is blended with diluent (condensate) in order to facilitate its transportation through pipelines. Therefore, the price received for a barrel of blended heavy crude oil or bitumen is impacted by the prevailing market price for condensate. The price of condensate at Edmonton decreased in 2019 compared to 2018, primarily due to the decrease in crude oil benchmark pricing.
Husky Energy Inc. | Managements Discussion and Analysis 2019 | 9
Natural Gas Benchmarks
The price received by the Company for natural gas production from Western Canada is primarily driven by the NIT near-month contract price of natural gas, while the price received by the Company for production from Asia Pacific is determined by long-term contracts.
North American natural gas is consumed internally by the Companys Upstream and Downstream operations, helping to mitigate the impact of weak natural gas benchmark prices on results.
Refining Benchmarks
The Chicago 3:2:1 crack spread is a key indicator for U.S. Midwest refining margins and reflects refinery gasoline output that is approximately twice the distillate output, and is calculated as the price of two-thirds of a barrel of gasoline plus one-third of a barrel of distillate fuel less one barrel of crude oil. Market crack spreads are based on quoted near-month contracts for WTI and spot prices for gasoline and diesel and do not reflect the actual crude purchase costs or the product configuration of a specific refinery. The Chicago Regular Unleaded Gasoline and the Chicago Ultra-low Sulphur Diesel average benchmark prices are the standard products included in the Chicago 3:2:1 crack spread.
The Companys realized refining margins are affected by the product configuration of its refineries, crude oil feedstock, product slates, transportation costs to benchmark hubs and the time lag between the purchase and delivery of crude oil. The product slates produced at the Lima and BP-Husky Toledo refineries contain between 11% and 13% of other products that are sold at discounted market prices compared to gasoline and distillate. The Companys realized refining margins are accounted for on a first in first out (FIFO) basis in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS).
Husky Energy Inc. | Managements Discussion and Analysis 2019 | 10
Foreign Exchange
The majority of the Companys revenues are received in U.S. dollars from the sale of oil and gas commodities and refined products whose prices are determined by reference to U.S. benchmark prices. The majority of the Companys non-hydrocarbon related expenditures are denominated in Canadian dollars. An increase in the value of the Canadian dollar relative to the U.S. dollar will decrease the revenues received from the sale of oil and gas commodities. Correspondingly, a decrease in the value of the Canadian dollar relative to the U.S. dollar will increase the revenues received from the sale of oil and gas commodities. In addition, changes in foreign exchange rates impact the translation of U.S. Downstream and Asia Pacific operations and U.S. dollar denominated debt. The Canadian dollar averaged US$0.754 in 2019 compared to US$0.772 in 2018.
A portion of the Companys long-term sales contracts in Asia Pacific are priced in Chinese Yuan (RMB). An increase in the value of the Canadian dollar relative to the RMB will decrease the revenues received in Canadian dollars from the sale of natural gas commodities in the region. The Canadian dollar averaged RMB 5.208 in 2019 compared to RMB 5.104 in 2018.
Husky Energy Inc. | Managements Discussion and Analysis 2019 | 11
Sensitivity Analysis
The following table is indicative of the impact of changes in certain key variables in 2019 on earnings before income taxes and net earnings. The table below reflects what the expected effect would have been on the financial results for 2019 had the indicated variable increased by the notional amount. The analysis is based on business conditions and production volumes during 2019. Each separate item in the sensitivity analysis shows the approximate effect of an increase in that variable only; all other variables are held constant. While these sensitivities are indicative for the period and magnitude of changes on which they are based, they may not be applicable in other periods, under other economic circumstances or upon greater magnitudes of change.
2019 | Effect on Earnings | Effect on | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Sensitivity Analysis |
Average | Increase | before Income Taxes(1) | Net Earnings(1) | ||||||||||||||||||||
($ millions) | ($/share)(2) | ($ millions) | ($/share)(2) | |||||||||||||||||||||
WTI benchmark crude oil price(3)(4) |
57.03 | US$1.00/bbl | 93 | 0.09 | 68 | 0.07 | ||||||||||||||||||
NYMEX benchmark natural gas price(5) |
2.63 | US$0.20/mmbtu | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
WTI/Lloyd crude blend differential(6) |
12.40 | US$1.00/bbl | (8 | ) | (0.01 | ) | (6 | ) | (0.01 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Canadian asphalt margins |
25.12 | Cdn $1.00/bbl | 10 | 0.01 | 7 | 0.01 | ||||||||||||||||||
Canadian light oil margins |
0.035 | Cdn $0.005/litre | 14 | 0.01 | 10 | 0.01 | ||||||||||||||||||
Chicago 3:2:1 crack spread |
15.80 | US$1.00/bbl | 98 | 0.10 | 76 | 0.08 | ||||||||||||||||||
Exchange rate (US $ per Cdn $)(3)(7) |
0.754 | US$0.01 | (73 | ) | (0.07 | ) | (54 | ) | (0.05 | ) |
(1) | Excludes mark to market accounting impacts. |
(2) | Based on 1,005.1 million common shares outstanding as of December 31, 2019. |
(3) | Does not include gains or losses on inventory. |
(4) | Includes impacts related to Brent-based production. |
(5) | Includes impact of natural gas consumption by the Company. |
(6) | Excludes impact on Canadian asphalt operations. |
(7) | Assumes no foreign exchange gains or losses on U.S. dollar denominated long-term debt and other monetary items, including cash balances. |
The Companys five-year plan was updated at its Investor Day in May 2019, which included guidance for 2019 of cash flowoperating activities and funds from operations in the range of $4.1$4.3 billion, a free cash flow projection of $800 million (compared to ($181) actual free cash flow, which is a non-GAAP measure, see Section 9.3 for a reconciliation to the corresponding GAAP measure, Upstream production in the range of 290,000305,000 boe/day and Downstream throughput of 355,000 bbls/day. These projections were based on several pricing assumptions, including WTI benchmark crude at $60 US per barrel, Brent crude oil at $65 US per barrel and a Chicago 3:2:1 crack spread of $16.50 US per barrel.
Actual 2019 results differed materially due to a combination of a weaker oil price environment and several unplanned events, including a longer than anticipated ramp-up of production at the SWRX, the impact of government-mandated production quotas in Alberta and an extended turnaround at the Lima Refinery to complete the tie-in of the crude oil flexibility project.
Husky Energy Inc. | Managements Discussion and Analysis 2019 | 12
4.0 Results of Operations
4.1 Segment Earnings
Segmented Earnings |
Earnings (Loss) before Income Taxes |
Net Earnings (Loss) | Capital Expenditures(1) | |||||||||||||||||||||
($ millions) |
2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | ||||||||||||||||||
Upstream |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exploration and Production |
(2,348 | ) | 288 | (1,706 | ) | 223 | 2,346 | 2,656 | ||||||||||||||||
Infrastructure and Marketing |
159 | 780 | 116 | 567 | 2 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Downstream |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Upgrading |
132 | 496 | 97 | 361 | 59 | 62 | ||||||||||||||||||
Canadian Refined Products |
(7 | ) | 216 | (5 | ) | 158 | 119 | 74 | ||||||||||||||||
U.S. Refining and Marketing |
309 | 619 | 240 | 481 | 768 | 665 | ||||||||||||||||||
Corporate |
(414 | ) | (471 | ) | (112 | ) | (333 | ) | 138 | 121 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total |
(2,169 | ) | 1,928 | (1,370 | ) | 1,457 | 3,432 | 3,578 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | Excludes capitalized costs related to asset retirement obligations and capitalized interest incurred during the year. Includes Exploration and Production assets acquired through acquisition, but excludes assets acquired through corporate acquisition. |
Husky Energy Inc. | Managements Discussion and Analysis 2019 | 13
4.2 Upstream
Exploration and Production
Exploration and Production Earnings Summary ($ millions) |
2019 | 2018 | ||||||
Gross revenues |
4,958 | 4,330 | ||||||
Royalties |
(323 | ) | (335 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net revenues |
4,635 | 3,995 | ||||||
Production, operating and transportation expenses |
1,634 | 1,527 | ||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
297 | 296 | ||||||
Depletion, depreciation, amortization and impairment (DD&A) |
4,312 | 1,811 | ||||||
Exploration and evaluation expenses |
547 | 149 | ||||||
Gain on sale of assets |
(3 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||
Other net |
86 | (120 | ) | |||||
Share of equity investment gain |
(50 | ) | (51 | ) | ||||
Financial items |
160 | 97 | ||||||
Provisions for (recovery of) income taxes |
(642 | ) | 65 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net earnings (loss) |
(1,706 | ) | 223 | |||||
|
|
|
|
Exploration and Production net revenues increased by $640 million in 2019 compared to 2018, primarily due to higher average realized sales prices, partially offset by lower production, both of which are described in more detail below.
Production, operating and transportation expenses increased $107 million in 2019 compared to 2018, which is described in more detail under Operating Costs.
Exploration and evaluation expenses increased by $398 million in 2019 compared to 2018, primarily due to higher expensed drilling, which is described in more detail under Exploration and Evaluation Expenses.
Depletion, depreciation, amortization and impairment expense increased by $2,501 million in 2019 compared to 2018, primarily due to a pre-tax impairment charge of $2,405 million recognized on certain crude oil and natural gas assets, which is described in more detail under Depletion, Depreciation, Amortization and Impairment.
Other net increased by $206 million in 2019 compared to 2018, primarily due to profit or loss elimination between segments.
Financial items increased by $63 million in 2019 compared to 2018, primarily due to higher finance expenses arising from the adoption of IFRS 16 in 2019.
Recovery of income taxes increased by $707 million in 2019 compared to 2018, primarily due to lower earnings before income taxes in 2019.
Husky Energy Inc. | Managements Discussion and Analysis 2019 | 14
Average Sales Prices Realized
Average Sales Prices Realized |
2019 | 2018 | ||||||
Crude oil and NGL ($/bbl) |
||||||||
Light & Medium crude oil |
72.85 | 83.71 | ||||||
NGL(1) |
44.99 | 55.72 | ||||||
Heavy crude oil |
54.70 | 39.26 | ||||||
Bitumen |
49.00 | 30.17 | ||||||
Total crude oil and NGL average |
52.28 | 42.16 | ||||||
Natural gas average ($/mcf)(1) |
6.44 | 6.64 | ||||||
Total average ($/boe) |
48.37 | 41.50 |
(1) | Reported average NGL and conventional natural gas prices include Huskys working interest production from the BD Project (40%). Revenues and expenses related to the Husky-CNOOC Madura Ltd. joint venture are accounted for under the equity method for consolidated financial statement purposes. |
The average sales prices realized by the Company for crude oil and NGL production increased by 24% in 2019 compared to 2018, primarily due to the narrowing of the Canadian light/heavy oil differential, partially offset by the lower global benchmark crude oil prices.
The average sales prices realized by the Company for natural gas production decreased by 3% in 2019 compared to 2018, primarily due to lower production from the Liwan Gas Project.
Daily Gross Production
Daily Gross Production |
2019 | 2018 | ||||||
Crude oil and NGL (mbbls/day) |
||||||||
Western Canada |
||||||||
Light and Medium crude oil |
8.5 | 9.4 | ||||||
NGL |
12.7 | 12.0 | ||||||
Heavy crude oil |
30.2 | 36.8 | ||||||
Bitumen(1) |
128.8 | 124.2 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
180.2 | 182.4 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Atlantic |
||||||||
White Rose and Satellite Fields light crude oil |
12.3 | 17.4 | ||||||
Terra Nova light crude oil |
4.1 | 4.0 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
16.4 | 21.4 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Asia Pacific |
||||||||
Liwan NGL(2) |
7.4 | 8.4 | ||||||
Madura NGL(3) |
2.5 | 2.5 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
9.9 | 10.9 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
206.5 | 214.7 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Conventional natural gas (mmcf/day) |
||||||||
Western Canada |
297.5 | 291.0 | ||||||
Asia Pacific |
||||||||
Liwan(2) |
171.0 | 184.8 | ||||||
Madura(3) |
32.4 | 31.2 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
203.4 | 216.0 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
500.9 | 507.0 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total (mboe/day) |
290.0 | 299.2 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
(1) | Bitumen consists of production from thermal developments in Lloydminster, the Tucker Thermal Project located near Cold Lake, Alberta and the Sunrise Energy Project. |
(2) | Reported production volumes include Huskys working interest production from the Liwan Gas Project (49%). |
(3) | Reported production volumes include Huskys working interest production from the BD Project (40%). Revenues and expenses related to the Husky-CNOOC Madura Ltd. joint venture are accounted for under the equity method for consolidated financial statement purposes. |
Husky Energy Inc. | Managements Discussion and Analysis 2019 | 15
Crude Oil and NGL Production
Crude oil and NGL production decreased by 8.2 mbbls/day, or 4%, in 2019 compared to 2018. The decrease was primarily due to a reduction of heavy crude oil production due to government-mandated production quotas in Alberta and natural declines, combined with lower production from Atlantic due to the suspension of production from the White Rose field. The decreases were partially offset by increased bitumen production from the Companys Saskatchewan thermal projects in Lloydminster.
Conventional Natural Gas Production
Conventional natural gas production decreased by 6.1 mmcf/day, or 1%, in 2019 compared to 2018, primarily due to lower production from the Liwan Gas Project. The decrease was partially offset by the higher production at the Rainbow Lake development.
Exploration and Production Revenue Mix (Percentage of Upstream Net Revenues) |
2019 | 2018 | ||||||
Crude oil and NGL |
||||||||
Light & Medium crude oil |
13 | 22 | ||||||
NGL(1) |
7 | 10 | ||||||
Heavy crude oil |
12 | 11 | ||||||
Bitumen |
45 | 29 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Crude oil and NGL |
77 | 73 | ||||||
Natural gas(1) |
23 | 28 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total |
100 | 100 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
(1) | Reported average NGL and conventional natural gas revenue include Huskys working interest production from the BD Project (40%). Revenues and expenses related to the Husky-CNOOC Madura Ltd. joint venture are accounted for under the equity method for consolidated financial statement purposes. |
2020 Production Guidance and 2019 Actual
Guidance | Year ended December 31 |
Guidance | ||||||||||
Gross Production |
2020 | 2019 | 2019 | |||||||||
Canada |
||||||||||||
Light & Medium crude oil (mbbls/day) |
23 - 25 | 25 | 29 - 31 | |||||||||
NGL (mbbls/day) |
12 - 13 | 13 | 12 - 13 | |||||||||
Heavy crude oil & bitumen (mbbls/day) |
169 - 178 | 159 | 155 - 163 | |||||||||
Conventional Natural gas (mmcf/day) |
270 - 280 | 298 | 297 - 307 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Canada total (mboe/day) |
249 - 263 | 246 | 246 - 258 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Asia Pacific |
||||||||||||
NGL (mbbls/day)(1) |
9 - 11 | 10 | 9 - 10 | |||||||||
Natural gas (mmcf/day)(1) |
210 - 220 | 203 | 210 - 220 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Asia Pacific total (mboe/day) |
44 - 48 | 44 | 44 - 47 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total (mboe/day) |
295 - 310 | 290 | 290 - 305 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | Includes Huskys working interest production from the BD Project (40%). Revenues and expenses related to the Husky-CNOOC Madura Ltd. joint venture are accounted for under the equity method for consolidated financial statement purposes. |
Total production for the year ended December 31, 2019 was at the low end of production guidance, primarily due to the factors that impacted crude oil and NGL production discussed above. The 2020 production guidance reflects a curtailment assumption of 5 mbbls/d for the first half of the year.
Factors that could potentially impact the Companys production performance in 2020 include, but are not limited to:
| eventual outcome and impact of the government-mandated production curtailment in Alberta. |
| changes in crude oil and natural gas prices such as decreases in commodity pricing, which may result in the decision to temporarily shut-in production or delay capital expenditures. |
| performance of recently commissioned facilities, new wells brought onto production and unanticipated reservoir response from existing fields. |
| unplanned or extended maintenance and turnarounds at any of the Companys operated or non-operated facilities, upgrading, refining, pipeline or offshore assets. |
| business interruptions due to unexpected events such as severe weather, fires, freeze-ups, equipment failures, unplanned and extended pipeline shutdowns and other similar events. |
| defaults by contracting parties whose services, goods or facilities are necessary for the Companys production. |
| operations and assets which are subject to a number of political, economic and socio-economic risks. |
Husky Energy Inc. | Managements Discussion and Analysis 2019 | 16
Royalties
Royalties (Percent) |
2019 | 2018 | ||||||
Western Canada |
7 | 9 | ||||||
Atlantic |
9 | 8 | ||||||
Asia Pacific(1) |
7 | 7 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total |
7 | 8 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
(1) | Reported royalties include Huskys working interest from the BD Project (40%). Revenues and expenses related to the Husky-CNOOC Madura Ltd. joint venture are accounted for under the equity method for interim financial statement purposes. |
The total royalty rate decreased in 2019, primarily due to lower royalty rates from thermal developments as a result of a change to the pre-payout status of a thermal property in the first quarter of 2019, combined with lower royalty rates from Western Canada as a result of a gas cost allowance credit in the third quarter of 2019. The decrease was partially offset by increased royalty rates for Atlantic due to a higher proportion of production from the Terra Nova field, which has a higher royalty rate.
Operating Costs
Operating Costs ($ millions) |
2019 | 2018 | ||||||
Western Canada |
1,296 | 1,218 | ||||||
Atlantic |
252 | 213 | ||||||
Asia Pacific |
96 | 95 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total |
1,644 | 1,526 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Per unit operating costs ($/boe) |
15.53 | 14.00 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
Total Exploration and Production operating costs were $1,644 million in 2019 compared to $1,526 million in 2018. Total per unit operating costs averaged $15.53/boe in 2019 compared to $14.00/boe in 2018. The increase in per unit operating costs was primarily due to the factors discussed below.
Per unit operating costs in Atlantic averaged $42.20/bbl in 2019 compared to $27.21/bbl in 2018. The increase in per unit operating costs was primarily due to the costs associated with the flowline repair and well workover costs at the White Rose field, combined with lower production.
Per unit operating costs in Western Canada averaged $15.44/boe in 2019 compared to $14.48/boe in 2018. The increase in per unit operating costs was primarily due to higher energy and transportation costs, combined with lower production.
Per unit operating costs in Asia Pacific averaged $6.03/boe in 2019 compared to $5.53/boe in 2018. The increase in per unit operating costs was primarily due to lower production in 2019.
Exploration and Evaluation Expenses
Exploration and Evaluation Expenses ($ millions) |
2019 | 2018 | ||||||
Seismic, geological and geophysical |
131 | 102 | ||||||
Expensed drilling |
409 | 41 | ||||||
Expensed land |
7 | 6 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total |
547 | 149 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
Exploration and Evaluation expenses were $547 million in 2019 compared to $149 million in 2018. The increase in expensed drilling was primarily due to a pre-tax write-down of $339 million related to certain crude oil assets in Atlantic and Western Canada. The write-down was primarily due to changes in managements future development plans resulting from sustained declines in forecasted short and long-term crude oil prices.
Depletion, Depreciation, Amortization and Impairment
During 2019, the Company recognized a pre-tax impairment charge of $2,405 million within the Sunrise Energy Project, Western Canada and Atlantic. The impairment charge, reflected in the fourth quarter of 2019, was primarily due to sustained declines in forecasted short and long-term crude oil and natural gas prices and managements decision to reduce capital investment in these areas.
In 2019, total DD&A excluding impairment averaged $18.46/boe compared to $16.99/boe in 2018.
Husky Energy Inc. | Managements Discussion and Analysis 2019 | 17
Exploration and Production Capital Expenditures
Exploration and Production capital expenditures were lower in 2019 compared to 2018, as further described below. Exploration and Production capital expenditures were as follows:
Exploration and Production Capital Expenditures(1) ($ millions) |
2019 | 2018 | ||||||
Exploration |
||||||||
Western Canada |
3 | 99 | ||||||
Thermal developments |
16 | 7 | ||||||
Non-thermal developments |
1 | | ||||||
Atlantic |
19 | 73 | ||||||
Asia Pacific(2) |
7 | 52 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
46 | 231 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Development |
||||||||
Western Canada |
189 | 332 | ||||||
Thermal developments |
748 | 874 | ||||||
Non-thermal developments |
117 | 110 | ||||||
Atlantic |
906 | 916 | ||||||
Asia Pacific(2) |
340 | 148 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
2,300 | 2,380 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Acquisitions |
||||||||
Western Canada |
| 4 | ||||||
Thermal developments |
| 41 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
| 45 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total |
2,346 | 2,656 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
(1) | Excludes capitalized costs related to asset retirement obligations and capitalized interest incurred during the period. |
(2) | Capital expenditures in Asia Pacific exclude amounts related to the Husky-CNOOC Madura Ltd. joint venture, which is accounted for under the equity method for consolidated financial statement purposes. |
Western Canada
During 2019, $192 million (8%) was invested in Western Canada compared to $435 million (16%) in 2018. Capital expenditures in 2019 related primarily to resource play development targeting the Montney Formation.
Thermal Developments
During 2019, $764 million (33%) was invested in thermal developments compared to $922 million (35%) in 2018. Capital expenditures in 2019 related primarily to the construction work at the Dee Valley, Spruce Lake Central and Spruce Lake North thermal projects.
Non-Thermal Developments
During 2019, $118 million (5%) was invested in non-thermal developments compared to $110 million (4%) in 2018. Capital expenditures in 2019 related primarily to drilling and advancing the Companys EOR program, particularly the Aberfeldy Polymer Project.
Atlantic
During 2019, $925 million (39%) was invested in Atlantic compared to $989 million (37%) in 2018. Capital expenditures in 2019 related primarily to the development of the West White Rose Project and sustainment and development activities at the White Rose field.
Asia Pacific
During 2019, $347 million (15%) was invested in Asia Pacific compared to $200 million (8%) in 2018. Capital expenditures in 2019 related primarily to the continued development of Liuhua 29-1.
Husky Energy Inc. | Managements Discussion and Analysis 2019 | 18
Exploration and Production Wells Drilled
Onshore Drilling Activity
The following table discloses the number of wells drilled during 2019 and 2018:
2019 | 2018 | |||||||||||||||
Wells Drilled (wells)(1) |
Gross | Net | Gross | Net | ||||||||||||
Thermal developments |
68 | 65 | 150 | 140 | ||||||||||||
Non-thermal developments |
47 | 47 | 31 | 26 | ||||||||||||
Western Canada |
21 | 17 | 46 | 45 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total |
136 | 129 | 227 | 211 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | Excludes service/stratigraphic test wells for evaluation purposes. |
Offshore Drilling Activity
The following table discloses the Companys Offshore drilling activity during 2019:
Region |
Well |
Working Interest |
Well Type | |||
Atlantic |
E-18 13 |
72.5% |
Development | |||
Atlantic |
E-18 14 |
72.5% |
Development | |||
Atlantic |
Tigers Eye D-17 |
40% |
Exploration | |||
Asia Pacific |
LH 29-1-A3 |
75% |
Development | |||
Asia Pacific |
LH 29-1-A1 |
75% |
Development | |||
Asia Pacific |
LH 29-1-A2 |
75% |
Development | |||
2020 Upstream Capital Expenditures Program
2020 Upstream Capital Expenditures Program ($ millions) |
|
|||
Thermal developments |
1,050 - 1,100 | |||
Non-thermal developments and Western Canada |
225 - 250 | |||
Atlantic |
1,075 - 1,150 | |||
Asia Pacific(1) |
275 - 300 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Upstream capital expenditures |
2,625 - 2,800 | |||
|
|
(1) | Capital expenditures in Asia Pacific exclude amounts related to the Husky-CNOOC Madura Ltd. joint venture, which is accounted for under the equity method for consolidated financial statement purposes. |
The 2020 Upstream capital expenditures program reflects a focus on near-term and medium-cycle projects in the Integrated Corridor business, including further growing the Lloydminister thermal bitumen portfolio. In the Offshore business, the capital expenditures program will support the continuation of construction at the Liuhua 29-1 field offshore China and the West White Rose Project in Atlantic.
The Company has budgeted $1,050 - $1,100 million in thermal developments for 2020, primarily for the development of the Spruce Lake North, Spruce Lake Central and Spruce Lake East thermal bitumen projects. The Company is making progress in its strategy to transition a greater percentage of production to long-life thermal bitumen production and the 2020 Upstream capital expenditures program will continue to build on this momentum.
The Company has budgeted $225 - $250 million in non-thermal developments and Western Canada for 2020, primarily for the planned EOR, consisting of polymer flooding at Golden Lake and horizontal drilling, drilling activities in the Spirit River and Montney formations, and sustainment and maintenance activities.
The Company has budgeted $1,075 - $1,150 million in Atlantic for 2020, primarily for the construction of the West White Rose Project.
The Company has budgeted $275 - $300 million in Asia Pacific for 2020, primarily for the continued development of the third field of the Liwan Gas Project, Liuhua 29-1.
Husky Energy Inc. | Managements Discussion and Analysis 2019 | 19
Oil and Gas Reserves
The Companys reserves disclosure was prepared in accordance with Canadian Securities Administrators National Instrument 51-101 Standards of Disclosure for Oil and Gas Activities (NI 51-101) effective December 31, 2019 with a preparation date of January 31, 2020.
Proved and Probable Reserves at December 31:
Note: All Lloydminster thermal reserves are classified as bitumen.
The Companys complete oil and gas reserves disclosure, prepared in accordance with NI 51-101, is contained in the Companys Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2019, which is available at www.sedar.com, and certain supplementary oil and gas reserves disclosure prepared in accordance with U.S. disclosure requirements is contained in the Companys Form 40-F, which is available at www.sec.gov and on the Companys website at www.huskyenergy.com.
Sproule Associates Limited (Sproule), an independent firm of qualified oil and gas reserves evaluation engineers, was engaged to conduct an audit and review of the Companys crude oil, natural gas and NGL reserves estimates. Sproule issued an audit opinion on January 31, 2020 stating that the Companys internally generated proved and probable reserves and net present values based on forecast and constant price assumptions are, in aggregate, reasonable and have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted oil and gas engineering and evaluation practices as set out in the Canadian Oil and Gas Evaluation Handbook.
At December 31, 2019, the Companys proved oil and gas reserves were 1,431 mmboe, down from 1,471 mmboe at the end of 2018. The Companys 2019 reserves replacement ratio, defined as net additions of proved reserves divided by total production during the period, was 67% excluding economic revisions (62% including economic revisions).
Major changes to proved reserves in 2019 included:
| Western Canada Extensions & Improved Recovery additions of 168 mmboe which included 40 mmbbls from one new and 35 mmbbls from three existing Lloydminster bitumen SAGD projects (16 mmbbls transferred from probable reserves), 20 mmbbls at the Tucker Thermal Project (transferred from probable reserves), 15 mmbbls at the Sunrise Energy Project and 38 mmboe from Wembley (including 111 bcf of conventional natural gas and 19 mmbbls of NGL) and 5 mmboe from Wapiti from new locations. |
| Discoveries included 27 bcf of conventional natural gas and 1 mmbbls of NGL for Liuhua 29-1 transferred from probable reserves as Technical Revisions. |
| Western Canada Technical Revisions are associated with the updated long-term strategic plan where less liquid-rich gas plays are no longer funded. This resulted in a reduction of proved undeveloped reserves of 443 bcf (90% of the Technical Revisions) of conventional natural gas and 5 mmbbls of NGL. |
| Economic Factors of 5 mmboe are mainly associated with lower gas prices in Western Canada. |
Husky Energy Inc. | Managements Discussion and Analysis 2019 | 20
Proved Plus Probable Reserves and Production at December 31, 2019:
Reconciliation of Proved Reserves(1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Canada | International | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Western Canada | Atlantic |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(forecast prices and costs before royalties) |
Light/Medium Crude Oil & NGL (mmbbls) |
Heavy Crude Oil (mmbbls)(2) |
Bitumen (mmbbls)(2) |
Conventional Natural Gas (bcf) |
Light Crude Oil (mmbbls) |
Light Crude Oil & NGL (mmbbls) |
Conventional Natural Gas (bcf) |
Crude Oil, Bitumen & NGL (mmbbls) |
Conventional Natural Gas (bcf) |
Equivalent Units (mmboe) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proved reserves |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2018 |
65 | 54 | 890 | 1,288 | 93 | 24 | 783 | 1,126 | 2,071 | 1,471 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Technical revisions |
(7 | ) | | (13 | ) | (496 | ) | (2 | ) | 1 | 1 | (21 | ) | (495 | ) | (103 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Acquisitions |
| | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dispositions |
| | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discoveries, extensions and improved recovery |
25 | 6 | 113 | 147 | | 1 | 27 | 145 | 174 | 174 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Economic factors |
(1 | ) | (1 | ) | | (15 | ) | | | | (2 | ) | (15 | ) | (5 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Production |
(7 | ) | (12 | ) | (47 | ) | (109 | ) | (6 | ) | (4 | ) | (74 | ) | (76 | ) | (183 | ) | (106 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Proved reserves December 31, 2019 |
75 | 47 | 943 | 815 | 85 | 22 | 737 | 1,172 | 1,552 | 1,431 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Proved and probable reserves December 31, 2019 |
126 | 66 | 1,366 | 1,155 | 169 | 28 | 948 | 1,755 | 2,103 | 2,105 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2018 |
80 | 76 | 1,722 | 1,751 | 177 | 30 | 984 | 2,085 | 2,735 | 2,541 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | Numbers in the above table may not align with other disclosures due to rounding. |
(2) | Lloydminster thermal property reserves are classified as bitumen. |
Reconciliation of Proved Developed Reserves(1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Canada | International | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Western Canada | Atlantic |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(forecast prices and costs |
Light/Medium Crude Oil & NGL (mmbbls) |
Heavy Crude Oil (mmbbls)(2) |
Bitumen (mmbbls)(2) |
Conventional Natural Gas (bcf) |
Light Crude Oil (mmbbls) |
Light Crude Oil & NGL (mmbbls) |
Conventional Natural Gas (bcf) |
Crude Oil, Bitumen & NGL (mmbbls) |
Conventional Natural Gas (bcf) |
Equivalent Units (mmboe) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proved developed reserves |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2018 |
56 | 53 | 142 | 804 | 24 | 20 | 528 | 295 | 1,332 | 517 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Technical revisions |
| | 19 | (49 | ) | (2 | ) | | 22 | 17 | (27 | ) | 13 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Transfer from proved undeveloped |
2 | 1 | 51 | 36 | 5 | | | 59 | 36 | 65 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Acquisitions |
| | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dispositions |
| | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discoveries, extensions and improved recovery |
5 | 5 | 3 | 41 | | | | 13 | 41 | 19 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Economic factors |
(1 | ) | (1 | ) | | (14 | ) | | | | (2 | ) | (14 | ) | (4 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Production |
(7 | ) | (12 | ) | (47 | ) | (109 | ) | (6 | ) | (4 | ) | (74 | ) | (76 | ) | (183 | ) | (106 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2019 |
55 | 46 | 168 | 709 | 21 | 16 | 476 | 306 | 1,185 | 504 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | Numbers in the above tables may not align with other disclosures due to rounding. |
(2) | Lloydminster thermal property reserves are classified as bitumen. |
Husky Energy Inc. | Managements Discussion and Analysis 2019 | 21
Infrastructure and Marketing
Infrastructure and Marketing Earnings Summary ($ millions) |
2019 | 2018 | ||||||
Gross revenues |
2,342 | 2,211 | ||||||
Marketing and other |
189 | 668 | ||||||
Expenses |
||||||||
Purchases of crude oil and products |
2,336 | 2,087 | ||||||
Production, operating and transportation expenses |
21 | 23 | ||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
9 | 5 | ||||||
Depletion, depreciation, amortization and impairment |
12 | | ||||||
Other net |
| 2 | ||||||
Share of equity investment gain |
(9 | ) | (18 | ) | ||||
Financial items |
3 | | ||||||
Provisions for income taxes |
43 | 213 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net earnings |
116 | 567 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
Infrastructure and Marketing gross revenues and purchases of crude oil and products increased by $131 million and $249 million, respectively, in 2019 compared to 2018, primarily due to increased prices and additional costs incurred on the construction of the Saskatchewan Gathering System Expansion in 2019.
Marketing and other decreased by $479 million in 2019 compared to 2018, primarily due to the tightening of location differentials between Canada and the U.S.
Provisions for income taxes decreased by $170 million in 2019 compared to 2018, primarily due to lower earnings before income taxes in 2019.
Husky Energy Inc. | Managements Discussion and Analysis 2019 | 22
4.3 Downstream
Upgrading
Upgrading Earnings Summary ($ millions, except where indicated) |
2019 | 2018 | ||||||
Gross revenues |
1,777 | 1,750 | ||||||
Expenses |
||||||||
Purchases of crude oil and products |
1,303 | 928 | ||||||
Production, operating and transportation expenses |
217 | 195 | ||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
9 | 7 | ||||||
Depletion, depreciation, amortization and impairment |
115 | 123 | ||||||
Financial items |
1 | 1 | ||||||
Provisions for income taxes |
35 | 135 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net earnings |
97 | 361 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Upgrading throughput (mbbls/day)(1) |
74.9 | 75.6 | ||||||
Total sales (mbbls/day) |
75.2 | 74.7 | ||||||
Synthetic crude oil sales (mbbls/day) |
55.4 | 52.9 | ||||||
Upgrading differential ($/bbl) |
17.19 | 29.05 | ||||||
Unit margin ($/bbl) |
17.27 | 30.15 | ||||||
Unit operating cost ($/bbl)(2) |
7.94 | 7.07 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
(1) | Throughput includes diluent returned to the field. |
(2) | Based on throughput. |
Upgrading operations add value by processing heavy crude oil into high value synthetic crude oil and low sulphur distillates. Upgrading profitability is primarily dependent on the differential between the cost of heavy crude oil feedstock and the sales price of synthetic crude oil and diesel.
Upgrading gross revenues increased by $27 million in 2019 compared to 2018, primarily due to higher synthetic crude sales volumes, partially offset by lower realized prices for synthetic crude oil. The price of Husky Synthetic Blend averaged $74.35/bbl in 2019 compared to $75.55/bbl in 2018.
Upgrading purchases of crude oil and products increased by $375 million in 2019 compared to 2018, primarily due to an increase in the average cost of heavy crude oil feedstock driven by tighter light/heavy oil differential, partially offset by lower throughput volumes in 2019.
Provisions for income taxes decreased by $100 million in 2019 compared to 2018, primarily due to lower earnings before income taxes in 2019.
Husky Energy Inc. | Managements Discussion and Analysis 2019 | 23
Canadian Refined Products
Canadian Refined Products Earnings Summary ($ millions, except where indicated) |
2019 | 2018 | ||||||
Gross revenues |
3,122 | 3,412 | ||||||
Expenses |
||||||||
Purchases of crude oil and products |
2,571 | 2,760 | ||||||
Production, operating and transportation expenses |
278 | 265 | ||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
53 | 47 | ||||||
Depletion, depreciation, amortization and impairment |
218 | 115 | ||||||
Gain on sale of assets |
(6 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||
Other net |
| (1 | ) | |||||
Financial items |
15 | 12 | ||||||
Provisions for (recovery of) income taxes |
(2 | ) | 58 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net earnings (loss) |
(5 | ) | 158 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Number of fuel outlets(1) |
553 | 557 | ||||||
Fuel sales volume, including wholesale |
||||||||
Fuel sales (millions of litres/day) |
7.4 | 7.7 | ||||||
Fuel sales per retail outlet (thousands of litres/day) |
12.7 | 12.3 | ||||||
Refinery throughput |
||||||||
Prince George Refinery (mbbls/day)(2)(3) |
7.2 | 10.7 | ||||||
Lloydminster Refinery (mbbls/day)(2) |
26.4 | 27.1 | ||||||
Ethanol production (thousands of litres/day) |
823.0 | 819.4 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
(1) | Average number of fuel outlets for period indicated. |
(2) | Includes all crude oil, feedstock, intermediate feedstock and blend-stocks used in producing sales volumes from the refinery. |
(3) | Sale of the Prince George Refinery closed on November 1, 2019. |
Canadian Refined Products gross revenues decreased by $290 million in 2019 compared to 2018, primarily due to lower product prices and lower sales volumes.
Canadian Refined Products purchases of crude oil and products decreased by $189 million in 2019 compared to 2018, primarily due to lower throughput volumes resulting primarily from a planned turnaround at the Prince George Refinery in the second quarter of 2019, combined with lower commodity prices.
Depletion, depreciation, amortization and impairment expense increased by $103 million in 2019 compared to 2018, primarily due to a pre-tax impairment charge of $90 million recognized on the Lloyd Ethanol Plant and Minnedosa Ethanol Plant. The impairment charge in 2019 was a result of sustained declines in forecasted ethanol margins.
Recovery of income taxes increased by $60 million in 2019 compared to 2018, primarily due to lower earnings before income taxes in 2019.
Husky Energy Inc. | Managements Discussion and Analysis 2019 | 24
U.S. Refining and Marketing
U.S. Refining and Marketing Earnings Summary ($ millions, except where indicated) |
2019 | 2018 | ||||||
Gross revenues |
9,940 | 11,770 | ||||||
Expenses |
||||||||
Purchases of crude oil and products |
8,629 | 10,334 | ||||||
Production, operating and transportation expenses |
869 | 795 | ||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
33 | 22 | ||||||
Depletion, depreciation, amortization and impairment |
735 | 450 | ||||||
Loss on sale of assets |
1 | | ||||||
Other net |
(654 | ) | (464 | ) | ||||
Financial items |
18 | 14 | ||||||
Provisions for income taxes |
69 | 138 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net earnings |
240 | 481 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Selected operating data: |
||||||||
Lima Refinery throughput (mbbls/day)(1) |
136.4 | 151.1 | ||||||
BP-Husky Toledo Refinery throughput (mbbls/day)(1)(2) |
63.1 | 71.1 | ||||||
Superior Refinery throughput (mbbls/day)(1) |
| 11.7 | ||||||
Refining and marketing margin (US$/bbl crude throughput) |
13.83 | 13.03 | ||||||
Refinery inventory (mmbbls)(3) |
5.0 | 6.9 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
(1) | Includes all crude oil, feedstock, intermediate feedstock and blend-stocks used in producing sales volumes from the refinery. |
(2) | Reported throughput volumes include Huskys working interest from the BP-Husky Toledo Refinery (50%). |
(3) | Feedstock and refined products are included in refinery inventory. |
U.S. Refining and Marketing gross revenues decreased by $1,830 million in 2019 compared to 2018, primarily due to lower sales volume at the Lima and BP-Husky Toledo refineries, both of which completed planned turnarounds in 2019, and no sales volume at the Superior Refinery in 2019.
U.S. Refining and Marketing purchases of crude oil and products decreased by $1,705 million in 2019 compared to 2018, primarily due to lower throughput volumes at the Lima and BP-Husky Toledo refineries, both of which completed planned turnarounds in 2019, combined with the realization of lower cost crude oil feedstock, from late 2018, at the Lima Refinery, during the first quarter of 2019.
Production, operating and transportation expenses increased by $74 million in 2019 compared to 2018, primarily due to planned turnarounds at the Lima and BP-Husky Toledo Refineries in 2019.
Depletion, depreciation, amortization and impairment expense increased by $285 million in 2019 compared to 2018, primarily due to a pre-tax derecognition of $254 million on the carrying value of components replaced as part of the crude oil flexibility project at the Lima Refinery.
Other net income increased by $190 million in 2019 compared to 2018, primarily due to pre-tax insurance recoveries for rebuild costs, incident costs and business interruption associated with the incident at the Superior Refinery.
Provisions for income taxes decreased by $69 million in 2019 compared to 2018, primarily due to lower earnings before income taxes in 2019.
Downstream Capital Expenditures
In 2019, Downstream capital expenditures totalled $946 million compared to $801 million in 2018. In Canada, capital expenditures of $178 million related primarily to a polymer modified asphalt project at the Lloydminster Refinery and the planned turnaround at the Prince George Refinery. In the U.S., capital expenditures of $768 million related primarily to the crude oil flexibility project at the Lima Refinery and costs related to the turnaround at the BP-Husky Toledo Refinery.
Husky Energy Inc. | Managements Discussion and Analysis 2019 | 25
4.4 Corporate
Corporate Summary ($ millions) income (expense) |
2019 | 2018 | ||||||
Production, operating and transportation expenses |
2 | 2 | ||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
(292 | ) | (277 | ) | ||||
Depletion, depreciation, amortization and impairment |
(104 | ) | (92 | ) | ||||
Other net |
16 | 8 | ||||||
Net foreign exchange gain |
44 | 14 | ||||||
Finance income |
71 | 52 | ||||||
Finance expense |
(151 | ) | (178 | ) | ||||
Recovery of income taxes |
302 | 138 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net loss |
(112 | ) | (333 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
The Corporate segment reported a net loss of $112 million in 2019 compared to a net loss of $333 million in 2018. The change was primarily due to the recognition of $233 million in tax recoveries related to the reduction in the Alberta provincial corporate tax rate that was substantively enacted in the second quarter of 2019.
Finance expense decreased by $27 million in 2019 compared to 2018, primarily due to lower interest expenses on long-term debt in 2019.
Net foreign exchange gain increased by $30 million due to the items noted below.
Foreign Exchange Summary ($ millions, except where indicated) |
2019 | 2018 | ||||||
Non-cash working capital gain (loss) |
17 | (3 | ) | |||||
Other foreign exchange gain |
27 | 17 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net foreign exchange gain |
44 | 14 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
U.S./Canadian dollar exchange rates: |
||||||||
At beginning of year |
US$ | 0.733 | US$ | 0.799 | ||||
At end of year |
US$ | 0.771 | US$ | 0.733 |
Included in the other foreign exchange gain are realized and unrealized gains and losses on working capital and intercompany financing. The foreign exchange gains and losses on these items can vary significantly due to the large volume and timing of transactions through these accounts in the period. The Company manages its exposure to foreign currency fluctuations with the goal of minimizing the impact of foreign exchange gains and losses on the consolidated financial statements.
Consolidated Income Taxes
Consolidated Income Taxes ($ millions) |
2019 | 2018 | ||||||
Provisions for (recovery of) income taxes |
(799 | ) | 471 | |||||
Cash income taxes paid |
41 | 37 |
Consolidated income taxes were a recovery of $799 million in 2019 compared to a provision of $471 million in 2018. The increase in recovery of income taxes was primarily due to a $741 million deferred income tax recovery associated with impairment, derecognition and exploration asset write-down charges recognized on crude oil and natural gas, and refinery assets located in Canada and United States, and $233 million in deferred income tax recovery related to the reduction in the Alberta provincial corporate tax rate that was substantively enacted in the second quarter of 2019.
Husky Energy Inc. | Managements Discussion and Analysis 2019 | 26
5.0 Risk and Risk Management
5.1 Enterprise Risk Management
The Companys enterprise risk management program supports decision-making via comprehensive and systematic identification and assessment of risks that could materially impact the results of the Company. Through this framework, the Company builds risk management and mitigation into strategic planning and operational processes for its business units through the adoption of standards and best practices. The Company has developed an enterprise risk matrix to identify risks to its people, the environment, its assets and its reputation, and to systematically mitigate these risks to an acceptable level.
The Company attempts to mitigate its financial, operational and strategic risks to an acceptable level through a variety of policies, systems and processes. The following provides a list of the most significant risks relating to the Company and its operations.
5.2 Significant Risk Factors
Operational and Safety Incidents
The Companys businesses are subject to inherent operational risks which have the potential to impact safety, the environment, its assets and its reputation. In general, the Companys operations are subject to operational risks, including, but not limited to: fires, loss of containment, blowouts, power outages, freeze-ups and other similar events; oil and natural gas leaks; encountering unexpected formations or pressures; premature declines of reservoir pressure or productivity; uncontrollable flows of oil, natural gas and well fluids; spills at truck terminals and hubs; spills associated with the loading and unloading of potentially harmful substances onto trucks; release of tailings or harmful substances into a water system; the breakdown or failure of equipment, pipelines and facilities, information systems and processes; the performance of equipment at levels below those originally intended (whether due to misuse, unexpected degradation or design, construction or manufacturing defects); releases or spills from shipping vessels; failure to maintain adequate supplies of spare parts; the compromise of information technology and control systems and related data; operator error; labour disputes; disputes with interconnected facilities and carriers; operational disruptions or apportionment on third-party systems or refineries, which may prevent the full utilization of the companys facilities and pipelines; epidemics or pandemics; and catastrophic events, including, but not limited to, war, extreme weather events, natural disasters, explosions, acts of sabotage and other similar events.
Failure to manage the hazards and associated risks effectively could result in potential fatalities, environmental impacts, interruptions to activities or use of assets, or loss of license to operate. The Company, in accordance with industry practice, maintains insurance coverage against losses from certain of these risks. Nonetheless, insurance proceeds may not be sufficient to cover all losses, and insurance coverage may not be available for all types of operational risks.
Commodity Price Volatility
The Companys results of operations and financial condition are dependent on the prices received for its refined products, crude oil, NGL and conventional natural gas production. Lower prices for crude oil, NGL and conventional natural gas could adversely affect the value and quantity of the Companys oil and gas reserves. The Companys reserves include significant quantities of heavier grades of crude oil that often trade at a discount to light crude oil. Heavier grades of crude oil are typically more expensive to produce, process, transport and refine into high-value refined products. Refining and transportation capacity for various grades of crude oil may be constrained from time to time, creating the need for additional refining and transportation capacity. Wider price differentials between heavier and lighter grades of crude oil could have a material adverse effect on the Companys results of operations and financial condition, reduce the value and quantities of the Companys heavier crude oil reserves and delay or cancel projects that involve the development of heavier crude oil resources. There is no guarantee that pipeline development projects or other transportation alternatives will provide sufficient transportation capacity and access to refining capacity to accommodate expected increases in North American heavy crude oil and bitumen production.
Prices for refined products and crude oil are based on world supply and demand. Supply and demand can be affected by a number of factors including, but not limited to, actions taken by OPEC, non-OPEC crude oil supply, social conditions in oil producing countries, the occurrence of natural disasters, general and specific economic conditions, technological developments, prevailing weather patterns, government regulation and policies and the availability of alternate sources of energy.
The Companys conventional natural gas production is currently located in Western Canada and Asia Pacific. Western Canadas conventional natural gas production is subject to North American market forces. North American natural gas supply and demand is affected by a number of factors including, but not limited to, the amount of natural gas available to specific market areas either from the wellhead of existing or accessible conventional or unconventional sources (such as from shale) or from storage facilities, technological developments, prevailing weather patterns, the U.S. and Canadian economies, the occurrence of natural disasters and pipeline restrictions.
Husky Energy Inc. | Managements Discussion and Analysis 2019 | 27
In certain instances, the Company will use derivative instruments to manage exposure to price volatility on a portion of its refined product, oil and gas production, inventory or volumes in long-distance transit. The Company may also use firm commitments for the purchase or sale of crude oil and conventional natural gas.
The fluctuations in refined products, crude oil and natural gas prices are beyond the Companys control and could have a material adverse effect on the Companys results of operations and financial condition.
Commodity Price Risk
In certain instances, the Company uses derivative commodity instruments and futures contracts on commodity exchanges, including commodity put and call options under a short-term hedging program, to manage exposure to price volatility on a portion of its refined product, oil and gas production, and inventory or volumes in long distance transit. The Company may also use firm commitments for the purchase or sale of crude oil and natural gas.
The Companys results will be impacted by a decrease in the price of crude oil and natural gas inventory. The Company has crude oil inventories that are feedstock, held at terminals or part of the in-process inventories at its refineries and at offshore sites. Due to the integrated nature, the Company has a natural partial mitigation to the WCS differential risk. The Company also has natural gas inventory that could have an impact on earnings based on changes in natural gas prices. All these inventories are subject to a lower of cost or net realizable value test on a quarterly basis.
Reservoir Performance Risk
Lower than projected reservoir performance on the Companys key growth projects could have a material adverse effect on the Companys results of operations, financial condition, business strategy and reserves. Inaccurate appraisal of large project reservoirs could result in missed production, revenue and earnings targets and negatively affect the Companys reputation, investor confidence and the Companys ability to deliver on its growth strategy.
In order to maintain the Companys future production of crude oil, conventional natural gas and NGL and maintain the value of the reserves portfolio, additional reserves must be added through discoveries, extensions, improved recovery, performance related revisions and acquisitions. The production rate of oil and gas properties tends to decline as reserves are depleted while the associated unit operating costs increase. To mitigate the effects of this, the Company must undertake successful exploration and development programs, increase the recovery factor from existing properties through applied technology and identify and execute strategic acquisitions of proved developed and undeveloped properties and unproved prospects. Maintaining an inventory of projects that can be developed depends upon, but is not limited to, obtaining and renewing rights to explore, develop and produce oil and natural gas, drilling success, completion of long lead time capital intensive projects on budget and on schedule and the application of successful exploitation techniques on mature properties.
Restricted Market Access and Pipeline Interruptions
The Companys results of operations and financial condition depend upon the Companys ability to deliver products to the most attractive markets. The Companys results of operations could be materially adversely affected by restricted market access resulting from a lack of pipeline or other transportation alternatives to attractive markets as well as regulatory and/or other marketplace barriers. Interruptions and restrictions may be caused by the inability of a pipeline to operate, or they can be related to capacity constraints as the supply of feedstock into the system exceeds the infrastructure capacity. With growing oil production across North America and the limited availability of infrastructure to carry the Companys products to the marketplace, oil and natural gas transportation capacity is expected to be restricted in the next few years. Restricted market access may potentially have a material adverse effect on the Companys results of operations, financial condition and business strategy. Unplanned shutdowns and closures of its refineries or Upgrader may limit the Companys ability to deliver product with a material adverse effect on sales and results of operations.
Security and Terrorist Threats
Security threats and terrorist or activist activities may impact the Companys personnel, which could result in injury, death, extortion, hostage situations and/or kidnapping, including unlawful confinement. A security threat, terrorist attack or activist incident targeted at a facility, office or offshore vessel/installation owned or operated by the Company could result in the interruption or cessation of key elements of the Companys operations. Outcomes of such incidents could have a material adverse effect on the Companys results of operations, financial condition and business strategy. The risk to employees and board members due to social unrest in Hong Kong is being managed through reduced travel and increased awareness and monitoring of the situation. The potential for detention and/or incarceration of the Companys employees/contractors entering into or working in China has increased, and as a result, review and reconsideration for travel into China has become a business/corporate process.
The Company does not own proved or probable reserves in or near areas of armed conflict. According to the Uppsala Conflict Data Program, armed conflict is defined as contested incompatibility that concerns government and/or territory over which the use of armed force between the military forces of two parties, of which at least one is the government of a state, has resulted in at least 25 battle-related deaths each year.
Husky Energy Inc. | Managements Discussion and Analysis 2019 | 28
International Operations
International operations can expose the Company to uncertain political, economic and other risks. The Companys operations in certain jurisdictions may be materially adversely affected by political, economic or social instability or events. These events may include, but are not limited to, onerous fiscal policy, renegotiation or nullification of agreements and treaties, imposition of onerous regulation, changes in laws governing existing operations, financial constraints, including currency restrictions and exchange rate fluctuations, unreasonable taxation and behaviour of public officials, joint venture partners or third-party representatives that could result in lost business opportunities for the Company. This could materially adversely affect the Companys interest in its foreign operations, results of operations and financial condition.
Major Project Execution
The Company manages a variety of oil and gas projects ranging from Upstream to Downstream assets across its global portfolio. The wide range of risks associated with project development and execution, as well as the commissioning and integration of new facilities with existing assets, can impact the economic viability of the Companys projects. Project risks may result in extended stakeholder consultation, additional environmental assessments and public hearings which may delay necessary environmental and regulatory approvals. Project risks may also manifest through schedule delays, cost overruns and commodity price drops. Some risks can impact the Companys safety and environmental records thereby negatively affecting the Companys reputation and social license to operate.
Litigation, Administrative Proceedings and Regulatory Actions
The Company may be subject to litigation, claims, administrative proceedings and regulatory actions, which may be material. Such claims could relate to environmental damage, climate change and the impacts thereof, failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations, breach of contract, tax, bribery and employment matters, which could result in an unfavourable decision, including fines, sanctions, monetary damages, temporary suspensions of operations or the inability to engage in certain operations or transactions. The outcome of such claims can be difficult to assess or quantify and may have a material adverse effect on the Companys reputation, financial condition and results of operations. The defence to such claims may be costly and could divert managements attention away from day-to-day operations.
Partner Misalignment
Joint venture partners operate or jointly control a portion of the Companys assets in which the Company has an ownership interest. This can reduce the Companys control and ability to manage risks. The Company is at times dependent upon its partners for the successful execution of various projects. If a dispute with partners were to occur over the development and operation of a project or if partners were unable to fund their contractual share of the capital expenditures, a project could be delayed and the Company could be partially or totally liable for its partners share of the project.
Reserves Data, Future Net Revenue and Resource Estimates
The reserves data contained or referenced in the MD&A represent estimates only. The accurate assessment of oil and gas reserves is critical to the continuous and effective management of the Companys Upstream assets. Reserves estimates support various investment decisions about the development and management of oil and gas properties. In general, estimates of economically recoverable crude oil and conventional natural gas reserves and the future net cash flow therefrom are based upon a number of variable factors and assumptions, such as product prices, future operating and capital costs, historical production from the properties and the effects of regulation by government agencies, including with respect to royalty payments, all of which may vary considerably from actual results. The Company uses all available information at the effective date of the evaluation and internal qualified reserves evaluators to prepare the reserves estimates. As required by NI 51-101, the Company obtains the opinion of an independent reserves auditor on the Companys reserves. The audit covers more than 75% of the future net revenue discounted at 10% attributable to proved plus probable reserves with the remainder reviewed by the independent qualified reserves auditor. However, given the best technical information and evaluation techniques, all such estimates are still to some degree uncertain. All reserves estimates involve a degree of ambiguity and, at times, rely on indirect measurement techniques to estimate the size and recoverability of the resource. While new technologies have increased the accuracy of these techniques, there remains the potential for human or systemic error in recording and reporting the magnitude of the Companys oil and gas reserves. Estimates of the economically recoverable oil and gas reserves attributable to any particular property or group of properties, and estimates of future net revenues expected therefrom, may differ substantially from actual results even though the total company reserves are shown to be reliable through the historical total company technical reserves revisions. The Company has a diverse portfolio of assets by product type, reservoir type and location which is a factor in mitigating specific property risks. Inaccurate appraisal of large project reservoirs could result in missed production, revenue and earnings targets and could have a material adverse effect on the Companys reputation, investor confidence and ability to deliver on its growth business strategy.
Husky Energy Inc. | Managements Discussion and Analysis 2019 | 29
Government Regulation
Given the scope and complexity of the Companys operations, the Company is subject to regulations and interventions by governments at the federal, provincial, state and municipal levels in the countries in which it conducts its operations, development or exploratory activities. As these governments continually balance competing demands from different interest groups and stakeholders, the Company recognizes that the magnitude of regulatory risks has the potential to change over time. Changes in government policy, legislation or regulations could impact the Companys existing and planned projects as well as impose costs of compliance and increase capital expenditures and operating expenses. Examples of the Companys regulatory risks include, but are not limited to, uncertain or negative interactions with governments, uncertain energy policies, uncertain climate policies, uncertain environmental and safety policies, penalties, taxes, royalties, government fees, reserves access, limitations or increases in costs relating to the exportation of commodities, production restrictions, restrictions on the acquisition of exploration and production rights and land tenure, expropriation or cancellation of contract rights, limitations on control over the development and abandonment of fields and loss of licences to operate.
Environmental Risks
Changes in environmental regulations could have a material adverse effect on the Companys results of operations, financial condition and business strategy by requiring increased capital expenditures and operating costs or by impacting the quality of, formulation of or demand for the Companys products, which may or may not be offset through market pricing.
The Company anticipates that further changes in environmental legislation could occur, which may result in stricter standards and enforcement, larger fines and liabilities, the introduction of emission limits, increased compliance costs and approval delays for critical licences and permits. Public interest in environmental, social and governance issues has also increased significantly in recent years, as evidenced by the large number of signatories to the United Nations Principles for Responsible Investment.
It is not possible to accurately forecast the amount of additional investment in new or existing facilities required in the future for environmental protection or to address all new regulatory compliance requirements, such as reporting.
Climate Change Risks
Regulatory
Climate change regulations may become more onerous over time as governments implement policies to further reduce greenhouse gases (GHG) emissions. As these regulations continue to evolve, they could have a material adverse effect on the Companys competitiveness, financial condition and results of operations through increased capital and operating costs and change in demand for refined products such as transportation fuels. Costs associated with levy payments for emerging climate change regulations may be significant.
In December 2018, the Government of Canada published the Regulatory Design Paper on the Clean Fuel Standard (CFS) that focuses on the liquid fuel stream regulations. A Proposed Regulatory Approach for the CFS was published in June 2019 and proposed regulations are expected to be published in Canada Gazette, Part I for early 2020. The final regulations for liquid fuels are planned for early 2021, with the regulations expected to come into force in 2022. Due to the uncertainty of the gaseous and solid fuel regulations, the full impact of the CFS is still unknown.
The Companys U.S. refining business may be materially adversely affected by the implementation of the Environmental Protection Agencys (EPA) climate change rules by future U.S. GHG legislation that applies to the oil and gas industry or the consumption of petroleum products and by other U.S. climate change statutes at the federal or state level or by regulations imposed by other federal agencies or at the state or local level. Such legislation or regulations could require the Companys U.S. refining operations to significantly reduce emissions and/or purchase emissions credits, thereby increasing operating and capital costs, and could change the demand for refined products which may have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial condition and results of operations.
The Company complies with the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) program in the U.S. by blending renewable fuels manufactured by third parties and by purchasing RINs on the open market. Due to regulatory uncertainty and in part due to the U.S. fuel supply reaching the blend wall (the 10% limit prescribed by most automobile warranties), the price and availability of RINs have been volatile. The Company cannot predict the future prices of RINs and renewable fuel blendstocks, and the costs to obtain the necessary RINs and blendstocks could be material. The Companys financial position and results of operations could be adversely affected if it is unable to pass the compliance costs on to its customers and if the Company pays significantly higher prices for RINs or blendstocks to comply with the RFS mandated standards.
Husky Energy Inc. | Managements Discussion and Analysis 2019 | 30
Climatic Conditions
Extreme climatic conditions may also have material adverse effects on the Companys financial condition and results of operations. Weather and climate affect demand, and therefore, the predictability of the demand for energy is affected to a large degree by the predictability of weather and climate. In addition, the Companys exploration, production and construction operations, and the operations of major customers and suppliers, can be affected by extreme weather. This may result in cessation or diminishment of production, delay of exploration and development activities or delay of plant construction.
The Company operates in some of the harshest environments in the world, including offshore NL. Climate change may increase the frequency of severe weather conditions in these locations including winds, flooding and variable temperatures, which are contributing to the melting of northern ice and increased creation of icebergs. Icebergs off the coast of NL may threaten Atlantic oil production facilities, cause damage to equipment and possible production disruptions, spills, other asset damage and human impacts.
Transition
In addition to emissions regulations and the physical risks of climate change, climate-related transition risks could have a material adverse effect on the Companys business, financial condition and results of operations, and could adversely impact the Companys reputation. For example, increased public opposition to companies in the oil sands industry could lead to constrained access to insurance, liquidity and capital and changes in demand for the Companys products, which may impact revenue. Any increases in GHG emissions by the Company could lead to additional taxes and levies, which would increase the costs associated with certain projects. The potential need to develop new technologies to reduce the intensity of GHG emissions could require significant capital investment. Further, the Company may become subject to climate change litigation initiated by third parties. The Companys management monitors these risks and reports to the Board through managements Enterprise Risk Management framework.
Overall, the Company is not able to estimate at this time the degree to which climate change related regulatory, climatic conditions, and transition risks could impact the Companys financial and operating results.
Foreign Currency
The Companys results are affected by the exchange rates between various currencies including the Canadian and U.S. dollars. The majority of the Companys expenditures are in Canadian dollars while most of the Companys revenues are received in U.S. dollars from the sale of oil and gas commodities that receive prices determined by reference to U.S. benchmark prices. An increase in the value of the Canadian dollar relative to the U.S. dollar will decrease the revenues received from the sale of oil and gas commodities. Correspondingly, a decrease in the value of the Canadian dollar relative to the U.S. dollar will increase the revenues received from the sale of oil and gas commodities. In addition, a change in the value of the Canadian dollar against the U.S. dollar will result in an increase or decrease in the Companys U.S. dollar-denominated debt and related interest expense, as expressed in Canadian dollars. The fluctuations in exchange rates are beyond the Companys control and could have a material adverse effect on the Companys results of operations and financial condition.
The Company enters into short-dated foreign exchange contracts to fix the exchange rate for conversion of U.S. dollar denominated revenue to hedge against these potential fluctuations. The Company also designates its U.S. denominated debt as a hedge of the Companys net investment in selected foreign operations with a U.S. dollar functional currency.
Interest Rate
Interest rate risk is the impact of fluctuating interest rates on financial condition. In order to manage interest rate risk and the resulting interest expense, the Company mitigates some of its exposure to interest rate changes by maintaining a mix of both fixed and floating rate debt through the use of its credit facilities and various financial instruments. The optimal mix maintained will depend on market conditions. The Company may also enter into interest rate swaps from time to time as an additional means of managing current and future interest rate risk.
Counterparty Credit
Credit risk represents the financial loss that the Company would suffer if the Companys counterparties in a transaction fail to meet or discharge their obligation to the Company. The Company actively manages this exposure to credit and contract execution risk from both a customer and a supplier perspective. Internal credit policies govern the Companys credit portfolio and limit transactions according to a counterpartys and a suppliers credit quality. Counterparties for financial derivatives transacted by the Company are generally major financial institutions or counterparties with investment grade credit ratings.
Liquidity
Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company will not be able to meet its financial obligations as they become due. Liquidity risk also includes the risk of not being able to liquidate assets in a timely manner at a reasonable price. The Companys process for managing liquidity risk includes ensuring, to the extent possible, that it has access to multiple sources of capital including: cash and cash equivalents, cash from operating activities, undrawn credit facilities and capacity to raise capital from various debt and equity capital markets under its shelf prospectuses. The availability of capital under its shelf prospectuses is dependent on market conditions at the time of sale.
Husky Energy Inc. | Managements Discussion and Analysis 2019 | 31
Debt Covenants
The Companys credit facilities include financial covenants, which contain a debt to capital covenant. If the Company does not comply with the covenants under these credit facilities, there is a risk that repayment could be accelerated.
Competition
The energy industry is highly competitive with respect to gaining access to the resources required to increase oil and gas reserves and production, and gaining access to markets. The Company competes with others to acquire prospective lands, retain drilling capacity and field operating and construction services, obtain sufficient pipeline and other transportation capacity, gain access to and retain adequate markets for its products and services and gain access to capital markets. The Companys ability to successfully complete development projects could be materially adversely affected if it is unable to acquire economic supplies and services due to competition. Subsequent increases in the cost of or delays in acquiring supplies and services could result in uneconomic projects. The Companys competitors comprise all types of energy companies, some of which have greater resources.
Credit Rating Risk
Credit ratings affect the Companys ability to obtain both short-term and long-term financing and the cost of such financing. Additionally, the ability of the Company to engage in ordinary course derivative or hedging transactions and maintain ordinary course contracts with customers and suppliers on acceptable terms depends on the Companys credit ratings. A reduction in the current rating on the Companys debt by one or more of its rating agencies, particularly a downgrade below investment grade ratings, or a negative change in the Companys ratings outlook could materially adversely affect the Companys cost of financing and its access to sources of liquidity and capital. Credit ratings are intended to provide investors with an independent measure of credit quality of any issuer of securities. The credit ratings accorded to the Companys securities by the rating agencies are not recommendations to purchase, hold or sell the securities in as much as such ratings do not comment as to market price or suitability for a particular investor. Any rating may not remain in effect for any given period of time or may be revised or withdrawn entirely by a rating agency in the future if in its judgment circumstances so warrant.
The Company is committed to retaining investment grade credit ratings to support access to capital markets and currently has the following credit ratings:
Standard and Poors Rating |
Moodys Investor Service (Moodys) |
Dominion Bond Rating Services | ||||
Outlook/Trend |
Stable | Stable | Stable | |||
Senior Unsecured Debt |
BBB | Baa2 | A(low) | |||
Series 1 Preferred Shares |
P-3(high) | Pfd-2(low) | ||||
Series 2 Preferred Shares |
P-3(high) | Pfd-2(low) | ||||
Series 3 Preferred Shares |
P-3(high) | Pfd-2(low) | ||||
Series 5 Preferred Shares |
P-3(high) | Pfd-2(low) | ||||
Series 7 Preferred Shares |
P-3(high) | Pfd-2(low) | ||||
Commercial Paper |
R-1(low) |
General Economic Conditions
General economic conditions may have a material adverse effect on the Companys results of operations and financial condition. A decline in economic activity will reduce demand for petroleum products and adversely affect the price the Company receives for its commodities. The Companys cash flow could decline, assets could be impaired, future access to capital could be restricted and major development projects could be delayed or abandoned.
Cost or Availability of Oil and Gas Field Equipment
The cost or availability of oil and gas field equipment may adversely affect the Companys ability to undertake exploration, development and construction projects. The oil and gas industry is cyclical in nature and is prone to shortages of supply of equipment and services including drilling rigs, geological and geophysical services, engineering and construction services and construction materials. These materials and services may not be available when required at reasonable prices. Without compromising safety, overall quality and environmental impacts, the Company continually develops its approved suppliers base to provide undisrupted access to materials, equipment and services, while maintaining a competitive cost baseline via cost escalation mitigation strategies.
Financial Controls
While the Company has determined that its disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls over financial reporting are effective, such controls can only provide reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and disclosure. Failure to prevent, detect and correct misstatements could have a material adverse effect on the Companys results of operations and financial condition.
Husky Energy Inc. | Managements Discussion and Analysis 2019 | 32
Cybersecurity Threats
As an oil and gas producer, the Companys ability to operate effectively is dependent upon developing and maintaining information systems and infrastructure that support the financial and general operating aspects of the business. Concurrently, the oil and gas industry has become the subject of increased levels of cybersecurity threats.
The Company has security measures, policies and controls designed to protect and secure the integrity of its information technology systems. The Company takes a proactive approach by continuing to invest in technology, processes and people to help minimize the impact of the changing cyber landscape and enhance the Companys resilience to cyber incidents. However, cybersecurity threats frequently change and require ongoing monitoring and detection capabilities. Such cybersecurity threats include unauthorized access to information technology systems due to hacking, viruses and other causes for purposes of misappropriating assets or sensitive information, corrupting data or causing operational disruption. Cyber-attacks could result in the loss or exposure of confidential information related to retail credit card information, personnel files, exploration activities, corporate actions, executive officer communications and financial results. The significance of any such event is difficult to quantify, but if the breach is material in nature, it could adversely affect the financial performance of the Company, its operations, its reputation and standing and expose it to regulatory consequences and claims of third-party damage, all of which could materially adversely affect the Companys results of operations and financial condition if the situation is not resolved in a timely manner, or if the financial impact of such adverse effects is not alleviated through insurance policies.
Although to date the Company has not experienced any material losses relating to cyber attacks or other information security breaches, there can be no assurance that the Company will not incur such losses in the future. The Companys risk and exposure to these matters cannot be fully mitigated because of, among other things, the evolving nature of these threats. The Audit Committee of the Board has oversight of the Companys risk mitigation strategies related to cybersecurity.
Skilled Workforce Attraction and Retention
Successful execution of the Companys strategy is dependent on ensuring the Companys workforce possesses the appropriate skill level. Failure to attract and retain personnel with the required skill levels could have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial condition and results of operations.
Aviation Incidents
The Companys Offshore operations in Canada and China rely on regular travel by helicopter. A helicopter incident resulting in loss of life, facility shutdown or regulatory action could have a material adverse effect on the operations of the Company. This risk is managed through an aviation management process. Aviation Safety Reviews are conducted by third party specialist contractors to verify that helicopter service providers meet the Companys and industry standards with respect to aviation safety. The reviews include evaluation of aircraft type, effectiveness of the safety and maintenance management systems and competency and training programs for critical roles in the operation of helicopters. Helicopters chartered to support Husky Offshore operations must be fit for service and as such are fitted with multiple redundant systems to address a wide range of potential in-flight emergencies. Additional measures specific to the Companys challenging operating environments are specified in the Companys design requirements including anti-icing and floatation systems effective for the maximum allowable sea height operating limits. Pilots are trained to address potential emergency situations through regular real-time and simulator training aligned with industry best practice.
Husky Energy Inc. | Managements Discussion and Analysis 2019 | 33
6.0 Liquidity and Capital Resources
6.1 Summary of Cash Flow
Cash Flow Summary ($ millions) |
2019 | 2018 | ||||||
Cash flow |
||||||||
Operating activities |
2,971 | 4,134 | ||||||
Financing activities |
(817 | ) | (325 | ) | ||||
Investing activities |
(3,197 | ) | (3,521 | ) |
Cash Flow from Operating Activities
Cash flow generated from operating activities decreased by $1,163 million in 2019 compared to 2018. The decrease was primarily due to the tightening of the location differentials between Canada and the U.S., combined with lower Upstream and U.S. Refining volumes.
Cash Flow used for Financing Activities
Cash flow used for financing activities increased by $492 million in 2019 compared to 2018. Financing activities in 2019 related primarily to higher common share dividend payments, combined with higher finance expenses arising from the adoption of IFRS 16 in 2019.
Cash Flow used for Investing Activities
Cash flow used for investing activities decreased by $324 million in 2019 compared to 2018. The decrease was primarily due to proceeds from the sale of the Prince George Refinery and decreased capital expenditures in 2019.
6.2 Working Capital Components
Working capital is the amount by which current assets exceed current liabilities. At December 31, 2019, the Companys working capital was $302 million compared to $694 million at December 31, 2018. A reconciliation of the Companys working capital is as follows:
Working Capital ($ millions) |
December 31, 2019 | December 31, 2018 | Change | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
1,775 | 2,866 | (1,091 | ) | ||||||||
Accounts receivable |
1,499 | 1,355 | 144 | |||||||||
Income taxes receivable |
30 | 112 | (82 | ) | ||||||||
Inventories |
1,486 | 1,232 | 254 | |||||||||
Prepaid expenses |
148 | 123 | 25 | |||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
(3,465 | ) | (3,159 | ) | (306 | ) | ||||||
Short-term debt |
(550 | ) | (200 | ) | (350 | ) | ||||||
Long-term debt due within one year |
(400 | ) | (1,433 | ) | 1,033 | |||||||
Lease liabilities |
(109 | ) | | (109 | ) | |||||||
Asset retirement obligations |
(112 | ) | (202 | ) | 90 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net working capital |
302 | 694 | (392 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease in cash and cash equivalents was primarily due to lower cash flow from operating activities. Fluctuations in accounts receivable and accounts payable were due to the timing of settlements in 2019 compared to 2018. The increase in inventories was primarily driven by the higher commodity prices at the end of 2019 compared to 2018, and a higher volume of crude oil feedstock inventory in U.S Refining and Marketing at the end of 2019 compared to 2018. The increase in short-term debt was due to increased borrowings on commercial paper. The decrease in long-term debt due within one year was due to the timing of debt maturities. The increase in lease liabilities was due to the adoption of IFRS 16 in 2019.
Husky Energy Inc. | Managements Discussion and Analysis 2019 | 34
6.3 Sources of Liquidity
Liquidity describes a companys ability to access cash. Sources of liquidity include funds from operations, proceeds from the issuance of equity, proceeds from the issuance of short and long-term debt, availability of short and long-term credit facilities and proceeds from asset sales. Since the Company operates in the upstream oil and gas industry, it requires significant cash to fund capital programs necessary to maintain or increase production, develop reserves, acquire strategic oil and gas assets and repay maturing debt.
During times of low oil and gas prices, a portion of capital programs can generally be deferred. However, due to the long cycle times and the importance to future cash flow in maintaining the Companys production, it may be necessary to utilize alternative sources of capital to continue the Companys strategic investment plan during periods of low commodity prices. As a result, the Company frequently evaluates the options available with respect to sources of short and long-term capital resources. The Company believes that it has sufficient liquidity to sustain its operations, fund capital programs and meet non-cancellable contractual obligations and commitments in the short and long-term principally by cash generated from operating activities, cash on hand, the issuance of equity, the issuance of debt, borrowings under committed and uncommitted credit facilities and cash proceeds from asset sales. The Company is continually examining its options with respect to sources of long and short-term capital resources to ensure it retains financial flexibility.
At December 31, 2019, the Company had the following available credit facilities:
Credit Facilities ($ millions) |
Available | Unused | ||||||
Operating facilities(1) |
900 | 464 | ||||||
Syndicated credit facilities(2) |
4,000 | 3,450 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
4,900 | 3,914 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
(1) | Consists of demand credit facilities. |
(2) | Commercial paper outstanding is supported by the Companys syndicated credit facilities. |
At December 31, 2019, the Company had $3,914 million of unused credit facilities of which $3,450 million are long-term committed credit facilities and $464 million are short-term uncommitted credit facilities. A total of $436 million short-term uncommitted borrowing credit facilities was used in support of outstanding letters of credit and $550 million of long-term committed borrowing credit facilities was used in support of commercial paper. At December 31, 2019, the Company had no direct borrowing against committed credit facilities. The maturity dates for the Companys revolving syndicated credit facilities are June 19, 2022 and March 9, 2024. The Companys ability to renew existing bank credit facilities and raise new debt is dependent upon maintaining an investment grade credit rating and the condition of capital and credit markets. Credit ratings may be affected by the Companys level of debt, from time to time.
The Companys share capital is not subject to external restrictions. The Companys leverage covenant under both of its revolving syndicated credit facilities is debt to capital and calculated as total debt (long-term debt including long-term debt due within one year and short-term debt) and certain adjusting items specified in the agreement divided by total debt, shareholders equity and certain adjusting items specified in the agreement. These covenants are used to assess the Companys financial strength. If the Company does not comply with the covenants under the syndicated credit facilities, there is risk that repayment could be accelerated. The Company was in compliance with the syndicated credit facility covenants at December 31, 2019, and assessed the risk of non-compliance to be low.
Sunrise Oil Sands Partnership has an unsecured demand credit facility of $10 million available for general purposes. The Companys proportionate share is $5 million. There were no amounts drawn on this demand credit facility at December 31, 2019.
On January 29, 2018, the Company filed a universal short form base shelf prospectus (the 2018 U.S. Shelf Prospectus) with the Alberta Securities Commission. On January 30, 2018, the Companys related U.S. registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) containing the 2018 U.S. Shelf Prospectus became effective which enables the Company to offer up to US$3.0 billion of debt securities, common shares, preferred shares, subscription receipts, warrants and units of the Company in the U.S. up to and including February 29, 2020. During the 25-month period that the 2018 U.S. Shelf Prospectus and the related U.S. registration statement are effective, securities may be offered in amounts, at prices and on terms set forth in a prospectus supplement.
On March 15, 2019, the Company issued US$750 million in senior unsecured notes. The notes bear an annual interest rate of 4.40% and are due on April 15, 2029. The Company raised the net proceeds of the offering for general corporate purposes, which included the repayment of certain outstanding debt securities that matured in 2019.
Husky Energy Inc. | Managements Discussion and Analysis 2019 | 35
On May 1, 2019, the Company filed a universal short form base shelf prospectus (the 2019 Canadian Shelf Prospectus) with applicable securities regulators in each of the provinces of Canada that enables the Company to offer up to $3.0 billion of common shares, preferred shares, debt securities, subscription receipts, warrants and other units in Canada up to and including June 1, 2021. The 2019 Canadian Shelf Prospectus replaced the Companys Canadian universal short form base shelf prospectus which expired on April 30, 2019. During the 25-month period that the 2019 Canadian Shelf Prospectus is in effect, securities may be offered in amounts, at prices and on terms set forth in a prospectus supplement.
On June 17, 2019, the Company repaid the maturing 6.15% notes. The amount paid to note holders was $402 million.
On December 16, 2019, the Company repaid the maturing 7.25% notes. The amount paid to note holders was $987 million.
As at December 31, 2019, the Company had $3.0 billion in unused capacity under the 2019 Canadian Shelf Prospectus and US$2.25 billion in unused capacity under the 2018 U.S. Shelf Prospectus and related U.S. registration statement. The ability of the Company to utilize the capacity under the 2019 Canadian Shelf Prospectus and the 2018 U.S. Shelf Prospectus and related U.S. registration statement is subject to market conditions at the time of sale.
Net Debt
The Company had total debt of $5,520 million and cash and cash equivalents of $1,775 million at December 31, 2019, compared to total debt of $5,747 million and cash and cash equivalents of $2,866 million at December 31, 2018. The Companys net debt at December 31, 2019 increased by $864 million when compared to December 31, 2018:
Net Debt(1) ($ millions) |
December 31, 2019 | December 31, 2018 | ||||||
Net debt at beginning of period |
(2,881 | ) | (2,927 | ) | ||||
Change in net debt due to: |
||||||||
Funds from operations(1) |
3,251 | 4,004 | ||||||
Long-term debt issuance |
1,000 | | ||||||
Long-term debt repayment |
(1,389 | ) | | |||||
Short-term debt issuance, net |
350 | | ||||||
Debt issue costs |
(9 | ) | | |||||
Dividends on common shares |
(503 | ) | (402 | ) | ||||
Dividends on preferred shares |
(35 | ) | (35 | ) | ||||
Finance lease payments |
(233 | ) | | |||||
Capital expenditures |
(3,432 | ) | (3,578 | ) | ||||
Capitalized interest |
(177 | ) | (108 | ) | ||||
Corporate acquisition |
| (15 | ) | |||||
Proceeds from asset sales |
277 | 4 | ||||||
Investment in joint ventures |
(40 | ) | (40 | ) | ||||
Change in non-cash working capital |
(104 | ) | 485 | |||||
Other |
1 | (27 | ) | |||||
Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents |
(48 | ) | 65 | |||||
Effect of exchange rates on long-term debt |
227 | (307 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
(864 | ) | 46 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net debt at end of period |
(3,745 | ) | (2,881 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
(1) | Net debt and funds from operations are non-GAAP measures. Refer to Section 9.3 for reconciliations to the corresponding GAAP measures. |
During the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Companys capital expenditures were primarily funded by funds from operations. The Companys funds from operations are dependent on a number of factors, including commodity prices, production and sales volumes, refining and marketing margins, operating expenses, taxes, royalties and foreign exchange rates. Management prepares capital expenditure budgets annually which are regularly monitored and updated to adapt to changes in market factors. In addition, the Company requires authorizations for capital expenditures on projects, which assists with the management of capital.
6.4 Capital Structure
Capital Structure | December 31, 2019 |
|||
($ millions) |
Outstanding | |||
Total debt(1) |
5,520 | |||
Shareholders equity |
17,296 |
Husky Energy Inc. | Managements Discussion and Analysis 2019 | 36
(1) | Total debt is a non-GAAP measure. Refer to Section 9.3 for a reconciliation to the corresponding GAAP measure. |
The Companys objectives when managing capital are to maintain a flexible capital structure, which optimizes the cost of capital at acceptable risk, and to maintain investor, creditor and market confidence to sustain the future development of the business. The Company manages its capital structure and makes adjustments as economic conditions and the risk characteristics of its underlying assets change. The Company considers its capital structure to include shareholders equity and debt, which was $22.8 billion at December 31, 2019 (December 31, 2018 $25.4 billion). To maintain or adjust the capital structure, the Company may, from time to time, issue shares, raise debt and/or adjust its capital spending to manage its current and projected debt levels.
The Company monitors its financing requirements and capital structure using, among other things, non-GAAP financial metrics consisting of debt to capital employed and debt to funds from operations (refer to Section 9.3). At December 31, 2019, debt to capital employed was 24.2% (December 31, 2018 22.7%) and debt to funds from operations was 1.7 times (December 31, 2018 1.4 times). The Company is subject to a leverage covenant in its credit facilities that limits debt to capital (subject to specific definitions in the credit agreements) to less than 65%. The Company is in compliance with this covenant and considers the risk of non-compliance low. The Company also targets a debt to funds from operations ratio of less than 2.0 times over the longer term.
To facilitate the management of these ratios, the Company prepares annual budgets, which are updated depending on varying factors such as general market conditions and successful capital deployment. The annual budget is approved by the Board of Directors.
6.5 Contractual Obligations, Commitments and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Contractual Obligations and Other Commercial Commitments
In the normal course of business, the Company is obligated to make future payments. The following summarizes known non-cancellable contracts and other commercial commitments:
Contractual Obligations
Payments due by period ($ millions) |
2020 | 2021-2022 | 2023-2024 | Thereafter | Total | |||||||||||||||
Long-term debt and interest on fixed rate debt |
612 | 1,040 | 1,303 | 3,775 | 6,730 | |||||||||||||||
Operating agreements(1) |
75 | 155 | 155 | 666 | 1,051 | |||||||||||||||
Firm transportation agreements(1) |
576 | 1,189 | 1,188 | 4,203 | 7,156 | |||||||||||||||
Unconditional purchase obligations(2) |
2,224 | 3,212 | 2,305 | 5,143 | 12,884 | |||||||||||||||
Lease rentals and exploration work agreements |
79 | 102 | 113 | 866 | 1,160 | |||||||||||||||
Obligations to fund equity investee(3) |
54 | 141 | 149 | 359 | 703 | |||||||||||||||
Lease obligations(4) |
205 | 340 | 313 | 2,174 | 3,032 | |||||||||||||||
Asset retirement obligations |
112 | 253 | 244 | 9,371 | 9,980 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
3,937 | 6,432 | 5,770 | 26,557 | 42,696 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | Included in the total of operating agreements and firm transportation agreements are blending and storage agreements and transportation commitments of $1.1 billion and $1.8 billion respectively with HMLP. |
(2) | Includes processing services, distribution services, insurance premiums, drilling services, natural gas purchases and the purchase of refined petroleum products. |
(3) | Equity investee refers to the Companys investment in Husky-CNOOC Madura Ltd. joint venture, which is accounted for under the equity method for consolidated financial statement purposes. |
(4) | Refer to Note 10 in the 2019 consolidated financial statements. |
During the three months ended December 31, 2019, the Company entered into a new agreement totaling an incremental $2.2 billion for a term of five years to purchase refined products for the purpose of supporting the retail network.
Other Obligations
The Company is involved in various claims and litigation arising in the normal course of business. While the outcome of these matters is uncertain and there can be no assurance that such matters will be resolved in the Companys favour, the Company does not currently believe that decisions in any pending or threatened proceedings related to these and other matters, or any amount which it may be required to pay, would have a material adverse impact on its financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
The Company has income tax filings that are subject to audit and potential reassessment. The findings may impact the tax liability of the Company. The final results are not reasonably determinable at this time. Management believes that it has adequately provided for current and deferred income taxes.
In accordance with the provisions of the regulations of the Peoples Republic of China, the Company is required to deposit funds into separate accounts restricted to the funding of future asset retirement obligations in offshore China. As at December 31, 2019, the Company has deposited funds of $142 million, which has been reclassified as non-current.
Husky Energy Inc. | Managements Discussion and Analysis 2019 | 37
The Company is also subject to various contingent obligations that become payable only if certain events or rulings occur. The inherent uncertainty surrounding the timing and financial impact of these events or rulings prevents any meaningful measurement, which is necessary to assess their impact on future liquidity. Such obligations include environmental contingencies, contingent consideration and potential settlements resulting from litigation.
The Company has a number of contingent environmental liabilities, which individually have been estimated to be immaterial. These contingent environmental liabilities are primarily related to the migration of contamination at fuel outlets and certain legacy sites where the Company had previously conducted operations. The contingent environmental liabilities involved have been considered in aggregate and based on reasonable estimates the Company does not believe they will result, in aggregate, in a material adverse effect on its financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
The Company does not believe it has any guarantees or off-balance sheet arrangements that have, or are reasonably likely to have, a current or future effect on the Companys financial condition, results of operations, liquidity or capital expenditures.
Standby Letters of Credit
On occasion, the Company issues letters of credit in connection with transactions in which the counterparty requires such security.
6.6 Transactions with Related Parties
The Company performs management services as the operator of the assets held by HMLP for which it recovers shared service costs. The Company is also the contractor for HMLP and constructs its assets on a cost recovery basis with certain restrictions. HMLP charges an access fee to the Company for the use of its pipeline systems in performing the Companys blending business, and the Company also pays for transportation and storage services. These transactions are related party transactions, as the Company has a 35% ownership interest in HMLP and the remaining ownership interests in HMLP belong to Power Assets Holdings Limited and CK Infrastructure Holdings Limited, which are affiliates of one of the Companys principal shareholders. For the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company charged HMLP $424 million related to construction costs and management services. For the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company had purchases from HMLP of $219 million related to the use of the pipeline for the Companys blending, transportation and storage activities. As at December 31, 2019, the Company had $143 million due from HMLP and $16 million due to HMLP.
6.7 Outstanding Share Data
Authorized:
| unlimited number of common shares |
| unlimited number of preferred shares |
Issued and outstanding: February 24, 2020
common shares |
1,005,121,738 | |||
cumulative redeemable preferred shares, series 1 |
10,435,932 | |||
cumulative redeemable preferred shares, series 2 |
1,564,068 | |||
cumulative redeemable preferred shares, series 3 |
10,000,000 | |||
cumulative redeemable preferred shares, series 5 |
8,000,000 | |||
cumulative redeemable preferred shares, series 7 |
6,000,000 | |||
stock options |
17,369,033 | |||
stock options exercisable |
9,586,551 |
Husky Energy Inc. | Managements Discussion and Analysis 2019 | 38
7.0 Critical Accounting Estimates and Key Judgments
The Companys consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with IFRS as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). Significant accounting policies are disclosed in Note 3 to the 2019 consolidated financial statements. Certain of the Companys accounting policies require subjective judgment and estimation about uncertain circumstances.
7.1 Accounting Estimates
Estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognized in the period in which the estimates are revised and on a prospective basis. By their nature, estimates are subject to measurement uncertainty and changes in such estimates in future years could require a material change in the consolidated financial statements. These underlying assumptions are based on historical experience and other factors that management believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, and are subject to change as new events occur, as more industry experience is acquired, as additional information is obtained, and as the Companys operating environment changes. Specifically, amounts recorded for depletion, depreciation, amortization and impairment, recoveries from insurance claims, asset retirement obligations, assets and liabilities measured at fair value, employee future benefits, income taxes and reserves and contingencies are based on estimates.
Depletion, Depreciation, Amortization and Impairment
Eligible costs associated with oil and gas activities are capitalized on a unit of measure basis. Depletion expense is subject to estimates including petroleum and natural gas reserves, future petroleum and natural gas prices, estimated future remediation costs, future interest rates as well as other fair value assumptions. The aggregate of capitalized costs, net of accumulated DD&A, less estimated salvage values, is charged to DD&A over the life of the proved developed reserves using the unit of production method, except in the case of assets whose useful life is shorter or longer than the lifetime of the proved developed reserves of that field, in which case the straight-line method or a unit-of-production method based on total proved plus probable reserves is applied.
Impairment and Reversals of Impairment of Non-Financial Assets
The carrying amounts of the Companys non-financial assets are reviewed at the end of each reporting period to determine whether there is any indication of impairment or reversal of impairment. Determining whether there are any indications of impairment, or reversal of impairment, requires significant judgment of external factors, such as an extended change in prices or margins for oil and gas commodities or products, a significant change in an assets market value, a significant change and revision of estimated volumes, revision of future development costs, a change in the entitys market capitalization or significant changes in the technological, market, economic or legal environment that would have an adverse impact on the entity. If impairment, or reversal of impairments, is indicated the amount by which the carrying value is different from the estimated recoverable amount of the long-lived asset is charged to net earnings.
The determination of the recoverable amount for impairment, or reversal of impairment, involves the use of numerous assumptions and estimates. Estimates of future cash flows used in the evaluation of assets are made using managements forecasts of commodity prices, operating costs and future capital expenditures, marketing supply and demand, forecasted crack spreads, growth rate, discount rate and, in the case of oil and gas properties, expected production volumes. Expected production volumes take into account assessments of field reservoir performance and include expectations about proved and probable volumes and where applicable economically recoverable resources associated with interests in certain Husky properties which are risk-weighted utilizing geological, production, recovery, market price and economic projections. Either the cash flow estimates or the discount rate is risk-adjusted to reflect local conditions as appropriate. Future revisions to these assumptions impact the recoverable amount.
Impairment losses recognized for assets in prior years are assessed at the end of each reporting period for indications that the impairment has decreased or no longer exists. An impairment loss is reversed only to the extent that the carrying amount of the asset or cash generating units (CGUs) does not exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined, net of depletion, depreciation and amortization, if no impairment loss had been recognized.
Asset Retirement Obligations
Estimating asset retirement obligations requires that the Company estimates costs that are many years in the future. Restoration technologies and costs are constantly changing, as are regulatory, political, environment, safety and public relations considerations. Inherent in the calculation of asset retirement obligations are numerous assumptions and estimates, including the ultimate settlement amounts, future third-party pricing, inflation factors, credit-adjusted discount rates, timing of settlement and changes in the legal, regulatory, environmental and political environments. Future revisions to these assumptions may result in changes to the asset retirement obligations.
Husky Energy Inc. | Managements Discussion and Analysis 2019 | 39
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The Companys financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, restricted cash, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, short-term debt, long-term debt, derivatives, portions of other assets, lease liabilities and other long-term liabilities. Derivative instruments are measured at fair value through profit or loss. The Companys remaining financial instruments are measured at amortized cost. For financial instruments measured at amortized cost, the carrying values approximate their fair value with the exception of long-term debt.
The Companys financial assets and liabilities that are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis have been categorized into one of three categories based upon the fair value hierarchy. Level 1 fair value measurements are determined by reference to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities. Fair value measurements of assets and liabilities in Level 2 include valuations using inputs other than quoted prices but for which all significant outputs are observable, either directly or indirectly. Level 3 fair value measurements are based on inputs that are unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement.
The fair values of derivatives are determined using valuation models which require assumptions concerning the amount and timing of future cash flows and discount rates. These estimates are also subject to change with fluctuations in commodity prices, interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and estimates of non-performance. The actual settlement of a derivative instrument could differ materially from the fair value recorded and could impact future results.
Employee Future Benefits
The determination of the cost of the defined benefit pension plan and the other post-retirement benefit plans reflects a number of estimates that affect expected future benefit payments. These estimates include, but are not limited to, attrition, mortality, the rate of return on pension plan assets, salary escalations for the defined benefit pension plan and expected health care cost trends for the post-retirement health and dental care plan. The fair value of the plan assets is used for the purposes of calculating the expected return on plan assets.
Income Taxes
The determination of the Companys income and other tax liabilities requires interpretation of complex laws and regulations often involving multiple jurisdictions. Estimates that require significant judgments are also made with respect to the timing of temporary difference reversals, the realizability of tax assets and in circumstances where the transaction and calculations for which the ultimate tax determination are uncertain. All tax filings are subject to audit and potential reassessment, often after the passage of considerable time. Accordingly, the actual income tax liability may differ significantly from that estimated and recorded by management.
Legal, Environmental Remediation and Other Contingent Matters
The Company is required to determine both whether a loss is probable based on judgment and interpretation of laws and regulations and whether the loss can be reasonably estimated. When a loss is determined it is charged to net earnings. The Company must continually monitor known and potential contingent matters and make appropriate provisions by charges to net earnings when warranted by circumstances.
7.2 Key Judgments
Management makes judgments regarding the application of IFRS for each accounting policy. Critical judgments that have the most significant effect on the amounts recognized in the consolidated financial statements include determination of technical feasibility and commercial viability, impairment assessments, the determination of CGUs, changes in reserve estimates, the determination of a joint arrangement, the designation of the Companys functional currency and the fair value of related party transactions.
Exploration and Evaluation Costs
Costs directly associated with an exploration well are initially capitalized as exploration and evaluation assets. Expenditures related to wells that do not find reserves or where no future activity is planned are expensed as exploration and evaluation expenses. Exploration and evaluation costs are excluded from costs subject to depletion until technical feasibility and commercial viability is assessed or production commences. At that time, costs are either transferred to property, plant and equipment or their value is impaired. Impairment is charged directly to net earnings. Drilling results, required operating costs and capital expenditure and estimated reserves are important judgments when making this determination and may change as new information becomes available.
Impairment of Financial Assets
A financial asset is assessed at the end of each reporting period to determine whether it is impaired based on objective evidence indicating that one or more events have had a negative effect on the estimated future cash flows of that asset. Objective evidence used by the Company to assess impairment of financial assets includes quoted market prices for similar financial assets and historical collection rates. Given that the calculations for the net present value of estimated future cash flows related to derivative financial assets require the use of estimates and assumptions, including forecasts of commodity prices, marketing supply and demand, product margins and expected production volumes, it is possible that the assumptions may change, which may require a material adjustment to the carrying value of financial assets.
Husky Energy Inc. | Managements Discussion and Analysis 2019 | 40
Cash Generating Units
The Companys assets are grouped into respective CGUs, which is the smallest identifiable group of assets, liabilities and associated goodwill that generates cash inflows that are largely independent of the cash inflows from other assets or groups of assets. The determination of the Companys CGUs is subject to managements judgment.
Reserves
Oil and gas reserves are evaluated internally and audited by independent qualified reserve engineers. The estimation of reserves is an inherently complex process and involves the exercise of professional judgment. Estimates are based on projected future rates of production, estimated commodity prices, engineering data and the timing of future expenditures, all of which are subject to uncertainty. Changes in reserve estimates can have an impact on reported net earnings through revisions to depletion, depreciation and amortization expense, in addition to determining possible impairments and reversal of impairments of property, plant and equipment.
Net reserves represent the Companys undivided gross working interest in total reserves after deducting crown, freehold and overriding royalty interests. Assumptions reflect market and regulatory conditions, as applicable, as at the balance sheet date and could differ significantly from other points in time throughout the year or future periods. Changes in market and regulatory conditions and assumptions can materially impact the estimation of net reserves.
Joint Arrangements
Joint arrangements represent activities where the Company has joint control established by a contractual agreement. Joint control requires unanimous consent for financial and operational decisions. A joint arrangement is either a joint operation, whereby the parties have rights to the assets and obligations for the liabilities, or a joint venture, whereby the parties have rights to the net assets.
Classification of a joint arrangement as either joint operation or joint venture requires judgment. Managements considerations include, but are not limited to, determining if the arrangement is structured through a separate vehicle and whether the legal form and contractual arrangements give the entity direct rights to the assets and obligations for the liabilities within the normal course of business. Other facts and circumstances are also assessed by management, including the entitys rights to the economic benefits of assets and its involvement and responsibility for settling liabilities associated with the arrangement.
Functional and Presentation Currency
Functional currency is the currency of the primary economic environment in which the Company and its subsidiaries operate and is normally the currency in which the entity primarily generates and expends cash. The designation of the Companys functional currency is a management judgment based on the composition of revenues and costs in the locations in which it operates.
Related Party Judgments and Estimates
The Company entered into transactions and agreements in the normal course of business with certain related parties, joint arrangements and associates. Proceeds for disposition of assets to related parties are recognized at fair value, based on discounted cash flow forecast from those assets. Independent opinions of the fair value may be obtained. Changes in the assumptions used to determine these fair values may result in a material difference in the proceeds and any gain or loss on disposition.
Husky Energy Inc. | Managements Discussion and Analysis 2019 | 41
8.0 Recent Accounting Standards and Changes in Accounting Policies
Recent Accounting Standards
The Company has not early adopted any standard, interpretation or amendment that has been issued but is not yet effective.
Change in Accounting Policy
Leases
In January 2016, the IASB issued IFRS 16 Leases (IFRS 16), which replaces the existing IFRS guidance on leases: IAS 17 Leases (IAS 17). Under IAS 17, lessees were required to determine if the lease is a finance or operating lease, based on specified criteria of whether the lease transferred significantly all the risks and rewards associated with ownership of the underlying asset. Finance leases were recognized on the balance sheet while operating leases were recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) when the expense was incurred. Under IFRS 16, lessees must recognize a lease liability and a right-of-use asset for most lease contracts. The recognition of the present value of the lease payments for certain contracts previously classified as operating leases resulted in increases to assets, liabilities, depletion, depreciation and amortization and finance expense, and a decrease to production, operating and transportation expense, purchases of crude oil and products and selling, general and administrative expenses.
The Company adopted IFRS 16 on January 1, 2019 using the modified retrospective approach. The modified retrospective approach does not require restatement of prior period financial information as it recognizes the cumulative effect as an adjustment to opening retained earnings and applies the standard prospectively. Accordingly, comparative information in the Companys financial statements are not restated.
On adoption, lease liabilities were measured at the present value of the remaining lease payments discounted using the Companys incremental borrowing rate on January 1, 2019. Right-of-use assets were measured at an amount equal to the lease liability. For leases previously classified as operating leases, the Company applied the exemption not to recognize right-of-use assets and liabilities for leases with a lease term of less than 12 months, excluded initial direct costs from measuring the right-of-use asset at the date of initial application and applied a single discount rate to a portfolio of leases with similar characteristics. For leases that were previously classified as finance leases under IAS 17, the carrying amount of the lease asset and lease liability remain unchanged upon transition and were determined at the carrying amount immediately before adoption date. Additionally, instead of an impairment review, the Company adjusted the right-of-use assets by the amount of IAS 37 onerous contract provision immediately before the date of initial application.
No adjustments were required upon transition to IFRS 16 for leases where the Company is a lessor. Under IFRS 16, the Company is required to assess the classification of a sub-lease with reference to the right-of-use asset, not the underlying asset. On transition, the Company reassessed the classification of any sub-lease contracts previously assessed under IAS 17. No changes to sublease classification or associated accounting treatment was required.
Financial Statement Impact
The recognition of the present value of lease payments resulted in an additional $1.3 billion of right-of-use assets and associated lease liabilities. The Company has recognized lease liabilities in relation to lease arrangements previously disclosed as operating lease commitments under IAS 17 that meet the criteria of a lease under IFRS 16. Upon recognition in the consolidated statement of financial position, the Companys weighted average incremental borrowing rate used in measuring lease liabilities was 3.58%.
Husky Energy Inc. | Managements Discussion and Analysis 2019 | 42
9.0 Reader Advisories
9.1 Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements in this document are forward-looking statements and information (collectively, forward-looking statements), within the meaning of the applicable Canadian securities legislation, Section 21E of the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 27A of the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The forward-looking statements contained in this document are forward-looking and not historical facts.
Some of the forward-looking statements may be identified by statements that express, or involve discussions as to, expectations, beliefs, plans, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance (often, but not always, through the use of words or phrases such as will likely result, are expected to, will continue, is anticipated, is targeting, is estimated, intend, plan, projection, could, aim, vision, goals, objective, target, schedules and outlook). In particular, forward-looking statements in this document include, but are not limited to, references to:
| with respect to the business, operations and results of the Company generally: the Companys general strategic plans and growth strategies; the Companys 2020 production guidance, including guidance for specified areas and product types; the Companys objective of maintaining stated debt to funds from operations; and the Companys 2020 Upstream capital expenditure program; |
| with respect to the Companys thermal developments, the expected timing of first production from the Spruce Lake Central, Spruce Lake North, Spruce Lake East, Edam Central and Dee Valley 2 projects; |
| with respect to the Companys Offshore business in Asia Pacific: the expected timing of commencement of construction activities, installation of the control system and connecting flow lines and first gas production at Liuhua 29-1; the expected timing of additional appraisal drilling at Block 15/33; the expected timing of drilling five MDA and two MBH field production wells, and the expected timing of first gas production and sales therefrom; the expected timing of development of a floating production unit to process gas at MDA and MBH; and plans to develop the additional MDK shallow water field; |
| with respect to the Companys Offshore business in the Atlantic, the expected timing of first production from the West White Rose Project; |
| with respect to the Companys Infrastructure and Marketing business, the expected timing of completion of construction of storage tanks at the Hardisty Terminal; and |
| with respect to the Companys Downstream operating segment: plans to market and potentially sell the Retail and Commercial Fuels Network; the timing of ramp-up to full rates at the Lima Refinery; the expected investment in the rebuild of the Superior Refinery and anticipated insurance recoveries for property damage and lost income associated therewith; and the expected timing of resumption of full operations at the Superior Refinery. |
In addition, statements relating to reserves are deemed to be forward-looking statements as they involve the implied assessment based on certain estimates and assumptions that the reserves described can be profitably produced in the future. There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities of reserves and in projecting future rates of production and the timing of development expenditures. The total amount or timing of actual future production may vary from reserves and production estimates.
Although the Company believes that the expectations reflected by the forward-looking statements presented in this document are reasonable, the Companys forward-looking statements have been based on assumptions and factors concerning future events, including the timing of regulatory approvals, that may prove to be inaccurate. Those assumptions and factors are based on information currently available to the Company about itself and the businesses in which it operates. Information used in developing forward-looking statements has been acquired from various sources, including third party consultants, suppliers and regulators, among others.
Because actual results or outcomes could differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements, investors should not place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements. By their nature, forward-looking statements involve numerous assumptions, inherent risks and uncertainties, both general and specific, which contribute to the possibility that the predicted outcomes will not occur. Some of these risks, uncertainties and other factors are similar to those faced by other oil and gas companies and some are unique to the Company.
The Companys Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2019 and other documents filed with securities regulatory authorities (accessible through the SEDAR website www.sedar.com and the EDGAR website www.sec.gov) describe risks, material assumptions and other factors that could influence actual results and are incorporated herein by reference.
Husky Energy Inc. | Managements Discussion and Analysis 2019 | 43
New factors emerge from time to time and it is not possible for management to predict all of such factors and to assess in advance the impact of each such factor on the Companys business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement. The impact of any one factor on a particular forward-looking statement is not determinable with certainty as such factors are dependent upon other factors, and the Companys course of action would depend upon managements assessment of the future considering all information available to it at the relevant time. Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which such statement is made and, except as required by applicable securities laws, the Company undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which such statement is made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.
9.2 Oil and Gas Reserves Reporting
Disclosure of Oil and Gas Reserves and Other Oil and Gas Information
Unless otherwise indicated: (i) reserves estimates have been prepared by internal qualified reserves evaluators in accordance with the Canadian Oil and Gas Evaluation Handbook, has been audited and reviewed by Sproule, an independent qualified reserves auditor, have an effective date of December 31, 2019 and represent the Companys working interest share (ii) projected and historical production volumes quoted are gross, which represents the total or the Companys working interest, as applicable share before deduction of royalties (iii) all Husky working interest production volumes quoted are before deduction of royalties; and (iv) historical production volumes provided are for the year ended December 31, 2019.
The Company uses the term barrels of oil equivalent (boe), which is consistent with other oil and gas companies disclosures, and is calculated on an energy equivalence basis applicable at the burner tip whereby one barrel of crude oil is equivalent to six thousand cubic feet of natural gas. The term boe is used to express the sum of the total company products in one unit that can be used for comparisons. Readers are cautioned that the term boe may be misleading, particularly if used in isolation. This measure is used for consistency with other oil and gas companies but does not represent value equivalency at the wellhead.
The Company uses the term reserves replacement ratio, which is consistent with other oil and gas companies disclosures. Reserves replacement ratios for a given period are determined by taking the Companys incremental proved reserves additions for that period divided by the Companys Upstream gross production for the same period. The reserves replacement ratio measures the amount of reserves added to a companys reserves base during a given period relative to the amount of oil and gas produced during that same period. A companys reserves replacement ratio must be at least 100% for the company to maintain its reserves. The reserves replacement ratio only measures the amount of reserves added to a companys reserve base during a given period. Reserves replacement ratios that exclude economic factors will exclude the impacts that changing oil and gas prices have.
Note to U.S. Readers
The Company reports its reserves information in accordance with Canadian practices and specifically in accordance with NI 51-101. Because the Company is permitted to prepare its reserves information in accordance with Canadian disclosure requirements, it may use certain terms in that disclosure that U.S. oil and gas companies generally do not include or may be prohibited from including in their filings with the SEC.
Husky Energy Inc. | Managements Discussion and Analysis 2019 | 44
9.3 Non-GAAP Measures
Disclosure of non-GAAP Measures
The Company uses measures primarily based on IFRS and also uses some secondary non-GAAP measures. The non-GAAP measures included in this MD&A and related disclosures are: funds from operations, free cash flow, total debt, net debt, operating netback, debt to capital employed, debt to funds from operations and sustaining capital. None of these measures is used to enhance the Companys reported financial performance or position. There are no comparable measures in accordance with IFRS for operating netback, debt to capital employed or debt to funds from operations. These are useful complementary measures that are used by management in assessing the Companys financial performance, efficiency and liquidity, and they may be used by the Companys investors for the same purpose. The non-GAAP measures do not have standardized meanings prescribed by IFRS and therefore are unlikely to be comparable to similar measures presented by other issuers. They are common in the reports of other companies but may differ by definition and application. All non-GAAP measures are defined below.
Debt to Capital Employed
Debt to capital employed percentage is a non-GAAP measure and is equal to total debt divided by capital employed. Capital employed is equal to total debt and shareholders equity. Management believes this measurement assists management and investors in evaluating the Companys financial strength.
Debt to Funds from Operations
Debt to funds from operations is a non-GAAP measure and is equal to total debt divided by funds from operations. Funds from operations is equal to cash flow operating activities excluding change in non-cash working capital. Management believes this measurement assists management and investors in evaluating the Companys financial strength.
The following table shows the reconciliation of debt to funds from operations for the periods ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017:
Debt to Funds from Operations ($ millions) |
December 31, 2019 | December 31, 2018 | December 31, 2017 | |||||||||
Total debt |
5,520 | 5,747 | 5,440 | |||||||||
Funds from operations |
3,251 | 4,004 | 3,306 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Debt to funds from operations |
1.7 | 1.4 | 1.6 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funds from Operations and Free Cash Flow
Funds from operations is a non-GAAP measure which should not be considered an alternative to, or more meaningful than, cash flow operating activities as determined in accordance with IFRS, as an indicator of financial performance. Funds from operations equals cash flow operating activities excluding change in non-cash working capital. Management believes that impacts of non-cash working capital items on cash flow operating activities may reduce comparability between periods, accordingly, funds from operations is presented in the Companys financial reports to assist management and investors in analyzing operating performance of the Company in the stated period compared to prior periods.
Free cash flow is a non-GAAP measure, which should not be considered an alternative to, or more meaningful than, cash flow operating activities as determined in accordance with IFRS, as an indicator of financial performance. Free cash flow is presented to assist management and investors in analyzing operating performance by the business in the stated period. Free cash flow equals funds from operations less capital expenditures.
Free cash flow was restated in the fourth quarter of 2018 in order to be more comparable to similar non-GAAP measures presented by other companies. Changes from prior period presentation include the removal of investment in joint ventures. Prior periods have been restated to conform to current presentation.
Husky Energy Inc. | Managements Discussion and Analysis 2019 | 45
The following table shows the reconciliation of net earnings to funds from operations and free cash flow, and related per share amounts for the three months and years ended December 31:
Reconciliation of Cash Flow |
Three months ended | Year ended | ||||||||||||||||||
($ millions) |
Dec. 31 2019 |
Dec. 31 2018 |
Dec. 31 2019 |
Dec. 31 2018 |
Dec. 31 2017 |
|||||||||||||||
Net earnings |
(2,341 | ) | 216 | (1,370 | ) | 1,457 | 786 | |||||||||||||
Items not affecting cash: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Accretion |
27 | 25 | 106 | 97 | 112 | |||||||||||||||
Depletion, depreciation, amortization and impairment |
3,520 | 662 | 5,496 | 2,591 | 2,882 | |||||||||||||||
Inventory write-down to net realizable value |
15 | 60 | 15 | 60 | | |||||||||||||||
Exploration and evaluation expenses |
332 | 22 | 355 | 29 | 6 | |||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes (recoveries) |
(789 | ) | 25 | (974 | ) | 396 | (359 | ) | ||||||||||||
Foreign exchange loss (gain) |
(11 | ) | 1 | (26 | ) | (6 | ) | (4 | ) | |||||||||||
Stock-based compensation |
(13 | ) | (50 | ) | (2 | ) | 44 | 45 | ||||||||||||
Gain on sale of assets |
(3 | ) | | (8 | ) | (4 | ) | (46 | ) | |||||||||||
Unrealized market to market loss (gain) |
(13 | ) | (16 | ) | 44 | (150 | ) | 56 | ||||||||||||
Share of equity investment gain |
5 | (16 | ) | (59 | ) | (69 | ) | (61 | ) | |||||||||||
Gain on insurance recoveries for damage to property |
(194 | ) | (253 | ) | (207 | ) | (253 | ) | | |||||||||||
Other |
11 | 2 | 12 | 21 | 16 | |||||||||||||||
Settlement of asset retirement obligations |
(90 | ) | (65 | ) | (276 | ) | (181 | ) | (136 | ) | ||||||||||
Deferred revenue |
(14 | ) | (30 | ) | (42 | ) | (100 | ) | (16 | ) | ||||||||||
Distribution from joint ventures |
27 | | 187 | 72 | 25 | |||||||||||||||
Change in non-cash working capital |
397 | 730 | (280 | ) | 130 | 398 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Cash flow operating activities |
866 | 1,313 | 2,971 | 4,134 | 3,704 | |||||||||||||||
Change in non-cash working capital |
(397 | ) | (730 | ) | 280 | (130 | ) | (398 | ) | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Funds from operations |
469 | 583 | 3,251 | 4,004 | 3,306 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Capital expenditures |
(894 | ) | (1,265 | ) | (3,432 | ) | (3,578 | ) | (2,220 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Free cash flow |
(425 | ) | (682 | ) | (181 | ) | 426 | 1,086 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Funds from operations basic |
0.47 | 0.58 | 3.23 | 3.98 | 3.29 | |||||||||||||||
Funds from operations diluted |
0.47 | 0.58 | 3.23 | 3.98 | 3.29 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Debt
Net debt is a non-GAAP measure that equals total debt less cash and cash equivalents. Management believes this measurement assists management and investors in evaluating the Companys financial strength.
The following table shows the reconciliation of total debt to net debt as at December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017:
Net Debt ($ millions) |
December 31, 2019 |
December 31, 2018 |
December 31, 2017 |
|||||||||
Total debt |
5,520 | 5,747 | 5,440 | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
(1,775 | ) | (2,866 | ) | (2,513 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net debt |
3,745 | 2,881 | 2,927 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Netback
Operating netback is a common non-GAAP metric used in the oil and gas industry. Management believes this measurement assists management and investors to evaluate the specific operating performance by product at the oil and gas lease level. Operating netback is calculated as gross revenue less royalties, production and operating and transportation costs on a per unit basis.
Husky Energy Inc. | Managements Discussion and Analysis 2019 | 46
Total debt
Total debt is a non-GAAP measure that equals the sum of long-term debt, long-term debt due within one year and short-term debt. Management believes this measurement assists management and investors in evaluating the Companys financial strength.
The following table shows the reconciliation of total debt as at December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017:
Total Debt ($ millions) |
December 31, 2019 |
December 31, 2018 |
December 31, 2017 |
|||||||||
Short-term debt |
550 | 200 | 200 | |||||||||
Long-term debt due within one year |
400 | 1,433 | | |||||||||
Long-term debt |
4,570 | 4,114 | 5,240 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total debt |
5,520 | 5,747 | 5,440 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sustaining Capital
Sustaining capital is the additional development capital that is required by the business to maintain production and operations at existing levels. Development capital includes the cost to drill, complete, equip and tie-in wells to existing infrastructure. Sustaining capital does not have any standardized meaning and therefore should not be used to make comparisons to similar measures presented by other issuers.
9.4 Additional Reader Advisories
Intention of Managements Discussion and Analysis
This Managements Discussion and Analysis is intended to provide an explanation of financial and operational performance compared with prior periods and the Companys prospects and plans. It provides additional information that is not contained in the Companys consolidated financial statements.
Review by the Audit Committee
This Managements Discussion and Analysis was reviewed by the Companys Audit Committee and approved by the Board of Directors on February 26, 2020. Any events subsequent to that date could materially alter the veracity and usefulness of the information contained in this document.
Additional Husky Documents Filed with Securities Commissions
This Managements Discussion and Analysis dated February 26, 2020, should be read in conjunction with the 2019 consolidated financial statements and related notes. Readers are also encouraged to refer to the Companys interim reports filed for 2019, which contain Managements Discussion and Analysis and consolidated financial statements, and the Companys Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2019, filed separately with Canadian securities regulatory authorities, and annual Form 40-F filed with the SEC, the U.S. federal securities regulatory agency. These documents are available at www.sedar.com, at www.sec.gov and www.huskyenergy.com.
Use of Pronouns and Other Terms
Husky and the Company refer to Husky Energy Inc. on a consolidated basis.
Standard Comparisons in this Document
Unless otherwise indicated, comparisons of results are for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 and the Companys financial position at December 31, 2019 and 2018.
Reclassifications and Materiality for Disclosures
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to current year presentation. Materiality for disclosures is determined on the basis of whether the information omitted or misstated would cause a reasonable investor to change his or her decision to buy, sell or hold Huskys securities.
Additional Reader Guidance
Unless otherwise indicated:
| Financial information is presented in accordance with IFRS as issued by the IASB. |
| All dollar amounts are in Canadian dollars, unless otherwise indicated. |
| Unless otherwise indicated, all production volumes quoted are gross, which represents the Companys working interest share before royalties. |
| Prices are presented before the effect of hedging. |
Husky Energy Inc. | Managements Discussion and Analysis 2019 | 47
Terms | ||
Asia Pacific |
Includes Upstream oil and gas exploration and production activities located offshore China and Indonesia | |
Asphalt Refinery |
The asphalt refinery owned by the Company and located in Lloydminster, Alberta. | |
Atlantic | Includes Upstream oil and gas exploration and production activities located offshore Newfoundland and Labrador | |
Bitumen | Bitumen is a naturally occurring solid or semi-solid hydrocarbon consisting mainly of heavier hydrocarbons, with a viscosity greater than 10,000 millipascal-seconds or 10,000 centipoise measured at the hydrocarbons original temperature in the reservoir and at atmospheric pressure on a gas-free basis, and that is not primarily recoverable at economic rates through a well without the implementation of enhanced recovery methods | |
Capital employed | Long-term debt, long-term debt due within one year, short-term debt and shareholders equity | |
Capital expenditures | Includes capitalized administrative expenses but does not include asset retirement obligations or capitalized interest | |
Capital program | Capital expenditures not including capitalized administrative expenses or capitalized interest | |
Debt to capital employed | Long-term debt, long-term debt due within one year and short-term debt divided by capital employed | |
Debt to funds from operations | Long-term debt, long-term debt due within one year and short-term debt divided by funds from operations | |
Diluent | A lighter gravity liquid hydrocarbon, usually condensate or synthetic oil, added to heavy oil and bitumen to facilitate transmissibility of the oil through a pipeline | |
Feedstock | Raw materials which are processed into petroleum products | |
Free cash flow | Funds from operations less capital expenditures | |
Funds from operations | Cash flow - operating activities excluding change in non-cash working capital | |
Gross/net wells | Gross refers to the total number of wells in which a working interest is owned. Net refers to the sum of the fractional working interests owned by a company | |
Gross reserves/production | A companys working interest share of reserves/production before deduction of royalties | |
Heavy crude oil | Crude oil with a relative density greater than 10 degrees API gravity and less than or equal to 22.3 degrees API gravity | |
High-TAN | A measure of acidity. Crude oils with a high content of naphthenic acids are referred to as high total acid number (TAN) crude oils or high acid crude oil. The TAN value is defined as the milligrams of Potassium Hydroxide required to neutralize the acidic group of one gram of the oil sample. Crude oils in the industry with a TAN value greater than 1 are referred to as high-TAN crudes | |
HOIMS | The Husky Operational Integrity Management System | |
Light crude oil | Crude oil with a relative density greater than 31.1 degrees API gravity | |
Medium crude oil | Crude oil with a relative density that is greater than 22.3 degrees API gravity and less than or equal to 31.1 degrees API gravity | |
Net debt | Total debt less cash and cash equivalents | |
Net revenue | Gross revenues less royalties | |
NOVA Inventory Transfer (NIT) | Exchange or transfer of title of gas that has been received into the NOVA pipeline system but not yet delivered to a connecting pipeline | |
Oil sands | Sands and other rock materials that contain crude bitumen and include all other mineral substances in association therewith | |
Operating netback | Gross revenue less royalties, operating costs and transportation costs on a per unit basis | |
Plan of Development | As it relates to the Companys operations in Indonesia, a Plan of Development represents development planning on one or more oil and gas fields in an integrated and optimal plan for the production of hydrocarbon reserves considering technical, economical and environmental aspects. An initial Plan of Development in a development area needs both SKK Migas and the Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources approvals. Subsequent Plans of Development in the same development area only need SKK Migas approval | |
Probable reserves | Those additional reserves that are less certain to be recovered than proved reserves. It is equally likely that the actual remaining quantities recovered will be greater or less than the sum of the estimated proved plus probable reserves |
Husky Energy Inc. | Managements Discussion and Analysis 2019 | 48
Proved developed reserves |
Those reserves that are expected to be recovered from existing wells and installed facilities or, if facilities have not been installed, that would involve a low expenditure (e.g., when compared to the cost of drilling a well) to put the reserves on production. The developed category may be subdivided into producing and non-producing | |
Proved reserves |
Reserves that can be estimated with a high degree of certainty to be recoverable. It is likely that the actual remaining quantities recovered will exceed the estimated proved reserves | |
RIN |
Renewable Identification Numbers | |
Seismic survey |
A method by which the physical attributes in the outer rock shell of the earth are determined by measuring, with a seismograph, the rate of transmission of shock waves through the various rock formations | |
Shareholders equity |
Common shares, preferred shares, contributed surplus, retained earnings, accumulated other comprehensive income and non-controlling interest | |
Stratigraphic test well |
A geologically directed test well to obtain information. These wells are usually drilled without the intention of being completed for production | |
Synthetic oil |
A mixture of hydrocarbons derived by upgrading heavy crude oils, including bitumen, through a process that reduces the carbon content and increases the hydrogen content | |
Thermal |
Use of steam injection into the reservoir in order to enable heavy oil and bitumen to flow to the well bore | |
Total debt |
Long-term debt including long-term debt due within one year and short-term debt | |
Turnaround |
Performance of scheduled plant or facility maintenance requiring the complete or partial shutdown of the plant or facility operations | |
Upgrader |
The heavy oil upgrading facility owned and operated by the Company and located in Lloydminster, Saskatchewan. | |
Western Canada |
Includes Upstream oil and gas exploration and development activities located in Alberta, Saskatchewan and British Columbia |
Units of Measure
bbls |
barrels |
mboe |
thousand barrels of oil equivalent | |||
bbls/day |
barrels per day |
mboe/day |
thousand barrels of oil equivalent per day | |||
bcf |
billion cubic feet |
mcf |
thousand cubic feet | |||
boe |
barrels of oil equivalent |
mcfge |
million cubic feet of gas equivalent | |||
boe/day |
barrels of oil equivalent per day |
mmbbls |
million barrels | |||
CO2e |
carbon dioxide equivalent |
mmboe |
million barrels of oil equivalent | |||
GJ |
gigajoule |
mmbtu |
million British Thermal Units | |||
mbbls |
thousand barrels |
mmcf |
million cubic feet | |||
mbbls/day |
thousand barrels per day |
mmcf/day |
million cubic feet per day |
Husky Energy Inc. | Managements Discussion and Analysis 2019 | 49
9.5 Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Huskys management, under supervision of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, have evaluated the effectiveness of Huskys disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the rules of the SEC and the Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA)) as at December 31, 2019, and have concluded that such disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
Managements Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
The following report is provided by management in respect of Huskys internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in the rules of the SEC and the CSA):
1) | Huskys management, under the supervision of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, is responsible for designing, establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for Husky. All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. |
2) | Huskys management has used the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013) framework to evaluate the effectiveness of Huskys internal control over financial reporting. |
3) | As at December 31, 2019, management, under the supervision of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of Huskys internal control over financial reporting and concluded that such internal control over financial reporting is effective. |
4) | KPMG LLP, who has audited the consolidated financial statements of Husky for the year ended December 31, 2019, has also issued a report on internal controls over financial reporting under Auditing Standard No. 5 of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) that attests to the effectiveness Huskys internal controls over financial reporting. |
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in Huskys internal control over financial reporting during the year ended December 31, 2019, that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect its internal control over financial reporting.
Husky Energy Inc. | Managements Discussion and Analysis 2019 | 50
10.0 Selected Quarterly Financial and Operating Information
10.1 Summary of Quarterly Results
Three months ended | ||||||||
Fourth Quarter Results Summary ($ millions, except where indicated) |
Dec. 31 2019 |
Dec. 31 2018 |
||||||
Gross revenues and Marketing and other |
||||||||
Upstream |
||||||||
Exploration and Production |
1,281 | 643 | ||||||
Infrastructure and Marketing |
618 | 678 | ||||||
Downstream |
||||||||
Upgrading |
456 | 307 | ||||||
Canadian Refined Products |
793 | 821 | ||||||
U.S. Refining and Marketing |
2,222 | 2,766 | ||||||
Corporate and Eliminations |
(489 | ) | (173 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total gross revenues and marketing and other |
4,881 | 5,042 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net earnings (loss) |
||||||||
Upstream |
||||||||
Exploration and Production |
(1,964 | ) | (206 | ) | ||||
Infrastructure and Marketing |
(3 | ) | 126 | |||||
Downstream |
||||||||
Upgrading |
48 | 80 | ||||||
Canadian Refined Products |
(64 | ) | 55 | |||||
U.S. Refining and Marketing |
(192 | ) | 213 | |||||
Corporate and Eliminations |
(166 | ) | (52 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net earnings (loss) |
(2,341 | ) | 216 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Per share Basic |
(2.34 | ) | 0.21 | |||||
Per share Diluted |
(2.34 | ) | 0.16 | |||||
Cash flow operating activities |
866 | 1,313 | ||||||
Funds from operations(1) |
469 | 583 | ||||||
Per share Basic |
0.47 | 0.58 | ||||||
Per share Diluted |
0.47 | 0.58 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Upstream |
||||||||
Daily gross production |
||||||||
Crude oil and NGL production (mbbls/day)(2) |
226.7 | 214.7 | ||||||
Conventional natural gas production (mmcf/day)(2) |
507.4 | 537.6 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total production (mboe/day) |
311.3 | 304.3 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Average sales prices realized ($/boe) |
||||||||
Crude oil and NGL ($/bbl)(2) |
47.52 | 18.93 | ||||||
Conventional natural gas ($/mcf)(2) |
7.02 | 6.86 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total average sales prices realized ($/boe) |
46.06 | 25.47 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Downstream |
||||||||
Refinery throughput |
||||||||
Lloydminster Upgrader (mbbls/day) |
79.6 | 71.8 | ||||||
Lloydminster Refinery (mbbls/day) |
28.2 | 25.3 | ||||||
Prince George Refinery (mbbls/day)(3) |
3.9 | 10.7 | ||||||
Lima Refinery (mbbls/day) |
21.4 | 105.9 | ||||||
BP-Husky Toledo Refinery (mbbls/day) |
70.3 | 73.2 | ||||||
Superior Refinery (mbbls/day) |
| | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total throughput (mbbls/day) |
203.4 | 286.9 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
Husky Energy Inc. | Managements Discussion and Analysis 2019 | 51
Three months ended | ||||||||
Fourth Quarter Results Summary (continued) ($ millions, except where indicated) |
Dec. 31 2019 |
Dec. 31 2018 |
||||||
Upgrading unit margin ($/bbl) |
20.21 | 29.13 | ||||||
Upgrading synthetic crude oil sales (mbbls/day) |
55.5 | 53.8 | ||||||
Upgrading total sales (mbbls/day) |
78.0 | 73.5 | ||||||
Retail fuel sales (million of litres/day) |
7.4 | 8.0 | ||||||
Canadian light oil margins ($/litre) |
0.032 | 0.037 | ||||||
Lloydminster Refinery asphalt margin ($/bbl) |
16.59 | 41.50 | ||||||
U.S. Refining and Marketing margin (US$/bbl crude throughput) |
7.85 | 9.12 | ||||||
U.S./Canadian dollar exchange rate (US$) |
0.758 | 0.757 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
(1) | Funds from operations is a non-GAAP measure. Refer to Section 9.3 for a reconciliation to the corresponding GAAP measure. |
(2) | Reported production volumes and associated per unit values include Huskys working interest production from the BD Project (40%). Revenues and expenses related to the Husky-CNOOC Madura Ltd. joint venture are accounted for under the equity method for financial statement purposes. |
(3) | Prince George Refinery was sold on November 1, 2019. |
Gross Revenue and Marketing and Other
The Companys consolidated gross revenues and marketing and other decreased by $161 million in the fourth quarter of 2019 compared to the fourth quarter of 2018.
In the Upstream business segment, Exploration and Production gross revenues increased primarily due to higher average realized sales prices and production. Infrastructure and Marketing gross revenues and marketing and other decreased primarily due to the tightening of the location price differentials between Canada and the U.S. in 2019.
In the Downstream business segment, gross revenues decreased primarily due to lower throughput volumes as the Lima Refinery completed a planned turnaround in the fourth quarter of 2019.
Net Earnings (Loss)
The Companys consolidated net loss increased by $2,557 million in the fourth quarter of 2019 compared to the fourth quarter of 2018.
In the Upstream business segment, Exploration and Production net loss increased primarily due to an after-tax impairment charge of $1,822 million within the Sunrise Energy Project, Western Canada and Atlantic, combined with the same factors which impacted gross revenue and marketing and other.
In the Downstream business segment, U.S. Refining and Marketing net loss increased primarily due to an after-tax $198 million derecognition of the carrying value of components replaced as part of the crude oil flexibility project at the Lima Refinery, and Canadian Refined Products net loss increased primarily due to an after-tax impairment charge of $69 million recognized on the Lloyd Ethanol Plant and Minnedosa Ethanol Plant.
In the Corporate business segment, net earnings increased primarily due to work force adjustments during the fourth quarter of 2019.
Cash Flow Operating Activities and Funds from Operations
Cash flow operating activities and funds from operations decreased by $447 million and $114 million, respectively, in the fourth quarter of 2019 compared to the fourth quarter of 2018, primarily due to lower sales volume at the Lima Refinery, which completed a planned turnaround in the fourth quarter of 2019, tightening of location differentials between Canada and the U.S. and workforce adjustments.
Daily Gross Production
Production increased by 7.0 mbbls/day during the fourth quarter of 2019 compared to the fourth quarter of 2018 as a result of:
| Higher crude oil production from Atlantic due to higher production from the White Rose field, which resumed full production in mid-August 2019; and |
| Higher bitumen production from the Companys thermal projects. |
Partially offset by:
| Lower production from the Liwan Gas Project and BD Project; and |
| Lower heavy crude oil production due to government-mandated production quotas in Alberta and natural declines. |
Husky Energy Inc. | Managements Discussion and Analysis 2019 | 52
Segmented Operational Information
Segmented Operational Information | 2019 | 2018 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
($ millions, except where indicated) |
Q4 | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | Q4 | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross revenues and Marketing and other |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Upstream |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exploration and Production |
1,281 | 1,241 | 1,252 | 1,184 | 643 | 1,319 | 1,284 | 1,084 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Infrastructure and Marketing |
618 | 711 | 634 | 568 | 678 | 769 | 821 | 611 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Downstream |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Upgrading |
456 | 464 | 457 | 400 | 307 | 534 | 444 | 465 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Canadian Refined Products |
793 | 871 | 804 | 654 | 821 | 1,001 | 869 | 721 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Refining and Marketing |
2,222 | 2,644 | 2,791 | 2,283 | 2,766 | 3,198 | 3,035 | 2,771 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate and Eliminations |
(489 | ) | (537 | ) | (552 | ) | (444 | ) | (173 | ) | (521 | ) | (470 | ) | (390 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total gross revenues and marketing and other |
4,881 | 5,394 | 5,386 | 4,645 | 5,042 | 6,300 | 5,983 | 5,262 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Net earnings (loss) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Upstream |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exploration and Production |
(1,964 | ) | 106 | 150 | 2 | (206 | ) | 214 | 158 | 57 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Infrastructure and Marketing |
(3 | ) | 34 | (38 | ) | 123 | 126 | 149 | 154 | 138 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Downstream |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Upgrading |
48 | 7 | (2 | ) | 44 | 80 | 88 | 84 | 109 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Canadian Refined Products |
(64 | ) | 37 | | 22 | 55 | 43 | 32 | 28 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Refining and Marketing |
(192 | ) | 126 | 134 | 172 | 213 | 158 | 115 | (5 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate and Eliminations |
(166 | ) | (37 | ) | 126 | (35 | ) | (52 | ) | (107 | ) | (95 | ) | (79 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Net earnings (loss) |
(2,341 | ) | 273 | 370 | 328 | 216 | 545 | 448 | 248 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Per share Basic |
(2.34 | ) | 0.26 | 0.36 | 0.32 | 0.21 | 0.53 | 0.44 | 0.24 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Per share Diluted |
(2.34 | ) | 0.25 | 0.36 | 0.31 | 0.16 | 0.53 | 0.44 | 0.24 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash flow operating activities |
866 | 800 | 760 | 545 | 1,313 | 1,283 | 1,009 | 529 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Funds from operations(1) |
469 | 1,021 | 802 | 959 | 583 | 1,318 | 1,208 | 895 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Per share Basic |
0.47 | 1.02 | 0.80 | 0.95 | 0.58 | 1.31 | 1.20 | 0.89 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Per share Diluted |
0.47 | 1.02 | 0.80 | 0.95 | 0.58 | 1.31 | 1.20 | 0.89 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S./Canadian dollar exchange rate (US$) |
0.758 | 0.757 | 0.748 | 0.752 | 0.757 | 0.765 | 0.775 | 0.791 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Exploration and Production |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Daily production, before royalties |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Crude oil & NGL production (mbbls/day) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Light & Medium crude oil |
33.3 | 30.5 | 19.6 | 16.5 | 22.6 | 33.7 | 29.7 | 37.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
NGL(2) |
23.0 | 22.4 | 20.3 | 24.7 | 24.8 | 24.5 | 21.8 | 20.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Heavy crude oil |
32.6 | 31.6 | 28.9 | 27.6 | 34.4 | 34.6 | 38.5 | 39.7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bitumen |
137.8 | 126.4 | 120.4 | 130.3 | 132.9 | 117.3 | 123.2 | 123.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total crude oil & NGL production (mbbls/day) |
226.7 | 210.9 | 189.2 | 199.1 | 214.7 | 210.1 | 213.2 | 220.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conventional Natural gas (mmcf/day)(2) |
507.4 | 503.3 | 475.1 | 516.8 | 537.6 | 519.5 | 494.0 | 477.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total production (mboe/day) |
311.3 | 294.8 | 268.4 | 285.2 | 304.3 | 296.7 | 295.5 | 300.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Average sales prices |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Light & Medium crude oil ($/bbl) |
71.67 | 71.32 | 77.07 | 73.09 | 60.19 | 93.84 | 92.23 | 82.08 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
NGL ($/bbl)(2) |
45.72 | 38.39 | 50.22 | 46.07 | 53.36 | 60.08 | 54.13 | 55.03 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Heavy crude oil ($/bbl) |
50.01 | 56.71 | 63.15 | 49.38 | 18.71 | 50.09 | 54.22 | 32.80 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bitumen ($/bbl) |
41.39 | 51.09 | 58.32 | 46.64 | 5.42 | 46.00 | 44.41 | 27.77 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conventional natural gas ($/mcf)(2) |
7.02 | 5.44 | 6.19 | 7.12 | 6.86 | 6.15 | 6.53 | 7.03 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating costs ($/boe) |
15.25 | 14.83 | 15.83 | 16.30 | 13.75 | 14.68 | 14.22 | 13.33 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating netbacks(2)(3) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lloydminster Thermal ($/bbl)(4) |
31.19 | 38.25 | 44.34 | 34.50 | (0.05 | ) | 35.83 | 36.16 | 19.77 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Lloydminster Non-Thermal ($/boe)(4) |
11.54 | 14.92 | 22.32 | 10.83 | (11.80 | ) | 13.28 | 20.83 | 4.13 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Tucker Thermal ($/bbl)(4) |
28.01 | 41.46 | 47.25 | 33.50 | (5.08 | ) | 29.53 | 31.67 | 16.16 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Sunrise Energy Project ($/bbl)(4) |
10.61 | 26.37 | 32.85 | 14.54 | (25.60 | ) | 15.79 | 12.59 | (5.62 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Western Canada Crude Oil ($/bbl)(4) |
(5.81 | ) | 10.49 | (0.98 | ) | 15.58 | (1.70 | ) | 23.81 | 29.37 | 17.88 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Western Canada NGL & Conventional natural gas ($/mcf)(5) |
0.68 | (0.07 | ) | (0.09 | ) | 1.06 | 1.13 | 0.29 | 0.39 | 1.33 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Atlantic Light Oil ($/bbl)(4) |
45.92 | 41.64 | 23.44 | (16.82 | ) | 23.19 | 68.20 | 57.79 | 65.23 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Asia Pacific Light Oil, NGL & Conventional natural gas ($/boe)(2)(4) |
69.12 | 62.59 | 68.07 | 68.33 | 67.42 | 65.45 | 68.44 | 70.31 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total ($/boe)(4) |
27.48 | 29.31 | 33.61 | 27.69 | 9.42 | 31.30 | 31.31 | 24.37 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Husky Energy Inc. | Managements Discussion and Analysis 2019 | 53
2019 | 2018 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Segmented Operational Information (continued) |
Q4 | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | Q4 | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Upgrading |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Synthetic crude oil sales (mbbls/day) |
55.5 | 58.5 | 54.1 | 53.5 | 53.8 | 54.9 | 47.1 | 56.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total sales (mbbls/day) |
78.0 | 75.3 | 72.8 | 74.8 | 73.5 | 76.7 | 69.1 | 79.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Upgrading differential ($/bbl) |
21.83 | 17.22 | 15.18 | 14.56 | 27.89 | 29.46 | 26.67 | 32.31 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Canadian Refined Products |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fuel sales (millions of litres/day) |
7.4 | 7.5 | 7.2 | 7.5 | 8.0 | 7.7 | 7.5 | 7.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Refinery throughput(6) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lloydminster Refinery (mbbls/day) |
28.2 | 28.3 | 26.1 | 22.8 | 25.3 | 27.8 | 26.8 | 28.7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prince George Refinery (mbbls/day)(8) |
3.9 | 11.4 | 3.5 | 10.2 | 10.7 | 11.5 | 8.8 | 12.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Refining and Marketing |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Refinery throughput(6) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lima Refinery (mbbls/day) |
21.4 | 174.3 | 179.8 | 171.4 | 105.9 | 163.3 | 171.2 | 164.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
BP-Husky Toledo Refinery (mbbls/day)(7) |
70.3 | 66.8 | 57.5 | 58.0 | 73.2 | 70.8 | 65.5 | 75.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Superior Refinery (mbbls/day) |
| | | | | | 10.1 | 37.0 |
(1) | Funds from operations is a non-GAAP measure. Refer to Section 9.3 for a reconciliation to the corresponding GAAP measure. |
(2) | Reported production volumes and associated per unit values include Huskys working interest production from the BD Project (40%). Revenues and expenses related to the Husky-CNOOC Madura Ltd. joint venture are accounted for under the equity method for financial statement purposes. |
(3) | Operating netback is a non-GAAP measure. Refer to Section 9.3. |
(4) | Includes associated co-products converted to boe. |
(5) | Includes associated co-products converted to mcfge. |
(6) | Includes all crude oil, feedstock, intermediate feedstock and blend-stocks used in producing sales volumes from the refinery. |
(7) | Reported throughput volumes include Huskys working interest from the BP-Husky Toledo Refinery (50%). |
(8) | Sale of Prince George Refinery closed on November 1, 2019 |
Significant Items Impacting Gross Revenues, Net Earnings (Loss) and Funds from Operations
Variations in the Companys gross revenues, net earnings (loss) and funds from operations are primarily driven by changes in production volumes, commodity prices, commodity price differentials, refining crack spreads, foreign exchange rates and planned turnarounds. Stronger performance in the Upstream operations were offset by the lower realized upgrading margins and lower earnings in U.S. Refining and Marketing as the Lima Refinery completed a planned turnaround in late 2019, which were offset by insurance recoveries for the Superior Refinery. This resulted in a decrease to the Companys gross revenues, net earnings and funds from operations. Other significant items which impacted gross revenues, net earnings and funds from operations over the last eight quarters include:
2019
Q4:
| The Company recognized a pre-tax impairment charge of $2,405 million within the Sunrise Energy Project, Western Canada and Atlantic. The impairment charge was primarily due to sustained declines in forecasted short and long-term crude oil and natural gas prices and managements decision to reduce capital investment in these areas. |
| The Company recognized a pre-tax write-down of $339 million related to certain Exploration and Evaluation assets in Atlantic and Western Canada. The write-down was primarily due to changes in managements future development plans resulting from sustained declines in forecasted short and long-term prices for crude oil. |
| The Company recognized a pre-tax derecognition charge of $254 million on the carrying value of components replaced as part of the crude oil flexibility project at the Lima Refinery. |
| The Company closed the sale of the Prince George Refinery to Tidewater Midstream and Infrastructure. |
| The Company recognized a pre-tax impairment charge of $90 million on the Lloyd Ethanol Plant and Minnedosa Ethanol Plant, primarily due to sustained declines in forecasted ethanol margins. |
| At the Spruce Lake Central project, construction on the CPF was completed. |
| At the Wembley area, in the Montney Formation, six liquids-rich wells were started up. |
| At the Liuhua 29-1 field, at Liwan, the remaining four of seven wells were completed. |
| At the Lima Refinery a planned turnaround was completed, with final tie-ins made for the crude oil flexibility project. |
| The Company recognized $308 million in pre-tax insurance recoveries for rebuild costs, incident costs and business interruption associated with the incident at the Superior Refinery. |
Husky Energy Inc. | Managements Discussion and Analysis 2019 | 54
Q3:
| At the Dee Valley Thermal Project, first oil was achieved and nameplate capacity was reached. |
| At the Spruce Lake North Thermal Project, concrete work was completed. |
| At the Spruce Lake East Thermal Project, regulatory approval was received and lease construction was completed. |
| At the Karr area, in the Montney Formation, one well was drilled. |
| At the Liuhua 29-1 field, at Liwan, three of the seven wells were fully completed. |
| At the White Rose field and satellite extension, full production was restored. |
| At the Superior Refinery, permits necessary for the rebuild were received and rebuilding work began. |
| The Company recognized $138 million in pre-tax insurance recoveries for incident costs and business interruption associated with the incident at the Superior Refinery. |
Q2:
| At the Dee Valley Thermal Project, first steam was achieved. |
| At the Spruce Lake North Thermal Project, site piling was completed and concrete work progressed. |
| At the Spruce Lake East Thermal Project, lease construction started. |
| At the Dee Valley 2 and Edam Central Thermal Projects, regulatory approval was received. |
| At the Ansell and Kakwa areas, in the liquids-rich Cardium and Spirit River formations, two wells were drilled and four were completed. |
| At the Liuhua 29-1 field, three development wells were drilled. |
| Two infill wells were completed at the White Rose field and satellite extensions. |
| The Company wrote off the Tigers Eye D-17 exploration well. |
| An exploration well drilled on Block 16/25 in 2018, which did not encounter commercial hydrocarbons, was written off. |
| The Company recognized $233 million in tax recoveries related to the reduction in the Alberta provincial corporate tax rate. |
| The Company recognized $71 million in pre-tax insurance recoveries for incident costs and business interruption associated with the incident at the Superior Refinery. |
Q1:
| At the Dee Valley Thermal Project, drilling and fabrication of the Central Processing Facility was completed. |
| At the Spruce Lake Central Thermal Project, site piling, concrete work and drilling were all completed. Large vessel and module fabrication progressed. |
| At the Spruce Lake North Thermal Project, site preparation was completed, and large vessel and module fabrication progressed. |
| At the Spruce Lake East Thermal Project, site preparation was completed, regulatory approval was received, and site clearing commenced. |
| At the Ansell and Kakwa areas, in the liquids-rich Cardium and Spirit River Formations, eight wells drilled and six completed. |
| At the Sinclair and Wembley areas, in the Montney Formation, four wells were drilled. |
| Two infill wells were drilled at the White Rose field and satellite extensions. |
| The Company recognized $113 million in pre-tax insurance recoveries for incident costs and business interruption associated with the incident at the Superior Refinery. |
2018
Q4:
| At the Rush Lake 2 Thermal Project, first production and nameplate capacity of 10,000 bbls/day were achieved. |
| At the Spruce Lake North Thermal Project, site clearing was completed. |
| At the Tucker Thermal Project, nameplate capacity of 30,000 bbls/day was achieved. |
| At the Sunrise Energy Project, nameplate capacity of 60,000 bbls/day was achieved. Additionally, the 10 infill wells previously drilled came online. |
| At the Ansell and Kakwa areas, a drilling program targeting the Spirit River Formation continued with six more wells drilled and 12 more were completed. |
| At the Karr and Wembley areas, in the Montney Formation, three more wells were drilled and completed. |
| On November 16, 2018, a flowline connector separated near the South White Rose Extension Drill Centre, causing a spill of approximately 250 cubic metres of oil. Production at the SeaRose FPSO was shut-in. Operations resumed in the first quarter of 2019. |
| The Company is a non-operating partner in two exploration licences awarded in the November 2018 C-NLOPB land sale. The licences are adjacent to Terra Nova and White Rose in the Jeanne dArc Basin and will bring the Companys total licence holdings in the region to nine. |
| The Company completed its 2018 planned scope of work on the Lima Refinery crude oil flexibility project. |
| The Company accrued pre-tax insurance recoveries for property damage, rebuild costs and business interruption associated with the incident at the Superior Refinery of $331 million. |
Husky Energy Inc. | Managements Discussion and Analysis 2019 | 55
Q3:
| At the Rush Lake 2 Thermal Project, construction of the CPF was completed and first steam was achieved. |
| At the Dee Valley Thermal Project, drilling of the second well pad was completed and construction of the CPF continued. |
| At the Spruce Lake Central Thermal Project, drilling of the first well pad was completed and construction of the CPF commenced. |
| At the Tucker Thermal Project, a planned turnaround was completed in support of reaching its 30,000 bbls/day design capacity. |
| At the Ansell and Kakwa areas, an accelerated drilling program from an 18-well program to a 25-well development program continued with eight more wells drilled and nine more were completed. |
| At the Karr and Wembley areas, in the Montney Formation, two more wells were drilled and three completed. |
| An exploration well was drilled on Block 16/25 which encountered hydrocarbons. Additional evaluation work was conducted. |
| At the Madura Strait, the BD Project achieved its gross daily sales targets of 100 mmcf/day of conventional natural gas (40 mmcf/day Husky working interest) and 6,000 bbls/day of associated NGL (2,400 bbls/day Husky working interest). |
| The Company accrued pre-tax insurance recoveries for property damage and clean-up costs associated with the incident at the Superior Refinery of $110 million. |
Q2:
| At the Dee Valley Thermal Project, drilling of the first well pad was completed and construction of the CPF commenced. |
| At the Spruce Lake Central Thermal Project, site clearing was completed. |
| At the Tucker Thermal Project, production from the remaining five wells of the 15-well D West pad commenced. |
| At the Sunrise Energy Project, two infill wells commenced production, and the remaining three of 10 infill wells were drilled. |
| At the Karr and Wembley areas, in the Montney Formation, two wells were drilled. |
| Construction to develop Liuhua 29-1 commenced. |
| Two exploration wells were drilled on Block 15/33 in the South China Sea. The first well was a success and the second well, which was drilled on a separate structure, did not encounter commercial hydrocarbons and was written off. |
| The Company and CNOOC signed two PSCs for Blocks 22/11 and 23/07 in the Beibu Gulf area of the South China Sea. |
| At the West White Rose Project, construction of the concrete gravity structure commenced at the purpose-built graving dock in Argentia, Newfoundland and Labrador. |
| An exploration well was drilled north of the main White Rose field. The well encountered a net pay thickness of more than 85 metres of oil-bearing sandstone. The discovery continues to be evaluated and further delineation of the area is planned. |
| On April 26, 2018, a fire occurred at the Superior Refinery and operations were suspended. The Company has insurance to cover business interruption, third-party liability and property damage. The Company accrued pre-tax insurance recoveries for property damage associated with the incident of $27 million. |
Q1:
| At the Rush Lake 2 Thermal Project, drilling of the 12 SAGD injector-producer well pairs was completed and construction of the CPF continued. |
| At the Dee Valley Thermal Project, drilling of the first well pad commenced. |
| At the Spruce Lake North and Central thermal projects, site clearing commenced. |
| At the Tucker Thermal Project, production from the first 10 wells of the new D West pad commenced. |
| At the Sunrise Energy Project, production commenced at the last well pair of the 14 previously drilled well pairs. Two infill wells commenced steaming, and seven out of 10 infill wells were drilled. |
| At the Ansell and Kakwa areas, production commenced at the remaining six wells of the 16-well 2017 drilling program. Additionally, an 18-well development program commenced with seven wells drilled and four completed. |
| Production operations on the SeaRose FPSO vessel were suspended for nine days due to a regulatory suspension. |
Husky Energy Inc. | Managements Discussion and Analysis 2019 | 56
Segmented Financial Information
Upstream | Downstream | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exploration and Production(1) | Infrastructure and Marketing | Upgrading | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2019 ($ millions) |
Q4 | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | Q4 | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | Q4 | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross revenues |
1,281 | 1,241 | 1,252 | 1,184 | 608 | 676 | 648 | 410 | 456 | 464 | 457 | 400 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Royalties |
(88 | ) | (81 | ) | (83 | ) | (71 | ) | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Marketing and other |
| | | | 10 | 35 | (14 | ) | 158 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues, net of royalties |
1,193 | 1,160 | 1,169 | 1,113 | 618 | 711 | 634 | 568 | 456 | 464 | 457 | 400 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchases of crude oil and products |
| | | | 591 | 658 | 686 | 401 | 311 | 360 | 375 | 257 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Production, operating and transportation expenses |
435 | 399 | 385 | 415 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 54 | 57 | 54 | 52 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
71 | 78 | 69 | 79 | 6 | | 2 | 1 | (3 | ) | 7 | 3 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depletion, depreciation, amortization and impairment |
2,963 | 497 | 430 | 422 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 29 | 29 | 28 | 29 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exploration and evaluation expenses |
390 | 41 | 86 | 30 | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loss (gain) on sale of assets |
(1 | ) | | | (2 | ) | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other net |
(11 | ) | (18 | ) | (35 | ) | 150 | | | (2 | ) | 2 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
3,847 | 997 | 935 | 1,094 | 608 | 666 | 695 | 409 | 391 | 453 | 460 | 340 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Earnings (loss) from operating activities |
(2,654 | ) | 163 | 234 | 19 | 10 | 45 | (61 | ) | 159 | 65 | 11 | (3 | ) | 60 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Share of equity investment income (loss) |
8 | 15 | 15 | 12 | (13 | ) | 4 | 8 | 10 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial items |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net foreign exchange gains (losses) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Finance income |
3 | | (1 | ) | 1 | | | | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Finance expenses |
(42 | ) | (39 | ) | (48 | ) | (34 | ) | (1 | ) | (2 | ) | | | | (1 | ) | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
(39 | ) | (39 | ) | (49 | ) | (33 | ) | (1 | ) | (2 | ) | | | | (1 | ) | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Earnings (loss) before income tax |
(2,685 | ) | 139 | 200 | (2 | ) | (4 | ) | 47 | (53 | ) | 169 | 65 | 10 | (3 | ) | 60 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Provisions for (recovery of) income taxes |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current |
8 | (9 | ) | 33 | | | | (2 | ) | 2 | 22 | 12 | 6 | 23 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deferred |
(729 | ) | 42 | 17 | (4 | ) | (1 | ) | 13 | (13 | ) | 44 | (5 | ) | (9 | ) | (7 | ) | (7 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
(721 | ) | 33 | 50 | (4 | ) | (1 | ) | 13 | (15 | ) | 46 | 17 | 3 | (1 | ) | 16 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net earnings (loss) |
(1,964 | ) | 106 | 150 | 2 | (3 | ) | 34 | (38 | ) | 123 | 48 | 7 | (2 | ) | 44 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Capital expenditures(3) |
564 | 597 | 566 | 619 | 1 | | | 1 | 30 | 13 | 12 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
17,533 | 19,956 | 19,847 | 20,025 | 1,661 | 1,619 | 1,504 | 1,458 | 1,203 | 1,219 | 1,178 | 1,204 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | Includes allocated depletion, depreciation, amortization and impairment related to assets in Infrastructure and Marketing, as these assets provide a service to Exploration and Production. |
(2) | Eliminations relate to sales and operating revenues between segments recorded at transfer prices based on current market prices. |
(3) | Excludes capitalized costs related to asset retirement obligations and capitalized interest incurred during the period. Includes Exploration and Production assets acquired through acquisition, and excludes assets acquired through corporate acquisition. |
Husky Energy Inc. | Managements Discussion and Analysis 2019 | 57
Segmented Financial Information Cont
Downstream (continued) | Corporate and Eliminations(2) | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Canadian Refined Products | U.S. Refining and Marketing |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q4 | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | Q4 | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | Q4 | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | Q4 | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
793 | 871 | 804 | 654 | 2,222 | 2,644 | 2,791 | 2,283 | (489 | ) | (537 | ) | (552 | ) | (444 | ) | 4,871 | 5,359 | 5,400 | 4,487 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | (88 | ) | (81 | ) | (83 | ) | (71 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | 10 | 35 | (14 | ) | 158 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
793 | 871 | 804 | 654 | 2,222 | 2,644 | 2,791 | 2,283 | (489 | ) | (537 | ) | (552 | ) | (444 | ) | 4,793 | 5,313 | 5,303 | 4,574 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
691 | 706 | 671 | 503 | 2,140 | 2,319 | 2,342 | 1,828 | (489 | ) | (537 | ) | (552 | ) | (444 | ) | 3,244 | 3,506 | 3,522 | 2,545 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
57 | 69 | 83 | 69 | 241 | 197 | 216 | 215 | | (1 | ) | | (1 | ) | 796 | 725 | 743 | 753 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
13 | 13 | 13 | 14 | 10 | 7 | 9 | 7 | 119 | 44 | 86 | 43 | 216 | 149 | 182 | 146 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
119 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 380 | 117 | 122 | 116 | 27 | 24 | 26 | 27 | 3,520 | 703 | 643 | 630 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | 390 | 41 | 86 | 30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(2 | ) | (4 | ) | | | | 1 | | | | | | | (3 | ) | (3 | ) | | (2 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | (307 | ) | (163 | ) | (76 | ) | (108 | ) | (4 | ) | (22 | ) | 10 | | (322 | ) | (203 | ) | (103 | ) | 44 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
878 | 816 | 800 | 620 | 2,464 | 2,478 | 2,613 | 2,058 | (347 | ) | (492 | ) | (430 | ) | (375 | ) | 7,841 | 4,918 | 5,073 | 4,146 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(85 | ) | 55 | 4 | 34 | (242 | ) | 166 | 178 | 225 | (142 | ) | (45 | ) | (122 | ) | (69 | ) | (3,048 | ) | 395 | 230 | 428 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | (5 | ) | 19 | 23 | 22 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | 20 | (8 | ) | 2 | 30 | 20 | (8 | ) | 2 | 30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | 11 | 24 | 17 | 19 | 14 | 24 | 16 | 20 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(3 | ) | (4 | ) | (4 | ) | (4 | ) | (4 | ) | (5 | ) | (5 | ) | (4 | ) | (29 | ) | (33 | ) | (48 | ) | (41 | ) | (79 | ) | (84 | ) | (105 | ) | (83 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(3 | ) | (4 | ) | (4 | ) | (4 | ) | (4 | ) | (5 | ) | (5 | ) | (4 | ) | 2 | (17 | ) | (29 | ) | 8 | (45 | ) | (68 | ) | (87 | ) | (33 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(88 | ) | 51 | | 30 | (246 | ) | 161 | 173 | 221 | (140 | ) | (62 | ) | (151 | ) | (61 | ) | (3,098 | ) | 346 | 166 | 417 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(4 | ) | 35 | (1 | ) | 8 | | 10 | 2 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 8 | 8 | 32 | 51 | 46 | 46 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(20 | ) | (21 | ) | 1 | | (54 | ) | 25 | 37 | 44 | 20 | (28 | ) | (285 | ) | (34 | ) | (789 | ) | 22 | (250 | ) | 43 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(24 | ) | 14 | | 8 | (54 | ) | 35 | 39 | 49 | 26 | (25 | ) | (277 | ) | (26 | ) | (757 | ) | 73 | (204 | ) | 89 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(64 | ) | 37 | | 22 | (192 | ) | 126 | 134 | 172 | (166 | ) | (37 | ) | 126 | (35 | ) | (2,341 | ) | 273 | 370 | 328 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
19 | 23 | 54 | 23 | 241 | 196 | 202 | 129 | 39 | 39 | 24 | 36 | 894 | 868 | 858 | 812 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1,287 | 1,663 | 1,656 | 1,604 | 8,691 | 8,799 | 8,462 | 8,768 | 2,747 | 3,356 | 3,507 | 4,315 | 33,122 | 36,612 | 36,154 | 37,374 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Husky Energy Inc. | Managements Discussion and Analysis 2019 | 58
Segmented Financial Information
Upstream | Downstream | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exploration and Production(1) | Infrastructure and Marketing | Upgrading | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2018 ($ millions) |
Q4 | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | Q4 | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | Q4 | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross revenues |
643 | 1,319 | 1,284 | 1,084 | 530 | 601 | 634 | 446 | 307 | 534 | 444 | 465 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Royalties |
(50 | ) | (106 | ) | (99 | ) | (80 | ) | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Marketing and other |
| | | | 148 | 168 | 187 | 165 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues, net of royalties |
593 | 1,213 | 1,185 | 1,004 | 678 | 769 | 821 | 611 | 307 | 534 | 444 | 465 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchases of crude oil and products |
(1 | ) | | 1 | | 497 | 567 | 602 | 421 | 110 | 328 | 251 | 239 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Production, operating and transportation expenses |
388 | 398 | 384 | 357 | 4 | 2 | 15 | 2 | 51 | 52 | 46 | 46 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
72 | 71 | 77 | 76 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depletion, depreciation, amortization and impairment |
469 | 461 | 434 | 447 | (1 | ) | | 1 | | 36 | 30 | 29 | 28 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exploration and evaluation expenses |
53 | 26 | 40 | 30 | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loss (gain) on sale of assets |
| 2 | | (4 | ) | | | | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other net |
(109 | ) | (42 | ) | 27 | 4 | 1 | (1 | ) | | 2 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
872 | 916 | 963 | 910 | 503 | 569 | 619 | 426 | 198 | 412 | 328 | 315 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Earnings (loss) from operating activities |
(279 | ) | 297 | 222 | 94 | 175 | 200 | 202 | 185 | 109 | 122 | 116 | 150 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Share of equity investment income (loss) |
18 | 12 | 17 | 4 | (2 | ) | 6 | 9 | 5 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial items |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net foreign exchange gains (losses) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Finance income |
| 2 | 1 | 9 | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Finance expenses |
(29 | ) | (29 | ) | (22 | ) | (29 | ) | | | | | | (1 | ) | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
(29 | ) | (27 | ) | (21 | ) | (20 | ) | | | | | | (1 | ) | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Earnings (loss) before income tax |
(290 | ) | 282 | 218 | 78 | 173 | 206 | 211 | 190 | 109 | 121 | 116 | 150 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Provisions for (recovery of) income taxes |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current |
(233 | ) | (46 | ) | (106 | ) | (99 | ) | 193 | 14 | 84 | 63 | 40 | 47 | 36 | 45 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deferred |
149 | 114 | 166 | 120 | (146 | ) | 43 | (27 | ) | (11 | ) | (11 | ) | (14 | ) | (4 | ) | (4 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
(84 | ) | 68 | 60 | 21 | 47 | 57 | 57 | 52 | 29 | 33 | 32 | 41 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net earnings (loss) |
(206 | ) | 214 | 158 | 57 | 126 | 149 | 154 | 138 | 80 | 88 | 84 | 109 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Capital expenditures(3) |
898 | 715 | 524 | 519 | | | (15 | ) | 15 | 9 | 9 | 33 | 11 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
19,175 | 18,410 | 18,263 | 18,070 | 1,301 | 1,529 | 1,519 | 1,417 | 1,149 | 1,308 | 1,275 | 1,270 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | Includes allocated depletion, depreciation, amortization and impairment related to assets in Infrastructure and Marketing, as these assets provide a service to Exploration and Production. |
(2) | Eliminations relate to sales and operating revenues between segments recorded at transfer prices based on current market prices. |
(3) | Excludes capitalized costs related to asset retirement obligations and capitalized interest incurred during the period. Includes Exploration and Production assets acquired through acquisition, and excludes assets acquired through corporate acquisition. |
Husky Energy Inc. | Managements Discussion and Analysis 2019 | 59
Segmented Financial Information Cont
Downstream (continued) | Corporate and Eliminations(2) | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Canadian Refined Products | U.S. Refining and Marketing |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q4 | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | Q4 | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | Q4 | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | Q4 | Q3 | Q2 | Q1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
821 | 1,001 | 869 | 721 | 2,766 | 3,198 | 3,035 | 2,771 | (173 | ) | (521 | ) | (470 | ) | (390 | ) | 4,894 | 6,132 | 5,796 | 5,097 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | (50 | ) | (106 | ) | (99 | ) | (80 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | 148 | 168 | 187 | 165 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
821 | 1,001 | 869 | 721 | 2,766 | 3,198 | 3,035 | 2,771 | (173 | ) | (521 | ) | (470 | ) | (390 | ) | 4,992 | 6,194 | 5,884 | 5,182 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
637 | 834 | 711 | 578 | 2,523 | 2,741 | 2,565 | 2,505 | (173 | ) | (521 | ) | (470 | ) | (390 | ) | 3,593 | 3,949 | 3,660 | 3,353 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
67 | 66 | 72 | 60 | 193 | 222 | 217 | 163 | (2 | ) | | | | 701 | 740 | 734 | 628 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11 | 12 | 11 | 13 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 21 | 96 | 88 | 72 | 112 | 187 | 186 | 169 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
29 | 29 | 28 | 29 | 102 | 129 | 125 | 94 | 27 | 23 | 22 | 20 | 662 | 672 | 639 | 618 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | 53 | 26 | 40 | 30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (2 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (4 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1 | ) | | | | (334 | ) | (107 | ) | (29 | ) | 6 | 1 | | (9 | ) | | (442 | ) | (150 | ) | (11 | ) | 12 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
743 | 939 | 822 | 680 | 2,489 | 2,990 | 2,885 | 2,773 | (126 | ) | (402 | ) | (369 | ) | (298 | ) | 4,679 | 5,424 | 5,248 | 4,806 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
78 | 62 | 47 | 41 | 277 | 208 | 150 | (2 | ) | (47 | ) | (119 | ) | (101 | ) | (92 | ) | 313 | 770 | 636 | 376 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | 16 | 18 | 26 | 9 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | (2 | ) | (9 | ) | 3 | 22 | (2 | ) | (9 | ) | 3 | 22 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | 16 | 13 | 12 | 11 | 16 | 15 | 13 | 20 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(3 | ) | (3 | ) | (3 | ) | (3 | ) | (3 | ) | (4 | ) | (3 | ) | (4 | ) | (41 | ) | (43 | ) | (46 | ) | (48 | ) | (76 | ) | (80 | ) | (74 | ) | (84 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(3 | ) | (3 | ) | (3 | ) | (3 | ) | (3 | ) | (4 | ) | (3 | ) | (4 | ) | (27 | ) | (39 | ) | (31 | ) | (15 | ) | (62 | ) | (74 | ) | (58 | ) | (42 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
75 | 59 | 44 | 38 | 274 | 204 | 147 | (6 | ) | (74 | ) | (158 | ) | (132 | ) | (107 | ) | 267 | 714 | 604 | 343 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
41 | 15 | 19 | 25 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | (18 | ) | (19 | ) | (17 | ) | (18 | ) | 26 | 13 | 18 | 18 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(21 | ) | 1 | (7 | ) | (15 | ) | 58 | 44 | 30 | (3 | ) | (4 | ) | (32 | ) | (20 | ) | (10 | ) | 25 | 156 | 138 | 77 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
20 | 16 | 12 | 10 | 61 | 46 | 32 | (1 | ) | (22 | ) | (51 | ) | (37 | ) | (28 | ) | 51 | 169 | 156 | 95 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
55 | 43 | 32 | 28 | 213 | 158 | 115 | (5 | ) | (52 | ) | (107 | ) | (95 | ) | (79 | ) | 216 | 545 | 448 | 248 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
22 | 23 | 18 | 11 | 296 | 196 | 118 | 55 | 40 | 25 | 30 | 26 | 1,265 | 968 | 708 | 637 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1,431 | 1,578 | 1,578 | 1,547 | 8,566 | 8,209 | 8,003 | 7,926 | 3,603 | 3,641 | 3,354 | 3,057 | 35,225 | 34,675 | 33,992 | 33,287 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Husky Energy Inc. | Managements Discussion and Analysis 2019 | 60
Exhibit No. |
Description | |
23.1 | Consent of KPMG LLP, independent registered public accounting firm. | |
23.2 | Consent of Sproule Associates Limited, independent qualified reserves auditor. | |
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. | |
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. | |
32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13(a)-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350). | |
32.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13(a)-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350). | |
99.1 | Supplemental Disclosures of Oil and Gas Activities. | |
99.2 | Amended Code of Business Conduct. | |
101.INS | XBRL Instance Document. | |
101.SCH | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document. | |
101.CAL | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document. | |
101.DEF | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document. | |
101.LAB | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document. | |
101.PRE | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document. |